.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
11-12 Yaş Yüzücülerin Fonksiyonel Hareket Tarama Puanlarına Göre 50 Metre Farklı Stil Derecelerinin Karşılaştırılması
The Comparison of 50 Meter Different Swimming Style Results According to the Functional Movement Screen Scores of 11-12 Aged Swimmers
Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Sci. 2021;13(1):91-9
doi: 10.5336/sportsci.2020-76653
Makale Dili: TR
Tam Metin
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışma, 11-12 yaş yüzücülerin Fonksiyonel Hareket Tarama (FHT) testi toplam puanlarına göre, 50 m mesafede 4 farklı stil derecelerinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmaya 14 kız (vücut ağırlığı: 40,06±6,81 kg; boy uzunluğu: 150,79±7,27 cm; beden kitle indeksi (BKİ): 17,56±2,35 kg/m2) ve 12 erkek (vücut ağırlığı: 40,98±5,69 kg; boy uzunluğu: 147,42±6,46 cm; BKİ: 18,85±2,37kg/m2) yüzücü gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. 50 m 4 farklı stil yüzme (kelebek, sırtüstü, kurbağalama, serbest) dereceleri, 2019 yılında İstanbul'da yapılan Ulusal Gelişim Projesi Grup Şampiyonası'nda kayıt altına alınan resmi sürelerden alınmıştır. FHT değerlendirmesi yapılan yüzücüler, FHT puanlarına göre 14 puan altında (n=13) ve üstünde (n=13) alanlar şeklinde 2'ye ayrılmıştır. Elde edilen FHT puanları ile 50 m yüzme dereceleri, SPSS 20.0 programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. İki grubun FHT puanlarına göre yüzme derecelerinin gruplar arası ve cinsiyetler arası karşılaştırılmasında Mann-Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. Anlamlılık düzeyi p0,05). Sonuç: Yüzücülerin toplam 21 olması gereken FHT puanları, kritik eşik olarak kabul edilen 14 puanın altında kaldığı görülmüştür. Bu durum yüzücülerin stabilite, mobilite ve motor kontrol özellikleri için yetersiz olduğu anlamına gelmekte ve yüzme dereceleriyle karşılaştırıldığında da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıkların olduğu gözlemlenmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Fonksiyonellik; yüzme; mobilite; stabilite
Amaç: Bu çalışma, 11-12 yaş yüzücülerin Fonksiyonel Hareket Tarama (FHT) testi toplam puanlarına göre, 50 m mesafede 4 farklı stil derecelerinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmaya 14 kız (vücut ağırlığı: 40,06±6,81 kg; boy uzunluğu: 150,79±7,27 cm; beden kitle indeksi (BKİ): 17,56±2,35 kg/m2) ve 12 erkek (vücut ağırlığı: 40,98±5,69 kg; boy uzunluğu: 147,42±6,46 cm; BKİ: 18,85±2,37kg/m2) yüzücü gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. 50 m 4 farklı stil yüzme (kelebek, sırtüstü, kurbağalama, serbest) dereceleri, 2019 yılında İstanbul'da yapılan Ulusal Gelişim Projesi Grup Şampiyonası'nda kayıt altına alınan resmi sürelerden alınmıştır. FHT değerlendirmesi yapılan yüzücüler, FHT puanlarına göre 14 puan altında (n=13) ve üstünde (n=13) alanlar şeklinde 2'ye ayrılmıştır. Elde edilen FHT puanları ile 50 m yüzme dereceleri, SPSS 20.0 programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. İki grubun FHT puanlarına göre yüzme derecelerinin gruplar arası ve cinsiyetler arası karşılaştırılmasında Mann-Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. Anlamlılık düzeyi p0,05). Sonuç: Yüzücülerin toplam 21 olması gereken FHT puanları, kritik eşik olarak kabul edilen 14 puanın altında kaldığı görülmüştür. Bu durum yüzücülerin stabilite, mobilite ve motor kontrol özellikleri için yetersiz olduğu anlamına gelmekte ve yüzme dereceleriyle karşılaştırıldığında da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıkların olduğu gözlemlenmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Fonksiyonellik; yüzme; mobilite; stabilite
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare between the four different swimming style times of 50 meters (m) according to the Functional Movement Screen (FMSTM) scores of 11-12 aged swimmers. Material and Methods: 14 girls (weight 40.06±6.81 kg; height 150.79±7.27 cm; body mass index (BMI) 17.56±2.35 kg/m2) and 12 boys (weight 40.98±5.69 kg; height 147.42±6.46 cm; BMI 18.85±2.37 kg/m2) voluntarily participated. 50 m swimming time in four different styles, the National Development Project Group Championships held in Istanbul, is taken from the official time recorded. FMSTM was performed by a certified specialist. After this assessment, swimmers were divided into two groups as 14 points (n=13) and above (n=13) according to FMSTM total scores. 50 m swimming time and FMSTM scores obtained were analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 program. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the swimming time and FMSTM scores between the groups and genders of the two groups. Significance level was taken as p0.05). Conclusion: It was seen that the FMSTM score which should have a total of 21 points, were below the 14 points accepted as the critical threshold. This means that swimmers were insufficient for stability, mobility and motor control features, and it has been found that there are statistically significant differences compared to swimming times.
Keywords: Functionality; swimming; mobility; stabilit
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare between the four different swimming style times of 50 meters (m) according to the Functional Movement Screen (FMSTM) scores of 11-12 aged swimmers. Material and Methods: 14 girls (weight 40.06±6.81 kg; height 150.79±7.27 cm; body mass index (BMI) 17.56±2.35 kg/m2) and 12 boys (weight 40.98±5.69 kg; height 147.42±6.46 cm; BMI 18.85±2.37 kg/m2) voluntarily participated. 50 m swimming time in four different styles, the National Development Project Group Championships held in Istanbul, is taken from the official time recorded. FMSTM was performed by a certified specialist. After this assessment, swimmers were divided into two groups as 14 points (n=13) and above (n=13) according to FMSTM total scores. 50 m swimming time and FMSTM scores obtained were analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 program. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the swimming time and FMSTM scores between the groups and genders of the two groups. Significance level was taken as p0.05). Conclusion: It was seen that the FMSTM score which should have a total of 21 points, were below the 14 points accepted as the critical threshold. This means that swimmers were insufficient for stability, mobility and motor control features, and it has been found that there are statistically significant differences compared to swimming times.
Keywords: Functionality; swimming; mobility; stabilit
REFERANSLAR:
- Işıldak K, Suna G. [The effects of 8-week endurance training on heart rate and T-20 swimming performance in 15-17 years old swimmers]. Sportive. 2020;3(1):25-32.[Link]
- Boyle M. New functional training for sports. 2nd. Human Kinetics; 2016, United States of America.
- Cook G. Athletic Body in Balance. 1st ed. USA: Human Kinetics; 2003.
- Perry FT, Koehle MS. Normative data for the functional movement screen in middle-aged adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(2):458-62.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gribble PA, Brigle J, Pietrosimone BG, Pfile KR, Webster KA. Intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(4):978-81.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cowen VS. Functional fitness improvements after a worksite-based yoga initiative. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010;14(1):50-4.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cook G, Burton L, Kiesel K, Rose G, Bryant MF. Movement: Functional Movement Systems: Screening, Assessment and corrective strategies. In: Cruz S, ed. 1st ed. Aptos, CA: On target publications; 2010.
- Boyas S, Guével A. Neuromuscular fatigue in healthy muscle: underlying factors and adaptation mechanisms. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;54(2):88-108. English, French.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ergun N, Baltacı G. Spor yaralanmalarında fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon prensipleri. 2. Baskı. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fizik Tedavi ve Yüksekokulu Yayınları; 2006.
- Altundağ E, Aka H, İbiş S, Akarçeşme C, Kurt S. [The comparison of functional movement screening test scores of female volleyball players at different competition levels]. Gaziantep University Journal of Sports Science. 2019;4(3):319-29.[Link]
- Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1(2):62-72.[PubMed] [PMC]
- Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can Serious Injury in Professional Football be Predicted by a Preseason Functional Movement Screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007;2(3):147-58.[PubMed] [PMC]
- Okada T, Huxel KC, Nesser TW. Relationship between core stability, functional movement, and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(1):252-61.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chapman RF, Laymon AS, Arnold T. Functional movement scores and longitudinal performance outcomes in elite track and field athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(2):203-11.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Parchmann CJ, McBride JM. Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(12):3378-84.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shojaedin SS, Letafatkar A, Hadadnezhad M, Dehkhoda MR. Relationship between functional movement screening score and history of injury and identifying the predictive value of the FMS for injury. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2014;21(4):355-60.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moran RW, Schneiders AG, Mason J, Sullivan SJ. Do Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite scores predict subsequent injury? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(23):1661-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yıldız S. Çocuk tenisçilerde fonksiyonel antrenman yaklaşımı [Thesis]. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. 2013.[Link]
- Bullock GS, Brookreson N, Knab AM, Butler RJ. Examining Fundamental Movement Competency and Closed-Chain Upper-Extremity Dynamic Balance in Swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(6):1544-51.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Duncan MJ, Stanley M, Wright SL. [The association between functional movement and overweight and obesity in British primary school children]. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology. 2013; 5(1): 11.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Paszkewicz JR, McCarty CW, Van Lunen BL. Comparison of functional and static evaluation tools among adolescent athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(10):2842-50.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bond D, Goodson L, Oxford SW, Nevill AM, Duncan MJ. The association between anthropometric variables, functional movement screen scores and 100 m freestyle swimming performance in youth swimmers. Sports. 2015;3(1):1-11.[Crossref]
- Whyte G. Swimming for Exercise: Optimize your technique, fitness and enjoyment. 2011, Great Britain.
- Bíró M, Revesz L, Hidvégi P. Swimming History Technique Teaching. Eszterházy Károly College: EKC Líceum Press Published; 2015;1.
- Üçer O, Tok İ, Günay E, Çelik A. [Determination and assessment of functional movement screen test results in 11-12 years old competitive swimmers]. Atatürk University Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2017;19(4):175-87.[Link]
- Bulgan C. Angular kinematics of the deep squat test in functional movement screen(TM) according to the scoring system. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2017;33(4):651-6.[Link]
- Portas MD, Parkin G, Roberts J, Batterham AM. Maturational effect on functional movement screen? score in adolescent soccer players. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(10):854-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Marques VB, Medeiros TM, de Souza Stigger F, Nakamura FY, Baroni BM. The functional movement screen (FMS?) in elite young soccer players between 14 and 20 years: composite score, individual-test scores and asymmetries. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017;12(6):977-85.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Aka H. [The relation between functional movement screen test scores and atletics performance and service speed of tennis players aged 13-15]. Nigde University Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2019;13(3):194-201.[Link]
- Doğan Ö, Savaş S, Zorlular A. Examination of the effects of 8-weeks core stabilization training on fms (functional movement screen) test scores applied to a 12-14 age group of male basketball players. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science. 2018;4(5):48-56.[Link]
- Shultz R, Anderson SC, Matheson GO, Marcello B, Besier T. Test-retest and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. J Athl Train. 2013;48(3):331-6.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bardenett SM, Micca JJ, DeNoyelles JT, Miller SD, Jenk DT, Brooks GS, et al. Functİonal movement screen normatİve values and validity in high school athletes: Can the fms? be used as a predıctor of ınjury? Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(3):303-8.[PubMed] [PMC]
- Günay E, Üçer O, Tok İ, Bediz CŞ. The relationship between functional movement screen and swimming performance. Science, Movement and Health. 2017;17(2):566-70.[Link]
- Yi Z, Yin J, Li H, Liu K. Relationship between Functional Movement Screen score and physical performance of Chinese elite swimming athletes. In: Luo Qi, ed. Sports Technology and Engineering: Proceedings of the 2014 Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology and Engineering. 1st ed. London, UK: Taylor&Francis Group. 2015. p.173.
- Willardson JW, eds. Bulgan C, Başar MA., çeviri editörleri. Core Gelişimi. 1. Baskı. İstanbul: İstanbul Tıp Kitabevleri; 2018.
- Secchi LL, Muratt MD, Ciolac EG, Greve J. Knee muscles isokinetic evaluation in short distance elite swimmers: A comparison between symmetric and asymmetric swimming styles. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 2011;19(4):261-4.[Crossref]
- Heinlein SA, Cosgarea AJ. Biomechanical Considerations in the Competitive Swimmer's Shoulder. Sports Health. 2010;2(6):519-25.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: İşlem Listesi