Amaç: Çalışmada, ''Antrenör Kaynaklı Özerklik Desteği'' ile ''Aile Kaynaklı Özerklik Desteği'' ölçeklerinin Türkçe formlarının psikometrik özelliklerinin Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) ile incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: ''Antrenör Kaynaklı Özerklik Desteği'' ile ''Aile Kaynaklı Özerklik Desteği'' ölçekleri 7'li Likert tipinde, 12 madde ve tek boyuttan oluşmaktadır. ''Antrenör Kaynaklı Özerklik Desteği Ölçeği''nin psikometrik özellikleri 145 erkek ve 63 kız toplam 208 (Xyaş=14,51±2,83), ''Aile Kaynaklı Özerklik Desteği Ölçeği''nin ise 164 erkek ve 70 kız toplam 234 (Xyaş=14,87±1,92) sporcu üzerinde test edilmiştir. Ölçeklerin yapı geçerlikleri DFA ile sınamıştır. Ölçeklerin yakınsak geçerlikleri Birleşik Güvenirlik [Composite Reliability (CR)] ve Ortalama Açıklanan Varyans [Average Variance Extracted (AVE)] değerleri hesaplanarak test edilmiştir. Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık ve CR katsayısı güvenirliğin test edilmesi için hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: DFA sonuçları her iki ölçeğin de orijinal yapısını desteklemiştir (Antrenör; x2 /df=3,67, Standartlaştırılmış Hata Kareleri Ortalamasının Karekökü [Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR)]=0,04, Normlu Uyum Indeksi [Normed Fit Index (NFI)]=0,90, Fazlalık Uyum İndeksi [Incremental Fit Index (IFI)]=0,91, Karşılaştırmalı Uyum İndeksi [Comparative Fit Index (CFI)]=0,91, Aile; x2 /df=3,71, SRMR=0,03, NFI=0,91, IFI=0,95, CFI=0,95). AVE ve CR değerleri ölçeklerin yakınsak geçerliğini destekler niteliktedir. ''Antrenör Kaynaklı Özerklik Desteği Ölçeği''ne ait Cronbach alfa ve CR değerleri 0,93 olarak bulunmuştur. ''Aile Kaynaklı Özerklik Desteği Ölçeğinden elde edilen Cronbach alfa ve CR değerleri 0,96 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Elde edilen bulgular ile 12-18 yaş arası sporcuların antrenör ve aileden algıladığı özerklik desteğinin değerlendirilmesi amacı ile çalışmada psikometrik özellikleri test edilen ölçeklerin güvenilir ve geçerli bir araç olduğu söylenebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Özerklik desteği; antrenör; aile; spor ortamı; sporcu
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of ''Perceived Autonomy Support Scale-Coaches Form'' and ''Perceived Autonomy Support Scale - Parent Form'' scales by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Material and Methods: Both scales are 7-point Likert type, 12 items, and unidimensional. The psychometric proporties of ''Perceived Autonomy Support Scale-Coaches Form'' and ''Perceived Autonomy Support ScaleParent Form'' were tested on 145 boys and 63 girls, a total of 208 participants (Mage=14.51±2.83) and 70 girls and 164 boys, totally 234 (Mage=14.87±1.92) participants, respectively. The CFA was used to test the construct validity. The convergent validity of both scales were tested by calculated Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and Composite Reliability (CR) values. In addition, to test reliability, Cronbach's Alpha and CR were calculated. Results: CFA results supported original model of both scale (Coaches; x2 /df=3.67, SRMR=0.04, normed fit index (NFI)=0.90, IFI=0.91, comparative fit index=0.91, Parent; x2 /df=3.71, SRMR=0.03, NFI=0.91, IFI=0.95, CFI=0.95). In addition, AVE and CR values supported the convergent validity of the scales. For ''Perceived Autonomy Support Scale-Coaches Form'' the Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency and CR coefficients was founded 0.93. For ''Perceived Autonomy Support Scale - Parent Form'' the Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency and CR coefficients was founded 0.96. Conclusion: The findings obtained reveal that the scales whose psychometric properties were tested in the study with the aim of evaluating the autonomy support perceived by athletes aged 12-18 years from coaches and family are reliable and valid tools.
Keywords: Autonomy support; coach; parent; sport environment; athlete
- Sarrazin P, Vallerand R, Guillet E, Pelletier L, Cury F. Motivation and dropout in female handballers: a 21‐month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2002;32(3):395-418. [Crossref]
- Ullrich-French S, Smith AL. Social and motivational predictors of continued youth sport participation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2009;10(1):87-95. [Crossref]
- Guay F, Chanal J, Ratelle CF, Marsh HW, Larose S, Boivin M. Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. Br J Educ Psychol. 2010;80(Pt 4):711-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000;11(4):227-68. [Crossref]
- Stenling A, Ivarsson A, Johnson U, Lindwall M. Bayesian structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2015;37(4):410-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- De Francisco C, Sánchez-Romero EI, Vílchez Conesa MDP, Arce C. Basic psychological needs, burnout and engagement in sport: the mediating role of motivation regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):4941. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Standage M, Gillison FB, Ntoumanis N, Treasure DC. Predicting students' physical activity and health-related well-being: a prospective cross-domain investigation of motivation across school physical education and exercise settings. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012;34(1):37-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Reeve, J. Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal. 2006;106(3):225-36. [Crossref]
- Simões FAM, de Amorim Calheiros MM, e Silva MMA, Sousa ÁST, da Silva ODL. Total and attuned multiple autonomy support and the social development of early adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2018;27(2):374-86. [Crossref]
- Calp Ş, Bacanlı H. Algılanan akademik yeterlik ve özerklik desteğinin özerk akademik motivasyon ve akademik başarıyla ilişkisi [The relationship between perceived autonomy support and academic competence with autonomous academic motivation and academic success. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;40:300-17. [Crossref]
- Mageau GA, Vallerand RJ. The coach-athlete relationship: a motivational model. J Sports Sci. 2003;21(11):883-904. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Standage M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. Students' motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: a self-determination theory approach. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006;77(1):100-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Hein V, Pihu M, Soós I, Karsai I. The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): development, validity, and crosscultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2007;8(5):632-53. [Crossref]
- Barkoukis V, Hagger MS, Lambropoulos G, Tsorbatzoudis H. Extending the trans-contextual model in physical education and leisure-time contexts: examining the role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Br J Educ Psychol. 2010;80(Pt 4):647-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jõesaar H, Hein V, Hagger MS. Youth athletes' perception of autonomy support from the coach, peer motivational climate and intrinsic motivation in sport setting: One-year effects. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2012;13(3):257-62. [Crossref]
- Wallhead TL, Hagger M, Smith DT. Sport education and extracurricular sport participation: an examination using the trans-contextual model of motivation. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81(4):442-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- González-Cutre D, Ferriz R, Beltran-Carillo VJ, Andres-Fabra JA, Montero-Carretero C, Cervello E, et al. Promotion of autonomy for participation in physical activity: a study based on the trans-contextual model of motivation. Educational Psychology. 2014; 34(3):367-84. [Crossref]
- Gillet N, Vallerand RJ, Amoura S, Baldes B. Influence of coaches' autonomy support on athletes' motivation and sport performance: A test of hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2010;11(2):155-61. [Crossref]
- Yoo J, Park JG. The role of emotion in motivational processes for engagement in physical education. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 2014;25:1-14. [Crossref]
- Murcia JAM, Rojas NP, Coll DGC. Influencia del apoyo a la autonomía, las metas sociales y la relación con los demás sobre la desmotivación en educación física. Psicothema. 2008;20(4):636-41. [Link]
- Müftüler M. Egzersizde Algılanan Özerklik Desteği Ölçeği: Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for exercise settings: validity and reliability study for Turkish]. Journal of Human Sciences. 2016;13(1):2158-69. [Crossref]
- Burucu S. Beden eğitimi derslerinde algılanan özerklik desteğinin güdülenme düzeyi ve optimal performans duygu durumu ile ilişkisi [Yüksek lisans tezi]. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi; 2019. [Link]
- Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2016.
- Erkuş A. Ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama çalışmalarında karşılaşılan sorunlar [Problems encountered in scale development and adaptation studies]. Türk Psikoloji Bülteni. 2007;13(40):17-25. [Link]
- West SG, Finch JF, Curran PJ. Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In: Hoyle RN, ed. In structural equation modeling: concepts, ıssues, and applications. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995. p.56-75.
- Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;97(3):562-82. [Crossref]
- Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999;6(1):1-55. [Crossref]
- Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online. 2003;8(8):23-74. [Link]
- Bentler PM. Fit indexes, lagrange multipliers, constraint changes and incomplete data in structural models. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990;25(2):163-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schumacker RE, Lomax RGA. Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. Routledge: New York. 2016. [Crossref]
- Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education; 2014.
- Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research. 1992;21(2):230-8. [Crossref]
- Chen F, Curran PJ, Bollen KA, Kirby J, Paxton P. An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res. 2008;36(4):462-94. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist. 1985;50(9):741-9. [Crossref]
.: İşlem Listesi