.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Ketofol Provides Better Upper Airway Size than Ketamine and Propofol in Pediatric Population Receiving Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ketofol Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme İçin Sedasyon Alan Pediatrik Hastalarda Ketamin ve Porofole Göre Daha Geniş Havayolu Açıklığı Sağlar
Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr. 2020;29(2):57-64
doi: 10.5336/pediatr.2019-71846
Makale Dili: EN
Tam Metin
Ücretsiz Erişim
ABSTRACT
Objective: The present study aimed to compare the upper airway dimensions as well as hemodynamic and anesthetic features of propofol, ketamine, and ketofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out on data derived from a total of 89 patients aged between 1-160 months who were allocated in 3 groups concerning the anesthetic agents administered during sedation for MRI. Group I received ketamine and propofol (ketofol), whereas Group II had propofol and, and Group III received ketamine in this procedure. Results: The cross-sectional area of the upper airway at the levels of the base of tongue, soft palate and epiglottis were higher in patients receiving ketofol, compared to those receiving propofol or ketamin (p<0.05). The duration of the recovery and total duration of the procedure were also significantly lower in patients receiving ketofol compared to others (p< 0.001). Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures were significantly lower in children receiving propofol compared to those receiving ketamine or ketofol. Conclusion: Ketofol, which is the combination of ketamine and propofol, provides an effective and safe anesthetic regimen for magnetic resonance imaging in the pediatric population. Our results show that ketofol-based sedation also provides a larger upper airway size without the development of any hemodynamic derangement.
Keywords: Child; upper airway; sedation; ketofol; magnetic resonance imaging
Objective: The present study aimed to compare the upper airway dimensions as well as hemodynamic and anesthetic features of propofol, ketamine, and ketofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out on data derived from a total of 89 patients aged between 1-160 months who were allocated in 3 groups concerning the anesthetic agents administered during sedation for MRI. Group I received ketamine and propofol (ketofol), whereas Group II had propofol and, and Group III received ketamine in this procedure. Results: The cross-sectional area of the upper airway at the levels of the base of tongue, soft palate and epiglottis were higher in patients receiving ketofol, compared to those receiving propofol or ketamin (p<0.05). The duration of the recovery and total duration of the procedure were also significantly lower in patients receiving ketofol compared to others (p< 0.001). Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures were significantly lower in children receiving propofol compared to those receiving ketamine or ketofol. Conclusion: Ketofol, which is the combination of ketamine and propofol, provides an effective and safe anesthetic regimen for magnetic resonance imaging in the pediatric population. Our results show that ketofol-based sedation also provides a larger upper airway size without the development of any hemodynamic derangement.
Keywords: Child; upper airway; sedation; ketofol; magnetic resonance imaging
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışma, manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) için sedasyon alan pediatrik hastalarda propofol, ketamin ve ketofolün hava yolu açıklığı, hemodinamik ve anestetik sonuçlar üzerine etiklerini karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma MRG için 3 ayrı anestetik ajan ile sedasyon uygulanan, 1-160 ay arasında 89 hastanın verileri kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Grup 1 ketamin ve propofol kombinasyonu olan ketofol, Grup 2 propofol, Grup 3 ise ketamin ile sedatize edilmiş hastalardan oluşmaktadır. Bulgular: Ketofol alan hastalarda propofol veya ketamin alanlara göre üst solunum yolu kesitsel alanı dil kökü, yumuşak damak ve epiglottis seviyelerinin tamamında daha genişti (p < 0,05). Derlenme süresi ve toplam prosedür süresi de ketofol grubunda diğer gruplara göre anlamlı olarak kısaydı (p< 0,001). Propofol uygulanan hastalarda işlem boyunca sistolik, diyastolik ve ortalama arter basınçları ketamin ve ketofol gruplarına göre önemli derecede düşüktü. Sonuç: Ketamin ve propofolün kombinasyonu olan ketofol MRG için sedasyon alan pediatrik hastalarda etkin ve güvenli sedasyon sağlar. Çalışmamızın sonuçları ketofol ile sedasyonun hemodinamik bozulmaya neden olmadan daha geniş hava yolu açıklığı sağladığını göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Çocuk; üst solunum yolu; sedasyon; ketofol; manyetik rezonans görüntüleme
Amaç: Bu çalışma, manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) için sedasyon alan pediatrik hastalarda propofol, ketamin ve ketofolün hava yolu açıklığı, hemodinamik ve anestetik sonuçlar üzerine etiklerini karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma MRG için 3 ayrı anestetik ajan ile sedasyon uygulanan, 1-160 ay arasında 89 hastanın verileri kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Grup 1 ketamin ve propofol kombinasyonu olan ketofol, Grup 2 propofol, Grup 3 ise ketamin ile sedatize edilmiş hastalardan oluşmaktadır. Bulgular: Ketofol alan hastalarda propofol veya ketamin alanlara göre üst solunum yolu kesitsel alanı dil kökü, yumuşak damak ve epiglottis seviyelerinin tamamında daha genişti (p < 0,05). Derlenme süresi ve toplam prosedür süresi de ketofol grubunda diğer gruplara göre anlamlı olarak kısaydı (p< 0,001). Propofol uygulanan hastalarda işlem boyunca sistolik, diyastolik ve ortalama arter basınçları ketamin ve ketofol gruplarına göre önemli derecede düşüktü. Sonuç: Ketamin ve propofolün kombinasyonu olan ketofol MRG için sedasyon alan pediatrik hastalarda etkin ve güvenli sedasyon sağlar. Çalışmamızın sonuçları ketofol ile sedasyonun hemodinamik bozulmaya neden olmadan daha geniş hava yolu açıklığı sağladığını göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Çocuk; üst solunum yolu; sedasyon; ketofol; manyetik rezonans görüntüleme
REFERANSLAR:
- Heard C, Harutunians M, Houck J, Joshi P, Johnson K, Lerman J. Propofol anesthesia for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and a laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(1):157-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schulte-Uentrop L, Goepfert MS. Anaesthesia or sedation for MRI in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23(4):513-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bosemani T, Hemani M, Cruz A, Shah M, Kim B, Gu B, et al. Assessment of upper airway patency in spontaneously breathing non-intubated neonates and infants undergoing conventional MRI of head and neck. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015;31(9):1521-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Heng Vong C, Bajard A, Thiesse P, Bouffet E, Seban H, Marec Bérard P. Deep sedation in pediatric imaging: efficacy and safety of intravenous chlorpromazine. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42(5):552-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Coulter FL, Hannam JA, Anderson BJ. Ketofol dosing simulations for procedural sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014;30(9):621-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tosun Z, Aksu R, Guler G, Esmaoglu A, Akin A, Aslan D, et al. Propofol-ketamine vs propofol-fentanyl for sedation during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17(10):983-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Vallejo MC, Romeo RC, Davis DJ, Ramanathan S. Propofol-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl for outpatient laparoscopy: comparison of postoperative nausea, emesis, analgesia, and recovery. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14(6):426-31. [Crossref]
- Yalcin S, Aydoğan H, Selek S, Kucuk A, Yuce HH, Karababa F, et al. Ketofol in electroconvulsive therapy anesthesia: two stones for one bird. J Anesth. 2012;26(4):562-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stevic M, Ristic N, Budic I, Ladjevic N, Trifunovic B, Rakic I, et al. Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32(7):1525-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mittal N, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A, Jain K. A double blind randomized trial of ketofol versus propofol for endodontic treatment of anxious pediatric patients. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013;37(4):415-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Habre W, Matsumoto I, Sly PD. Propofol or halothane anaesthesia for children with asthma: effects on respiratory mechanics. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77(6):739-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Isaiah A, Kiss E, Olomu P, Koral K, Mitchell RB. Characterization of upper airway obstruction using cine MRI in children with residual obstructive sleep apnea after adenotonsillectomy. Sleep Med. 2018;50:79-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kulling D, Rothenbuhler R, Inauen W. Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy. 2003;35(8):679-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mahmoud M, Radhakrishman R, Gunter J, Sadhasivam S, Schapiro A, McAuliffe J, et al. Effect of increasing depth of dexmedetomidine anesthesia on upper airway morphology in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(6):506-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jager MD, Aldag JC, Deshpande GG. A presedation fluid bolus does not decrease the incidence of propofol-induced hypotension in pediatric patients. Hosp Pediatr. 2015;5(2):85-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jalili M, Bahreini M, Doosti-Irani A, Masoomi R, Arbab M, Mirfazaelian H. Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) vs propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(3):558-69. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wu J. Deep sedation with intravenous infusion of combined propofol and ketamine during dressing changes and whirlpool bath in patients with severe epidermolysis bullosa. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17(6):592-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kogan A, Efrat R, Katz J, Vidne BA. Propofol-ketamine mixture for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(6):691-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Akin A, Esmaoglu A, Tosun Z, Gulcu N, Aydogan H, Boyaci A. Comparison of propofol with propofol-ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing auditory brainstem response testing. I Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(11):1541-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kip G, Atabek D, Bani M. Comparison of three different ketofol proportions in children undergoing dental treatment. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(11):1501-7.
.: İşlem Listesi