Amaç: Çalışmada sporcuların, spor ve eğitim hayatlarını başarılı bir şekilde birleştirmesi için gereken yetkinliklerini değerlendirmek amacıyla geliştirilen 'Sporcular için Çift Kariyer Yetkinliği Ölçeği'nin [Dual Career Competency Questionnaire for Athletes (DCCQ-A)] Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmaya 13-22 yaş aralığında 113 kadın ve 108 erkek olmak üzere 10 farklı spor branşından toplam 221 (Xyaş= 15,87; Ss=2,06) sporcu katılmıştır. Algılanan Yetkinlik ve Algılanan Önem olmak üzere iki ayrı formu bulunan, 29 madde, 5'li Likert tipi değerlendirmeye sahip olan ölçeğin; çift kariyer yönetimi, kariyer planlama, duygusal farkındalık ve sosyal zekâ ve uyum alt boyutlarından oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi; yakınsak ve ıraksak geçerlikleri için Ortalama Açıklanan Varyans [Average Variance Extracted (AVE)], Maksimum Paylaşılan Varyansın Karesi [Maximum Squared Variance (MSV)] ve Paylaşılan Varyansın Karesinin Ortalaması [Average Shared Squared Variance (ASV)], Bileşik Güvenirlik [Composite Reliability (CR)] değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliğini sınamak için ise Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık ve CR katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre ölçekte yer alan maddelerin faktör yükleri, Algılanan Yetkinlik Formu için 0,82 ile 0,94; Algılanan Önem Formu için 0,86- 0,93 aralığında değişmekte ve modelin her iki form için de iyi uyum indeks değerlerine sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Ölçeğin her iki formu için hesaplanan MSV, ASV ve AVE değerleri ölçeğin yakınsak ve ıraksak geçerliğini; Cronbach alfa ve CR katsayıları ise envanterin güvenirliğini desteklemektedir. Sonuç: Elde edilen bulgular, DCCQ-A'nın sporcularda çift kariyer yetkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesi için geçerlik ve güvenirlik koşullarını sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Çift kariyer; sporcu-öğrenci; yetkinlik; doğrulayıcı faktör analizi; geçerlik ve güvenirlik
Objective: In the study, it was aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of the "Dual Career Competency Questionnaire for Athletes" (DCCQ-A), which was developed to evaluate the competencies of athletes to successfully combine their sports and educational lives. Material and Methods: A total of 221 (Xage= 15.87; Sd=2.06) athletes from 10 different sports branches, including 113 women and 108 men between the ages of 13-22, participated in the study. The scale has two forms, Perceived Competence and Perceived Importance, 29 items, 5-point Likert type evaluation; dual career management, career planning, emotional awareness and social intelligence and adaptation sub-dimensions. Confirmatory factor analysis for the construct validity of the scale; Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Maximum Squared Variance (MSV) and Average Shared Squared Variance (ASV), Composite Reliability (CR) values were calculated for convergent and divergent validity. Cronbach alpha and CR coefficients were calculated to test the reliability of the scale. Results: According to the confirmatory factor analysis results, the factor loads of the items in the scale were 0.82 and 0.94 for the perceived competence form; It ranges from 0.86 to 0.93 for the perceived importance form and the model has good fit index values for both forms. The MSV, ASV and AVE values calculated for both forms of the scale show the convergent and divergent validity of the scale; Cronbach's alpha and CR coefficients support the reliability of the inventory. Conclusion: The findings show that the DCCQ-A provides validity and reliability conditions for the evaluation of dual career competencies in athletes.
Keywords: Dual career; athlete-student; competence; confirmatory factor analysis; reliability and validity
- Wylleman P, De Knop P, Reints A. Transitions in competitive sports. In: Nicholas L, Talbot HM, eds. Lifelong Engagement in Sport and Physical Activity. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2013. p.81-94. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- De Knop P, Wylleman P, Van Hoecke J, Bollaert L. Sports management - a European approach to the management of the combination of academics and elite-level sport. In: Bailey S, ed. Perspectives: The interdisciplinary series of Physical Education and Sport Science. Vol. 1. School Sport and Competition. 1st ed. Oxford: Meyer and Meyer Sport; 1999. p.49-62.
- European Commission. EU guidelines on dual Careers of athletes. Recommended policy Actions in support of dual Careers in high-performance sport. Brussels: Author. 2012. [Link]
- Stambulova N. Counseling athletes in career transitions: the five-step career planning strategy. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action. 2010;1(2):95-105. [Crossref]
- Wylleman P, De Brandt K, Defruyt S. GEES Consortium. GEES Handbook for Dual Career Support Providers (DCSPs). Belgium: Brussels; 2017. [Link]
- Wylleman P, Rosier N. Holistic perspective on the development of elite athletes. In: Raab M, Wylleman P, Seiler R, Elbe AM, Hatzigeorgiadis A, eds. Sport and Exercise Psychology Research: From Theory to Practice. 1st ed. London: Elsevier; 2016. p.269-88. [Crossref]
- Aquilina D. A study of the relationship between elite athletes' educational development and sporting performance. The International Journal of the History of Sport. 2013;30(4):374-92. [Crossref]
- Brown DJ, Fletcher D, Henry I, Borrie A, Emmett J, Buzza A, et al. A British university case study of the transitional experiences of student athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise.2015;21:78-90. [Crossref]
- Debois N, Ledon A, Wylleman P. A lifespan perspective on the dual career of elite male athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2015;21:15-26. [Crossref]
- Tekavc J, Wylleman P, Cecić Erpič S. Perceptions of dual career development among elite level swimmers and basketball players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2015;21:27-41. [Crossref]
- MacNamara Á, Button A, Collins D. The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance part 1: identifying mental skills and behaviors. The Sport Psychologist. 2010;24(1):52-73. [Crossref]
- Stambulova N, Engström C, Franck A, Linnér L, Lindahl K. Searching for an optimal balance: Dual career experiences of Swedish adolescent athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2015;21:4-14. [Crossref]
- Lupo C, Guidotti F, Goncalves CE, Moreira L, Doupona Topic M, Bellardini H, et al. Motivation towards dual career of European student-athletes. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(2):151-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shimamoto K, Tokairin Y, Murakami K, Ishii M. Appraisal of required life skills for athletes: a scale development on college student athletes. Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology. 2013;40(1):13-30. [Crossref]
- Sandstedt SD, Cox RH, Martens MP, Ward DG, Webber SN, Ivey S. Development of the student-athlete career situation inventory (SACSI). Journal of Career Development. 2004;31(2):79-93. [Link]
- Baron-Thiene A, Alfermann D. Personal characteristics as predictors for dual career dropout versus continuation - a prospective study of adolescent athletes from German elite sport schools. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2015;21:42-9. [Crossref]
- De Brandt K, Wylleman P, Torregrossa M, Schipper-Van Veldhoven N, Minelli D, Defruyt S, et al. Exploring the factor structure of the dual career competency questionnaire for athletes in European pupil- and student-athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2018;35(1):1-18. [Crossref]
- Semiz K. Does sports and school run together? A needs analysis of university student-athletes. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Studies. 2018;10(2):123-33. [Crossref]
- Aksu G, Eser MT, Güzeller CO. Faktör analizi. Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli Uygulamaları. 1. Baskı. İstanbul: Detay Yayıncılık; 2017. p.25-46. [Link]
- Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;15;25(24):3186-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Seçer İ. SPSS ve LISREL ile Pratik Veri Analizi. 3. Baskı. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık; 2017. p.29-34. [Link]
- Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online. 2003;8(8):23-74. [Link]
- Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999;6(1):1-55. [Crossref]
- Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2015. p.74-8. [Link]
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson; 2012. [Link]
- George D, Mallery P. Descriptive statistics. Reliability analysis. In: IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step. 14th ed. New York: Routledge; 2016. p.245-56. [Crossref]
- Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. NJ: Pearson: 2009. [Link]
- Hair JF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivariate Data Analysis. 2017;1(2):107-23. [Link]
- Gliner JA, Morgan GA, Leech NL. Sampling measurement and data collection. Research Methods in Applied Settings an Integrated Approach to Design and Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2017. p.211. [Link]
- Erkuş A. Kağıt kaleme dayanan veri toplama araçları. Davranış Bilimleri İçin Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci. 4. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2013. p.139. [Link]
- Yaşlıoğlu MM. Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. [Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: applications of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses]. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business. 2017;46(özel sayı):74-85. [Link]
.: Process List