.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
İneklerde Belirli Günlük Aktivitelerde Kulak Pozisyonlarının Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Pilot Bir Çalışma
A Pilot Study on Evaluation The Far Position of Some Daily Activity of Cows
Turkiye Klinikleri J Vet Sci. 2019;10(2):37-44
doi: 10.5336/vetsci.2019-71387
Makale Dili: TR
Tam Metin
ÖZET
Bu çalışmada, her bir ineğin pratik bir refah değerlendirmesinde farklı rutin aktiviteler esnasında kulak pozisyonlarındaki değişimlerin ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın materyalini, Aydın ili Bozdoğan ilçesinde bir süt sığırcılığı işletmesinde yetiştirilen 2 yaşlı 30 baş Siyah Alaca inek oluşturmuştur. Yem yeme esnasında %35 oranında eksen boyunca, %23 ileri, %17 geri yukarı, %4 geri aşağı, %13 asimetrik sol ve %8 asimetrik sağ şeklinde kulak pozisyonları gözlenmiştir. Fırçalanma sırasında ise söz konusu oranlar esnasında %32 eksen boyunca, %29 ileri, %15 geri yukarı, %7 geri aşağı, %10 asimetrik sol ve %7 asimetrik sağ kulak pozisyonu şeklinde tespit edilmiştir. Kulak pozisyonları üzerine gözlem günü (p<0,001) haricinde diğer faktör etkileri ve etkileşimleri istatistiksel olarak önemsiz bulunmuştur (p>0,05). Sonuç olarak, belirli günlük aktivitelerde ineklerin kulak pozisyonlarına bakılarak nötr, pozitif ya da negatif duygusal durum içinde olup olmadığı tahmin edilebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: İnek; kulak pozisyonu; hayvan refahı
Bu çalışmada, her bir ineğin pratik bir refah değerlendirmesinde farklı rutin aktiviteler esnasında kulak pozisyonlarındaki değişimlerin ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın materyalini, Aydın ili Bozdoğan ilçesinde bir süt sığırcılığı işletmesinde yetiştirilen 2 yaşlı 30 baş Siyah Alaca inek oluşturmuştur. Yem yeme esnasında %35 oranında eksen boyunca, %23 ileri, %17 geri yukarı, %4 geri aşağı, %13 asimetrik sol ve %8 asimetrik sağ şeklinde kulak pozisyonları gözlenmiştir. Fırçalanma sırasında ise söz konusu oranlar esnasında %32 eksen boyunca, %29 ileri, %15 geri yukarı, %7 geri aşağı, %10 asimetrik sol ve %7 asimetrik sağ kulak pozisyonu şeklinde tespit edilmiştir. Kulak pozisyonları üzerine gözlem günü (p<0,001) haricinde diğer faktör etkileri ve etkileşimleri istatistiksel olarak önemsiz bulunmuştur (p>0,05). Sonuç olarak, belirli günlük aktivitelerde ineklerin kulak pozisyonlarına bakılarak nötr, pozitif ya da negatif duygusal durum içinde olup olmadığı tahmin edilebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: İnek; kulak pozisyonu; hayvan refahı
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to determine the changes in ear positions during different routine activities in a practical welfare assessment of each cow. The material of this study involved by 30 head Holstein cows, aged 2 year, was raised at a dairy farm in Bozdogan county in Aydin. During the feeding, 35% axial, 23% forward, 17% backward up, 4% backward down, 13% asymmetric left and 8% asymmetric right ear positions were observed. During the brushing, 32% axial, 29% forward, 15% backward up, 7% backward down, 10% asymmetric left and 7% asymmetric right ear positions were observed. The effects of other factors were not found significant (p>0.05), apart from period of the day (p<0.001). As a result, it can be estimated whether the cows are in a neutral, positive or negative emotional state by looking at the ear positions in certain daily activities.
Keywords: Cow; ear posture; animal welfare
The aim of this study was to determine the changes in ear positions during different routine activities in a practical welfare assessment of each cow. The material of this study involved by 30 head Holstein cows, aged 2 year, was raised at a dairy farm in Bozdogan county in Aydin. During the feeding, 35% axial, 23% forward, 17% backward up, 4% backward down, 13% asymmetric left and 8% asymmetric right ear positions were observed. During the brushing, 32% axial, 29% forward, 15% backward up, 7% backward down, 10% asymmetric left and 7% asymmetric right ear positions were observed. The effects of other factors were not found significant (p>0.05), apart from period of the day (p<0.001). As a result, it can be estimated whether the cows are in a neutral, positive or negative emotional state by looking at the ear positions in certain daily activities.
Keywords: Cow; ear posture; animal welfare
REFERANSLAR:
- Veissier I, Boissy A. Stress and welfare: two complementary concepts that are intrinsically related to the animal's point of view. Physiol Behav. 2007;92(3):429-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Selye H. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature. 1936;138(3479):32. [Crossref]
- Carpenter E. A report of the working party convened. Animals and Ethics. 1st ed. London (UK): Watkins & Duverton; 1980. p.48.
- Broom DM. A usable definition of animal welfare. J Agr Environ Ethic. 1993;6(2):15-25.
- Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, et al. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav. 2007;92(3):375-97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mellor DJ. Animal emotions, behaviour and the promotion of positive welfare states. N Z Vet J. 2012;60(1):1-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Proctor HS, Carder G. Can ear postures reliably measure the positive emotional state of cows? Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2014;161(1):20-7. [Crossref]
- Leliveld MCL, Langbein J, Puppe B. The emergence of emotional lateralization: evidence in non-human vertebrates and implications for farm animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2013;145(1-2):1-14. [Crossref]
- Duncan IJH. Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Anim Sci. 1996;27:29-35.
- Duncan IJH, Fraser D. Understanding animal welfare. Animal Welfare. 3rd ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1997. p.19-31.
- Plutchik R, Kellerman H. Theories of Emotion. 1st ed. New York, USA: Academic Press; 1980. p.424.
- Paul ES, Harding EJ, Mendl M. Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(3):469-491. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mendl M, Burman OH, Paul ES. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proc Biol Sci. 2010;277(1696):2895-904. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Reefmann N, Kaszas FB, Wechsler B, Gygax L. Ear and tail postures as indicators of emotional valence in sheep. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2009;118(3-4):199-207. [Crossref]
- Desire L, Boissy A, Veissier I. Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behav Processes. 2002;60(2):165-80. [Crossref]
- Sandem AI, Janczak AM, Braastad BO. A short note on effects of exposure to a novel stimulus (umbrella) on behaviour and percentage of eye-white in cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2004;89(3-4):309-14. [Crossref]
- Broom DM. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci. 1991;69(10):4167-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Duncan IJH. Welfare is to do with what animals feel. J Agr Environ Ethic. 1993;2:8-14.
- Dawkins MS. Through animal eyes: what behaviour tells us. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006;100(1-2):4-10. [Crossref]
- Boissy A, Aubert A, Desire L, Greiveldinger L, Delval E, Veissier I. Cognitive sciences to relate ear postures to emotions in sheep. Anim Welf. 2011;20(1):47.
- Guesgen MJ, Beausoleil NJ, Minot EO, Stewart M, Stafford KJ, Morel PCH. Lambs show changes in ear posture when experiencing pain. Anim Welf. 2016;25(2):171-7. [Crossref]
- Briefer EF, Tettamanti F, McElligott AG. Emotions in goats: mapping physiological, behavioural and vocal profiles. Anim Behav. 2015;99:131-43. [Crossref]
- Reimert I, Bolhuis JE, Kemp B, Rodenburg TB. Indicators of positive and negative emotions and emotional contagion in pigs. Physiol Behav. 2013;109:42-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gleerup KB, Andersen PH, Munksgaard L, Forkman B. Pain evaluation in dairy cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015;171:25-32. [Crossref]
- Blokhuis HJ, Veissier I, Miele M, Jones B. The Welfare Quality (R) project and beyond: Safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agr Scand Sect A Anim Sci. 2010;60(3):129-40. [Crossref]
- Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Lebelt D, Scholz P, Barbieri S, Canali E, et al. Welfare assessment of horses: the AWIN approach. Anim Welf. 2016;25(4):481-8. [Crossref]
- Wemelsfelder F, Hunter TEA, Mendl MT, Lawrence AB. Assessing the 'whole animal': a free choice profiling approach. Anim Behav. 2001;62(2):209-20. [Crossref]
- Schmied C, Waiblinger S, Scharl T, Leisch F, Boivin X. Stroking of different body regions by a human: effects on behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008;109(1):25-38. [Crossref]
- de Vere AJ, Kuczaj SA. Where are we in the study of animal emotions?. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 2016;7(5): 354-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- de Oliveira D, Keeling LJ. Routine activities and emotion in the life of dairy cows: integrating body language into an affective state framework. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0195674. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- SPSS. SPSS release 18.0.0, Standard version for Windows; 2009.
- Zimmerman PH, Koene P. The effect of loss of predictability and controllability of reward during frustration on behaviour in two strains of laying hens, Gallus gallus domesticus. Neth J Zool. 1998;48(3):255-65. [Crossref]
- Sandem AI, Braastad BO, Boe KE. Eye white may indicate emotional state on a frustration-contentedness axis in dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2002;79(1):1-10. [Crossref]
- Weary DM, Fraser D. Signaling need-costly signals and animal welfare assessment. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1985;44(2-4):159-69. [Crossref]
- Andrew RJ. The origin and evolution of the calls and facial expressions of the primates. Behaviour. 1963;20(1-2):1-109. [Crossref]
- Parr LA, Cohen M, De Waal F. Influence of social context on the use of blended and graded facial displays in chimpanzees. Int J Primatol. 2005;26(1):73-103. [Crossref]
- Diogo R, Wood BA, Aziz MA, Burrows A. On the origin, homologies and evolution of primate facial muscles, with a particular focus on hominoids and a suggested unifying nomenclature for the facial muscles of the Mammalia. J Anat. 2009;215(3):300-19. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Defensor EB, Corley MJ, Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC. Facial expressions of mice in aggressive and fearful contexts. Physiol Behav. 2012;107(5):680-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wathan J, McComb K. The eyes and ears are visual indicators of attention in domestic horses. Curr Biol. 2014;24(15):R677-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Descovich KA, Wathan J, Leach MC, Buchanan-Smith HM, Flecknell P, Farningham D, et al. Facial expression: an under-utilized tool for the assessment of welfare in mammals. ALTEX. 2017;34(3):409-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Verbeek E, Ferguson D, de Monjour PQ, Lee C. Opioid control of behaviour in sheep: effects of morphine and naloxone on food intake, activity and the affective state. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012;142(1-2):18-29. [Crossref]
.: İşlem Listesi