Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, internet ortamında genellikle romantik partnerlerle tanışma işlevi taşıyan çevrim içi tanışma servisleri (ÇTS)ni kullanan ve kullanmayan bireylerin, karanlık üçlü (KÜ) kişilik özellikleri ve problemli internet davranışlarının incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu doğrultuda, 18-64 (ortalama=29,83±7,99 yıl) yaş arasında olan, Türkiye'nin farklı şehirlerinden 463 katılımcının verileri incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, ÇTS kullanım alışkanlıklarıyla ilgili soruları içeren sosyodemografik formun yanında, Jones ve Paulhus tarafından geliştirilen kısaltılmış karanlık üçlü ölçeği ve Kızıltepe tarafından geliştirilen çevrim içi sosyal etkileşim durumları (trol davranış) ölçeği kullanılmıştır.Veriler, çevrim içi anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Elde edilen bulgulara göre, ÇTS'yi kullanmış olan bireylerin, KÜ toplam puanları ve trol davranış ölçeği toplam puanları, kullanıcı olmayan bireylerinkinden anlamlı olarak daha yüksektir. ÇTS'yi aktif olarak kullanan bireylerin, KÜ psikopati ve Makyavelizm alt boyutlarının toplam puanları, kullanıcı olmayanlardan anlamlı olarak yüksek bulunurken, benzer bir farklılık narsisizm alt boyutu için gözlemlenmemiştir. Ayrıca bireylerin, KÜ toplam puanları ile trol davranış ölçeği toplam puanları arasında pozitif yönde ve orta düzeyde bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, KÜ kişilik özelliklerine sahip olma ve problemli internet davranışı sergilemenin, ÇTS kullanımını etkileyebildiği görülmüştür. Literatür dâhilinde ilgili olabileceği düşünülen, sosyodemografik değişkenler de incelenmiş ve bulgular literatür çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Karanlık üçlü; çevrim içi tanışma; problemli internet davranışı; evrimsel psikoloji
Objective: This study aims to examine the difference of dark triad traits and online trolling behaviors between users and nonusers of online dating services' (ODS) which are generally used for meeting possible romantic partners. Material and Methods: In this direction, socio-demographic questionnaire that includes questions about ODS usage habits, Short Dark Triad Personality Inventory developed by Jones and Paulhus and Trolling Behavior Scale developed by Kızıltepe were used. Scores of participants from different cities of Turkey between the age of 18 and 64 (mean=29.83±7.99 years) were analyzed. Data gathered from online survey. Results: Results showed that there is a statistically significant difference between the short dark triad inventory and trolling behavior scale scores of ODS' users and non-users. Participants who are active users of OCD showed higher scores of antisocial and Machiavellianism subtypes but no difference was found for narcissism subtype scores. In addition, a statistically significant moderate positive relationship was found between the short dark triad inventory and trolling behavior scale scores. Conclusion: In line with the results, it's seen that dark triad traits and problematic internet behaviors affect the usage of ODS. Moreover, sociodemographic variables taught to be related were examined and results were discussed accordingly with the literature.
Keywords: Dark triad; online dating; problematic internet behaviors; evolutionary psychology
- Paulhus DL, Williams KM. The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J Res Pers. 2002;36(6):556-63. [Crossref]
- Book A, Visser BA, Volk AA. Unpacking "evil": claiming the core of the dark triad. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;73:29-38. [Crossref]
- Furnham A, Richards SC, Paulhus DL. The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2013;7(3):199-216. [Crossref]
- Jones DN, Figueredo AJ. The core of darkness: uncovering the heart of the dark triad. Eur J Pers. 2013;27(6):521-31. [Crossref]
- Jonason PK, Li NP, Webster GD, Schmitt DP. The dark triad: facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. Eur J Pers. 2009;23(1):5-18. [Crossref]
- House RJ, Howell JM. Personality and charismatic leadership. Leadersh Q. 1992;3(2):81-108. [Crossref]
- Morf CC, Rhodewalt F. Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: a dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychol Inq. 2001;12(4):177-96. [Crossref]
- Raskin RN, Hall CS. A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychol Rep. 1979;45(2):590. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jonason PK, Lyons M, Blanchard A. Birds of a 'bad' feather flock together: the dark triad and mate choice. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;78:34-8. [Crossref]
- Rauthmann JF, Kolar GP. How ''dark'' are the dark triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Pers Individ Dif. 2012;53(7):884-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hare RD. Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(1):7-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Petrides KV, Vernon PA, Schermer JA, Veselka L. Trait emotional intelligence and the dark triad traits of personality. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14(1):35-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cooke DJ, Michie C. Refining the construct of psychopath: towards a hierarchical model. Psychol Assess. 2001;13(2):171-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev. 1993;100(2):204-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Buss DM. Sexual strategies theory: historical origins and current status. J Sex Res. 1998;35(1):19-31. [Crossref]
- Schmitt DP, Jonason PK, Byerley GJ, Flores SD, Illbeck BE, O'Leary KN, et al. A reexamination of sex differences in sexuality: new studies reveal old truths. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(2):135-9. [Crossref]
- Penke L, Asendorpf JB. Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95(5):1113-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Buss DM. Conflict in married couples: personality predictors of anger and upset. J Pers. 1991;59(4):663-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Botwin M, Buss DM, Shackelford TK. Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. J Pers. 1997;65(1):107-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Barelds DPH, Dijkstra P, Groothof HAK, Pastoor CD. The dark triad and three types of jealousy: its' relations among heterosexuals and homosexuals involved in a romantic relationship. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;116:6-10. [Crossref]
- Brewer G, Bennett C, Davidson L, Ireen A, Phipps AJ, Stewart-Wilkes D, et al. Dark triad traits and romantic relationship attachment, accommodation, and control. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;120:202-8. [Crossref]
- Rasmussen KR, Boon SD. Romantic revenge and the dark triad: a model of impellance and inhibition. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;56:51-6. [Crossref]
- Valentova JV, Moraes Junior FP, ?těrbová Z, Varella MAC, Fisher ML. The association between dark triad traits and sociosexuality with mating and parenting efforts: a cross-cultural study. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;154:109613. [Crossref]
- Westhead J, Egan V. Untangling the concurrent influences of the dark triad, personality and mating effort on violence. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;86:222-6. [Crossref]
- McHoskey JW. Machiavellianism and sexuality: on the moderating role of biological sex. Pers Individ Dif. 2001;31(5):779-89. [Crossref]
- Linton DK, Wiener NI. Personality and potential conceptions: mating success in a modern Western male sample. Pers Individ Dif. 2001;31(5):675-88. [Crossref]
- Campbell WK, Foster CA, Finkel EJ. Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;83(2):340-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pilch I, Smolorz K. The dark triad and the quality of sexual life. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;149:78-82. [Crossref]
- Hobbs M, Owen S, Gerber L. Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. J Sociol. 2017;53(2):271-84. [Crossref]
- Lykens J, Pilloton M, Silva C, Schlamm E, Wilburn K, Pence E, et al. Google for sexual relationships: mixed-methods study on digital flirting and online dating among adolescent youth and young adults. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019;16;5(2):e10695. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Beauchamp AM, Cotton HR, LeClere AT, Reynolds EK, Riordan SJ, Sullivan KE, et al. Super likes and right swipes: how undergraduate women experience dating apps. J Stud Person Assoc Indiana Univ. 2017;50:1-16. https://scholar-works.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jiuspa/arti- cle/view/23700
- Newett L, Churchill B, Robards B. Forming connections in the digital era: Tinder, a new tool in young Australian intimate life. J Sociol. 2017;54(3):346-61. [Crossref]
- Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S, Gonzaga GC, Ogburn EL, VanderWeele TJ. Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;18;110(25):10135-40. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- LeFebvre LE. Swiping me off my feet: explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. J Soc Pers Relat. 2017;35(9):1205-29. [Crossref]
- Bryant K, Sheldon P. Cyber dating in the age of mobile apps: understanding motives, attitudes, and characteristics of users. Am Commun J. 2017;19(2):1-15. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Cyber-Dating-in-the-Age-of-Mobile-Apps-%3A-Motives-%2C-Bryant/c32ed8d871edc872b7793891c2bf9e1184421080
- Cobb C, Kohno T. How Public İs My Private Life?: Privacy in Online Dating. 26th International Conference. Perth, Australia: World Wide Web; 2017. p.1231-40. [Crossref]
- Orosz G, Benyó M, Berkes B, Nikoletti E, Gál É, Tóth-Király I, et al. The personality, motivational, and need-based background of problematic Tinder use. J Behav Addict. 2018;1;7(2):301-16. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sumter SR, Vandenbosch L, Ligtenberg L. Love me Tinder: untangling emerging adults' motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telemat Inform. 2017;34(1):67-78. [Crossref]
- Daneback K, Månsson SA, Ross MW. Using the internet to find offline sexual partners. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10(1):100-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sevi B, Aral T, Eskenazi T. Exploring the hook-up app: low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;133:17-20. [Crossref]
- Sevi B. The dark side of tinder the dark triad of personality as correlates of tinder use. J Individ Dif. 2019;40(4):242-6. [Crossref]
- Henry N, Powell A. Technology-facilitated sexual violence: a literature review of empirical research. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018;19(2):195-208. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bogolyubova O, Panicheva P, Tikhonov R, Ivanov V, Ledovaya Y. Dark personalities on Facebook: harmful online behaviors and language. Comput Human Behav. 2018;78:151-9. [Crossref]
- Goodboy AK, Martin MM. The personality profile of a cyberbully: examining the dark triad. Comput Human Behav. 2015;49:1-4. [Crossref]
- March E, Grieve R, Marrington J, Jonason PK. Trolling on Tinder (and other dating apps): examining the role of the dark tetrad and impulsivity. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;110:139-43. [Crossref]
- Buckels EE, Trapnell PD, Paulhus DL. Trolls just want to have fun. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;67:97-102. [Crossref]
- Smoker M, March E. Predicting perpetration of intimate partner cyberstalking: gender and the dark tetrad. Comput Human Behav. 2017;72:390-6. [Crossref]
- Baughman HM, Jonason PK, Veselka L, Vernon PA. Four shades of sexual fantasies linked to the dark triad. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;67:47-51. [Crossref]
- Jonason PK, Valentine KA, Li NP, Harbeson CL. Mate-selection and the dark triad: facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;51(6):759-63. [Crossref]
- Yazıcıoğlu Y, Erdoğan S. SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 4. Baskı. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2004. p.448.
- Jones DN, Paulhus DL. Introducing the Short dark triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment. 2014;21(1):28-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Özsoy E, Rauthmann JF, Jonason PK, Ardıç K. Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD-T), short dark triad (SD3-T), and single item narcissism scale (SINS-T). Pers Individ Dif. 2017;117:11-4. [Crossref]
- Kızıltepe F. Çevrimiçi trol davraniş ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve trol davranişlarina yönelik farkindaliğin incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019. p.1-112. http://www.openaccess.hacettepe.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11655/8914
- George D, Mallery M. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: a Simple Guide And Reference, 17.0 update. 10th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2010. p.386. https://lib.ugent.be/en/catalog/rug01:001424067
- Book A, Visser BA, Blais J, Hosker-Field A, Methot-Jones T, Gauthier NY, et al. Unpacking more "evil": what is at the core of the dark tetrad? Pers Individ Dif. 2016;90:269-72. [Crossref]
- Lyons M, Messenger A, Perry R, Brewer G. The dark tetrad in tinder: hook-up app for high psychopathy individuals, and a diverse utilitarian tool for machiavellians? Curr Psychol. 2020:1-8. [Crossref]
- Timmermans E, Courtois C. From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: exploring the experiences of Tinder users. Inf Soc. 2018;34(2):59-70. [Crossref]
- Dussault M, Hojjat M, Boone RT. Machiavellianism and dating: deception and intimacy. Soc Behav Pers. 2013;41(2):283-94. [Crossref]
- Carter GL, Lyons M, Brewer G. Lifetime offspring and the dark triad. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;132:79-83. [Crossref]
- Orosz G, Tóth-Király I, Bőthe B, Melher D. Too many swipes for today: the development of the problematic tinder use scale (PTUS). J Behav Addict. 2016;5(3):518-23. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Shapiro GK, Tatar O, Sutton A, Fisher W, Naz A, Perez S, et al. Correlates of Tinder use and risky sexual behaviors in young adults. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(12):727-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List