Objective: Canalicular lacerations are usually treated with monocanalicular or bicanalicular silicon stent intubation. This study aimed to report the prognosis and cost-effectiveness of monocanalicular intubation using re-sterilized silicone tubes for canalicular lacerations. Material and Methods: Patient demographics, surgery timing, surgical time, postoperative treatment, follow-up, timing of the silicon tube removal, and postoperative lacrimal patency (anatomical success) and subjective epiphora (functional success) were investigated. Five-centimeter silicone tubes remaining from dacryocystorhinostomy surgery, re-sterilized with ethylene oxide, were used. The silicone tube was left approximately 1.5 centimeters beyond the lacrimal punctum to avoid corneal contact. The free end of the tube was sutured to the skin and orbicularis muscle, positioning it downward. Anatomical success was determined with the lacrimal irrigation test upon removal, and functional success was assessed using the Munk score. Results: Twenty-seven patients with an average age of 47.5 years and a mean follow-up of 7.6 months were included. Canalicular reconstruction was performed within 24 hours of injury, with an average surgical time of 24.7 minutes. No intraoperative complications, ocular surface irritation, stent migration, spontaneous stent loss, or infection were observed. Granuloma formation occurred in one (3.7%) patient, and medial ectropion of the lower eyelid in one (3.7%) patient. Anatomical success was 100%, and functional success was 96.2%. Conclusion: Repairing lacerated canaliculi with re-sterilized silicon tubes was successful and cost-effective. This technique avoids manipulation of the uninjured canaliculus, making tube insertion and removal straightforward. Its significant advantage is the lack of additional costs or instruments, valuable during limited instrument availability, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: Monocanalicular intubation; re-sterilized silicon tube; epiphora; lacrimal irrigation; Munk score
Amaç: Kanaliküler laserasyonlar genellikle monokanaliküler veya bikanaliküler silikon tüp entübasyonu ile tedavi edilir. Bu çalışmada, kanalikül laserasyonlarının tedavisinde tekrar sterilize edilmiş silikon tüpler kullanılarak yapılan monokanaliküler entübasyonun prognozu ve maliyet etkinliğinin araştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Hasta demografisi, cerrahi zamanlaması, ameliyat süresi, ameliyat sonrası tedavi, takip süresi, silikon tüp çıkarılma zamanı ve postoperatif lakrimal geçiş (anatomik başarı) ve subjektif epifora (fonksiyonel başarı) araştırıldı. Dakriyosistorinostomi ameliyatından kalan beş santimetrelik silikon tüpler etilen oksit ile tekrar sterilize edilerek kullanıldı. Korneal teması önlemek için silikon tüp lakrimal punktumdan itibaren yaklaşık 1.5 santimetre uzun bırakıldı. Tüpün serbest ucu cilde ve orbiküler kasa sütüre edilerek aşağı yönde konumlandırıldı. Anatomik başarı, tüp çıkarıldığında lakrimal irrigasyon testi ile, fonksiyonel başarı ise Munk skoru ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 47.5 yıl olan ve ortalama 7.6 aylık takip süresi olan 27 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Kanaliküler rekonstrüksiyon, yaralanmadan sonraki 24 saat içinde gerçekleştirildi ve ortalama cerrahi süresi 24.7 dakika idi. Ameliyat sırasında komplikasyon, oküler yüzey irritasyonu, stent göçü, spontan stent kaybı veya enfeksiyon gözlemlenmedi. Bir (%3.7) hastada granüloma oluşumu ve bir (%3.7) hastada alt göz kapağının medial ektropiyonu gözlendi. Anatomik başarı %100 ve fonksiyonel başarı %96.2 olarak bulundu. Sonuç: Tekrar sterilize edilmiş silikon tüplerle kanaliküler laserasyonlarının onarımı hem başarılı hem de maliyet etkin bulundu. Bu teknikte, sağlam kanalikülün manipülasyonu gerekmemektedir ve silikon tüp yerleştirme ve çıkarma işlemleri nispeten basittir. Tekniğimizin en önemli avantajı, ek maliyet ve donanım gerektirmemesidir, bu da COVID-19 pandemisi gibi enstrüman bulunabilirliğinin sınırlı olduğu dönemlerde özellikle değerlidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Monokanaliküler entübasyon; tekrar sterilize edilmiş silikon tüp; epifora; lakrimal irrigasyon; Munk skoru
- Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The round-tipped, eyed pigtail probe for canalicular intubation: a review of 228 patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(3):176-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jordan DR, Mawn L. Repair of canalicular lacerations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(5):792-3; author reply 793. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tavakoli M, Karimi S, Behdad B, Dizani S, Salour H. Traumatic canalicular laceration repair with a new monocanalicular silicone tube. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;33(1):27-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Murchison AP, Bilyk JR. Canalicular laceration repair: an analysis of variables affecting success. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30(5):410-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nam SM. Microscope-assisted reconstruction of canalicular laceration using Mini-Monoka. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(6):2056-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhang W, Zhang D, Han P, Liang X, Zhang W, Feng F, et al. A novel monocanalicular silicone intubation technique for canalicular laceration repair. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(8):1848-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gupta VP, Gupta P, Gupta R. Repair of canalicular lacerations using monostent and Mini-Monoka stent. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(2):216. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bi Y, Sui G, Zhou Q, Heindl LM, Bock F, Sun X, et al. Two-step retrograde closed stenting: a novel method for treating canalicular lacerations in Chinese patients. Eye (Lond). 2013;27(11):1275-80. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Balaji SM. Management of nasolacrimal duct injuries in mid-facial advancement. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2015;5(1):93-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Munk PL, Lin DT, Morris DC. Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology. 1990;177(3):687-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lee H, Ahn J, Lee TE, Lee JM, Shin H, Chi M, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment of blow-out fracture accompanied by canalicular laceration. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(5):1399-403. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Men CJ, Ko AC, Ediriwickrema LS, Liu CY, Kikkawa DO, Korn BS. Canalicular laceration repair using a self-retaining, bicanalicular, hydrophilic nasolacrimal stent. Orbit. 2021;40(3):239-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):375-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shah SM, Shah MA, Shah PD, Patel KB. Successful repair of injury to the eyelid, lacrimal passage, and extraocular muscle. GMS Ophthalmol Cases. 2016;6:Doc04. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Iñiguez-Soto M, Espinosa-Noguera J, Dávila-Camargo A, Nava-Castañeda A. Anatomical and Functional Success Analysis of Lacrimal Canalicular Lacerations Repaired with Bicanalicular Stents in a Tertiary Referral Teaching Center in Mexico. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2021;13(24):118-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wladis EJ, Aakalu VK, Tao JP, Sobel RK, Freitag SK, Foster JA, et al. Monocanalicular Stents in Eyelid Lacerations: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(9):1324-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mangan MS, Turan SG, Ocak SY. Pediatric canalicular laceration repair using the Mini Monoka versus Masterka monocanalicular stent. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2023;86(1):46-51. [PubMed]
- Bai F, Tao H, Zhang Y, Wang P, Han C, Huang YF, et al. Old canalicular laceration repair: a retrospective study of the curative effects and prognostic factors. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(6):902-7. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Alam MS, Mehta NS, Mukherjee B. Anatomical and functional outcomes of canalicular laceration repair with self retaining mini-MONOKA stent. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2017;31(3):135-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tsai MJ, Lin IW, Lee SS, Lai CS. Stitch guide technique for bicanalicular nasal intubation in single canalicular laceration reconstruction. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(9):529-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Han S, Wang T, Jia J, Sun S, Fan Y. Bicanalicular lacerations: clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes with a new bicanalicular silicone stent. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(7):2261-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Leibovitch I, Kakizaki H, Prabhakaran V, Selva D. Canalicular lacerations: repair with the Mini-Monoka® monocanalicular intubation stent. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(4):472-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim T, Yeo CH, Chung KJ, Lee JH, Kim YH. Repair of lower canalicular laceration using the mini-monoka stent: primary and revisional repairs. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(4):949-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Conlon MR, Smith KD, Cadera W, Shum D, Allen LH. An animal model studying reconstruction techniques and histopathological changes in repair of canalicular lacerations. Can J Ophthalmol. 1994;29(1):3-8. [PubMed]
- Shi W, Fan X. Incidence of postoperative obstruction at different sites of lacrimal canalicular injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(4):731e-3e. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fayet B, Racy E, Ruban JM, Katowitz J. Pushed monocanalicular intubation. Pitfalls, deleterious side effects, and complications. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011;34(9):597-607. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Anastas CN, Potts MJ, Raiter J. Mini Monoka silicone monocanalicular lacrimal stents: Subjective and objective outcomes. Orbit. 2001;20(3):189-200. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Eo S, Park J, Cho S, Azari KK. Microsurgical reconstruction for canalicular laceration using Monostent and Mini-Monoka. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(4):421-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Raj A, Thakur S, Arya KS, Kesarwani P, Sinha U. Canalicular lacerations in a tertiary eye hospital: our experience with monocanalicular stents. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2020;64(2):146-52. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Aytoğan H, Karadeniz Uğurlu Ş. Evaluation of anatomical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing repair of traumatic canalicular laceration. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017;23(1):66-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fayet B, Katowitz WR, Racy E, Ruban JM, Katowitz JA. Pushed monocanalicular intubation: an alternative stenting system for the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions. J AAPOS. 2012;16(5):468-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rajabi MT, Zavarzadeh N, Mahmoudi A, Johari MK, Hosseini SS, Abrishami Y, et al. Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(10):1466-70. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Fayet BE, Katowitz WR, Racy E, Ruban JM, Katowitz JA. An update to monocanalicular stent surgery. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(5):797-8. [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List