Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, sağlık bilimlerinin farklı alanlarından öğrenci ve profesyonellerin koronavirüs hastalığı-2019'a [coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)] bakış açısını ve empati düzeylerini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma; 18 yaş ve üzeri, araştırmaya katılmaya gönüllü olan, farklı üniversitelerden lisans veya ön lisans düzeyinde sağlık alanında eğitim gören öğrenciler ile lisans veya ön lisans sağlık eğitimi veren kurumlardan mezun olmuş sağlık profesyonellerinden 181 birey ile çevrim içi anket yoluyla gerçekleştirildi. Katılımcıların genel bilgileri, COVID-19'a bakış açıları (COVID-19 ilk bulaş yolu, ilk belirtiler, koruyucu ekipman tercihi, bağışıklık güçlendirme yöntemleri ve pandemi süreci ile ilgili bilgileri takip platformu) ve empati düzeyleri [Toronto Empati Ölçeği (TEÖ)] değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Sağlık profesyonellerinin, COVID-19'lu hasta ile teması, öğrencilere göre anlamlı olarak fazla bulundu (p0,05). Eklem ağrıları ile koku ve tat kaybı belirtilerinin, sağlık profesyonelleri tarafından istatistiksel olarak daha fazla bildirildiği görüldü (p=0,006; p=0,002; p=0,010). Bağışıklık güçlendirme yöntemleri ve TEÖ skorlarında, öğrenciler ve sağlık profesyonelleri arasında anlamlı bir fark görülmedi (p>0,05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda, sağlık bilimlerinin farklı alanlarından öğrenci ve sağlık profesyonellerinin, COVID-19 bakış açılarının ve empati düzeylerinin çoğunlukla benzer olduğu görüldü. Pandemi döneminde sağlık profesyonelleri ile öğrencilerin bakış açılarını ve empati düzeylerini inceleyen daha geniş kapsamlı çalışmalar yapılmasını ve eğitim-öğretimde sağlık ve empati ilişkisine daha fazla yer verilmesi gerektiğini düşünmekteyiz.
Anahtar Kelimeler: COVID-19; empati; sağlık çalışanları; öğrenciler
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the perspective of students and professionals from different fields of health sciences on coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and to compare their empathy levels. Material and Methods: The study was carried out through an online questionnaire with 181 individuals aged 18 and over, volunteering to participate in the study, students from different universities studying in the field of health at the undergraduate or associate degree level, and health professionals graduated from institutions providing undergraduate or associate degree health education. Participants' general information, perspective of COVID-19 (first transmission route of COVID-19, first symptoms, protective equipment preferences, immune enhancement methods and information tracking platform on the pandemic process) and empathy status [Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ)] were evaluated. Results: The contact of health professionals with the patient with COVID-19 was found to be significantly higher than the students (p0.05). It was observed that joint pains and symptoms of loss of smell and taste were statistically more frequently reported by healthcare professionals (p=0.006, p=0.002, p=0.010). There were no significant differences between students and healthcare professionals in immune enhancement methods and TEQ scores (p>0.05). Conclusion: In our study, the perspective to COVID-19 and empathy levels of students and health professionals from different fields of health sciences were mostly similar. We think that more comprehensive studies should be conducted to examine the perspectives and empathy levels of health professionals and students during the pandemic period and the relationship between health and empathy should be included more in education.
Keywords: COVID-19; empathy; medical staffs; students
- Zhong BL, Luo W, Li HM, Zhang QQ, Liu XG, Li WT, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(10):1745-52. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565-74. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Alam A, Siddiqui MF, Imam N, Ali R, Mushtaque M, Ishrat R. Covid-19: current knowledge, disease potential, prevention and clinical advances. Turk J Biol. 2020;44(3):121-31. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Plaster AN, Painter JE, Tjersland DH, Jacobsen KH. University students' knowledge, attitudes, and sources of information about Zika virus. J Community Health. 2018;43(4):647-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Spoorthy MS, Pratapa SK, Mahant S. Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic-A review. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102119. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Elsalem L, Al-Azzam N, Jum'ah AA, Obeidat N, Sindiani AM, Kheirallah KA. Stress and behavioral changes with remote E-exams during the Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study among undergraduates of medical sciences. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;60:271-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Byock I. The Best Care Possible: A Physician's Quest to Transform Care Through the End of Life. 1st ed. New York: Penguin; 2013. [Link]
- Cunico L, Sartori R, Marognolli O, Meneghini AM. Developing empathy in nursing students: a cohort longitudinal study. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(13-14):2016-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kiosses VN, Karathanos VT, Tatsioni A. Empathy promoting interventions for health professionals: a systematic review of RCTs. Journal of Compassionate Health Care. 2016;3(7):1-22. [Link]
- Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1171-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277(7):553-9. [PubMed]
- Putrino N, Tabullo Á, Mesurado B, de Minzi MCR. Are there differences in health professionals' empathy due to academic and clinical experience? Current Psychology. 2021;40: 647-54. [Link]
- Neuwirth ZE. Physician empathy--should we care? Lancet. 1997;350(9078):606. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ferri P, Guerra E, Marcheselli L, Cunico L, Di Lorenzo R. Empathy and burnout: an analytic cross-sectional study among nurses and nursing students. Acta Biomed. 2015;86 Suppl 2:104-15. [PubMed]
- Nosek M, Gifford E, Kober B. Nonviolent Communication (NVC) training increases empathy in baccalaureate nursing students: A mixed method study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2014;4(10):1-15. [Crossref]
- Ward J, Cody J, Schaal M, Hojat M. The empathy enigma: an empirical study of decline in empathy among undergraduate nursing students. J Prof Nurs. 2012;28(1):34-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mahoney S, Sladek RM, Neild T. A longitudinal study of empathy in pre-clinical and clinical medical students and clinical supervisors. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):270. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Khalid I, Khalid TJ, Qabajah MR, Barnard AG, Qushmaq IA. Healthcare workers emotions, perceived stressors and coping strategies during a MERS-CoV outbreak. Clin Med Res. 2016;14(1):7-14. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Silva JV, Carvalho I. Physicians experiencing intense emotions while seeing their patients: what happens? Perm J. 2016;20(3):15-229. [PubMed] [PMC]
- King DB, Kamble S, DeLongis A. Coping with influenza A/H1N1 in India: empathy is associated with increased vaccination and health precautions. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education. 2016;54(6):283-94. [Crossref]
- Spreng RN, McKinnon MC, Mar RA, Levine B. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. J Pers Assess. 2009;91(1):62-71. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Totan T, Doğan T, Sapmaz F. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish university students. Egitim Arastirmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2012;46:179-98. [Link]
- Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med. 2004;23(12):1921-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Phillips KF. Power of the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1990;18(2):137-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987;15(6):657-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sağlam E. Tıp fakültelerinde empati eğitimine genel bir bakiş, geliştirmek için neler yapilabilir? [An overview of empathy education in medical schools, what can be done to improve?]. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2019;18(55):62-9. [Link]
- Ca-as-Lerma AJ, Cuartero-Casta-er ME, Mascialino G, Hidalgo-Andrade P. Empathy and COVID-19: study in professionals and students of the social health field in Ecuador. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):338. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kataoka HU, Koide N, Ochi K, Hojat M, Gonnella JS. Measurement of empathy among Japanese medical students: psychometrics and score differences by gender and level of medical education. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1192-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Veloski JJ, Erdmann JB, et al. Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender. Med Educ. 2002;36(6):522-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bhagavathula AS, Aldhaleei WA, Rahmani J, Mahabadi MA, Bandari DK. Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) knowledge and perceptions: a survey on healthcare workers. MedRxiv. 2020. [Crossref]
- Khasawneh AI, Humeidan AA, Alsulaiman JW, Bloukh S, Ramadan M, Al-Shatanawi TN, et al. Medical Students and COVID-19: knowledge, attitudes, and precautionary measures. A descriptive study from Jordan. Front Public Health. 2020;8:253. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Shereen MA, Khan S, Kazmi A, Bashir N, Siddique R. COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. J Adv Res. 2020;24:91-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Chen X, Zhang SX, Jahanshahi AA, Alvarez-Risco A, Dai H, Li J, et al. Belief in a COVID-19 conspiracy theory as a predictor of mental health and well-being of health care workers in Ecuador: cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(3):e20737. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- El Alami A, Fattah A, Chait A. Medicinal plants used for the prevention purposes during the covid-19 pandemic in Morocco. Journal of Analytical Sciences and Applied Biotechnology. 2020;2(1):4-11. [Link]
- Mao R, Qiu Y, He JS, Tan JY, Li XH, Liang J, et al. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(7):667-8. Erratum in: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(7):e6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List