Amaç: YouTube, dünya çapında kullanılan en büyük internet platformlarından biridir. Birkaç çalışma, hasta bilgileri için YouTube videolarındaki bilgilerin kalitesinin düşük olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu çalışma, gut hastalığı için hasta bilgi kaynağı olarak YouTube videolarının içeriğini ve kalitesini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu kesitsel çalışmada, 'gut hastalığı' anahtar kelimesi ile YouTube araması yapıldı ve ilk 152 video alaka düzeyine göre listelendi. Reklamlar, mükerrer videolar, Türkçe dışındaki dillerdeki videolar ve sessiz videolar çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Video özellikleri ('beğenme' sayısı, 'beğenmeme' sayısı, görüntülenme sayısı, videonun uzunluğu) ve yükleme kaynağı kaydedildi. Kalite analizi için DISCERN ve Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) karşılaştırma kriterleri kullanıldı. Video kalitesi, yükleme kaynağı ve video özelliklerine göre değerlendirildi. Korelasyon analizi video özellikleri, JAMA ve DISCERN puanları arasında yapıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 106 video analiz edildi. En yaygın yükleme kaynağı doktorlardı (%49,1) ve içeriğin çoğunluğu (%30,2) semptomlar ve tedaviyle ilgiliydi. Ortalama DISCERN ve JAMA skorları sırasıyla 44,43 ve 2,54 idi. Bu puanlar doktorlar tarafından yüklenen videolarda en yüksek [sırasıyla 58 (28-74) ve 3 (1-4)] idi. Videonun süresi ile DISCERN ve JAMA puanları arasında pozitif bir korelasyon saptandı. Sonuç: YouTube'da gut hastalığı ile ilgili içeriğin çoğu düşük kalitedir. Sağlık çalışanları, YouTube'da sağlıkla ilgili bilgilerin öneminin farkında olmalı ve yüksek kaliteli, doğru ve güncel içerik sağlamalıdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Gut; sağlık; internet; Youtube
Objective: YouTube is one of the biggest internet platforms used worldwide. Several studies showed that quality of the information on YouTube videos for patient information is poor. This study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos, as a source of patient information for gout disease. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a YouTube search with the keyword 'gout disease' was performed, and the first 152 videos were listed according to relevancy. Advertisements, duplicate videos, videos in languages other than Turkish, and videos without audio were excluded. Video features (number of 'likes', 'dislikes', views, length of video), and source of upload were recorded. DISCERN and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used for quality analysis. Video quality was assessed according to the source of upload and video features. The correlation analysis was performed between video features, JAMA, and DISCERN scores. Results: A total number of 106 videos were analyzed. The most common source of upload was physicians (49.1%) and majority of the content (30.2%) was about symptoms and treatment. Mean DISCERN and JAMA scores were 44.43 and 2.54, respectively. These scores were highest in videos uploaded by physicians [58 (28-74) and 3 (1-4), respectively]. There is a positive correlation between the duration of the video, DISCERN, and JAMA scores. Conclusion: The majority of content about gout on YouTube is poor quality. Health professionals should be aware of the importance of health-related information on YouTube and provide high-quality accurate and up-to-date content.
Keywords: Gout; health; internet; Youtube
- Amante DJ, Hogan TP, Pagoto SL, English TM, Lapane KL. Access to care and use of the Internet to search for health information: results from the US National Health Interview Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e106. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Wikipedia [İnternet]. [Erişim tarihi: 3 Nisan 2021]. List of most popular websites. Erişim linki: [Link]
- Tolu S, Yurdakul OV, Basaran B, Rezvani A. English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on self-administer subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38(7):1285-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):1995-2002. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Elangovan S, Kwan YH, Fong W. The usefulness and validity of English-language videos on YouTube as an educational resource for spondyloarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40(4):1567-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kocyigit BF, Nacitarhan V, Koca TT, Berk E. YouTube as a source of patient information for ankylosing spondylitis exercises. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(6):1747-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(2):197-202. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Punzi L, Scanu A, Ramonda R, Oliviero F. Gout as autoinflammatory disease: new mechanisms for more appropriated treatment targets. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12(1):66-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dalbeth N, Merriman TR, Stamp LK. Gout. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2039-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ragab G, Elshahaly M, Bardin T. Gout: An old disease in new perspective-A review. J Adv Res. 2017;8(5):495-511. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM, et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(6):744-60. Erratum in: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(8):1187. Erratum in: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021;73(3):458. [PubMed]
- Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Casta-eda-Sanabria J, et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(1):29-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Robinson PC, Stamp LK. The management of gout: Much has changed. Aust Fam Physician. 2016;45(5):299-302. [PubMed]
- Li HO, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(5):e002604. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-11. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kaicker J, Borg Debono V, Dang W, Buckley N, Thabane L. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC Med. 2010;8:59. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J, Gustin T, Lévêque M. Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(1-2):e31-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Som R, Gunawardana NP. Internet chemotherapy information is of good quality: assessment with the DISCERN tool. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(2):403; author reply 404. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ng CH, Lim GRS, Fong W. Quality of English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020;23(12):1636-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Carneiro B, Dizon DS. Prostate Cancer Social Media: In YouTube We Trust? Eur Urol. 2019;75(4):568-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hay MC, Cadigan RJ, Khanna D, Strathmann C, Lieber E, Altman R, et al. Prepared patients: internet information seeking by new rheumatology patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(4):575-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wong K, Doong J, Trang T, Joo S, Chien AL. YouTube Videos on Botulinum Toxin A for Wrinkles: A Useful Resource for Patient Education. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(12):1466-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019:S1878-8750(19)30246-3. [PubMed]
- Beyl RN Jr, Hughes L, Morgan S. Update on Importance of Diet in Gout. Am J Med. 2016;129(11):1153-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Esen E, Aslan M, Sonbahar BÇ, Kerimoğlu RS. YouTube English videos as a source of information on breast self-examination. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(3):629-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- ReFaey K, Tripathi S, Yoon JW, Justice J, Kerezoudis P, Parney IF, et al. The reliability of YouTube videos in patients education for Glioblastoma Treatment. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;55:1-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ter Laak S, Lucas I, Oude Nijeweeme J, van Ravenstein L, de Jong K, Rollema C, et al. An age-adjusted instruction video enhances the correct use of nasal corticosteroid sprays in children. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2020;48(5):465-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Adorisio O, Silveri M, Torino G. Evaluation of educational value of YouTube videos addressing robotic pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(3):390.e1-390.e4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Culha Y, Seyhan Ak E, Merder E, Ariman A, Culha MG. Analysis of the YouTube videos on pelvic floor muscle exercise training in terms of their reliability and quality. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53(1):1-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(22):E1334-E1339. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(1):8-28. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Basch CH, Menafro A, Mongiovi J, Hillyer GC, Basch CE. A Content Analysis of YouTube? Videos Related to Prostate Cancer. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11(1):154-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(9):1776-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi