Amaç: Endotel yetmezliği nedeniyle, desme membran endotelyal keratoplasti (DMEK) ve/veya kombine göz içi cerrahi uygulanan olgularda klinik sonuçların sunulması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Şubat 2014-Şubat 2018 tarihleri arasında DMEK uygulanan 155 hastanın kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Klinik sonuçlar ve komplikasyonlar değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Ortalama 17,2±6,4 (6-47) ay olan takip süresi sonunda kornea, 136 (%87,7) olguda saydam, 3 (%1,9) olguda yarı-saydam ve 16 (%10,3) olguda ise ödemli olarak tespit edildi. Ameliyat öncesi düzeltilmiş uzak görme keskinliği ortalama 0,022±0,022 (0,001-0,1) iken, takip süresi sonunda 0,46±0,27 (0,001-1,0) olarak tespit edildi. Santral kornea kalınlık değerleri, ameliyat öncesi ortalama 859,0±155,5 μ (643-1890), takip süresi sonunda ise 537,8±79,6 μ (422-890) olarak tespit edildi. Diğer göz içi cerrahiler ile kombine DMEK uygulanan olgular, yalnızca DMEK uygulanan olgular ile karşılaştırıldığında ameliyat sonrası 1.günde greftte periferik ayrılma ve total ayrılma oranları benzer bulunurken, 1.ayda kombine cerrahi uygulanan olgularda greftte periferik ayrılma ve total ayrılma, yalnızca DMEK uygulanan olgulara göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fazlaydı. Son kontrol muayenesinde ise her iki grupta greft yatışıklığı benzer olarak izlendi. Sonuç: DMEK, stromal opasifikasyonu bulunmayan ve epitel uzaklaştırılması sonrası ön kamara detaylarının görülebildiği endotel yetmezlikli olgularda başarılı bir yöntemdir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Desme membran endotelyal keratoplasti; fuchs endotelyal distrofi; psödofakik ve afakik büllöz keratopati; greft yetmezliği; desme membranı
Objective: To present the clinical data of the patients with endothelial dysfunction who underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) alone or with either intra ocular surgery. Material and Methods: The clinical data of the cases who underwent DMEK between February 2014 and February 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The mean follow up was 17.2±6.4 (min:6-max:47) months. At the last follow-up visit, 136 (87.7%) of the patients' corneas were clear, 3 (1.9%) were semiclear and 16 (10.3%) were edematous. The mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.022±0.022 (0.001-0.1) preoperatively and 0.46±0.27 (0.001-1.0) at the last follow-up visit. The mean central corneal thickness was found to be 859.0±155.5 μ (643-1890) preoperatively and 537.8±79.6 μ (422-890) at the last follow-up visit. Peripheral or total detachment of DM graft rates were similar when compared between the patients WHO underwent DMEK alone and combined with other intraocular surgeries on first postoperative day. On the first postoperative month, these rates were found to be higher in the patients who underwent DMEK with other intraocular surgeries. At the last follow-up visit, total graft attachment rate was similar between these two groups. Conclusion: DMEK is a successful surgery in patients with endothelial dysfunction and no stromal opacity in which anterior chamber details can be seen after epithelial debridement.
Keywords: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; fuchs endothelial dystrophy; pseudophakic and aphakic bullous keratopathy; graft failure; descemet's membrane
- Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial kerato plasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25(8):98790. [Crossref]
- Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. En dothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane en dothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30(12):13826. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet?s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1year vi sual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):236873. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2010;50(3):13747. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and hybrid techniques for managing failed penetrating grafts. Cornea. 2013;32(1):14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dirisamer M, Dapena I, Ham L, van Dijk K, Oganes O, Frank LE, et al. Patterns of corneal endothelialization and corneal clearance after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Am J Oph thalmol. 2011;152(4):54355.e1. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ham L, Dapena I, van der Wees J, Melles GR. Secondary DMEK for poor visual outcome after DSEK: donor posterior stroma may limit visual acuity in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2010;29(11):127883. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Arslan OŞ, Doğan C. [Current techniques in edothelial keratoplasty]. MN Oftalmoloji. 2017;24(1):92100.
- Eye Bank Association of America Medical Ad visory Board. Medical Standarts. Washington DC: Eye Bank Association of America; 2008.
- Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet?s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: the bare minimum. In: Price FW Jr, Price MO, eds. DSEK: What You Need to Know About Endothelial Kerato plasty. 1 st ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorpo rated; 2009. p.11946.
- Feng MT, Price MO, Price FW Jr. Update on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013;53(2):3145. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial kerato plasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25(8): 98790.[Crossref]
- Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, Ham L, van Dijk K, Melles GR. Standardized ?no touch? technique for Descemet membrane en dothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(1):8894. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Güell JL, Morral M, Gris O, Elies D, Manero F. Bimanual technique for insertion and posi tioning of endotheliumDescemet membrane graft in Descemet membrane endothelial ker atoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32(12):15216. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Liarakos VS, Dapena I, Ham L, van Dijk K, Melles GR. Intraocular graft unfolding tech niques in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(1): 2935. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bachmann BO, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. A method to confirm correct orientation of descemet membrane during descemet mem brane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Oph thalmol. 2010;149(6):9225.e2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- PerazaNieves J, Baydoun L, Dapena I, Ilyas A, Frank LE, Luceri S, et al. Twoyear clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergo ing descemet membrane endothelial kerato plasty. Cornea. 2017;36(6):65560. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Singh A, ZareiGhanavati M, Avadhanam V, Liu C. Systematic review and metaanalysis of clinical outcomes of descemet membrane en dothelial keratoplasty versus descemet strip ping endothelial keratoplasty/descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017;36(11):143743. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet membrane endothe lial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsi fication and intraocular lens implantation: advanced triple procedure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(1):4755.e2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- RodríguezCalvodeMora M, Quilendrino R, Ham L, Liarakos VS, van Dijk K, Baydoun L, et al. Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet?s membrane endothe lial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(3): 46470. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Reid RA, Craig EA, Suleman H. Descemet?s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): first UK prospective study of 1year visual out comes, graft survival and endothelial cell count. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(2):1669. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Steven P, Le Blanc C, Velten K, Lankenau E, Krug M, Oelckers S, et al. Optimizing de scemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using intraoperative optical coherence tomog raphy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(9):1135 42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Veldman PB, Dye PK, Holiman JD, Mayko ZM, Sáles CS, Straiko MD, et al. The Sstamp in Descemet membrane endothelial kerato plasty safely eliminates upsidedown graft im plantation. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1): 1614. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bachmann BO, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. A method to confirm correct orientation of descemet membrane during descemet mem brane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Oph thalmol. 2010;149(6):9225.e2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dragnea DC, Nobacht S, Gericke A, Parker J, Oellerich S, Ham L, et al. Postoperative repo sitioning of inverted descemet membrane en dothelial keratoplasty grafts. Cornea. 2018; 38(2):1625. [Crossref]
- Oellerich S, Baydoun L, PerazaNieves J, Ilyas A, Frank L, Binder PS, et al. Multicenter study of 6month clinical outcomes after de scemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017;36(12):146776. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Heinzelmann S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, Lapp T, Reinhard T, Maier P. Descemet mem brane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure following penetrating keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(5):979 85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ang M, Ho H, Wong C, Htoon HM, Mehta JS, Tan D. Endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: an alternative to re peat penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthal mol. 2014;158(6):12217.e1. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sorkin N, EinanLifshitz A, Ashkenazy Z, Boutin T, Showail M, Borovik A, et al. En hancing descemet membrane endothelial ker atoplasty in postvitrectomy eyes with the use of pars plana infusion. Cornea. 2017;36(3): 2803.
- Arslan OŞ, Doğan C. [The history and evolu tion of the eye banking in the world]. Turkiye Klinikleri J OphthalmolSpecial Topics. 2016;9(3):5763.
- Acar BT, Acar S. [Effect of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty on endothelial cell den sity]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol. 2011; 20(4):2125.
- Monnereau C, Bruinsma M, Ham L, Baydoun L, Oellerich S, Melles GR. Endothelial cell changes as an indicator for upcoming allograft rejection following descemet membrane en dothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(3):48595. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dapena I, Ham L, Netuková M, van der Wees J, Melles GR. Incidence of early allograft re jection after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30(12):13415. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Acar BT, Esen D, Buttanrı İB, Sevim MŞ, Acar S. [Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for treatment of keratoconus]. Turk Oftalmoloji Dergisi. 2010;40(3):1715. [Crossref]
- Price MO, Price FW Jr, Kruse FE, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T. Randomized comparison of topical prednisolone acetate 1% versus fluo rometholone 0.1% in the first year after de scemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2014;33(9):8806. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List