Amaç: Bu araştırma, gebelerde sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ile yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırma tanımlayıcı-kesitsel türde planlanmıştır. Çalışma 158 gebe ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın verileri Şubat-Nisan 2019 tarihleri arasında kişisel bilgi formu, Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları Ölçeği (SYBDÖ) ve Kısa Form-36 Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği (KF-36 YKÖ) ile toplanmıştır. Veriler tanımlayıcı ve ilişki arayıcı istatistikler kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Gebelerin %67,1'inin 19-28 yaş arasında olduğu, %27,2'sinin okuryazar olmadığı saptanmıştır. Gebelerin %61,4'ünün 3. trimesterde olduğu, %87,3'ünün doğum öncesi bakım aldığı, %69,0'ının gebeliğinde sağlık sorunu yaşamadığı belirlenmiştir. Gebeler, SYBDÖ'den 124,48±19,26 puan almışlardır. KF-36 YKÖ'den en yüksek puanı fiziksel sağlık bileşenleri (19,53±4,58) alt boyutundan ve en düşük puanı emosyonel rol kısıtlılığı (4,35±0,82) alt boyutundan aldıkları saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada yer alan gebelerin, sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışlarının ve yaşam kalitelerinin orta düzeyde olduğu saptanmıştır. Gebelerin sağlıklı yaşam davranışlarını sürdürmesinde ve yaşam kalitesinin artırılmasına yönelik sağlık bakım profesyonelleri mevcut yaşam davranışlarını tanımlamalı, sağlıklı davranışları desteklenmeli, sağlıksız davranışlarının düzeltilmesi için eğitimler yapmalı ve gerekli yönlendirmelerde bulunmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Gebelik; hemşirelik; yaşam kalitesi; sağlıklı yaşam biçimi
Objective: This research was carried out to determine the relationship between lifestyle and quality of life in pregnant women. Material and Methods: The research was planned in descriptive- crosssectional type. The study was carried out with 158 pregnant women. The data of the study were collected between February and April 2019 with a personal information form, Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale (HLBS) and Short Form-36 Quality of Life Scale (SF-36 QLS). The data were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results: It was determined that 67.1% of pregnant women were between 19-28 years old and 27.2% were not literate. It was determined that 61.4% of the pregnant women were in the third trimester, 87.3% received prenatal care and 69.0% did not have any health problems in their pregnancy. Pregnant women got 124.48±19.26 points from the HLBS. It was determined that the highest score from the SF-36 QLS was obtained from the physical health components (19.53±4.58) sub-dimension and the lowest score from the emotional role constraint (4.35±0.82) sub-dimension. Conclusion: The score averages of healthy life style behaviors and quality of life of the pregnant women in this study were found to be moderate. Health care professionals should define current life behaviors, support healthy behaviors, provide training and provide necessary guidance to correct unhealthy behaviors in order to maintain healthy lifestyle behaviors of pregnant women and increase their quality of life.
Keywords: Pregnancy; nursing; quality of life; healthy lifestyle
- Nik-Azin A, Nainian MR, Zamani M, Bavojdan MR, Bavojdan MR, Motlagh MJ. Evaluation of sexual function, quality of life, and mental and physical health in pregnant women. J Family Reprod Health. 2013;7(4):171-6. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Toivonen KI, Oinonen KA, Duchene KM. Preconception health behaviours: a scoping review. Prev Med. 2017;96:1-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sehhatie F, Mirghafourvand M, Momeni K. Health promoting behaviors among postmenopausal women in langroud city, Iran. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci. 2015;3(3):58-62. [Crossref]
- Mahmoodi H, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Babazadeh T, Mohammadi Y, Shirzadi S, Sharifi-Saqezi P, et al. Health promoting behaviors in pregnant women admitted to the prenatal care unit of Imam Khomeini Hospital of Saqqez. J Educ Community Health. 2015; 1(4):58-65. [Crossref]
- Christian LM, Iams J, Porter K, Leblebicioglu B. Self-rated health among pregnant women: associations with objective health indicators, psychological functioning, and serum inflammatory markers. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(3): 295-309. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- World Health Organization [İnternet]. © 2021 WHO. [Erişim tarihi: 17.03.2021]. Health in 2015: from MDGs to SDGs. Erişim linki: [Link]
- Tunçalp Ӧ, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gülmezoglu AM, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122(8): 1045-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- O'Keeffe LM, Kearney PM, Greene RA. Surveillance during pregnancy: methods and response rates from a hospital based pilot study of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Ireland. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:180. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lang AY, Harrison CL, Barrett G, Hall JA, Moran LJ, Boyle JA. Opportunities for enhancing pregnancy planning and preconception health behaviours of Australian women. Women Birth. 2021;34(2):e153-e61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dunney C, Murphy DJ. Healthy lifestyle behaviours in pregnancy: a prospective cohort study in Ireland. British Journal of Midwifery. 2015;23(12):874-84. [Crossref]
- Stephenson J, Heslehurst N, Hall J, Schoenaker DAJM, Hutchinson J, Cade JE, et al. Before the beginning: nutrition and lifestyle in the preconception period and its importance for future health. Lancet. 2018;391(10132):1830-41. Erratum in: Lancet. 2018;391(10132):1774. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Anderson K, Nisenblat V, Norman R. Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment - a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(1):8-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Badon SE, Miller RS, Qiu C, Sorensen TK, Williams MA, Enquobahrie DA. Maternal healthy lifestyle during early pregnancy and offspring birthweight: differences by offspring sex. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31(9):1111-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Badon SE, Littman AJ, Chan KCG, Williams MA, Enquobahrie DA. Trajectories of maternal leisure-time physical activity and sedentary behavior during adolescence to young adulthood and offspring birthweight. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27(11):701-7.e3. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- American Cancer Society [İnternet]. [Erişim tarihi: 20.03.2021]. How does smoking affect your health? [Link]
- Adibelli D, Kirca N. The relationship between gestational active and passive smoking and early postpartum complications. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(14):2473-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Perry MF, Mulcahy H, DeFranco EA. Influence of periconception smoking behavior on birth defect risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220(6):588.e1-e7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. The management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: synthesis of national guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2019;74(3): 161-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987;36(2):76-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Esin N. Adapting the healthy lifestyle behaviors scale to Turkish. Hemşirelik Bülteni. 1999;12(45):87-95. [Link]
- Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kocyigit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Short Form-36 (SF-36). İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12(2):102-6. [Link]
- Gokyildiz S, Alan S, Elmas E, Bostanci A, Kucuk E. Health-promoting lifestyle behaviours in pregnant women in Turkey. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20(4):390-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gharaibeh M, Al-Ma'aitah R, Al Jada N. Lifestyle practices of Jordanian pregnant women. Int Nurs Rev. 2005;52(2):92-100. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lin YH, Tsai EM, Chan TF, Chou FH, Lin YL. Health promoting lifestyles and related factors in pregnant women. Chang Gung Med J. 2009;32(6):650-61. [PubMed]
- Özhüner Y, Çelik N. Gebelerde uyku kalitesi ve yaşam kalitesi [Sleep quality and quality of life in pregnants]. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi. 2019;6(1):25-33. [Link]
- Calikoglu EO, Akcaya HB, Kavuncuoglu D, Tanriverdi EC, Yerli EB, Salcan S. Erzurum il merkezinde yaşayan üçüncü trimester gebelerin sosyodemografik özellikleri ve yaşam kaliteleri [Socio-demographic characteristics and quality of life among women in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy living in Erzurum city center]. Fam Pract Palliat Care. 2018;3(1):33-8. [Crossref]
- Özer K. Gebe kadınların yaşam kalitesi ve depresyon durumlarının belirlenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi]. İstanbul: Haliç Üniversitesi; 2015. [Link]
- Ünver H, Aylaz R. Gebelerde fiziksel egzersizin yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi [The effect of physical exercise on quality of life in pregnancy]. J Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;27(2):71-8. [Crossref]
- Nakamura Y, Takeishi Y, Atogami F, Yoshizawa T. Assessment of quality of life in pregnant Japanese women: comparison of hospitalized, outpatient, and non-pregnant women. Nurs Health Sci. 2012;14(2):182-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Haas JS, Jackson RA, Fuentes-Afflick E, Stewart AL, Dean ML, Brawarsky P, et al. Changes in the health status of women during and after pregnancy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(1):45-51. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. 2018 Türkiye nüfus ve sağlık araştırması ileri analiz çalışması. Ankara: Elma Teknik Basım Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti.; 2021. [Link]
- Berde AS, Uner S. Adequacy of antenatal care received by Nigerian women and some related factors. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2016;15(3):190-8. [Crossref]
- Gill KP, Devgun P. Socio-demographic factors influencing antenatal care practices in urban slums of Amritsar City, Punjab, India. Natl J Community Med. 2013;4(4):574-8. [Link]
- Parineeta M, Bedre R, Solanki H. A study of antenatal care service utilization & factors affecting them in rural Bidar, Karnataka. NJIRM. 2014;5(1):31-6. [Link]
.: İşlem Listesi