Amaç: Travmaya bağlı kanaliküler kesi nedeniyle başvuran olgularda, demografik özellikler ve uygulanan cerrahi girişim yöntemlerini incelemek, anatomik ve fonksiyonel başarı sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Nisan 2015- Kasım 2018 tarihleri arasında, kanalikül kesisi nedeniyle perikanaliküler nonmukozal anastomoz ve silikon tüp implantasyonu yapılan 69 olgunun 69 gözü demografik bulguları, travma sebebi ve oluş şekli, travma ile cerrahi arasında geçen süre, takip süresi ve komplikasyonlar yönünden retrospektif olarak incelendi. Silikon tüp alındıktan sonraki 3. ayda yapılan kanaliküler irrigasyonla sert sonlanma alınması ve lakrimal sistem açıklığının sıvının geçişi ile saptanması anatomik başarı kabul edilirken, epiforanın Munk epifora sınıflamasına göre evre 0 veya 1 olması fonksiyonel başarı olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Altmışı erkek (%87) ve 9'u kadın (%13) 69 olgunun ortalama yaşı 26,2±19 (1-73 yaş) idi. Ameliyat sonrası ortalama takip süresi 9,31±1,02 ay idi. Munk epifora sınıflamasına göre fonksiyonel başarı %89,9 olarak saptandı. Altmış altı olguda lakrimal lavaj ile sert sonlanma alınarak anatomik başarı %95,7 olarak saptandı. Kanalikül tamiri sonrasında anatomik ve fonksiyonel başarıyı etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek için yapılan multivariable logistik regresyon analizinde yaş, cinsiyet, travma etiyolojisi, etkilenen kanalikül, kesinin yeri, cerrahiye kadar geçen süre, takılan tüp çeşidi ve tüpün kalma süresi değerlendirildiğinde herhangi bir değişkenin başarı üzerine etkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmadı (p>0,05). Sonuç: Yaş grubunun genç popülasyon olduğu ve ilerleyen dönemde sağlam kanalikülde de hasar gelişme ihtimali düşünülürse tüm kanalikül kesilerini şartların uygun olduğu en kısa zamanda tüp yerleştirilerek anatomisine uygun onarmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Kanalikül kesisi; kanalikül kesi tamiri
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the demographic characteristics and surgical intervention methods in patients presenting with traumatic canalicular incision and to evaluate the anatomical and functional results. Material and Methods: The demographic findings, cause of trauma and mode of occurrence, time between trauma and surgery, the follow-up period and complications were evaluated retrospectively in 69 eyes of 69 patients who underwent pericanalicular non-mucosal anastomosis and silicone tube implantation due to canalicular incision between April 2015 and November 2018. In the third month after silicone tube removal, it was accepted as anatomical success to determine the lacrimal system patency with hard stop and the passage of the fluid and as functional success to achieve a grade 0 or 1 according to Munk epifora classification. Results: Sixty men (87%) and 9 women (13%) had a mean age of 26.2±19 (1-73 years). The mean postoperative follow-up was 9.31±1.02 months. According to Munk epifora classification functional success was 89.9%. The anatomic success rate was determined as 95.7% in 66 cases with lacrimal lavage. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis performed to determine the factors affecting anatomical and functional success after canaliculus repair, when the age, gender, trauma etiology, damaged canaliculus type, localization of laceration, time to surgery, the type of tube inserted and the duration of the tube was evaluated, no variable was found to be statistically significant. Conclusion: Given that the age group is a young population and the possibility of damage to the intact canaliculus in the future, all canalicular incisions should be repaired by placing a tube in accordance with its anatomy as soon as the conditions are suitable.
Keywords: Canalicular laceration; canalicular laceration repair
- Herzum H, Holle P, Hintschich C. Lidverletzungen. Epidemiologische aspekte [Eyelid injuries: epidemiological aspects]. Ophthalmologe. 2001;98(11):1079-82. German. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fayet B, Bernard JA, Ammar J, Karpouzas Y, Hamici S, Hamache F, et al. Contribution à l'étude des plaies récentes des voies lacrymales. A propos de 262 cas traités en urgence [Recent wounds of the lacrimal duct. Apropos of 262 cases treated as emergencies]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988;11(10):627-37. French. [PubMed]
- Kennedy RH, May J, Dailey J, Flanagan JC. Canalicular laceration. An 11-year epidemiologic and clinical study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;6(1):46-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kuru Ö, Ocak SY, Yıldırım MA, Erden B, Aslankurt M, Elçioğlu MN. Travma sonrası gelişen kanalikül kesilerinin klinik özellikleri ve monoka tüp entübasyonu ile onarımın etkinliği [Clinical features of patients with post-traumatic canalicular laceration and the effectiveness of surgical repair with monoka tube intubation].Turk J Ophthalmol. 2015;45:14-17. [Crossref]
- Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):375-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kersten RC, Kulwin DR. "One-stitch" canalicular repair. A simplified approach for repair of canalicular laceration. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(5):785-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Munk PL, Lin DT, Morris DC. Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology. 1990;177(3):687-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wulc AE, Arterberry JF. The pathogenesis of canalicular laceration. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(8):1243-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Murchison AP, Bilyk JR. Canalicular laceration repair: an analysis of variables affecting success. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30(5):410-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Anastas CN, Potts MJ, Raiter J. Mini Monoka silicone monocanalicular lacrimal stents: Subjective and objective outcomes. Orbit. 2001;20(3):189-200. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lee H, Chi M, Park M, Baek S. Effectiveness of canalicular laceration repair using monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(7):793-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Leibovitch I, Kakizaki H, Prabhakaran V, Selva D. Canalicular lacerations: repair with the Mini-Monoka® monocanalicular intubation stent. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(4):472-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ortiz MA, Kraushar MF. Lacrimal drainage following repair of inferior canaliculus. Ann Ophthalmol. 1975;7(5):739-41. [PubMed]
- Smit TJ, Mourits MP. Monocanalicular lesions: to reconstruct or not. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(7):1310-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Eo S, Park J, Cho S, Azari KK. Microsurgical reconstruction for canalicular laceration using Monostent and Mini-Monoka. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(4):421-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wu SY, Ma L, Chen RJ, Tsai YJ, Chu YC. Analysis of bicanalicular nasal intubation in the repair of canalicular lacerations. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54(1):24-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chu YC, Wu SY, Tsai YJ, Liao YL, Chu HY. Early versus late canalicular laceration repair outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;182:155-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bai F, Tao H, Zhang Y, Wang P, Han C, Huang YF, et al. Old canalicular laceration repair: a retrospective study of the curative effects and prognostic factors. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(6):902-7. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Jordan DR. Monocanalicular lacerations: to reconstruct or not? Can J Ophthalmol. 2002;37(4):245-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jordan DR, Ziai S, Gilberg SM, Mawn LA. Pathogenesis of canalicular lacerations. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(5):394-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- von Denffer H, Dressler J, Pabst HW. Lacrimal dacryoscintigraphy. Semin Nucl Med. 1984;14(1):8-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Murgatroyd H, Craig JP, Sloan B. Determination of relative contribution of the superior and inferior canaliculi to the lacrimal drainage system in health using the drop test. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32(4):404-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Saunders DH, Shannon GM, Flanagan JC. The effectiveness of the pigtail probe method of repairing canalicular lacerations. Ophthalmic Surg. 1978;9(3):33-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Daubert J, Nik N, Chandeyssoun PA, el-Choufi L. Tear flow analysis through the upper and lower systems. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;6(3):193-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Reed S, Lissner G. Clinical study on the effectiveness of tear drainage with a single canalicular system under environmental stress. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9(1):27-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hawes MJ, Dortzbach RK. Trauma of the lacrimal drainage system. In: Linberg JV, ed. Lacrimal Surgery. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. p.241-62.
- Riu R, Reboul. Plaies des paupières avec section des canalicules lacrymaux [Eyelid injuries with section of the lacrimal ducts]. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1964;64(12):1107-8. French. [PubMed]
- Hanselmayer H. Prognosis of injured canaliculi in relation to elapsed time until primary operation. Ophthalmologica. 1973;166(3):175-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dortzbach RK, Angrist RA. Silicone intubation for lacerated lacrimal canaliculi. Ophthalmic Surg. 1985;16(10):639-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim T, Yeo CH, Chung KJ, Lee JH, Kim YH. Repair of lower canalicular laceration using the mini-monoka stent: Primary and revisional repairs. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(4):949-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alam MS, Mehta NS, Mukherjee B. Anatomical and functional outcomes of canalicular laceration repair with self retaining mini-MONOKA stent. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2017;31(3):135-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Wladis EJ, Aakalu VK, Tao JP, Sobel RK, Freitag SK, Foster JA, et al. Monocanalicular stents in eyelid lacerations: A report by the american academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(9):1324-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Della Rocca DA, Ahmad SM, Della Rocca RC. Direct repair of canalicular lacerations. Facial Plast Surg. 2007;23(3):149-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chu YC, Ma L, Wu SY, Tsai YJ. Comparing pericanalicular sutures with direct canalicular wall sutures for canalicular laceration. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27(6):422-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Conlon MR, Smith KD, Cadera W, Shum D, Allen LH. An animal model studying reconstruction techniques and histopathological changes in repair of canalicular lacerations. Can J Ophthalmol. 1994;29(1):3-8. [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi