Objective: The aim of the present study is to determine the predictors of cyber bullying and cyber victimization in university students. Moreover, whether cyber bullying and cyber victimization scores of the participants differ or not in terms of gender and marital status was examined. Material and Methods: The participants of the study were 300 (150 females and 150 males) university students who were studying in different departments in state and private universities in Istanbul and the ages of the participants were between 18 and 35 years. Demographic Information Form, Cyber Bullying/Cyber Victimization Scales and Young Internet Addiction Scale were applied to the students. Results: According to the findings of this study, gender, marital status and internet addiction as together had predictive value on cyber victimization in university students. It was also found that gender, marital status, internet addiction and age as together had significantly predicted cyber bullying scores of the participants. Furthermore, cyber victimization scores of males were higher than females; however, there was no significant difference between females and males in terms of cyber bullying. Additionally, it was found that there was no significant difference between married and single subjects in terms of cyber victimization, but single subjects were more prone to make cyber bullying than married ones. Conclusion: Cyber bullying and cyber victimization seem to be widespread all over the world. It is stated that prevention and coping programs should be organized in order to protect students from the negative effects of cyber bullying and that the participation of school staff, family and community in these programs is very important. Individuals need to be educated on the use of the internet and mobile phones, and taught how to cope with cyber bullying.
Keywords: Cyber victimization; cyber bullying; internet addiction; cyber psychology; cyber pathology
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinde siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyet değişkenlerinin yordayıcılarının incelenmesidir. Ayrıca bu çalışmada, katılımcıların siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyet puanlarının cinsiyet ve medeni durum açısından farklılık gösterip göstermediği incelenmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu araştırmanın katılımcılarını, İstanbul'da devlet üniversitelerinde ve özel üniversitelerde farklı bölümlerde okuyan 300 (150 kadın ve 150 erkek) üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır ve katılımcıların yaşları 18 ile 35 arasındadır. Katılımcılara, Demografik Bilgi Formu, Siber Zorbalık/ Siber Mağduriyet Ölçekleri ve Young İnternet Bağımlılığı Ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Bu çalışmanın bulgularına göre, cinsiyet, medeni durum ve internet bağımlılığı değişkenleri birlikte üniversite öğrencilerinde siber mağduriyeti yordamaktadır. Ayrıca, cinsiyet, medeni durum, internet bağımlılığı ve yaş değişkenlerinin birlikte üniversite öğrencilerinin siber zorbalık puanlarını anlamlı derecede yordadığı bulunmuştur. Bunların yanı sıra, erkeklerin siber mağduriyet puanları kadınlardan daha yüksektir; ancak, kadınlar ile erkekler arasında siber zorbalık açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunamamıştır. Bunlara ek olarak, evli ve bekar insanlar arasında siber mağduriyet açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunmazken, bekar bireylerin evli bireylere oranla daha fazla siber zorbalık yaptıkları görülmüştür. Sonuç: Siber zorbalığın ve siber mağduriyetin tüm dünyada oldukça yaygın olduğu görülmektedir. Öğrencileri siber zorbalığın olumsuz etkilerinden korumak açısından önleme ve başa çıkma programlarının düzenlenmesinin gerektiği ve okul personelinin, ailenin ve toplumun bu programlara katılımının oldukça önemli olduğu belirtilmektedir. Bireylerin internet ve cep telefonu kullanımı konusunda eğitilmeleri ve siber zorbalık ile karşılaştıklarında bu durum ile nasıl başa çıkacaklarının öğretilmesi gerekmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Siber mağduriyet; siber zorbalık; internet bağımlılığı; siber psikoloji; siber patoloji
- Guan SS, Subrahmanyam K. Youth internet use: risks and opportunities. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009;22(4):351-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yellowlees PM, Marks S. Problematic internet use or internet addiction? Comput Human Behav. 2007;23(3):1447-53. [Crossref]
- Kim S, Kim R. A study of Internet addiction: status, causes, and remedies. J Korean Home Econ Assoc Engh Ed. 2002;3(1):2.
- Kalaitzaki AE, Birtchnell J. The impact of early parenting bonding on young adults' Internet addiction, through the mediation effects of negative relating to others and sadness. Addict Behav. 2014;39(3):733-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lee J, Hwang JY, Park SM, Jung HY, Choi SW, Kim DJ, et al. Differential resting-state EEG patternassociated with comorbid depression in Internet addiction. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014;50:21-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Griffith M. Internet addiction: does it really exist? In: Gackenback J, ed. Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. 1st ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. p.61-75.
- Gunuc S, Kayri M. The profile of Internet dependency in Turkey and development of Internet addiction scale: study of validity and reliability. H.U. Journal of Education. 2010;39: 220-32.
- Ozturk O, Odabasıoglu G, Eraslan D, Genc Y, Kalyoncu O.A. [Internet addiction: clinic and treatment]. J Depend. 2007;8:36-41.
- Ceyhan AA. Predictors of problematic Internet use on Turkish university students. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(3):363-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Young KS. Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction--and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. 1st ed. New York: Wiley; 1998. p.256. [Crossref]
- Trolley B, Shields L, Hanel C. School cyberbullying: description, assessment, and therapeutic intervention. J Technol Couns. 2008;5.
- Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2006;4(2):148-69. [Crossref]
- Belsey B. Cyberbullying: An emerging threat to the "always on" generation; 2006. Retrieved February 19, 2019 from http://www.cyberbullying.ca.
- Arıcak OT, Kınay H, Tanrıkulu T. [The first psychometric findings of the cyber bullying scale]. J Educ Fac. 2012;9:101-14.
- Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch Suicide Res. 2010;14(3):206-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wolak J, Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D. Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41(6 Suppl 1):S51-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sengupta A, Chaudhuri A. Are social networking sites a source of online harassment for teens? Evidence from survey data. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(2):284-90. [Crossref]
- Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Wolak J, Finkelhor D. Examining characteristic and associated distress related to Internet harassment: findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):e1169-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Akbulut Y, Sahin YL, Eristi B. Cyberbullying victimization among Turkis online social utility members. J Educ Techno Soc. 2010;13(4): 192-201.
- Burnukara P, Uçanok Z. [A Descriptive Study on Opportunities of Adolescents' Use of Information and Communication Technologies and Cyberbullying]. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet. 2010;21(2):47-62.
- Ozturk C. [Investigation of Cyber Bullying Tendencies of 8th Grade Students in Terms of Various Variables: The Case of Adapazarı District of Sakarya Province] Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice. 2019;1(1):76-90.
- Topçu C, Erdur-Baker O, Capa-Aydin Y. Examination of cyberbullying experiences among Turkish students from different school types. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):643-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Peker A, Eroglu Y. [Internet addiction as a predictor of cyberbullying and victimization in male students]. Sunbul AM, Sahin I, editörler. 4. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu, Tam Metin Kitabı. Konya: Selcuk Üniversitesi; 2010. p.862-7.
- Li Q. Bullying in the new playground: research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation. Australas J Educ Technol. 2007;23(4):435-54. [Crossref]
- Wright MF, Li Y. Kicking the digital dog: a longitudinal investigation of young adults' victimization and cyber-displaced aggression. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15(9): 448-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hoover JH, Olsen GW. Teasing and Harassment: The Frames and Scripts Approach for Teachers and Parents. 1st ed. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service; 2001. p.124.
- Pellegrini AD, Bartini M. A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. Am Educ Res J. 2000;37(3): 699-725. [Crossref]
- Nabuzoka D. Teacher ratings and peer nominations of bullying and other behaviour of children with and without learning difficulties. Educ Psychol. 2003;23(3):307-21. [Crossref]
- Pellegrini AD, Bartini M, Brooks F. School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. J Educ Psychol. 1999;91(2):216-24. [Crossref]
- Cetin B, Peker A, Eroolu Y. [Internet addiction and life satisfaction as predictors of cyberbullying and victimization in female students]. Keser N, Baytekin B, editörler. 1. Uluslararası Kadın ve Sağlık Kongresi Kongre Kitabı; 2010. p.181-6.
- Cetin B, Peker A, Eroglu Y, Citemel N. [Cognitive distortions about relationships as a predictor of cyberbullying: a preliminary study for adolescents]. Int J Educ Sci. 2011;3:1064-80.
- Akcan G, Ozturk E. The investigation of predictors of cyberbullying and cyber victimization in university students. Forensic Res Criminol Int J. 2017;4:1-4. [Crossref]
- Peker A, Eroglu Y, Ada S. [The investigation of predictors of cyberbullying and cybervictimization in adolescents]. Abant Izzet Baysal Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Derg. 2012;185-206.
- Eroglu Y, Aktepe E, Akbaba S, Isık A, Ozkorumak E. [The investigation of prevalence and risk factors associated with cyber bullying and victimization]. Egitim ve Bilim. 2015;40(177): 93-107. [Crossref]
- Ozturk E, Akcan G. Preventing and coping strategies for cyber bullying and cyber victimization. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Int J Soc Behav Educ Econ Bus Ind Eng. 2016;10:1771-4.
- Mesch GS. Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009;12(4):387-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Baran B, Keskin E, Genc S. [Investigation of pre-service teachers' bullying and bullying on Facebook according to some variables]. J Instr Tech Teach Educ. 2014;3:34-43.
- Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(3):277-87. [Crossref]
- Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Tippett N. An Investigation Into Cyberbullying, its Forms, Awareness and Impact, and the Relationship Between Age and Gender in Cyberbullying. Res Brief No. RBX03-06. London: DIES; 2006. p.3.
- Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J. Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies and bully-victims. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34:63-70. [Crossref]
- Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. J Adolesc. 2004;27(3):319-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Khoury-Kassabri M. The relationship between staff maltreatment of students and bully-victim group membership. Child Abuse Negl. 2009;33(12):914-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Balakrishnan V. Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: the roles of gender, age and Internet frequency. Comput Human Behav. 2015;46:149-57. [Crossref]
- Sargın N. A study on bullying tendencies among preadolescents. J Educ Learn. 2017;6(4):209-16. [Crossref]
- Beran T, Li Q. The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. J Stud Wellbeing. 2007;1(2):15-33. [Crossref]
- Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49(4):376-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kılıcer K, Ozeke V, Coklar AN. [Investigating social media users' cyber behaviors from the perspective of human values]. Dumlupınar Univ J Soc Sci. 2018;56.
- Akbulut Y, Eristi B. Cyberbullying and victimisation among Turkish university students. Australas J Educ Technol. 2011;27(7):1155-70. [Crossref]
- Ngo FT, Paternoster R. Cybercrime victimization: an examination of Individual and situational level factors. Int J Cyber Criminol. 2011;5(1):773-93.
- Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998;1(3):237-44. [Crossref]
- Cassidy W, Jackson M, Brown KN. Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students' experiences with cyber-bullying. Sch Psychol Int. 2009;30:383-402. [Crossref]
- Ayas T, Horzum MB. Exploring the teachers' cyber bullying perception in terms of various variables. Int Online J of Educ Sci. 2011;3(2): 619-40.
- Erdur-Baker O, Yerin-Guneri O, Akbaba-Altun S. [How information and communication technologies affect children and young people]. MEB, 1. Şiddet ve Okul: Okul ve Cevresinde Cocuğa Yonelik Siddet ve Alınabilecek Tedbirler. Uluslarası Katılımlı Sempozyum; 2006. p.28-31.
- Erdur-Baker O, Kavsut F. [Cyber bullying: a new face of peer bullying]. Eurasian J Educ Res (EJER). 2007;27:31-42.
- Slovak K, Singer JB. School social workers' perceptions of cyberbullying. Child Sch. 2011;33:5-16. [Crossref]
- Roland E. Bullying, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts. Educ Res. 2002;44(1):55-67. [Crossref]
- Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Cyber bullying among middle school students. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:22-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Erdur-Baker O. Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender, and frequent and risky usage of Internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Soc. 2010;12:109-25. [Crossref]
- Wright MF, Li Y. The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: the moderating effect of peer rejection. J Youth Adolesc. 2013;42(5):662-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Demir O, Seferoglu SS. [The investigation of the relationship of cyber bullying with cyber loafing, Internet addiction, information literacy and various other variables]. Online J Technol Addict Cyberbullying. 2016;3(1):1-26.
- Genc G, Aksu MB. An investigation of bully victim behaviors of general high school students in terms of some variables. GU Gazi Fac Educ J. 2010;30.
- Loukaitou-Sideris A. Hot spots of bus stop crime: the importance of environmental attributes. J Am Plann Assoc. 1999;65:395-411. [Crossref]
- Campbell MA. Cyberbullying: an old problem in a new guise? Aust J Guid Couns. 2005;15(1):68-76. [Crossref]
- Dehue F, Bolman C, Vollink T. Cyberbullying: youngsters' experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11:217-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Beran T, Li Q. Cyber-harrasment: a new method for a behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2005;32(3):137-53. [Crossref]
.: İşlem Listesi