Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi sağlık çalışanlarının Hastane Bilgi Sistemleri (HBS) kabul düzeylerini belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TKM) ile Sağlık Bakanlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesindeki sağlık çalışanlarının HBS kullanımlarının değerlendirilmesi nedeni ile tanımlayıcı türdedir. Çalışmada kullanılan ölçeğin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizlerinin yapılması nedeni ile metodolojik yönü de bulunmaktadır. Çalışmanın evrenini Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde görev yapan 1.789 sağlık çalışanları oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak anket kullanılmış, analizler anketlere dönüş yapan 763 sağlık çalışanlarının verileri üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada TKM ölçeğinin HBS alanında kullanılması için uyarlama çalışması yapılmıştır. İki grubun ortalamalarının farklı olup olmadığını analiz etmek için bağımsız örneklemler için t-testi uygulanmış; ikiden fazla ortalama arasındaki farklılığı test etmek için ise tek yönlü ANOVA uygulanmıştır. Etki büyüklüğünü için kısmı etakare katsayısı hesaplanmıştır. Çalışma 2018 yılında tamamlanmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışma grubunun 'algılanan fayda' alt boyut puanlarının ortalaması X =18,96±4,11, 'algılanan kullanım kolaylığı' alt boyut puan ortalaması X =17,83±3,84, 'kullanıma yönelik niyet' alt boyut puan ortalaması X =10,71±2,85 olarak bulunmuştur. TKM ölçeği puan ortalaması ise X =47,51±9,37 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç: HBS kullanımına ilişkin ne olumlu ne olumsuz algıya sahip olduğu, ancak geliştirilmesi gereken yönleri olduğu belirlenmiştir. HBS'ye yönelik algıda bütün değişkenler incelendiğinde en yüksek puanlar 'algılanan fayda', en düşük puanlar 'kullanıma yönelik niyet' boyutunda gözlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sağlık Personeli; hastane bilgi sistemleri; bilgi sistemleri
Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the acceptance level of Hospital Information Systems (HIS) by Ankara Training and Research Hospital's healthcare professionals. Material and Methods: It is a descriptive research whose scope is to evaluate the use of HIS of health and administrative personnel in the Training and Research Hospital of the Ministry of Health through the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Due to the validity and reliability study, the scales used in this research also have methodological aspects. The universe of the study consists of 1,789 healthcare professionals working in Ankara Training and Research Hospital. The questionnaire is used as a data collection tool and the data of 763 healthcare professionals who answer the questionnaire are analyzed. In the study, an adaptation study is carried out for the use of TAM Scale in HIS field. In order to analyze whether the means of the two groups are different, independent samples t-test is applied; one-way ANOVA is applied to test the difference between more than two means. Partial etakare coefficient is calculated for the effect size. The study is completed in 2018. Results: The average score of the research group's "perceived usefulness" sub-dimension is X =18.96±4.11, the average score of the "perceived ease of use" sub-dimension is X=17.83±3.84, and the "use-related intention" sub-dimension average score is X=10.71±2.85. The average score of the TAM scale is calculated as X=47.51±9.37. Conclusion: It has been determined that there is neither positive nor negative views regarding the use of the HIS, but there are some aspects that should be improved. When all of the variables related to perception towards HIS are examined, the highest scores are noted in the "perceived usefulness" dimension, and the lowest scores are noted in the "use-related intention" dimension.
Keywords: Health personnel; hospital information systems; information systems
- Glandon GL. Health Information Technology Strategic Alignment. Glandon GL, Smaltz DH, Slovensky JD, eds. Information Systems for Healthcare Management. 9th ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2020. p.3-31,199. [Link]
- Glandon GL. Health Information Technology Strategic Alignment. Glandon GL, Smaltz DH, Slovensky JD, eds. Austin and Boxerman's Information Systems for Healthcare Management. 7nd ed. Chicago: Aupha Health Administration Press; 2008. p.3-17. [Link]
- Wager KA, Lee FW, Glaser JP. Health Care Information. Healthcare Information Systems A Practical Approach For Healthcare Management. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009. p.3-14. [Link]
- Brogan TT. Introduction to Healthcare Delivery Systems. Health Information Tecnology Basics. 1st. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2009. p.73-89. [Link]
- Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):464-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Davıs FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Mis Quarterly. 1989;3(3): 319-40. [Crossref]
- Esen M. Bireysel ve Kurumsal Hazıroluşun Teknoloji Kabulüne Etkisi: Elektronik İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi (E-İKY) Alanında Amprik Bir Araştırma [Doktora Tezi]. [Link]
- Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 1993;38(3): 475-87. [Crossref]
- Çivici T, Kale S. Mimari tasarım bürolarında bilişim teknolojilerinin kullanımını etkileyen akademisyen görüşlerinin teknoloji kabul modeli çerçevesinde incelenmesi [Examining the views of the academicians affecting the use of information technologies in architectural design firms within the framework of technology acceptance model]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi. 2007;13(1):109-11. [Link]
- Yazıcıoğlu Y, Erdoğan S. Örnekleme. Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2004. p.84. [Link]
- Özdamar K. Parametrik testler. Güvenirlik ve Soru Analizi. Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. 5. Baskı. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi; 2011. p. 327-633. [Link]
- Uluç S. Roc analizi I. özgüllük, duyarlılık, pozitif yordayıcı değer ve negatif yordayıcı değer hesaplamaları [Roc analysis I. specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value calculations] Türk Psikoloji Bülteni. 2007;40:26-31. [Link]
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Structural Equation Modeling. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. United States: Pearson Education; 2013. p.737-48. [Link]
- Farzandipur M, Jeddi FR, Azimi E. Factors affecting successful implementation of hospital information systems. Acta Inform Med. 2016; 24(1):51-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(15):1477-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Heeks R. Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(2):125-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Culler SD, Jose J, Kohler S, Edwards P, Dee AD, Sainfort F, et al. Implementing a pharmacy system: facilitators and barriers. J Med Syst. 2009;33(2):81-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hoerbst A, Kohl CD, Knaup P, Ammenwerth E. Attitudes and behaviors related to theintroduction of electronic health records among Austrian and German citizens. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(2):81-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pretlow R. E-health international: a cutting edge company for a new age in health care. JE-Health Nurs. 2000;18(5):32-40. [Link]
- Moucheraud C, Schwitters A, Boudreaux C, Giles D, Kilmarx P, Bangani Z et al. Sustainability of health information systems: a three-country qualitative study in southern Africa. Bmc Health Services Research. 2017;17(23):2-11. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hanada E. Hospital information systems: the past, present, and future. International Journal of Computer Software Engineering. 2017;2:114-115. [Crossref]
- Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S, et al. Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;(175):1-1422. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Abeer A. healthcare providers' perceptions towards health information applications at king abdul-aziz medical city, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 2011;2(10):14-22. [Crossref]
- Bennett CJ, Walston S, Abeer A. Understanding the effects of age, tenure, skill, and gender on employee perceptions of healthcare information technology within a middle eastern. International Journal of Healthcare Management. 2015;8(4):272-80. [Crossref]
- Kowitlawakul Y, Chan SW, Pulcini J, Wang W. Factors influencing nursing students' acceptance of electronic health records for nursing education (EHRNE) software program. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(1):189-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Whittaker AA, Aufdenkamp M, Tinley S. Barriers and facilitators to electronic documentation in a rural hospital. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(3):293-300. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Al-Gahtani S. Computer technology acceptance success factors in Saudi Arabia: an exploratory study. J Glob Inf Technol Manage. 2004;7(1):5-29. [Crossref]
- Engin M, Gürses F. Adoption of hospital information systems in public hospitals in Turkey: an analysis with the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 2019;16(6). [Crossref]
- Rasoulzadeh N, Abbaszadeh A, Zaefarian R, Khounraz F. Nurses views on accepting the creation of a nurses' health monitoring system. Electron Physician. 2017;9(5):4454-60. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Quarterly. 2003; 27(3):425-78. [Crossref]
- Alkhunaizan A, Love S. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised utaut model. International Journal of Management and Marketing Academy. 2012;2(1):82-99. [Link]
- Lorenzi N, Kouroubali A, Detmer D, Bloomrosen M. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. Bmc Med Inform Decision Making. 2009;9(15):1-13. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Stamatian F, Baba CO, Timofe M. Barriers in the implementation of health information systems: a scoping review. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences. 2013;9:156-73. [Link]
- Walston SL, Bennett CJ, Al-Harbi A. Understanding the factors affecting employees' perceived benefits of healthcare information technology. International Journal of Healthcare Management. 2014;7(1):35-44. [Crossref]
- Holden RJ. What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements?: a study of facilitators and barriers to physicians' use of electronic health records. J Patient Saf. 2011;7(4):193-203. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List