Antrenman yükü takibi, antrenör yargılarından daha fazla ilgiyi hak eden bir konudur. Bu fikir temel alınarak yazılan makalenin amacı, antrenman yükü ölçüm yöntemlerinin araştırılması ve incelenmesidir. Son yıllardaki teknolojik gelişmeler, çeşitli nesnel ve öznel yöntemlerle antrenman yükü ölçümü kolaylaşmıştır. Bu yöntemlerden beklenilen özellik, antrenman yükünü ne kadar ölçebildiğidir ve bu da bilimin konusu hâline gelmiştir bu doğrultuda da konuyla ilgili yapılan araştırmalar artış göstermiştir. Son çeyrek asırda, çalışmalar sonucunda antrenman yükü, iç yük ve dış yük olarak kavramsallaştırılmıştır. Antrenman planlamasında, katedilen mesafeler, koşu hızları, kaldırılan ağırlık vb. gibi göstergeler antrenman dış yük göstergeleri olarak kullanılırken, sporcularda antrenmanlar sırasında oluşan kalp atım hızı, oksijen tüketimi (VO2), laktat konsantrasyonları, algılanan zorluk düzeyi vb. gibi yanıtlar ise antrenman iç yük göstergeleri olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Antrenman yükü ölçümü amacıyla kullanılan her yöntemin, takip edilmek istenen antrenman tipine göre değişen avantajları ve sınırlılıkları (küresel konumlama sistemi); düşük frekanslı cihazlarda ölçüm güvenirliliği düşer, VO2supramaksimal antrenmanlar için uygun değil, kalp atım hızı takibi; antrenman yükünden bağımsız çevresel koşullardan etkilenir, laktat konsantrasyonları; laktat eşiğinin üzerindeki antrenman şiddetlerinin sınıflandırılmasında çok uygun bir yöntem değil vs.) bulunmaktadır. Antrenmanın bireyselleştirilmesinde bu sınırlılıkların bilinmesi ve aşılması, bunun yanı sıra iç-dış yük kavramlarının birlikte ele alındığı bütünleştirici yaklaşımların sergilenmesi kritik önem arz ederken, gelecekte elde edilecek verilerin gelişmiş algoritmalar aracılığıyla değerlendirilmesi bizlere antrenman yükü takibinde daha kesin ve tatmin edici bilgiler verecektir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Antrenman yükü; iç yük; dış yük; performans
Monitoring training load deserts much more attention than coaching judgment alone. Based on this idea, the aim of this study is examining and analyzing training load methods. Recently, various objective and subjective tools have been used to quantify training load along with advancing in technology. There has been increasing scientific interest to what extent such tools measurement efficiency related to desired parameters and then numerous studies are implemented with this objective. Last quarter, internal and external load are conceptualized as training load indicator in which distance run, distance speed, movement repetition etc. are assessed to measure external load indicator, whilst heart rate, oxygen consumption, blood lactate rated perceived exertion etc. response to training that are assessed to measure internal load indicator. Such tools using for load monitoring have some advantages and limitations based on training type (lower GPS frequency rates reduce reliability for measuring, VO2 is not proper method to measure supramaximal training load, heart rate values may be influenced enviromental conditions, and blood lactate may not be a propher method to quantify exercise intensity above the lactate threshold).To individualize training, one must consider and overcome such limitations and recommended to use integrative approach which is combine of external and internal load measures. Furthermore, obtain datas will be needed to assess in conjuction with advanced algorithms to get more accurate and substantial knowledge relevant to load monitoring and quantifying
Keywords: Training load; internal load; external load; performance
- Foster C, Rodriguez-Marroyo JA, de Koning JJ. Monitoring training loads: the past, the present, and the future. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S22-S8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Borresen J, Lambert MI. The quantification of training load, the training response and the effect on performance. Sports Med. 2009;39(9):779-95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med. 2014;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S139-47. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bourdon PC, Cardinale M, Murray A, Gastin P, Kellmann M, Varley MC, et al. Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S2161-S70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):273-80. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Viru A, Viru M. Nature of training effects. Exercise and sport science. 1st ed. In: Garrett W, Kirkendall D, eds. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Williams; 2000. p.67-95.
- Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Coutts AJ. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;1;14(2):270-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mujika I, Padilla S. Detraining: loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part II: long term insufficient training stimulus. Sports Med. 2000;30(3):145-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Akubat I, Barrett S, Abt G. Integrating the internal and external training loads in soccer. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(3):457-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schwellnus M, Soligard T, Alonso JM, Bahr R, Clarsen B, Dijkstra HP, et al. How much is too much? (Part 2) International olympic committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1043-52. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Alemdaroğlu U, Köklü Y. [Training load and the role of injury prevention]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Med-Special Topics. 2017;3(3):184-90. [Link]
- Scott TJ, Black CR, Quinn J, Coutts AJ. Validity and reliability of the session-RPE method for quantifying training in Australian football: a comparison of the CR10 and CR100 scales. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(1):270-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Soligard T, Schwellnus M, Alonso JM, Bahr R, Clarsen B, Dijkstra HP, et al. How much is too much? (Part 1) International olympic committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1030-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cardinale M, Varley MC. Wearable training-monitoring technology: applications, challenges, and opportunities. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S255-S62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Osgnach C, Poser S, Bernardini R, Rinaldo R, di Prampero PE. Energy cost and metabolic power in elite soccer: a new match analysis approach. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(1):170-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- di Prampero PE, Fusi S, Sepulcri L, Morin JB, Belli A, Antonutto G, et al. Sprint running: a new energetic approach. J Exp Biol. 2005;208(Pt 14):2809-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rampinini E, Alberti G, Fiorenza M, Riggio M, Sassi R, Borges TO, et al. Accuracy of GPS devices for measuring high-intensity running in field-based team sports. Int J Sports Med. 2015;36(1):49-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jennings D, Cormack S, Coutts AJ, Boyd L, Aughey RJ. The validity and reliability of GPS units for measuring distance in team sport specific running patterns. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):328-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Scott MTU, Scott TJ, Kelly VG. The validity and reliability of global positioning systems in team sport: a brief review. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(5):1470-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lambert MI, Borresen J. Measuring training load in sports. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):406-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Arts FJ, Kuipers H. The relation between power output, oxygen uptake and heart rate in male athletes. Int J Sports Med. 1994;15(5):228-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334-59. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- arvonen J, Vuorimaa T. Heart rate and exercise intensity during sports activities. Practical application. Sports Med. 1988;5(5):303-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pind R, Mäestu J. Monitoring training load: necessity, methods and applications. Acta Kinesiologiae Universitatis Tartuensis. 2017;23:7-18. [Crossref]
- Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Coutts AJ, Rampinini E, Marcora SM, Castagna C, Impellizzeri FM. Heart rate and blood lactate correlates of perceived exertion during small-sided soccer games. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(1):79-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Eston R. Use of ratings of perceived exertion in sports. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7(2):175-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Green JM, McLester JR, Crews TR, Wickwire PJ, Pritchett RC, Lomax RG, et al. RPE association with lactate and heart rate during high-intensity interval cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(1):167-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Robinson DM, Robinson SM, Hume PA, Hopkins WG. Training intensity of elite male distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23(9):1078-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(11):873-99. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Little T, Williams AG. Measures of exercise intensity during soccer training drills with professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(2):367-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Djaoui L, Haddad M, Chamari K, Dellal A. Monitoring training load and fatigue in soccer players with physiological markers. Physiol Behav. 2017;1;181:86-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Billat LV. Use of blood lactate measurements for prediction of exercise performance and for control of training. Recommendations for long-distance running. Sports Med. 1996;22(3):157-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mujika I. Quantification of training and competition loads in endurance sports: methods and applications. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S29-S217. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Swart J, Jennings CL. Use of blood lactate concentration as a marker of training status. South African Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004;16(2):1-5.
- Pyne DB, Lee H, Swanwick KM. Monitoring the lactate threshold in world-ranked swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(2):291-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jeukendrup AE, Hesselink MK. Overtraining--what do lactate curves tell us? Br J Sports Med. 1994;28(4):239-40. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Parkin JM, Carey MF, Zhao S, Febbraio MA. Effect of ambient temperature on human skeletal muscle metabolism during fatiguing submaximal exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999;86(3):902-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hopkins WG. Quantification of training in competitive sports. Methods and applications. Sports Med. 1991;12(3):161-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Xu F, Rhodes EC. Oxygen uptake kinetics during exercise. Sports Med. 1999;27(5):313-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Marcora SM. Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer. J Sports Sci. 2005;23(6):583-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Swain DP, Leutholtz BC. Heart rate reserve is equivalent to %VO2 reserve, not to %VO2max. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(3):410-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Swain DP, Leutholtz BC, King ME, Haas LA, Branch JD. Relationship between % heart rate reserve and % VO2 reserve in treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(2):318-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kellmann M, Kallus KW. The Recovery-Stress-Questionnaire for Athletes: User Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2001. p.128.
- Kenttä G, Hassmén P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model. Sports Med. 1998;26(1):1-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Morgan WP, Brown DR, Raglin JS, O'connor PJ, Ellickson KA. Psychological monitoring of overtraining and staleness. Br J Sports Med. 1987;21(3):107-14. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Rushall BS. A tool for measuring stress tolerance in elite athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol. 1990;2(1):51-66. [Crossref]
- Kellmann M. Preventing overtraining in athletes in high-intensity sports and stress/recovery monitoring. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20 Suppl 2:95-102. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, Fry A, Gleeson M, Nieman D, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the european college of sport science and the american college of sports medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(1):186-205. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Raglin JS, Wilson GS. Overtraining in Athletes. In: Hanin YL, ed. Emotions in Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2001. p.191-207. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Brink MS, Visscher C, Coutts AJ, Lemmink KAPM. Changes in perceived stress and recovery in overreached young elite soccer players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22(2):285-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kenttä G, Hassmén P, Raglin JS. Mood state monitoring of training and recovery in elite kayakers. European Journal of Sport Science. 2006;6(4):245-53. [Crossref]
- Zerguini Y, Dvorak J, Maughan RJ, Leiper JB, Bartagi Z, Kirkendall DT, et al. Influence of Ramadan fasting on physiological and performance variables in football players: summary of the F-MARC 2006 Ramadan fasting study. J Sports Sci. 2008;26 Suppl 3:S3-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Buchheit M, Racinais S, Bilsborough JC, Bourdon PC, Voss SC, Hocking J, et al. Monitoring fitness, fatigue and running performance during a pre-season training camp in elite football players. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(6):550-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Coutts AJ, Slattery KM, Wallace LK. Practical tests for monitoring performance, fatigue and recovery in triathletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2007;10(6):372-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Saw AE, Main LC, Gastin PB. Monitoring athletes through self-report: factors influencing implementation. J Sports Sci Med. 2015;1;14(1):137-46. [PubMed]
- Ekegren CL, Donaldson A, Gabbe BJ, Finch CF. Implementing injury surveillance systems alongside injury prevention programs: evaluation of an online surveillance system in a community setting. Inj Epidemiol. 2014;1(1):19. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Rankin D, Hanekom SM, Wright HH, MacIntyre UE. Dietary assessment methodology for adolescents: a review of reproducibility and validation studies. South Afr J Clin Nutr. 2010;23(2):65-74. [Crossref]
- Taylor KL, Chapman DW, Cronin JB, Newton MJ, Gill N. Fatigue monitoring in high performance sport: a survey of current trends. J Aust Strength Cond. 2012;20(1):12-23.
- Saw AE, Main LC, Gastin PB. Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):281-91. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Banister E, Macdougall J, Wenger H. Modeling Elite Athletic Performance. In: Green H, McDougall J, Wenger H, eds. Physiological Testing of High-Performance Athletes. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1991. p.403-24.
- Coutts A, Cormack S. Monitoring the Training Response. In: Lawindon D, Joyce D, eds. High-Performance Training for Sports. 1st ed. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 2014. p.71-84.
- Akubat I, Patel E, Barrett S, Abt G. Methods of monitoring the training and match load and their relationship to changes in fitness in professional youth soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(14):1473-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Manzi V, Iellamo F, Impellizzeri F, D'Ottavio S, Castagna C. Relation between individualized training impulses and performance in distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(11):2090-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Edwards S. High Performance Training and Racing. In: Edwards S, ed. Heart Rate Monitor Book. 1st ed. Sacramento, CA: Feet Fleet Press; 1993. p.113-23.
- Borresen J, Lambert MI. Quantifying training load: a comparison of subjective and objective methods. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008;3(1):16-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lucia A, Hoyos J, Santalla A, Earnest C, Chicharro JL. Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espa-a: which is harder? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(5):872-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Coutts AJ, Sassi A, Marcora SM. Use of RPE-based training load in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(6):1042-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin LA, Parker S, et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):109-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations. Sports Med. 2003;33(7):517-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Slimani M, Davis P, Franchini E, Moalla W. Rating of perceived exertion for quantification of training and combat loads during combat sport-specific activities: a short review. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(10):2889-902. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Herman L, Foster C, Maher MA, Mikat RP, Porcari JP. Validity and reliability of the session RPE method for monitoring exercise training intensity. South African Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006;18(1):14-7. [Crossref]
- Haddad M, Stylianides G, Djaoui L, Dellal A, Chamari K. Session-RPE method for training load monitoring: validity, ecological usefulness, and influencing factors. Front Neurosci. 2017;2;11:612. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Manzi V, D'Ottavio S, Impellizzeri FM, Chaouachi A, Chamari K, Castagna C, et al. Profile of weekly training load in elite male professional basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(5):1399-406. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Minganti C, Capranica L, Meeusen R, Amici S, Piacentini MF. The validity of sessionrating of perceived exertion method for quantifying training load in teamgym. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(11):3063-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wallace LK, Slattery KM, Coutts AJ. The ecological validity and application of the session-RPE method for quantifying training loads in swimming. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):33-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Padulo J, Chaabéne H, Tabben M, Haddad M, Gevat C, Vando S, et al. The construct validity of session RPE during an intensive camp in young male karate athletes. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014;4(2):121-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wallace LK, Slattery KM, Impellizzeri FM, Coutts AJ. Establishing the criterion validity and reliability of common methods for quantifying training load. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(8):2330-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- McGuigan MR, Foster C. A new approach to monitoring resistance training. National Strength and Conditioning Journal. 2004;26(6):42-7. [Crossref]
- Hiscock DJ, Dawson B, Peeling P. Perceived exertion responses to changing resistance training programming variables. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(6):1564-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Day ML, McGuigan MR, Brice G, Foster C. Monitoring exercise intensity during resistance training using the session RPE scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(2):353-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sweet TW, Foster C, McGuigan MR, Brice G. Quantitation of resistance training using the session rating of perceived exertion method. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(4):796-802. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Haddad M, Chaouachi A, Castagna C, Wong DP, Behm DG, Chamari K, et al. The construct validity of session RPE during an intensive camp in young male taekwondo athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011;6(2):252-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Clarke N, Farthing JP, Norris SR, Arnold BE, Lanovaz JL. Quantification of training load in Canadian football: application of session-RPE in collision-based team sports. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(8):2198-205. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List