Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı NiTi eğe sistemleri [Scope RS® Retreatment GOLD (SRG), WaveOne Gold (WOG) ve ProTaper Gold (PTG)] kullanılarak kök kanal dolgu maddelerinin uzaklaştırılması sırasında apikalden taşan debris ve kök kanal duvarlarında kalan dolgu maddesi miktarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kırk beş adet çekilmiş alt çene küçük azı dişin kök kanalları genişletilmiş ve tek kon tekniği kullanılarak gütaperka ve AH Plus kanal patı ile doldurulmuştur. SRG, WOG ve PTG eğeleri ile kök dolgu materyalinin uzaklaştırılması için dişler rastgele 15'li 3 gruba ayrıldı. Uzaklaştırma işlemi sırasında apikalden taşan debris, önceden tartılmış Eppendorf tüplerinde toplandı ve elektronik bir terazi ile ölçüldü. Kök kanallarında kalan dolgu maddesi miktarı dijital analiz programı (Image J) kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Veriler tek yönlü ANOVA testi kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: WOG eğe sistemi, PTG eğe sistemine göre anlamlı derecede apikalden daha az debris taşırırken (p=0,020); SRG eğe sistemi ile diğer 2 eğe sistemi arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadı (p=0,426, p=0,647). Kalan dolgu maddesi miktarı açısından anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadı (p=0,308). Sonuç: Tüm gruplar apikal foramenden debris taşırdı. PTG eğe sistemi, WOG ve SRG eğe sistemlerine oranla daha yüksek seviyelerde apikal ekstrüzyona sebep oldu. Ayrıca kalan kanal dolgusu miktarı açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Kök kanal tedavisi; yeniden tedavi; tedavi başarısızlığı
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of debris extruded apically and residual filling material during the removal of root canal filling material using different NiTi file systems [Scope RS® Retreatment GOLD (SRG), WaveOne Gold (WOG) and ProTaper Gold (PTG)]. Material and Methods: Fourty five extracted mandibular premolar teeth were prepared and filled with guttapercha and AH Plus sealer using the single cone technique. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 15 for removal of the root filling material with SRG, WOG, and PTG files. Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes and was assessed with an electronic balance. Residual filling material in the root canals was assessed using digital analysis software (Image J). These data were analysed statistically using ANOVA and the KruskalWallis H test. Results: WOG file system extruded significantly less debris than PTG file system from the apical foramen (p=0.020). There was no significant difference between the SRG file system and the other two file systems (p=0.426, p=0.647). There was no significant difference in the amount of remaining canal filling (p=0.308). Conclusion: All groups extruded debris from the apical foramen. The PTG file system caused higher levels of apical extrusion in proportion to the WOG and SRG file systems. In addition, there was no significant difference among groups in terms of the amount of remain canal filing.
Keywords: Root canal therapy; retreatment; treatment failure
- Wong R. Conventional endodontic failure and retreatment. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(1):265-89. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mounce R. Endodontic retreatment possibilities: evaluation, limitations, and considerations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25(5):364-8. [PubMed]
- Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Three-dimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1370-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gergi R, Sabbagh C. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2007;40(7):532-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Duncan HF, Chong BS. Removal of root filling materials. Endod Topics. 2008;19(1):33-57. [Crossref]
- Scope Endodontic System [İnternet]. [Erişim tarihi: 01.03.2021]. SCOPE RS® Retreatment. Erişim linki: [Link]
- Orhan EO, Ertuğrul İF, Tosun S. Monotonic torsional resistance and fatigue resistance of novel SCOPE RS instruments. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84(1):62-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bürklein S, Flüch S, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and reciproc blue. Odontology. 2019;107(1):96-102. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kwak SW, Lee CJ, Kim SK, Kim HC, Ha JH. Comparison of screw-in forces during movement of endodontic files with different geometries, alloys, and kinetics. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(9):1506. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sousa-Neto MD, Plazas-Garzon A, Basrani B. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1718-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Ricucci D, Hülsmann M. Causes and management of post-treatment apical periodontitis. Br Dent J. 2014;216(6):305-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1102-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod. 1991;17(6):275-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985;11(11):472-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tanalp J, Güngör T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2014;47(3):211-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dincer AN, Er O, Canakci BC. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Int Endod J. 2015;48(12):1194-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kaşıkçı Bilgi I, Köseler I, Güneri P, Hülsmann M, Çalışkan MK. Efficiency and apical extrusion of debris: a comparative ex vivo study of four retreatment techniques in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2017;50(9):910-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yılmaz K, Özyürek T. Apically extruded debris after retreatment procedure with reciproc, ProTaper next, and twisted file adaptive instruments. J Endod. 2017;43(4):648-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Baxter S, Schöler C, Dullin C, Hülsmann M. Sensitivity of conventional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography in detecting the remaining root-canal filling material. J Oral Sci. 2020;62(3):271-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Abramovitz I, Relles-Bonar S, Baransi B, Kfir A. The effectiveness of a self-adjusting file to remove residual gutta-percha after retreatment with rotary files. Int Endod J. 2012;45(4):386-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Romania C, Beltes P, Boutsioukis C, Dandakis C. Ex-vivo area-metric analysis of root canal obturation using gutta-percha cones of different taper. Int Endod J. 2009;42(6):491-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Türker SA, Uzunoğlu E, Sağlam BC. Evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris during retreatment of root canals filled by different obturation techniques. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(6):802-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schäfer E, Nelius B, Bürklein S. A comparative evaluation of gutta-percha filled areas in curved root canals obturated with different techniques. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(1):225-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- van der Sluis LW, Gambarini G, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J. 2006;39(6):472-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Toyoğlu M, Altunbaş D. Influence of different kinematics on apical extrusion of irrigant and debris during canal preparation using K3XF instruments. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1565-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper universal, ProTaper next, twisted file adaptive, and HyFlex instruments. J Endod. 2014;40(10):1638-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Marques da Silva B, Baratto-Filho F, Leonardi DP, Henrique Borges A, Volpato L, Branco Barletta F. Effectiveness of ProTaper, D-RaCe, and Mtwo retreatment files with and without supplementary instruments in the removal of root canal filling material. Int Endod J. 2012;45(10):927-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Brunson M, Heilborn C, Johnson DJ, Cohenca N. Effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on irrigant volume delivered by using negative pressure irrigation system. J Endod. 2010;36(4):721-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- ElAyouti A, Kiefner P, Hecker H, Chu A, Löst C, Weiger R. Homogeneity and adaptation of endodontic fillings in root canals with enlarged apical preparation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(3):e141-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tanalp J, Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Bayirl G. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101(2):250-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva EJ, Mendonça TA, Lourenço C, Calixto C, et al. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(2):357-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Silva EJ, Sá L, Belladonna FG, Neves AA, Accorsi-Mendonça T, Vieira VT, et al. Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: assessment of the apically extruded material. J Endod. 2014;40(12):2077-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Koçak S, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, Türker SA, Sağsen B, Er Ö. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2013;39(10):1278-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Webber J. Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. International Dentistry - African Edition. 2015;6(3):6-17. [Link]
- Altundasar E, Nagas E, Uyanik O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(4):e31-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List