.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Retrograd İntrarenal Cerrahide Üreteral Erişim Kılıfı Kullanımının Postoperatif Sonuçlara Etkisi: Retrospektif Kohort Çalışması
Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Postoperative Outcomes in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Retrospective Cohort Study
J Reconstr Urol. 2023;13(3):102-8
doi: 10.5336/urology.2023-99131
Makale Dili: TR
Tam Metin
Ücretsiz Erişim
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, fleksibl üreterorenoskopi (f-URS) sırasında yaygın olarak kullanılan üreteral erişim kılıfının (ÜEK) postoperatif enfektif komplikasyonlar ve böbrek fonksiyonları üzerine etkilerini araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Retrospektif yöntem ile Ocak 2021-Temmuz 2023 tarihleri arasında böbrek ya da proksimal üreter taşı nedeniyle f-URS yapılmış olan hastaların verileri tarandı. Hastaların ameliyat süreleri ve erişim kılıfı kullanım durumları, preoperatif görüntüleri ve postoperatif ateş, sepsis, üriner sistem enfeksiyonu (ÜSE) durumları ve periferik kandan ve idrar tetkikinden bakılan inflamasyon belirteçleri kaydedildi. Hastaların kreatinin ve glomerüler filtrasyon hız (GFH) değişimleri ile taburcu olduktan sonra ilk 2 haftadaki acil servis başvuruları kaydedildi. Hastalar ÜEK kullanılmayanlar ve kullanılanlar olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Gruplar arasında kaydedilen veriler karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplamda 124 hasta dâhil edildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 48,15±17,06 yıl idi. Hastalar ÜEK kullanılmayan (Grup 1, n=70) ve kullanılan (Grup 2, n=54) olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Her iki grup arasında cinsiyet, taş tarafı, double J stent (DJS) takılması, postoperatif sepsis, postoperatif ÜSE, postoperatif lökosit esteraz pozitifliği, postoperatif hematüri ve postoperatif acil servise başvuru açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık izlenmedi. Postoperatif ateş, idrar tetkikinde nitrit pozitifliği, beyaz kan hücresi ve Creaktif protein erişim kılıfı kullanılmayan hasta grubunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı yüksek bulundu. Her iki grup arasında ortalama yaş, ameliyat süresi, postoperatif DJS çekim günü, kreatinin ve GFH değişimleri açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık izlenmedi. Sonuç: Böbrek taşı hastalarında erişim kılıfı kullanmanın böbrek fonksiyonları üzerinde koruyucu etkisi gözlenmemekle birlikte, postoperatif enfektif komplikasyonları bir miktar azaltabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Ateş; üreteroskopi; üreteroskopik cerrahi; üreteral erişim kılıfı; sepsis
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, fleksibl üreterorenoskopi (f-URS) sırasında yaygın olarak kullanılan üreteral erişim kılıfının (ÜEK) postoperatif enfektif komplikasyonlar ve böbrek fonksiyonları üzerine etkilerini araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Retrospektif yöntem ile Ocak 2021-Temmuz 2023 tarihleri arasında böbrek ya da proksimal üreter taşı nedeniyle f-URS yapılmış olan hastaların verileri tarandı. Hastaların ameliyat süreleri ve erişim kılıfı kullanım durumları, preoperatif görüntüleri ve postoperatif ateş, sepsis, üriner sistem enfeksiyonu (ÜSE) durumları ve periferik kandan ve idrar tetkikinden bakılan inflamasyon belirteçleri kaydedildi. Hastaların kreatinin ve glomerüler filtrasyon hız (GFH) değişimleri ile taburcu olduktan sonra ilk 2 haftadaki acil servis başvuruları kaydedildi. Hastalar ÜEK kullanılmayanlar ve kullanılanlar olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Gruplar arasında kaydedilen veriler karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplamda 124 hasta dâhil edildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 48,15±17,06 yıl idi. Hastalar ÜEK kullanılmayan (Grup 1, n=70) ve kullanılan (Grup 2, n=54) olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Her iki grup arasında cinsiyet, taş tarafı, double J stent (DJS) takılması, postoperatif sepsis, postoperatif ÜSE, postoperatif lökosit esteraz pozitifliği, postoperatif hematüri ve postoperatif acil servise başvuru açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık izlenmedi. Postoperatif ateş, idrar tetkikinde nitrit pozitifliği, beyaz kan hücresi ve Creaktif protein erişim kılıfı kullanılmayan hasta grubunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı yüksek bulundu. Her iki grup arasında ortalama yaş, ameliyat süresi, postoperatif DJS çekim günü, kreatinin ve GFH değişimleri açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık izlenmedi. Sonuç: Böbrek taşı hastalarında erişim kılıfı kullanmanın böbrek fonksiyonları üzerinde koruyucu etkisi gözlenmemekle birlikte, postoperatif enfektif komplikasyonları bir miktar azaltabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Ateş; üreteroskopi; üreteroskopik cerrahi; üreteral erişim kılıfı; sepsis
ABSTRACT
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effects of the ureteral access sheath (UEC), which is commonly used during flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS), on postoperative infective complications and renal functions. Material and Methods: The data of patients who underwent f-URS for kidney or proximal ureteral stones between January 2021 and July 2023 were reviewed using the retrospective method. The duration of surgery and access sheath usage status, preoperative images and postoperative fever, sepsis, urinary tract infection (UTI) status, and inflammation markers from peripheral blood and urinalysis were recorded. The creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) changes of the patients and their admissions to the emergency department in the first 2 weeks after discharge were recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as those who did not use UEC and those who were used. Data recorded between groups were compared. Results: A total of 124 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 48.15±17.06 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups as non-UEC (Group 1, n=70) and used (Group 2, n=54). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of gender, stone side, double J stent (DJS) insertion, postoperative sepsis, postoperative UTI, postoperative leukocyte esterase positivity, postoperative hematuria, and postoperative emergency department admission. Postoperative fever, nitrite positivity in urinalysis, white blood cell and C-reactive protein access sheath were found to be statistically significantly higher in the patient group. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of mean age, duration of surgery, postoperative DJS shooting day, creatinine and GFR changes. Conclusion: Although there is no protective effect of using an access sheath on kidney functions in kidney stone patients, it may slightly reduce postoperative infective complications.
Keywords: Fever; ureteroscopy; ureteroscopic surgery; ureteral access sheath; sepsis
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effects of the ureteral access sheath (UEC), which is commonly used during flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS), on postoperative infective complications and renal functions. Material and Methods: The data of patients who underwent f-URS for kidney or proximal ureteral stones between January 2021 and July 2023 were reviewed using the retrospective method. The duration of surgery and access sheath usage status, preoperative images and postoperative fever, sepsis, urinary tract infection (UTI) status, and inflammation markers from peripheral blood and urinalysis were recorded. The creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) changes of the patients and their admissions to the emergency department in the first 2 weeks after discharge were recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as those who did not use UEC and those who were used. Data recorded between groups were compared. Results: A total of 124 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 48.15±17.06 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups as non-UEC (Group 1, n=70) and used (Group 2, n=54). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of gender, stone side, double J stent (DJS) insertion, postoperative sepsis, postoperative UTI, postoperative leukocyte esterase positivity, postoperative hematuria, and postoperative emergency department admission. Postoperative fever, nitrite positivity in urinalysis, white blood cell and C-reactive protein access sheath were found to be statistically significantly higher in the patient group. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of mean age, duration of surgery, postoperative DJS shooting day, creatinine and GFR changes. Conclusion: Although there is no protective effect of using an access sheath on kidney functions in kidney stone patients, it may slightly reduce postoperative infective complications.
Keywords: Fever; ureteroscopy; ureteroscopic surgery; ureteral access sheath; sepsis
REFERANSLAR:
- Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, Lombardo R, Yuan C, Thomas K, et al. Best practice in interventional management of urolithiasis: an update from the european association of urology guidelines panel for urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9(1):199-208. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Breda A, Territo A, López-Martínez JM. Benefits and risks of ureteral access sheaths for retrograde renal access. Curr Opin Urol. 2016;26(1):70-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Huang J, Zhao Z, AlSmadi JK, Liang X, Zhong F, Zeng T, et al. Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193600. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ao P, Shu L, Zhuo D, Zhang ZX, Dong CB, Huang HB, et al. [Risk factors associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ueteroscopic lithotripsy based on enhanced recovery after surgery]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;99(10):758-63. Chinese. [PubMed]
- Mi Q, Meng X, Meng L, Chen D, Fang S. Risk factors for systemic inflammatory response syndrome induced by flexible ureteroscope combined with holmium laser lithotripsy. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6842479. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Zhong W, Leto G, Wang L, Zeng G. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors. J Endourol. 2015;29(1):25-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Villa L, Dioni P, Candela L, Ventimiglia E, De Angelis M, Corsini C, et al. Understanding the role of ureteral access sheath in preventing post-operative infectious complications in stone patients treated with ureteroscopy and ho:yag laser lithotripsy: results from a tertiary care referral center. J Clin Med. 2023;12(4):1457. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yitgin Y, Yitgin E, Verep S, Gasimov K, Tefik T, Karakose A. Is access sheath essential for safety and effective retrograde intrarenal stone surgery? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31(10):1202-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sari S, Cakici MC, Aykac A, Baran O, Selmi V, Karakoyunlu AN. Outcomes with ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a retrospective comparative analysis. Ann Saudi Med. 2020;40(5):382-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bozzini G, Bevilacqua L, Besana U, Calori A, Pastore A, Romero Otero J, et al. Ureteral access sheath-related injuries vs. post-operative infections. Is sheath insertion always needed? A prospective randomized study to understand the lights and shadows of this practice. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021;45(9):576-81. English, Spanish. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Damar E, Senocak C, Ozbek R, Haberal HB, Sadioglu FE, Yordam M, et al. Does ureteral access sheath affect the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(5):777-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Özkaya F, Sertkaya Z, Karabulut İ, Aksoy Y. The effect of using ureteral access sheath for treatment of impacted ureteral stones at mid-upper part with flexible ureterorenoscopy: a randomized prospective study. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019;71(4):413-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rapoport D, Perks AE, Teichman JM. Ureteral access sheath use and stenting in ureteroscopy: effect on unplanned emergency room visits and cost. J Endourol. 2007;21(9):993-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Meier K, Hiller S, Dauw C, Hollingsworth J, Kim T, Qi J, et al. Understanding ureteral access sheath use within a statewide collaborative and its effect on surgical and clinical outcomes. J Endourol. 2021;35(9):1340-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang HH, Huang L, Routh JC, Kokorowski P, Cilento BG Jr, Nelson CP. Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy in children. J Urol. 2011;186(4 Suppl):1728-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- De Coninck V, Somani B, Sener ET, Emiliani E, Corrales M, Juliebø-Jones P, et al. Ureteral access sheaths and its use in the future: a comprehensive update based on a literature review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(17):5128. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Mahmood SN, Babarasul MH, Fakhralddin SS, Tawfeeq HM. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney: Does access sheath matter? Afr J Urol. 2021;27:1-6. [Crossref]
- Loftus C, Byrne M, Monga M. High pressure endoscopic irrigation: impact on renal histology. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47(2):350-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ecer G, Sönmez MG, Aydın A, Topçu C, Alalam HNI, Güven S, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery with and without a ureteral access sheath using kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) levels: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(5):625-33. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: İşlem Listesi