.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Evaluation of Radiographic Features of Third Molars with Digital Panoramic Radiographic Images: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Üçüncü Büyük Azı Dişlerinin Radyografik Özelliklerinin Dijital Panoramik Radyografik Görüntülerle Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Retrospektif Kesitsel Çalışma
Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2023;29(1):30-9
doi: 10.5336/dentalsci.2022-90836
Makale Dili: EN
Tam Metin
Ücretsiz Erişim
ABSTRACT
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of impacted 3rd molar, angulation status, the level of eruption, relationship with the occlusal plane of the 3rd molar teeth, and the rate of pathology in their own and the adjacent tooth of Turkish adult individuals who applied to Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry via panoramic radiographic images. Material and Methods: 700 patients were examined for this retrospective study. In addition to the localization, eruption, angulation, and occlusal level of the 3rd molars, the accompanying pathologies and the pathologies in the adjacent 2nd molars were recorded and retromolar spaces were measured. p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The rate of impaction in a total of 2800 3rd molars was 29%. Impacted 3rd molars were found at a higher rate (54.4%) in the mandible. It was determined that the 3rd molar teeth were mostly in the vertical position (77.8%) and 63.1% of them were at level A. 49.9% of mandibular third molar teeth were in class I. Conclusion: Impacted 3rd molar teeth prevalence was 29 %. The most common angulation status was vertical. According to the level of impaction, it was determined that the occlusal planes of the 3rd molars and the 2nd molars were at the same level most frequently. The location of the 3rd molar completely in front of the anterior ramus was the most common position. The most common pathology in the 3rd molars was caries, and no pathology was found in the 2nd molars except caries.
Keywords: Impacted teeth; panoramic radiography; third molars
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of impacted 3rd molar, angulation status, the level of eruption, relationship with the occlusal plane of the 3rd molar teeth, and the rate of pathology in their own and the adjacent tooth of Turkish adult individuals who applied to Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry via panoramic radiographic images. Material and Methods: 700 patients were examined for this retrospective study. In addition to the localization, eruption, angulation, and occlusal level of the 3rd molars, the accompanying pathologies and the pathologies in the adjacent 2nd molars were recorded and retromolar spaces were measured. p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The rate of impaction in a total of 2800 3rd molars was 29%. Impacted 3rd molars were found at a higher rate (54.4%) in the mandible. It was determined that the 3rd molar teeth were mostly in the vertical position (77.8%) and 63.1% of them were at level A. 49.9% of mandibular third molar teeth were in class I. Conclusion: Impacted 3rd molar teeth prevalence was 29 %. The most common angulation status was vertical. According to the level of impaction, it was determined that the occlusal planes of the 3rd molars and the 2nd molars were at the same level most frequently. The location of the 3rd molar completely in front of the anterior ramus was the most common position. The most common pathology in the 3rd molars was caries, and no pathology was found in the 2nd molars except caries.
Keywords: Impacted teeth; panoramic radiography; third molars
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine başvuran Türk erişkin bireylerin gömülü 3. büyük azı dişlerinin prevalansı, açılanma durumu, sürme düzeyi, 3. büyük azı dişlerinin okluzal düzlemi ile ilişkisi ve kendi ve komşu dişteki patoloji oranlarının panoramik radyografik görüntüler ile değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma için 700 hasta incelendi. Üçüncü büyük azı dişlerinin lokalizasyonu, sürme durumu, açılanma durumu ve okluzal düzeyine ek olarak eşlik eden patolojiler, komşuluğundaki 2. büyük azı dişlerinde görülen patolojiler kaydedilerek retromolar boşluklar ölçüldü. İstatistiksel anlamlılığın p<0,05 olduğu varsayıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 2800 3. molar dişte gömülü olma oranı %29 idi. Gömülü 3. molar dişler mandibulada daha yüksek oranda (%54,4) bulundu. Üçüncü molar dişlerinin en çok dikey pozisyonda olduğu (%77,8) ve %63,1'inin A düzeyinde olduğu tespit edildi. Mandibular 3. molar dişlerin %49,9'u sınıf I'deydi. Sonuç: Gömülü 3. molar diş prevalansı %29 idi. Üçüncü molarlarda en yaygın görülen açılanma durumu dikey açılanma idi. İmpaksiyon seviyesine göre en sık 3. molarların ve 2. molarların okluzal düzlemlerinin aynı seviyede olduğu tespit edildi. Mandibular 3. molar dişlerin anterior ramusun tamamen önünde yer alması en sık görülen pozisyondu. Üçüncü molarlarda en sık görülen patoloji çürüktü ve 2. molarlarda çürük dışında patolojiye rastlanılmadı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Gömülü dişler; panoramik radyografi; üçüncü molar dişler
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine başvuran Türk erişkin bireylerin gömülü 3. büyük azı dişlerinin prevalansı, açılanma durumu, sürme düzeyi, 3. büyük azı dişlerinin okluzal düzlemi ile ilişkisi ve kendi ve komşu dişteki patoloji oranlarının panoramik radyografik görüntüler ile değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma için 700 hasta incelendi. Üçüncü büyük azı dişlerinin lokalizasyonu, sürme durumu, açılanma durumu ve okluzal düzeyine ek olarak eşlik eden patolojiler, komşuluğundaki 2. büyük azı dişlerinde görülen patolojiler kaydedilerek retromolar boşluklar ölçüldü. İstatistiksel anlamlılığın p<0,05 olduğu varsayıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 2800 3. molar dişte gömülü olma oranı %29 idi. Gömülü 3. molar dişler mandibulada daha yüksek oranda (%54,4) bulundu. Üçüncü molar dişlerinin en çok dikey pozisyonda olduğu (%77,8) ve %63,1'inin A düzeyinde olduğu tespit edildi. Mandibular 3. molar dişlerin %49,9'u sınıf I'deydi. Sonuç: Gömülü 3. molar diş prevalansı %29 idi. Üçüncü molarlarda en yaygın görülen açılanma durumu dikey açılanma idi. İmpaksiyon seviyesine göre en sık 3. molarların ve 2. molarların okluzal düzlemlerinin aynı seviyede olduğu tespit edildi. Mandibular 3. molar dişlerin anterior ramusun tamamen önünde yer alması en sık görülen pozisyondu. Üçüncü molarlarda en sık görülen patoloji çürüktü ve 2. molarlarda çürük dışında patolojiye rastlanılmadı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Gömülü dişler; panoramik radyografi; üçüncü molar dişler
REFERANSLAR:
- Hassan AH. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Saudi population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2010;2:109-13. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hattab FN. Positional changes and eruption of impacted mandibular third molars in young adults. A radiographic 4-year follow-up study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(6):604-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sandhu S, Kaur T. Radiographic evaluation of the status of third molars in the Asian-Indian students. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(5):640-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hattab FN, Rawashdeh MA, Fahmy MS. Impaction status of third molars in Jordanian students. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79(1):24-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Akarslan ZZ, Kocabay C. Assessment of the associated symptoms, pathologies, positions and angulations of bilateral occurring mandibular third molars: is there any similarity? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(3):e26-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yilmaz S, Adisen MZ, Misirlioglu M, Yorubulut S. Assessment of third molar impaction pattern and associated clinical symptoms in a Central Anatolian Turkish Population. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(2):169-75. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hashemipour MA, Tahmasbi-Arashlow M, Fahimi-Hanzaei F. Incidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(1):e140-5. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kaya GS, Aslan M, Omezli MM, Dayı E. Some morphological features related to mandibular third molar impaction. J Clin Exp Dent. 2010;2:12-7. [Link]
- Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(5):548-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Barakat A, Nofal R. Pattern of impacted third molars and their associated radiographic pathological lesions in Makkah region: a retrospective radiographic survey. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2019;65(Issue 1):171-8. [Crossref]
- Ma'aita J, Alwrikat A. Is the mandibular third molar a risk factor for mandibular angle fracture? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89(2):143-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Almendros-Marqués N, Alaejos-Algarra E, Quinteros-Borgarello M, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Factors influencing the prophylactic removal of asymptomatic impacted lower third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(1):29-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Peker I, Sarikir C, Alkurt MT, Zor ZF. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:71. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Matzen LH, Wenzel A. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140189. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Bonetti GA, Gatto MR, Checchi L. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(3):312-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jaroń A, Trybek G. The pattern of mandibular third molar impaction and assessment of surgery difficulty: a retrospective study of radiographs in East Baltic population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):6016. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ventä I. Predictive model for impaction of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;76(6):699-703. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Polat HB, Ozan F, Kara I, Ozdemir H, Ay S. Prevalence of commonly found pathoses associated with mandibular impacted third molars based on panoramic radiographs in Turkish population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(6):e41-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Eliasson S, Heimdahl A, Nordenram A. Pathological changes related to long-term impaction of third molars. A radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;18(4):210-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rajasuo A, Murtomaa H, Meurman JH. Comparison of the clinical status of third molars in young men in 1949 and in 1990. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;76(6):694-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Morris CR, Jerman AC. Panoramic radiographic survey: a study of embedded third molars. J Oral Surg. 1971;29(2):122-5. [PubMed]
- Jasim HH. The incidence of impacted permanent teeth: a review article. Oral Health Dental Sci. 2022;6(1):1-5. [Link]
- Kim JC, Choi SS, Wang SJ, Kim SG. Minor complications after mandibular third molar surgery: type, incidence, and possible prevention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102(2):e4-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ventä I, Turtola L, Ylipaavalniemi P. Radiographic follow-up of impacted third molars from age 20 to 32 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(1):54-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Obiechina AE, Arotiba JT, Fasola AO. Third molar impaction: evaluation of the symptoms and pattern of impaction of mandibular third molar teeth in Nigerians. Odontostomatol Trop. 2001;24(93):22-5. [PubMed]
- Hattab FN, Alhaija ES. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molar eruption space. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88(3):285-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ganss C, Hochban W, Kielbassa AM, Umstadt HE. Prognosis of third molar eruption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;76(6):688-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Richardson ME. The etiology and prediction of mandibular third molar impaction. Angle Orthod. 1977;47(3):165-72. [PubMed]
- Ventä I, Murtomaa H, Ylipaavalniemi P. A device to predict lower third molar eruption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(6):598-603. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kasimoglu Y, Tuna EB, Rahimi B, Marsan G, Gencay K. Condylar asymmetry in different occlusion types. Cranio. 2015;33(1):10-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Silvestrini-Biavati F, Ugolini A, Laffi N, Canevello C, Silvestrini-Biavati A. Early diagnostic evaluation of mandibular symmetry using orthopantomogram. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25(2):154-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(2):150-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Haidar Z, Shalhoub SY. The incidence of impacted wisdom teeth in a Saudi community. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15(5):569-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bataineh AB, Albashaireh ZS, Hazza'a AM. The surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a study in decision making. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(8):613-7. [PubMed]
- Al-Khateeb TH, Bataineh AB. Pathology associated with impacted mandibular third molars in a group of Jordanians. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(11):1598-602. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi