Amaç: Uşak Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine başvuran hastalarda dişlerin gömülü kalma oranlarını , lokalizasyonların ı, yaş ve cinsiyete göre dağılı mlarını ve literatürde bulunan Türkiye'de yapılmış çalışmalarla tartışmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, 2016-2018 yılları arasında Uşak Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine başvuran 3.858 hastanın panoramik radyografları değerlendirildi. Hastaların gömülü dişlerinin lokalizasyonları cinsiyete ve yaşa göre değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel değerlendirme için ki-kare testi, Pearson korelasyon testi ve iki orantının karşılaştırılması Z testi yapıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların 909 (%23,56)'unda gömülü diş tespit edildi. Hastaların yaş aralığı 18-59 yıl idi. En sık gömülü kalan dişler sırasıyla mandibuler 3. molar, maksiller 3. molar, maksiller kanin, mandibular kanin, maksiller 2. molar ve mandibuler 2. molar dişlerdi. Hastaların yaşları ile gömülü diş sayıları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulundu (p=0,001). Cinsiyet ile gömülü dişler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı (p<0,05). Gömülü dişlere komşu olan dişlerde rezorpsiyon, çürük ve kist görülmesi gömülü olmayan komşu dişlere göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde farklı idi (p<0,001). Sonuç: Uzun dönem gömülü 3. molarla ilişkili patolojik değişiklikler, asemptomatik gömülü molarların çekimine karar vermek için önemli olabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Gömülü diş; retrospektif çalışmalar; prevalans
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the locations, rate and gender distribution of impacted teeth of the patients who admitted to Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry and discuss the results with other studies carried out in Turkey. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, panoramic radiographs of 3.858 patients who applied to Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry between 2016-2018 were evaluated. The location of the impacted teeth of the patients were evaluated according to gender and age. For statistical evaluation, chi-square test, Pearson correlation test and comparison of two proportions Z test were performed. Results: Impacted teeth were detected in 909 (23.56%) patients and the age of patients ranged from 18-59 years. The most frequently impacted teeth are respectively; mandibular third molar, maxillary third molar, maxillary canine, mandibular canine, maxillary second molar and mandibular second molars. A statistically significant relationship was found between the age of the patients and the number of impacted teeth (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between sex and impacted teeth (p<0.05). Resorption, caries and cysts were significantly different in teeth adjacent to impacted teeth compared to non adjacent to impacted teeth (p<0.001). Conclusion: Pathological changes associated with long-term impacted third molars may be important to decide the extraction of asymptomatic third molars.
Keywords: Impacted tooth; retrospective studies; prevalence
- Purfasar F, Salemi F, Dalband M, Khamverdi Z. Prevalence of impacted teeth and their radiographic signs in panoramic radiographs of patients referred to Hamadan dental school in 2009. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2011;3(1):25-31.
- Chu FC, Li TK, Lui VK, Newsome PR, Chow RL, Cheung LK. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies--a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J. 2003;9(3):158-63.
- Kaczor-Urbanowicz K, Zadurska M, Czochrowska E. Impacted teeth: an interdisciplinary perspective. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016;25(3):575-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Grover PS, Lorton L. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;59(4):420-5. [Crossref]
- Aydın U, Yilmaz HH, Yildirim D. Incidence of canine impaction and transmigration in a patient population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(3):164-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10(4):283-95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Santosh P. Impacted mandibular third molars: review of and a proposal of a combined clinical and radiological classification. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5(4):229-34. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yazıcı S, Kökden A, Tank A. [Gömülü dişler üzerine retrospektif bir çalışma]. Cumhuriyet Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2002;5(2):102-5.
- Damlar İ, Altan A, Tatlı U, Arpağ OF. [Retrospective investigation of the prevalence of impacted teeth in Hatay]. Çukurova Medical J. 2014;39(3):559-65. [Crossref]
- Ezzodini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health. 2007;24(3)140-4.
- Çelikoğlu M, Miloğlu Ö, Kamak H, Kazancı F, Öztek Ö, Ceylan İ. [Retrospective investigation of the frequency of impacted teeth in patients aged between 12-25 from Erzurum and its around city]. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2009;19(2):72-5.
- Dural S, Avcı N, Karabıyıkoğlu T. [Gömük dişlerin görülme sıklığı, çenelere göre dağılımları ve gömülü kalma nedenleri]. Sağ Bil Arş Derg. 1996;7:127-33.
- Hashemipour MA, Tahmasbi-Arashlow M, Fahimi-Hanzaei F. Incidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population. Med Oral Patol Cir Bucal. 2013;1(18):e140-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(5):548-52. [Crossref]
- Tuğsel Z, Kandemir S, Küçüker F. [Üniversite öğrencilerinde üçüncü molarların gömülülük durumlarının değerlendirilmesi]. Cumhuriyet Üniv Diş Hek Derg. 2001;4:102-5.
- Yıldırım G, Ataoğlu H, Bulut T, Menziletoğlu DK, Özkan BT. Is it different in Turkish population? Evaluation of impacted third molars. SÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2009;18:55-62.
- Hassan AH. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Saudi population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2010;2:109-13. [Crossref]
- Etöz M, Şekerci AE, Şişman Y. [Retrospective radiographic evaluation of third molar theet in a Turkish population]. J Dent Fac Ataturk Uni. 2011;21(3):170-4.
- Syed KB, Zaheer KB, Ibrahim M, Bagi MA, Assiri MA. Prevalence of impacted molar teeth among Saudi population in Asir Region Saudi Arabia-a retrospective study of 3 years. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(1):43-7.
- Al-Khateeb TH, Bataineh AB. Pathology associated with impacted mandibular third molars in a group of Jordanians. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(11):1598-602. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Knutson K, Brehmer B, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82(1):10-7. [Crossref]
- Lysell L, Rohlin M. A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 1988;17(3):161-4. [Crossref]
- Yamaoka M, Furusawa K, Yamamoto M. Influence of adjacent teeth on impacted third molars in the upper and lower jaws. Aust Dent J. 1995;40(4):233-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- van der Linden W, Cleaton-Jones P, Lownie M. Diseases and lesions associated with third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79(2):142-5. [Crossref]
- Özeç İ, Hergüner Siso Ş, Taşdemir U, Ezirganlı Ş, Göktolga G. Prevalence and factors affecting the formation of second molar distal caries in a Turkish population. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(12):1279-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Polat HB, Ozan F, Kara I, Ozdemir H, Ay S. Prevalence of commonly found pathoses associated with mandibular impacted third molars based on panoramic radiographs in Turkish population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(6):e41-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Matzen LH, Schropp L, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Use of cone beam computed tomography to assess significant imaging findings related to mandibular third molar impaction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;124(5):506-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Suter VGA, Rivola M, Schriber M, Leung YY, Bornstein MM. Risk factors for root resorption of second molars associated with impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48(6):801-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Oening AC, Melo SL, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. Mesial inclination of impacted third molars and its propensity to stimulate external root resorption in second molars--a cone beam computed tomographic evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(3):379-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang D, He X, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhu Y, Sun C, et al. External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investing. 2017;21(4):1335-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gündüz K, Acıkgöz A, Egrioglu E. Radiologic investigation of prevalence associated pathologies and dental anomalies of non-third molar impacted teeth in Turkish oral patients. Chin J Dent Res. 2011;14(2):141-6.
.: Process List