Objective: This descriptive study has been conducted in order to determine the efficiency of coloured communication cards in improving satisfaction of communication for intubated patients. Material and Methods: The sample of the study was consisted of 47 volunteer patients who had undergone open cardiac surgery and intubated. The data were obtained from the patient thought-suggestion form used to determine the subjects of coloured communication cards prepared by making use of actual literature, questionnaire form determining patients' experiences about communication during intubation and communication process determination form. Besides the descriptive statistics, Pearson chi-square and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used regarding appropriateness. Results: The average age of patients was 56±14.6; mostly men, married, primary school graduated. The 82.98% of patients stated that coloured communication cards helped them to communicate with health professionals. It was determined that patients with a past history of intubation and intensive care unit faced more difficulties in communication (p<0.05). Of patients, 87.2% attended the study suggested that health care professionals use coloured communication cards to communicated with intubated patients.Conclusion: It is concluded that using coloured communication cards to communicate with intubated patients is an efficient method.
Keywords: Communication; nonverbal communication; intensive care units; cardiac surgical procedures
Amaç: Entübe hastalarla iletişim sürecinde kullanılmak üzere geliştirilen resimli iletişim kartlarının hastalar ile iletişimi ve iletişime yönelik memnuniyetlerini arttırmada etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla tanımlayıcı olarak yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmanın örneklemini erişkin kalp ve damar cerrahisi yoğun bakım ünitesinde yatan açık kalp cerrahisi gerçekleştirilmiş ve entübe edilmiş olan 47 hasta oluşturmuştur. Çalışmada veriler, litaratürden yararlanılarak hazırlanan resimli iletişim kartlarında yer alacak konuları belirleyici hasta görüş-öneri formu, entübe olduğu süre içinde hastanın iletişimle ilgili deneyimlerini belirlemeye yönelik soru formu ve iletişim sürecini değerlendirme formu kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistiklerin yanı sıra, Pearson ki-kare ve Fisher-Freeman- Halton testleri yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalamaları 56±14,6; çoğunluğu erkek, evli, ilköğretim mezunudur. Hastaların %82,98'i sağlık personelinin entübe hastalarla iletişiminde resimli iletişim kartlarının yardımcı olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Çalışmada yer alan daha önce entübasyon ve yoğun bakım deneyimi olan hastaların sağlık personeli ile iletişimde daha fazla güçlük yaşadıkları belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). Çalışma kapsamında bulunan hastaların %87,2'si sağlık personelinin resimli iletişim kartlarını entübe hastaların iletişiminde kullanmasını önermişlerdir. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak entübe hastalarla iletişimde resimli iletişim kartlarının etkin bir yöntem olduğu belirlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: İletişim; sözsüz iletişim; yoğun bakım üniteleri; kardiyak cerrahi işlemler
- Özcan A. Hemşire-Hasta İlişkisi ve İletişim. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Sistem Ofset; 2006.
- Nazik MH, Bayazıt A. İnsan İlişkileri ve İletişim. 1. Baskı. İstanbul: Ya-Pa; 2005.
- Birol L. Hemşirelik Süreci. 4. Baskı. İzmir: Bozyaka; 2000. p.8-43.
- Happ MB, Garrett K, Thomas DD, Tate J, George E, Houze M, et al. Nurse-patient communication interactions in the intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20(2):e28-40.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Johnson P, St John W, Moyle W. Long-term mechanical ventilation in a critical care unit: existing in an uneveryday world. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(5):551-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wojnicki-Johansson G. Communication between nurse and patient during ventilator treatment: patient reports and RN evaluations. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2001;17(1):29-39.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Otuzoğlu M, Karahan A. Determining the effectiveness of illustrated communication material for communication with intubated patients at an intensive care unit. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20(5):490-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R. Post-intensive care syndrome: an overview. J Transl Int Med. 2017;5(2):90-92.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Pullen RL Jr. Communicating with a patient on mechanical ventilation. Nursing. 2007; 37(4): 22.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tosun N, Yava A, Ünver V, Akbayrak N, Hatipoglu S. Experience of patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation: a phenomenological study. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2009;29(3):648-58.[Link]
- Bayrak Kahraman B, Bostanoğlu H. [Identification of patient communication difficulties for nurses who work in medical intensive care unit]. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2012;15(4):236-43.[Link]
- Patak L, Gawlinski A, Fung NI, Doering L, Berg J, Henneman EA. Communication boards in critical care: patients' views. Appl Nurs Res. 2006;19(4):182-90.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Khalaila R, Zbidat W, Anwar K, Bayya A, Linton DM, Sviri S. Communication difficulties and psychoemotional distress in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20(6):470-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rotondi AJ, Chelluri L, Sirio C, Mendelsohn A, Schulz R, Belle S, et al. Patients' recollections of stressful experiences while receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(4):746-52.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yava A, Koyuncu A. [Our communication experiences with the intubated patients: case reports]. Gülhane J Med 2006;48(3):175-9.[Link]
- Alasad J, Ahmad M. Communication with critically ill patients. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(4):356-62.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Koszalinski RS, McCarthy JM. Patient communication in the intensive care unit: background and future possibilities. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020:102955.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Liu JJ, Chou FH, Yeh SH. Basic needs and their predictors for intubated patients in surgical intensive care units. Heart Lung. 2009;38(3):208-16.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245-51.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ten Hoorn S, Elbers PW, Girbes AR, Tuinman PR. Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):333.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Claesson A, Mattson H, Idvall E. Experiences expressed by artificially ventilated patients. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(1):116-7.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hweidi IM. Jordanian patients' perception of stressors in critical care units: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(2):227-35.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shorofi SA, Jannati Y, Moghaddam HR, Yazdani-Charati J. Psychosocial needs of families of intensive care patients: perceptions of nurses and families. Niger Med J. 2016;57(1):10-8.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Patak L, Gawlinski A, Fung NI, Doering L, Berg J. Patients' reports of health care practitioner interventions that are related to communication during mechanical ventilation. Heart Lung. 2004;33(5):308-20.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Finke EH, Light J, Kitko L. A systematic review of the effectiveness of nurse communication with patients with complex communication needs with a focus on the use of augmentative and alternative communication. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(16):2102-15.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fried-Oaken M, Howard J, Stewart SR. Feedback on AAC intervention from adults who are temporarily unable to speak. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 1991;7(1):43-50.[Crossref]
- Dingley C, Daugherty K, Derieg MK, et al. Improving Patient Safety Through Provider Communication Strategy Enhancements. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug. Available from:[Link]
- Lieu CC, Sadler GR, Fullerton JT, Stohlmann PD. Communication strategies for nurses interacting with deaf patients. Medsurg Nurs. 2007;16(4):239-45.[PubMed]
- Soroush A, Heydarpour B, Komasi S, Saeidi M, Ezzati P. Barriers for the referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: a predictive model including actual and perceived risk factors and perceived control. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018;21(3):249-54.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Samuelson KA, Lundberg D, Fridlund B. Stressful experiences in relation to depth of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients. Nurs Crit Care. 2007;12(2):93-104.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lee MA, Yom YH. A comparative study of patients' and nurses' perceptions of the quality of nursing services, satisfaction and intent to revisit the hospital: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(4):545-55.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- McCabe C. Nurse-patient communication: an exploration of patients' experiences. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(1):41-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jaffray MA, Osman L, Mackenzie JF, Stearn R. Asthma leaflets for patients: what do asthma nurses use? Patient Educ Couns. 2001;42(2):193-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi