Amaç: Bu araştırma intörn hemşirelik öğrencilerinin tıbbi hata eğilimlerini belirlemek amacıyla tanımlayıcı olarak yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmanın örneklemini Nisan-Mayıs 2017 tarihleri arasında çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 164 intörn hemşirelik öğrencisi oluşturdu. Verilerin toplanmasında Özata ve Altunkan (2010) tarafından geliştirilen, 'Hemşirelikte Tıbbi Hataya Eğilim Ölçeği (HTHEÖ)' ve intörn tanıtım formu kullanıldı. Verilerin analizi ortalama ve yüzdelik hesaplamalar ile Kruskal Wallis Testi ve Mann-Whitney U Testi kullanılarak yapıldı. Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan intörn hemşirelerin yaş ortalaması 22,40±1,37 olup %71,3'ü kadındır. Öğrencilerin %73,2'si klinik uygulamada ortalama 5-10 arasında hastaya bakım verdiğini, %77,4'ü hasta bakımını hemşire ile birlikte yaptığını, %48,2 si de tıbbi hata ile karşılaştığını ifade etmiştir. HTHEÖ toplam puan ortalaması 212,15±23,92 (min: 126, max: 245) dir. Ölçeğin alt boyut puan ortalamalarının 'İlaç ve Transfüzyon Uygulamaları' alt boyutunda 78,15±9,82, 'Enfeksiyonların Önlenmesi' alt boyutunda 54,44±5,98, 'Düşmelerin Önlenmesi' alt boyutunda 22,06±2,86, 'Hasta İzlemi ve Malzeme- Cihaz Güvenliği' alt boyutunda 36,20±6,37, 'İletişim' alt boyutunda 21,28±3,75 olduğu belirlendi. İntörnlerin cinsiyeti ile HTHEÖ 'iletişim' alt boyutu puan ortalamaları arasında (p: 0,050) ve hasta bakımını hemşireden bağımsız yapma durumları ile 'İlaç ve Transfüzyon Uygulamaları' alt boyutu puan ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark (p=0,015) saptandı. Sonuç: Araştırma bulgularına göre; intörn hemşirelik öğrencilerinin tıbbi hata yapma eğiliminin düşük olduğu, hasta bakımında ilaç ve transfüzyon uygulamalarını hemşireden bağımsız yapan intörnlerin tıbbi hata eğiliminin hemşire ile birlikte yapan intörnlere göre daha yüksek olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Hemşirelik eğitiminin intörnlük döneminde öğrencilerin tıbbi hataların önlenmesine yönelik bilgi ve becerilerinin güncellenmesi önerilebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Tıbbi hata; tıbbi hata eğilimi; intörn hemşire
Objevtive: This study was conducted to determine the medical error tendency of intern nurses. Material and Methods: The sample of the study was composed of 164 voluntary intern nurses in April-May 2017. 'Medical Error Tencency Scale in Nursing' developed by Özata and Altunkan (2010) and 'Intern Identification Form' were used as data collection tools in the study. Descriptive data of the study was analyzed for percentages and averages and Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were utilized in data analysis. Results: The avarega of age 22.40±1.37 and female 71.3% of intern nurses who participated in the study. Students stated that give care to avarega 5-10 patient in clinical practice (73.2%), that give care to patients with nurse (77.4%), and that to meet the medical errors (48.2%). Mean score for the HTHEO scale is 212.15±23.92 (min: 126, max: 245). It was determined that mean score of the sub-dimensions of inventory is 78.15±9.82 for 'Medicine and Transfusion Practices' dimension, 54.44±5.98 for 'Prevention of Infections' dimension, 22.06±2.86 for'Prevention of Falls' dimension, 36.20±6.37 for 'Patient Monitoring and Material Safety' dimension, and 21.28±3.75 for 'Communication' dimension, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the gender (p=0.050) of the interns and the sub-dimension of 'communication', and to give care to patient the nurse-independent (p=0.015) and the mean scores of 'medicine and transfusion practices' sub-dimension. Conclusion: Study results shows that medical error tendency among intern nurses is low. It was concluded that the level of medical error tendency of the intern students who made the medication and transfusion practices independent of the nurse was higher than the intern students who made with nurse. It is suggestible to update the knowledge and skills of the students about prevention of medical errors in the internship period of nursing education.
Keywords: medical error; medical error tendency; intern nurse
- Bell SK, White AA, Yi JC, Yi-Frazier, Joyce P, Gallagher TH. Transparency when things go wrong: physician attitudes about reporting medical errors to patients, peers, and institutions. J Patient Saf. 2017;13(4):243-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Top M, Gider O, Tas, Y, Cimen, S. [Physicians' assessments about casual factors of medical errors: a field study from kocaeli province]. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration. 2008;11(2):161-200.
- Ozer O, Tastan K, Set T, Cayir Y, Sener MT. [Malpractise]. Dicle Medical Journal. 2015;42(3): 394-7. [Crossref]
- Demir Dikmen Y, Yorgun S, Yesilcam N. [Identification the level of tendency in malpractice among nurses]. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing. 2014;1(1):44-56.
- Assiri GA, Shebl NA, Mahmoud MA, Aloudah N, Grant E, Aljadhey H, et al. What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature. BMJ Open. 2018;8(5):e019101. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Prot S, Fontan JE, Alberti C, Bourdon O, Farnoux C, Macher MA, et al. Drug administration errors and their determinants in pediatric in-patients. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(5):381-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ertem G, Oksel E, Akbiyik A. [A retrospective review about the malpractice applications in medicine]. Dirim Tip Gazetesi. 2009;84(1):1-10.
- Unver V, Tastan S, Akbayrak A. Medication errors: perspectives of newly graduated and experienced nurses. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(4):317-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ozata M, Aslan S, T. C. Saglik Bakanligi Performans Yonetimi ve Kalite Gelistirme Daire Baskanligi. The effect of nursing and midwifery students to patient safety. Kirilmaz H, editor. I. Uluslararasi Saglikta Performans ve Kalite Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabi. Saglik Bakanligi Yayinlari, Yayin No: 772-2. 2. Cilt. 1. Baski. Ankara: Turunc Matbaacilik; 2009. p.60-6.
- Sutherland A, Canobbio M, Clarke J, Randall M, Skelland T. Weston E. [Incidence and prevalence of intravenous medication errors in the UK: a systematic review]. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018;0:1-6. [Crossref]
- Koohestani HR, Baghcheghi N. Barriers to the reporting of medication administration errors among nursing students. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2009;27(1):66-74.
- Cooper E. Nursing student medication errors: a snapshot view from a school nursing's quality and safety officer. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(3):S51-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zieber M, Williams B. The experience of nursing students who make mistakes in clinical. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2015;12(1):1-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bodur S, Filiz E, Cimen A, Kapci C. [Attitude of final year students of midwifery and nursing school on patient safety and medical errors]. Genel Tip Derg. 2012;22(2):37-42.
- Cebeci F, Karazeybek E, Sucu Dag G. [Medical errors encountered by nursing students in clinical practice]. Gumushane University Journal of Health Sciences. 2014;3(2):736-48.
- Bayindir Cevik A, Demirci A, Guven Z. [Medication administration errors and medical error awareness of nursing students during clinical training ]. Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;6(3):152-8.
- Kahriman I, Ozturk H, Bahcecik N, Sokmen S, Nazan C, Altundag S. The effect of theoretical and simulation training on medical errors of nurse students in Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey. J Pakistan Med Assoc. 2018;68(11):1636-43.
- Shahoei R, Fathi M, Valiee S. Clinical instructors' experience of managing students' errors: a qualitative study. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2018;68(11):1-3.
- Ozata M, Altunkan H, T. C. Saglik Bakanligi Performans Yonetimi ve Kalite Gelistirme Daire Baskanligi. [Development of malpractice trend scale in nursing and validity and reliability analysis]. Kirilmaz H, editor. II. Uluslararasi Saglikta Performans ve Kalite Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabi. Saglik Bakanligi Yayinlari, Yayin No: 789. 1. Cilt. 1. Baski. Ankara: Baydan Ofset; 2010. p.415-31.
- Cebeci F, Gursoy E, Tekingunduz S. [Determining the level of tendency in malpractice among nurses]. Anadolu Hemsirelik ve Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2012;15(3):188-96.
- Isik Andsoy I, Kar G, Ozturk O. [ A Study on Trends to Medical Error for Nurses]. Journal of Health Science and Profession-HSP. 2014;1(1):17-27. [Crossref]
- Solak Kabatas M, Sevinc F, Sav D. [Determining the level of tendency in malpractice among nurses]. International Refereed Journal of Nursing Researches. 2014;1(2):59-74. [Crossref]
- Ozata M. [Determination of tendency to make medical error of nurses and their attention in patient care]. Journal of Social Sciences. 2009;12(1-2):417-30.
- Gunes U, Zaybak A, Baran L, Ozdemir H. [Determining the tendency levels of intern nurses toward medical errors]. Journal of Ege University Nursing Faculty. 2016;32(3):41-9.
- Kiymaz D, Koc Z. [Identification of factors which affect the tendency towards and attitudes of emergency unit nurses to make medical errors]. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(5-6):1160-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Avsar G, Atabek Armutcu E, Karaman Ozlu Z. [Determining the level of tendency in malpractice of nurses: a hospital sample]. Journal of Health Science and Profession-HSP. 2016;3(2):115-22. [Crossref]
- Ozcetin M, Ulas Saz E, Karapinar B, Ozen S, Aydemir S, Vardar F. [Pediatric nosocomial infections; incidence, risk factors]. J Pediatr Inf. 2009;3(2):49-53.
- Caymaz M. [A research on malpractice of health personnel]. Journal of International Management and Social Researches. 2015;2(4):1-14.
- Celik Durmus S. [Medical errors: causes and solution suggestions]. Social Sciences Studies Journal. 2018;4(23):4388-96. [Crossref]
.: Process List