Amaç: Birçok diş hekimliği öğrencisi, endodonti stajını zor ve stresli bulmaktadır. Endodontik tedavinin çok aşama gerektiren ve uzun süren bir tedavi olması, kök kanal anatomilerinin karmaşık olması gibi sebepler, öğrenciler üzerinde stres oluşumu ve öz güven azalmasına sebep olabilmekte ve tedavinin başarısını etkileyebilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, 5. sınıf endodonti stajını tamamlamış öğrencilerin yaptıkları tedaviler üzerine düşüncelerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: İnternet üzerinden yapılan anket tipi, Türkiye genelindeki diş hekimliği fakültesi 5. sınıf öğrencilerine e-posta ve haberleşme uygulamaları üzerinden anket linki gönderilmesi ile uygulandı. Anket, endodontik tedavi sırasında kullanılan bazı ekipmanlar, tedavinin idealliği, staj puanlama sistemi ve kök kanal varyasyonlarının tedavi edilmesinin değerlendirilmesi ile ilgili kapalı uçlu sorulardan oluşturuldu. Toplamda 706 katılımcının anketi değerlendirmeye dâhil edildi. Elde edilen veriler, ki-kare ve Fisher exact testleri kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin %76,2'si, endodonti stajında yaptıkları kanal tedavilerinin ideal olmadığını düşünmektedir. Bunların %46,5'i, staj puanlarını yetiştirebilmek için ideal olarak çalışmadığını belirtmiştir. Endodonti stajında öğrencilerin %49,9'u rutin, %21,1'i bazen rubber dam kullandığını, %29'u ise hiç rubber dam kullanmadığını belirtmiştir. Döner alet sistemi kullanan öğrenciler, yaptıkları tedavilerin daha ideal olduğunu düşünmektedir (p0,05), fakat staj puanı kanal sayısı üzerinden hesaplanan öğrenciler kök kanal varyasyonlarını bulup tedavi etme üzerine daha istekli olduklarını belirtmişlerdir. Sonuç: Mezuniyet öncesi öğrencilerin görüşlerinin değerlendirildiği bu ankette, öğrencilerin büyük çoğunluğu endodonti stajında yaptıkları kanal tedavilerinin ideal olmadığını belirtmiştir. Bunun nedeninin kendilerine olan güven eksikliğinden çok teknik ekipmanlar ve süre gibi faktörlerle daha çok ilişkili olduğu görülmüştür.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Kök kanal tedavisi; eğitim, diş hekimliği; lisans; diş izolasyon lastikleri; anatomik varyasyon
Objective: Many undergraduate dental students consider the internship program of endodontics extremely complicated and stressful. Endodontic therapy is time consuming and root canal anatomy has a very complex anatomy. For these reasons, there may be a lack of confidence and stress development in students, which may affect the success of root canal therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the considerations of students on root canal therapy in internship program of endodontics. Material and Methods: This study was online-survey research. The questionnaire link was sent to 5th grade students of dental faculties in Turkey via e-mail and communication applications. The questionnaire was comprised of closed-ended questions, about some equipment used during endodontic treatment, ideality of treatment, internship scoring system and evaluation of treatment of root canal variations. 706 questionnaires were included. The data were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: 76.2% of the students considered that their root canal treatments are not ideal. 46.5% of them stated that they did not perform their treatment ideally in order to complete their internship scores. 49.9% of the students stated that they used a rubber dam routinely, 21.1% sometimes used, and 29% never used. Students who use rotary systems considered that their treatments are required less time and more ideal (p0.05), but students whose internship scores were calculated over the number of canals stated that they were more willing to find root canal variations. Conclusion: Most of the students just before graduation stated that the root canal treatments performed in the endodontics internship were not ideal. It was related to factors such as technical equipment and time rather than self-confidence.
Keywords: Root canal therapy; education, dental; graduate; rubber dams; anatomic variation
- Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002;28(4):324-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rolland S, Hobson R, Hanwell S. Clinical competency exercises: Some student perceptions. Eur J Dent Educ. 2007;11(3):184-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dahlstrom L, Lindwall O, Rystedt H, Reit C. 'Working in the dark': Swedish general dental practitioners on the complexity of root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2017;50(7):636-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Luz LB, Grock CH, Oliveira VF, Bizarro L, Ardenghi TM, Ferreira MBC, et al. Self-reported confidence and anxiety over endodontic procedures in undergraduate students-Quantitative and qualitative study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(4):482-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Davey J, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. The confidence of undergraduate dental students when performing root canal treatment and their perception of the quality of endodontic education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2015;19(4):229-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tanalp J, Güven EP, Oktay I. Evaluation of dental students' perception and self-confidence levels regarding endodontic treatment. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(2):218-24. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ahmad IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: A review. Int Endod J. 2009;42(11):963-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Karabucak B, Bunes A, Chehoud C, Kohli MR, Setzer F. Prevalence of apical periodontitis in endodontically treated premolars and molars with untreated canal: A cone-beam computed tomography study. J Endod. 2016;42(4):538-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(3):256-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Martins RC, Seijo MO, Ferreira EF, Paiva SM, Ribeiro Sobrinho AP. Dental students' perceptions about the endodontic treatments performed using NiTi rotary instruments and hand stainless steel files. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(6):729-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Del Fabbro M, Afrashtehfar KI, Corbella S, El-Kabbaney A, Perondi I, Taschieri S. In vivo and in vitro effectiveness of rotary nickel-titanium vs manual stainless steel instruments for root canal therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018;18(1):59-69. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, de Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Gutmann JL. Analysis of the gutta-percha filled area in C-shaped mandibular molars obturated with a modified MicroSeal technique. Int Endod J. 2009;42(3):186-97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Murray CM, Chandler NP. Undergraduate endodontic teaching in New Zealand: Students' experience, perceptions and self-confidence levels. Aust Endod J. 2014;40(3):116-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil J. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod. Topics. 2005;10(1):77-102. [Crossref]
- Hajcak G, McDonald N, Simons RF. Anxiety and error-related brain activity. Biol Psychol. 2003;64(1-2):77-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alrahabi M. The confidence of undergraduate dental students in Saudi Arabia in performing endodontic treatment. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(1):17-21. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Alzahem AM, Van der Molen HT, De Boer BJ. Effect of year of study on stress levels in male undergraduate dental students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013;4:217-22. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ribeiro DM, Réus JC, Felippe WT, Pacheco-Pereira C, Dutra KL, Santos JN, et al. Technical quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using hand instrumentation: A meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 201851(3):269-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Honey J, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Gilmour AS. Ready for practice? A study of confidence levels of final year dental students at Cardiff University and University College Cork. Eur J Dent Educ. 2011;15(2):98-103. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stewart CM, Vertucci FJ, Bates RE. Improving performance on the endodontic section of the Florida Dental Licensure Examination. J Dent Educ. 2004;68(8):829-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tavares ÉP, Tavares ALP, Flório FM. The impact of technological endodontic resources on the training of the general dentist. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021;25(2):332-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Connert T, Truckenmüller M, ElAyouti A, Eggmann F, Krastl G, Löst C, et al. Changes in periapical status, quality of root fillings and estimated endodontic treatment need in a similar urban German population 20 years later. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(3):1373-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Abu-Tahun I, Al-Rabab'ah MA, Hammad M, Khraisat A. Technical quality of root canal treatment of posterior teeth after rotary or hand preparation by fifth year undergraduate students, The University of Jordan. Aust Endod J. 2014;40(3):123-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Erdemir A, Ünverdi Eldeniz A, Belli S. Farklı restorasyon materyalleri ile restore edilmiş endodontik tedavili dişlerin kırılma dirençlerinin in vitro incelenmesi [In vitro of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different restoration materials]. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2004;14:41-9. [Link]
- Hanafi A, Donnermeyer D, Schafer E, Burklein S. [Perception of a modular 3D print model in undergraduate endodontic education]. Int Endod J. 2020;53(7):1007-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List