Amaç: Rezin nanoseramik CAD/CAM (RNC) materyaller, tamir kolaylığı ve uygun fiyatları nedeniyle günümüzde indirekt restorasyonlarda yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, RNC materyale uygulanan farklı yüzey işlemlerinin ve silan uygulanmasının kompozit rezin ile tamir bağlanma dayanımı [repair bond strength (RBS)] üzerine etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: RNC bloklar (CeraSmart, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japonya) kullanılarak toplam 60 örnek (2×7×12 mm) hazırlandı ve 5.000 termal siklusla yaşlandırıldı. Örnekler yüzey işlemlerine göre rastgele 3 gruba (n=20) ayrıldı: (1) Kontrol, işlem yapılmamış, (2) Al2O3 partikülleri ile kumlama, (3) Frezle pürüzlendirme. Ardından her grup ilave silan uygulamasına göre rastgele 2 alt gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Tüm örnekler 2x3,5 mm nanohibritkompozit (Clearfil Majesty Posterior, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Japonya) ile tamir edildi ve RBS testi evrensel test cihazı (Autograph AGS-X, Shimadzu Co, Kyoto, Japonya) kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. Kopma yüzeyleri stereomikroskop (MP 320; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Almanya) kullanılarak x50 büyütmede analiz edildi. Veriler iki yönlü varyans, Tukey ve bağımsız-t testleri kullanılarak analiz edildi (p=0,05). Bulgular: Yüzey işlemi uygulanmış Grup 2 ve 3, kontrol grubu olan 1'e göre anlamlı ölçüde daha yüksek RBS sergiledi (p<0,05). Grup 2'de en yüksek RBS değerleri görülmesine rağmen Grup 2 ile 3 arasında anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0,05). Bununla birlikte ilave silan uygulanan gruplarda daha fazla RBS değerleri görülmüştür ve bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır (p<0,001). Sonuç: Al2O3 kumlama veya frezle pürüzlendirme işlemleri RNC'lerin tamirinde gereklidir. Yüzey işlemleri sonrasında ilave silan uygulaması RNC'lerin RBS değerlerini önemli ölçüde artırır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Bağlanma dayanımı; tamir; rezin nanoseramik; yüzey işlemi
Objective: Resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM (RNC) materials are widely used in indirect restorations today for reasons such as ease of repair and price availability. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and silane application on repair bond strength (RBS) of composite resin to RNC material. Material and Methods: A total of 60 samples (2×7×12 mm) were prepared from RNC blocks (Cerasmart, GC Dental Products, Japan) and subjected to 5,000 thermal cycles. The samples were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20) according to surface treatment: (1) Control, untreated, (2) Sandblasting with Al2O3 particles, (3) Roughening with a diamond bur. Then, each group was divided into two subgroups according to additional silane application (n=10). All samples were repaired with a 2x3.5 mm nanohybrid composite (Clearfil Majesty Posterior, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Japan) and a universal testing machine (Autograph AGS-X, Shimadzu Co, Kyoto, Japan) was used to test the RBS. Fracture surfaces were examined using a stereomicroscope (MP 320; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at x50 magnification. Data were analyzed with two-way variance, Tukey and independent-t tests (p=0.05). Results: The surface treated groups 2 and 3 exhibited significantly higher RBS than Group 1, the control group (p<0.05). Although Group 2 had the highest RBS, there was no significant difference between Group 2 and 3 (p>0.05). Higher RBS values were observed in the groups where additional silane was applied and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: Sandblasting with Al2O3 or roughening with a diamond bur significantly increase the RBS of RNC. Silane has a synergistic effect when applied in combination with surface treatments.
Keywords: Bond strength; repair; resin nanoceramic; surface treatment
- Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J. 2011;56 Suppl 1:97-106. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Della Bona A, Nogueira AD, Pecho OE. Optical properties of CAD-CAM ceramic systems. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1202-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alshehri SA. An investigation into the role of core porcelain thickness and lamination in determining the flexural strength of In-Ceram dental materials. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(4):261-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(4):587-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(5):705-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hämmerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(3):377-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Trottmann A, Schmutz F, Roos M, Hämmerle C. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(5):325-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tunac AT, Celik EU, Yasa B. Two-year performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin composite inlay restorations: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(6):627-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29(4):419-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wady AF, Paleari AG, Queiroz TP, Margonar R. Repair technique for fractured implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations: a clinical report. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(5):589-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Batista GR, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Caneppele TM, Rocha Gomes Torres C. Effects of different surface treatments on composite repairs. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(5):421-6. [PubMed]
- Üstün Ö, Büyükhatipoğlu IK, Seçilmiş A. Shear bond strength of repair systems to new CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(8):748-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(4):349-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(2):161-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a repair composite to leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2007;18(4):314-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sismanoglu S, Tugce Gurcan A, Yildirim‐Bilmez Z, Gumustas B. Mechanical properties and repair bond strength of polymer‐based CAD/CAM restorative materials. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology. 2021;18(2):312-8. [Crossref]
- Tatar N, Ural C. Repair success of two innovative hybrid materials as a function of different surface treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(3):267-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Güngör MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, Ünver S, Doğan A. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(4):259-66. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kuraray Noritake [Internet]. ©2023 Kuraray America, Inc [Cited: March 7, 2024]. Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus. Available from: [Link]
- Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(2):299-308. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Magni E, Ferrari M, Papacchini F, Hickel R, Ilie N. Influence of ozone on the composite-to-composite bond. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(2):249-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e78-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e100-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bähr N, Keul C, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, et al. Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):492-501. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Arpa C, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Perdigão J. Repair bond strength and nanoleakage of artificially aged CAD-CAM composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(3):523-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Duarte S, Sartori N, Phark J-H. Ceramic-reinforced polymers: CAD/CAM hybrid restorative materials. Current Oral Health Reports. 2016;3(3):198-202. [Crossref]
- Sismanoglu S, Yildirim-Bilmez Z, Erten-Taysi A, Ercal P. Influence of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the repair of CAD-CAM composite resins: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(2):238.e1-238.e9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wiegand A, Stucki L, Hoffmann R, Attin T, Stawarczyk B. Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(8):2007-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Loomans BA, Mesko ME, Moraes RR, Ruben J, Bronkhorst EM, Pereira-Cenci T, et al. Effect of different surface treatment techniques on the repair strength of indirect composites. J Dent. 2017;59:18-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Honda MI, Flório FM, Basting RT. Effectiveness of indirect composite resin silanization evaluated by microtensile bond strength test. Am J Dent. 2008;21(3):153-8. [PubMed]
- Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(2):155-64. [PubMed]
- Şişmanoğlu S, Gürcan AT, Yıldırım-Bilmez Z, Turunç-Oğuzman R, Gümüştaş B. Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(1):22-32. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tinastepe N, Turkes E, Kazazoglu E. Comparative approach to analyse the effects of different surface treatments on CAD/CAM resin nanoceramics-resin composite repair bond strength. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2018;32(1):142-9. [Crossref]
- Cinar S, Altan B, Akgungor G. Comparison of bond strength of monolithic CAD-CAM materials to resin cement using different surface treatment methods. Journal of Advanced Oral Research. 2019;10(2):120-7. [Crossref]
.: Process List