Amaç: Bu anket çalışmasının amacı, Türkiye'deki diş hekimlerinin kök kanallarının şekillendirilmesinde döner alet sistemlerinden hangisini tercih ettiğini nedenleri ile birlikte incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: İnternet platformu üzerinden oluşturulan anket Türkiye genelindeki diş hekimlerine ulaştırılmıştır. Döner alet sistemini kullanan diş hekimlerine hangi döner alet sistemini kullandıkları, kaç senedir kullandıkları, döner alet kullanımı ile ilgili bir eğitime katılıp katılmadığı, kullandıkları döner alet sisteminden beklentileri, tercihlerinde etkili olan faktörler, memnuniyetleri ve sisteminin en önemli dezavantajının ne olduğuna ilişkin sorular yöneltilmiştir. Veriler, SPSS programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler ile birlikte kategorik değişkenlerin karşılaştırılmasında ki-kare ve Fisher's kesin testleri kullanılmıştır. Anlamlılık düzeyi p0,05). Sonuç: Çalışmaya katılan diş hekimleri, kullandıkları döner alet sistemlerinden genel olarak memnun olmakla birlikte, kullandıkları sistemi ideal bulmamaktadırlar.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sörveyler ve anketler; endodonti; kök kanalını hazırlama
Objective: The purpose of this questionnaire study was to investigate the rotary instrument preference of dentists in Türkiye for shaping root canals with its reasons. Material and Methods: The questionnaire survey conducted on the internet platform was delivered to dentists throughout Türkiye. The dentists using the rotary instruments were asked questions about which rotary instrument they used, how many years they had been using it, whether they had attended a training on the use of rotary instruments, their expectations from the rotary instrument, the factors affecting their preferences, their satisfaction and what the most crucial disadvantage of the rotary system was. The data were analyzed with the SPSS program. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables with descriptive statistics. The significance level was set to p0.05). Conclusion: Although the dentists participating in the study were generally satisfied with the rotary instrument they have been using, they did not find the systems ideal.
Keywords: Surveys and questionnaires; endodontics; root canal preparation
- Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):30-76. [Crossref]
- Bird DC, Chambers D, Peters OA. Usage parameters of nick el-titanium rotary instruments: a survey of endodontists in the United States. J Endod. 2009;35(9):1193-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bletsa A, Iden O, Sulo G, Berggreen E. Work experience influences treatment approaches in endodontics: a questionnaire survey among dentists in Western Norway. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(8):617-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cheung GS, Liu CS. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod. 2009;35(7):938-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Daugherty DW, Gound TG, Comer TL. Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J Endod. 2001;27(2):93-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14(7):346-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30(8):559-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kaptan RF, Haznedaroglu F, Kayahan MB, Basturk FB. An investigation of current endodontic practice in Turkey. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:565413. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996;22(7):369-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hatipoğlu FP, Hatipoğlu Ö, Arıcıoğlu B. Türk diş hekimlerinin endodontik tedavi prosedürlerindeki yaklaşımlarının incelenmesi [Examination of approaches of turkish dentists in endodontic treatment procedures]. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;11(1):54-64. [Link]
- Kayalar E, Yircali A. İstanbul diş hekimliği pratiğinde kök kanalı tedavisi: kimyasal ajanlar ve seans sıklığı [Root canal treatment in İstanbul dental practice: the chemical agents and frequency of sessions]. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2010;16(1):13-23. [Link]
- Koch M, Eriksson HG, Axelsson S, Tegelberg A. Effect of educational intervention on adoption of new endodontic technology by general dental practitioners: a questionnaire survey. Int Endod J. 2009;42(4):313-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Küçükkaya S, Görduysus M, Görduysus Ö, Anıl D. A questionnaire survey on current endodontic practice of dental practitioners in Turkey. Clin Dent Res. 2015;39(3):101-9. [Link]
- Fink A. How to Ask Survey Questions. 1st ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1995.
- Parashos P, Messer HH. Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists. Int Endod J. 2004;37(4):249-59. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Madarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough AJ. Opinions and attitudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intracanal fracture of endodontic instruments: part 1. Int Endod J. 2008;41(8):693-701. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mozayeni MA, Golshah A, Nik Kerdar N. A Survey on NiTi rotary ınstruments usage by endodontists and general dentist in Tehran. Iran Endod J. 2011;6(4):168-75. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Mathew ST, Al Nafea M. An evaluation of the current endodontic trends among the general dental practitioners and specialist in Riyadh, KSA. Int J Innov Educ Res. 2015;3(9):8-19. [Crossref]
- Patturaja K, Leelavathi L, Jayalakshmi S. Choice of rotary instrument usage among endodontists-a questionnaire study. Biomed Pharmaco J. 2018;11(2):851. [Crossref]
- Demir E, Aydın U, Culha E, Yıldırım C. Gaziantep ilindeki diş hekimlerinin endodonti pratiği ile ilgili alışkanlıklarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluating the attitudes of general dental practitioners in Gaziantep about endodontics]. Gaziantep Med J. 2015;21(3):178-84. [Crossref]
- Unal GC, Kaya BU, Tac AG, Kececi AD. Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(4):376-84. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Al-Nahlawi T, Doumani M, Alalo HA, Habib A. Dentists' knowledge, attitude and practice of root canal treatment procedure: survey-based research. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(3):347-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Barbakow F, Lutz F. The 'Lightspeed' preparation technique evaluated by Swiss clinicians after attending continuing education courses. Int Endod J. 1997;30(1):46-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Thomas MB, Locke M, Dummer PM. A survey of adoption of endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation part 2: community and hospital dental practitioners in Wales. Br Dent J. 2013;214(3):E7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Patil TN, Saraf PA, Penukonda R, Vanaki SS, Kamatagi L. A survey on nickel titanium rotary ınstruments and their usage techniques by endodontists in India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(5):ZC29-ZC35. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Gündoğdu EC, Doğanay E, Arslan H. Nikel titanyum aletlerin kırılmalarının sebep ve çözümlerine yönelik anket çalışması [A questionnaire study related to reasons and solutions of seperation of nickel titanium instruments]. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2017;27(3):130-8. [Crossref]
.: Process List