Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, flor (F) tedavisi ile ilgili Türkçe YouTube videolarının, video içeriğini değerlendirmek ve ne kadar doğru bilgilendirme yapıldığına ışık tutmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 'Flor uygulamaları' anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak YouTube'da arama yapıldı. İlk 200 video bağımsız olarak gözden geçirildi; içerikleri ve doğruluğu değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel değerlendirmelerde SPSS Windows 22.0 versiyon programı kullanıldı. Bulgular: Elli dört video çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Videolar 2011-2021 tarihleri arasında; çoğu (n=20, %37) bir medya kuruluşu/TV tarafından yüklenmişti. En çok bahsedilen F ajanı F vernikti (n=21, %39). Bir üniversite tarafından yüklenen 2 videonun 2'si (%100); Sağlık Bakanlığı kurum ve kuruluşları tarafından yüklenen 7 videonun 4'ü (%57); özel klinikler/hastaneler tarafindan yüklenen 17 videonun 4'ü (%24) ve medya/TV kuruluşları tarafından yüklenen 20 videonun 4'ü (%15) çok yararlı/yararlı video olarak tespit edildi. Videoların 12'si (%22) kapsam olarak başarısız; 29'u (%54) yetersiz; 9'u (%17) ortalama seviyede ve 4'ünde de (%7) mükemmel bulundu. On yedi (%31) videonun doğru bilgi içermediği; 20 (%37) videonun az derecede doğru bilgi içerdiği; 7 (%13) videonun orta derecede doğru bilgi içerdiği ve 10 (%19) videonun da tamamen doğru-profesyonel bilgi içerdiği tespit edildi. Altısı (%11) 'çok yararlı', 8'i (%15) 'yararlı', 22'si (%41) 'az yararlı' ve 18'i (%33) 'yararsız' olarak tespit edildi. Görüntülenme sayısı, görüntülenme oranı, etkileşim puanı ve yükleyen kaynak ile yararlılık skoru arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadı (p=0,056; p=0,513; p=0,210; p=0,216). Sonuç: Türkçe YouTube videoları, F tedavilerinin yararları, uygulama prosedürü, uygulama aralığı, uygulanma yaşı, uygulama miktarı ve kapsamı hakkında yeterli ve doğru bilgi içermemektedir. Diş hekimleri, internetteki videoların yüklenme kaynağına ve kapsamına göre yanlış ve sınırlı bilgi içerebileceği konusunda hastalarını uyarmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Florürler; internet; sosyal medya
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the video content of Turkish YouTube videos about fluor (F) therapy and to shed light on how accurate information is provided. Material and Methods: A search was made on YouTube using the keywords 'Fluor applications.' The first 200 videos were independently evaluated for content and accuracy. SPSS Windows 22.0 version program was used for statistical evaluations. Results: Fifty-four videos were included in the study. Most of videos (n=20, 37%) were uploaded by a media/TV. Two of the 2 videos uploaded by a university (100%); 4 out of 7 videos uploaded by Ministry of Health institutions and organizations (57%); 4 out of 17 (24%) videos uploaded by private clinics/hospitals and 4 (15%) out of 20 videos uploaded by media/TV organizations were identified as very useful/useful videos. Twelve (22%) of the videos were unsuccessful; 29 (54%) were inadequate; 9 (17%) were found to be average and 4 (7%) were found to be excellent. 17 (31%) videos contain no accurate information. Twenty (37%) videos contain little accurate information; 7 (13%) videos contain moderately accurate information and 10 (19%) videos contain completely accurate-professional information. Six (11%) videos were determined as 'very useful', 8 (15%) videos as 'useful', 22 (41%) videos as 'less useful' and 18 (33%) videos as 'useless'. Conclusion: Turkish YouTube videos do not contain sufficient and accurate information about the benefits of F treatments, application procedure, application interval, application age, amount and scope of application. Dentists should warn their patients about videos on the internet may contain false and limited information, depending on the source and scope of the upload.
Keywords: Fluorides; internet; social media
- Gugnani N, Gugnani S. Remineralisation and arresting caries in children with topical fluorides. Evid Based Dent. 2017;18(2):41-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ismail AI. Visual and visuo-tactile detection of dental caries. J Dent Res. 2004;83 Spec No C:C56-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rosin-Grget K, Lincir I. Current concept on the anticaries fluoride mechanism of the action. Coll Antropol. 2001;25(2):703-12. [PubMed]
- American Dental Association [İnternet]. [Erişim tarihi: 22 Şubat 2021]. Fluoridation Facts: American Dental Association. 2018. Erişim linki: [Link]
- Norman OH, Franklin G, Christine NN. Primary Preventive Dentistry. 7th ed. Cranbury, NJ, USA: Pearson Education, Inc; 2008. [Link]
- Saunders JG, McIntyre JM. The ability of 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride gel to inhibit simulated endogenous erosion in tooth roots. Aust Dent J. 2005;50(4):263-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTube? as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod. 2017;44(2):90-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Powell J, Inglis N, Ronnie J, Large S. The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: Cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e20. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bundorf MK, Wagner TH, Singer SJ, Baker LC. Who searches the internet for health information? Health Serv Res. 2006;41(3 Pt 1):819-36. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(1):8-28. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Finney Rutten LJ, Agunwamba AA, Wilson P, Chawla N, Vieux S, Blanch-Hartigan D, et al. Cancer-related information seeking among cancer survivors: Trends over a decade (2003-2013). J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(2):348-57. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cutrona SL, Mazor KM, Vieux SN, Luger TM, Volkman JE, Finney Rutten LJ. Health information-seeking on behalf of others: characteristics of "surrogate seekers". J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(1):12-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: Findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e4. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Finney Rutten LJ, Blake KD, Greenberg-Worisek AJ, Allen SV, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Online health information seeking among US adults: Measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Rep. 2019;134(6):617-25. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- YouTube [İnternet]. [Erişim tarihi: 30 Temmuz 2017]. Doctors bring their expertise on vaccines to YouTube. Erişim linki: [Link]
- Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Basch CH, Yin J, Walker ND, de Leon AJ, Fung IC. TMJ online: Investigating temporomandibular disorders as "TMJ" on YouTube. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(1):34-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Samuel N, Alotaibi NM, Lozano AM. YouTube as a source of information on neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:394-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hansen C, Interrante JD, Ailes EC, Frey MT, Broussard CS, Godoshian VJ, et al. Assessment of YouTube videos as a source of information on medication use in pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(1):35-44. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lee JS, Seo HS, Hong TH. YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(14):4066-70. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Singh SK, Liu S, Capasso R, Kern RC, Gouveia CJ. YouTube as a source of information for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39(4):378-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016;49(12):1194-200. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):202-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12): e82469. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube as a source for parents' education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27(6):437-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Egil E, Salli GA. Youtube as a source of information on fluoride therapy. Research Report Fluoride. 2020;53(2):292-301. [Link]
- Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: Literature review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018;4(1): e3. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Çapan BŞ. YouTube as a source of information on space maintainers for parents and patients. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246431. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Basch CH, Blankenship EB, Goff ME, Yin J, Basch CE, DeLeon AJ, et al. Fluoride-related YouTube videos: A cross-sectional study of video contents by upload sources. J Dent Hyg. 2018;92(6):47-53. [PubMed]
.: Process List