.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
The Effect of Different Mask Types Used by Dentists on Oxygen Saturation During COVID-19 Pandemic: Clinical Study
COVID-19 Pandemisi Sürecinde Diş Hekimlerinin Kullandıkları Farklı Tip Maskelerin Oksijen Saturasyonuna Etkisi: Klinik Çalışma
Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2022;28(2):299-306
doi: 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-85033
Makale Dili: EN
Tam Metin
Ücretsiz Erişim
ABSTRACT
Objective: Wearing mask is the most effective prevention measure to limit the spread of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID19). Dentistry is one of the professions at risk of contracting COVID-19. The aim of this study was to examine the change in oxygen saturation and pulse rate of dentists who use different types of masks for long hours professionally. Material and Methods: One hundred and sixty eight (100 male, 68 female) volunteer dentists were included in the study. They were divided into 4 groups as those using single surgical mask, double surgical mask, surgical masks+face shield and FFP2+face shield. Oxygen saturations and pulses of the volunteers were measured before starting work and after a half day work (3 hours later) by finger pulse oxymeter and results were statistically evaluated. Results: Sixty seven (%39.9) of the volunteers wore single surgical mask, 38 (%22.6) wore double surgical masks, 35 (%20.8) wore surgical masks+face shields and 28 (16.7%) wore FFP2+face shields. A statistically significant decrease in oxygen saturation was observed after the use of masks in dentists wearing single surgical mask, double surgical mask, and surgical masks+face shield. There was no statistically significant difference in either the pulse rate or oxygen saturation after using the mask in those who used the FFP2+face shield. Conclusion: FFP2 masks did not cause any decrease in users' oxygen saturation. Although surgical masks caused a statistically significant decrease in oxygen saturation, the results did not fall below the physiological limits and were not of clinical significance.
Keywords: COVID-19; dentistry; FFP2 mask
Objective: Wearing mask is the most effective prevention measure to limit the spread of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID19). Dentistry is one of the professions at risk of contracting COVID-19. The aim of this study was to examine the change in oxygen saturation and pulse rate of dentists who use different types of masks for long hours professionally. Material and Methods: One hundred and sixty eight (100 male, 68 female) volunteer dentists were included in the study. They were divided into 4 groups as those using single surgical mask, double surgical mask, surgical masks+face shield and FFP2+face shield. Oxygen saturations and pulses of the volunteers were measured before starting work and after a half day work (3 hours later) by finger pulse oxymeter and results were statistically evaluated. Results: Sixty seven (%39.9) of the volunteers wore single surgical mask, 38 (%22.6) wore double surgical masks, 35 (%20.8) wore surgical masks+face shields and 28 (16.7%) wore FFP2+face shields. A statistically significant decrease in oxygen saturation was observed after the use of masks in dentists wearing single surgical mask, double surgical mask, and surgical masks+face shield. There was no statistically significant difference in either the pulse rate or oxygen saturation after using the mask in those who used the FFP2+face shield. Conclusion: FFP2 masks did not cause any decrease in users' oxygen saturation. Although surgical masks caused a statistically significant decrease in oxygen saturation, the results did not fall below the physiological limits and were not of clinical significance.
Keywords: COVID-19; dentistry; FFP2 mask
ÖZET
Amaç: Maske takmak, koronavirüs hastalığı-2019'un [coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)] yayılmasını azaltmada en etkili önlemdir. Diş hekimliği, COVID-19'a yakalanma riski olan mesleklerden biridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, profesyonel olarak uzun saatler boyunca farklı tipte maske kullanan diş hekimlerinin oksijen saturasyonu ve nabız hızındaki değişimi incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 168 (100 erkek, 68 kadın) diş hekimi dâhil edildi. Çalışmaya katılanlar; tek cerrahi maske, çift cerrahi maske, cerrahi maske+yüz siperi ve FFP2 maske+yüz siperi kullananlar olarak 4 gruba ayrıldılar. Gönüllülerin oksijen saturasyonları ile nabzı işe başlamadan önce ve yarım günlük bir mesaiden sonra (3 saat sonra) puls oksimetreyle ölçülmüş olup, sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Gönüllülerin 67'si (%39,9) tek cerrahi maske, 38'i (%22,6) çift cerrahi maske, 35'i (%20,8) cerrahi maske+yüz siperi ve 28'i (%16,7) FFP2 maske+ yüz siperi takıyordu. Tek cerrahi maske, çift cerrahi maske ve cerrahi maske+yüz siperi takan diş hekimlerinde maske kullanımı sonrası oksijen saturasyonunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir düşüş gözlendi. FFP2+yüz siperi kullananlarda maskeyi kullandıktan sonra nabız hızında ve oksijen saturasyonunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık izlenmedi. Sonuç: FFP2 maske, kullanıcıların oksijen saturasyonunda herhangi bir azalmaya neden olmadı. Cerrahi maskelerin, oksijen saturasyonunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir düşüşe neden olmasına rağmen sonuçlar fizyolojik sınırların altına düşmedi ve klinik olarak anlamlı değildi.
Anahtar Kelimeler: COVID-19; diş hekimliği; FFP2 maske
Amaç: Maske takmak, koronavirüs hastalığı-2019'un [coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)] yayılmasını azaltmada en etkili önlemdir. Diş hekimliği, COVID-19'a yakalanma riski olan mesleklerden biridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, profesyonel olarak uzun saatler boyunca farklı tipte maske kullanan diş hekimlerinin oksijen saturasyonu ve nabız hızındaki değişimi incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 168 (100 erkek, 68 kadın) diş hekimi dâhil edildi. Çalışmaya katılanlar; tek cerrahi maske, çift cerrahi maske, cerrahi maske+yüz siperi ve FFP2 maske+yüz siperi kullananlar olarak 4 gruba ayrıldılar. Gönüllülerin oksijen saturasyonları ile nabzı işe başlamadan önce ve yarım günlük bir mesaiden sonra (3 saat sonra) puls oksimetreyle ölçülmüş olup, sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Gönüllülerin 67'si (%39,9) tek cerrahi maske, 38'i (%22,6) çift cerrahi maske, 35'i (%20,8) cerrahi maske+yüz siperi ve 28'i (%16,7) FFP2 maske+ yüz siperi takıyordu. Tek cerrahi maske, çift cerrahi maske ve cerrahi maske+yüz siperi takan diş hekimlerinde maske kullanımı sonrası oksijen saturasyonunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir düşüş gözlendi. FFP2+yüz siperi kullananlarda maskeyi kullandıktan sonra nabız hızında ve oksijen saturasyonunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık izlenmedi. Sonuç: FFP2 maske, kullanıcıların oksijen saturasyonunda herhangi bir azalmaya neden olmadı. Cerrahi maskelerin, oksijen saturasyonunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir düşüşe neden olmasına rağmen sonuçlar fizyolojik sınırların altına düşmedi ve klinik olarak anlamlı değildi.
Anahtar Kelimeler: COVID-19; diş hekimliği; FFP2 maske
REFERANSLAR:
- Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565-74. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(4):536-44. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O'Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76:71-76. Erratum in: Int J Surg. 2020;77:217. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ather A, Patel B, Ruparel NB, Diogenes A, Hargreaves KM. Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19): Implications for clinical dental care. J Endod. 2020;46(5):584-95. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- World Health Organization [Internet]. Erişim Tarihi: 22 Mart 2021. Available from: [Link]
- Giacomelli A, Pezzati L, Conti F, Bernacchia D, Siano M, Oreni L, et al. Self-reported olfactory and taste disorders in patients with severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 infection: A cross-sectional study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(15):889-90. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al; China medical treatment expert group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708-20. [PubMed] [PMC]
- World Health Organization [Internet]. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Children and masks. Erişim Tarihi: 22 Mart 2021. Available from: [Link]
- World Health Organization [Internet]. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Masks. Erişim Tarihi: 22 Mart 2021 Available from: [Link]
- Al Badri F. Surgical mask contact dermatitis and epidemiology of contact dermatitis in healthcare workers. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;30(3):183-8. [Link]
- Swennen GRJ, Pottel L, Haers PE. Custom-made 3D-printed face masks in case of pandemic crisis situations with a lack of commercially available FFP2/3 masks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(5):673-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Villani FA, Aiuto R, Paglia L, Re D. COVID-19 and dentistry: Prevention in dental practice, a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12):4609. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Li KKW, Joussen AM, Kwan JKC, Steel DHW. FFP3, FFP2, N95, surgical masks and respirators: what should we be wearing for ophthalmic surgery in the COVID-19 pandemic? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020; 258(8):1587-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1564-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lee SA, Hwang DC, Li HY, Tsai CF, Chen CW, Chen JK. Particle size-selective assessment of protection of european standard FFP respirators and surgical masks against particles-tested with human subjects. J Healthc Eng. 2016;2016:8572493. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hirschmann MT, Hart A, Henckel J, Sadoghi P, Seil R, Mouton C. COVID-19 coronavirus: recommended personal protective equipment for the orthopaedic and trauma surgeon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(6): 1690-8. Erratum in: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Santarsiero A, Ciambelli P, Donsì G, Quadrini F, Briancesco R, D'Alessandro D, et al. Face masks. Technical, technological and functional characteristics and hygienic-sanitary aspects related to the use of filtering mask in the community. Ann Ig. 2020;32(5):472-520. [PubMed]
- Regli A, Sommerfield A, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. The role of fit testing N95/FFP2/ FFP3 masks: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(1):91-100. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ruiz-Arranz C, Mencía-Gutiérrez E, Bengoa-González Á, Pérez-Trigo S, Gutiérrez-Díaz E. Orbital-conjunctival-eyelid hemorrhage-hematoma due to Inappropriate use of FFP2/NK95 facial mask in COVID-19. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e11273. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Widmer AF, Richner G. Proposal for a EN 149 acceptable reprocessing method for FFP2 respirators in times of severe shortage. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):88. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Navarro-Trivi-o FJ, Merida-Fernández C, Ródenas-Herranz T, Ruiz-Villaverde R. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by elastic bands from FFP2 mask. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;83(2):168-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ciotti C, Pellissier G, Rabaud C, Lucet JC, Abiteboul D, Bouvet E; GERES. Effectiveness of respirator masks for healthcare workers, in France. Med Mal Infect. 2012;42(6):264-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Teesing GR, van Straten B, de Man P, Horeman-Franse T. Is there an adequate alternative to commercially manufactured face masks? A comparison of various materials and forms. J Hosp Infect. 2020;106(2):246-53. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Leung NHL, Chu DKW, Shiu EYC, Chan KH, McDevitt JJ, Hau BJP, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):676-80. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sommerstein R, Fux CA, Vuichard-Gysin D, Abbas M, Marschall J, Balmelli C, et al; Swissnoso. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by aerosols, the rational use of masks, and protection of healthcare workers from COVID-19. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020; 9(1):100. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bartoszko JJ, Farooqi MAM, Alhazzani W, Loeb M. Medical masks vs N95 respirators for preventing COVID-19 in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020;14(4):365-73. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Samannan R, Holt G, Calderon-Candelario R, Mirsaeidi M, Campos M. Effect of face masks on gas exchange in healthy persons and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(3):541-4. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Fikenzer S, Uhe T, Lavall D, Rudolph U, Falz R, Busse M, et al. Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020; 109(12):1522-30. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hopkins SR, Stickland MK, Schoene RB, Swenson ER, Luks AM. Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity: the numbers do not add up. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109(12):1605-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Biçen Ç, Ertürk E. COVID-19 evaluation of the effects of wearing masks among healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic. Turkish Studies. 2020;15:205-18. [Link]
.: İşlem Listesi