.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Eskrimcilerde Branşlar Arası Bilişsel Test Skorlarının ve Reaksiyon Zamanlarının Karşılaştırılması
Comparison of Cognitive Test Scores and Reaction Time Between Branches in Fencers
Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Sci. 2020;12(3):253-9
doi: 10.5336/sportsci.2019-72832
Makale Dili: TR
Tam Metin
ÖZET
Amaç: ''Epe, flöre ve kılıç'' olarak 3 farklı branşta oynanan eskrimde, oyuncuların saniyeler içinde karar verme ve uygulama becerilerinin iyi düzeyde olması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı reaksiyon performansları ve bilişsel becerileri, eskrimin 2 branşında karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, 13-17 yaşları arasında 53 (flöre=24 ve kılıç=29) sporcu katılmıştır. Katılımcılara 2 ayrı bilişsel beceri testi (Clock Test ve Timewall Testi) uygulatılmış ve reaksiyon süreleri, 3 farklı test (Clock Test, Basit Düğme Testi, Branşa Özgü Reaksiyon Zamanı Testi) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Verilerin normal dağılmaması sebebiyle istatistikler, Friedman analizi ve Wilcoxon testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Timewall Testi ve Basit Düğme Testi'nde, branşlar arası anlamlı fark bulunmazken, Clock Test ile ölçülen reaksiyon zamanı, flörede istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha kısa bulunmuştur (p=0,022). Flöre branşında, 3 reaksiyon testi karşılaştırıldığında, testler arasında anlamlı bir fark çıkmış ve en iyi sonuçlar ''Branşa Özgü Reaksiyon Zamanı Testi''nde gözlemlenmiştir. Kılıç branşı için yapılan 2 reaksiyon testinin karşılaştırılmasında ise Clock Test sonuçları istatistiksel olarak daha iyi sonuç vermiştir (p=0,003). Sonuç: Bu araştırma sonuçları, eskrim gibi rakip ataklarına en kısa sürede yanıt verilmesi gereken bir mücadele sporunda, branşa özgü bir test ile reaksiyon zamanının daha hassas ölçülebildiğini göstermektedir. Bunun yanında, eskrimde uygulanabilecek bilişsel testlerin seçimi, branşlara göre farklılık göstermektedir. Flöre branşında, bilişsel testlerde daha iyi sonuçlar alınmasının sebebi, branşın yapısında daha fazla dikkat ve odaklanma olması olabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Eskrim; bilişsel performans; reaksiyon zamanı; bilişsel testler
Amaç: ''Epe, flöre ve kılıç'' olarak 3 farklı branşta oynanan eskrimde, oyuncuların saniyeler içinde karar verme ve uygulama becerilerinin iyi düzeyde olması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı reaksiyon performansları ve bilişsel becerileri, eskrimin 2 branşında karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, 13-17 yaşları arasında 53 (flöre=24 ve kılıç=29) sporcu katılmıştır. Katılımcılara 2 ayrı bilişsel beceri testi (Clock Test ve Timewall Testi) uygulatılmış ve reaksiyon süreleri, 3 farklı test (Clock Test, Basit Düğme Testi, Branşa Özgü Reaksiyon Zamanı Testi) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Verilerin normal dağılmaması sebebiyle istatistikler, Friedman analizi ve Wilcoxon testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Timewall Testi ve Basit Düğme Testi'nde, branşlar arası anlamlı fark bulunmazken, Clock Test ile ölçülen reaksiyon zamanı, flörede istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha kısa bulunmuştur (p=0,022). Flöre branşında, 3 reaksiyon testi karşılaştırıldığında, testler arasında anlamlı bir fark çıkmış ve en iyi sonuçlar ''Branşa Özgü Reaksiyon Zamanı Testi''nde gözlemlenmiştir. Kılıç branşı için yapılan 2 reaksiyon testinin karşılaştırılmasında ise Clock Test sonuçları istatistiksel olarak daha iyi sonuç vermiştir (p=0,003). Sonuç: Bu araştırma sonuçları, eskrim gibi rakip ataklarına en kısa sürede yanıt verilmesi gereken bir mücadele sporunda, branşa özgü bir test ile reaksiyon zamanının daha hassas ölçülebildiğini göstermektedir. Bunun yanında, eskrimde uygulanabilecek bilişsel testlerin seçimi, branşlara göre farklılık göstermektedir. Flöre branşında, bilişsel testlerde daha iyi sonuçlar alınmasının sebebi, branşın yapısında daha fazla dikkat ve odaklanma olması olabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Eskrim; bilişsel performans; reaksiyon zamanı; bilişsel testler
ABSTRACT
Objective: In fencing which played in 3 different branches as epee, foil and sabre; players must have advanced skills such as making decisions and perform within seconds. Aim of this study is to compare different reaction performances and cognitive skills between two branches of fencing. Material and Methods: 53 (foil=24 and sabre=29) athletes aged 13-17 were included in this study. Two cognitive skills tests (Clock Test and Timewall Test) were applied and reaction times were evaluated with 3 different tests (Clock Test, Simple Button Test, Branch Specific Reaction Time Test). Friedman analysis and Wilcoxon test used because the data were not distributed normally. Results: There was no difference between the branches according to Timewall Test and Simple Button Test. Reaction times which measured with Clock Test was significantly shorter in foil (p=0.022). When the average of three tests in foil were compared, there was a significant difference between all tests and the best results were observed in Branch Specific Reaction Time Test. In the comparison of the two reaction tests performed in the sabre, the Clock Test showed significantly better results (p=0.003). Conclusion: The findings indicates that reaction time can be measured more precisely with a branch-specific test in a combat sport that athletes need to respond to rival attacks as soon as possible like fencing. Besides the selection of cognitive tests can be applied in fencing varies according to the branches. The reason for better scores in cognitive tests in foil may be that there are more attention and focus in the structure of the branch.
Keywords: Fencing; cognitive performance; reaction time; cognitive tests
Objective: In fencing which played in 3 different branches as epee, foil and sabre; players must have advanced skills such as making decisions and perform within seconds. Aim of this study is to compare different reaction performances and cognitive skills between two branches of fencing. Material and Methods: 53 (foil=24 and sabre=29) athletes aged 13-17 were included in this study. Two cognitive skills tests (Clock Test and Timewall Test) were applied and reaction times were evaluated with 3 different tests (Clock Test, Simple Button Test, Branch Specific Reaction Time Test). Friedman analysis and Wilcoxon test used because the data were not distributed normally. Results: There was no difference between the branches according to Timewall Test and Simple Button Test. Reaction times which measured with Clock Test was significantly shorter in foil (p=0.022). When the average of three tests in foil were compared, there was a significant difference between all tests and the best results were observed in Branch Specific Reaction Time Test. In the comparison of the two reaction tests performed in the sabre, the Clock Test showed significantly better results (p=0.003). Conclusion: The findings indicates that reaction time can be measured more precisely with a branch-specific test in a combat sport that athletes need to respond to rival attacks as soon as possible like fencing. Besides the selection of cognitive tests can be applied in fencing varies according to the branches. The reason for better scores in cognitive tests in foil may be that there are more attention and focus in the structure of the branch.
Keywords: Fencing; cognitive performance; reaction time; cognitive tests
REFERANSLAR:
- Tsolakis C, Douvis A, Tsigganos G, Zacharogiannis E, Smirniotou A. Acute effects of stretching on flexibility, power and sport specific performance in fencers. J Hum Kinet. 2010;26:105-14.[Crossref]
- Rippetoe M. Strength and conditioning for fencing. Strength Cond J. 2000;22(2):42.[Crossref]
- Barth B, Beck E. The Complete Guide to Fencing. Meyer and Meyer Series. 2nd ed. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Verlag; 2007. p.366.
- Kogler a. One Touch at a Time: Psychological Processes in Fencing. 2nd ed. Staten Island, NY: SKA SwordPlay Books; 2005. p.333.
- Balkó ?, Borysiuk Z, ?imonek J. The influence of different performance level of fencers on simple and choice reaction time. Rev Bras Cineantropom Hum. 2016;18(4):391-400.[Crossref]
- Roi GS, Bianchedi D. The science of fencing: implications for performance and injury. Sports Med. 2008;38(6):465-81.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lambourne K, Tomporowski P. The effect of exercise-induced arousal on cognitive task performance: a meta-regression analysis. Brain Res. 2010;1341:12-24.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lambourne K, Audiffren M, Tomporowski PD. Effects of acute exercise on sensory and executive processing tasks. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(7):1396-402.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Covassin T, Weiss L, Powell J, Womack C. Effects of a maximal exercise test on neurocognitive function. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(6):370-4.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kamijo K, Nishihira Y, Hatta A, Kaneda T, Wasaka T, Kida T, et al. Differential influences of exercise intensity on information processing in the central nervous system. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;92(3):305-11.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Winter B, Breitenstein C, Mooren FC, Voelker K, Fobker M, Lechtermann A, et al. High impact running improves learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007;87(4):597-609.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ruiz-Ariza A, Grao-Cruces A, de Loureiro NEM, Martínez-López EJ. Influence of physical fitness on cognitive and academic performance in adolescents: a systematic review from 2005-2015. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2017;10(1):108-33.[Crossref]
- Chan JSY, Wong ACN, Liu Y, Yu J, Yan JH. Fencing expertise and physical fitness enhance action inhibition. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12(5):509-14.[Crossref]
- Bruna R, Zani A, Taddei F, Pesce C. Chronometric aspects of information processing in high level fencers as compared to non-athletes: an ERPs and RT study. J Hum Mov Stud. 1992;23:17-28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230647044_Chronometric_aspects_of_information_processing_in_high_level_fencers_as_compared_to_non-athletes_an_ERPs_and_RT_study
- Di Russo F, Taddei F, Apnile T, Spinelli D. Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers. Neurosci Lett. 2006;408(2):113-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Vallesi A, Stuss DT. Excessive sub-threshold motor preparation for non-target stimuli in normal aging. Neuroimage. 2010;50(3):1251-7.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sorel A, Plantard P, Bideau N, Pontonnier C. Studying fencing lunge accuracy and response time in uncertain conditions with an innovative simulator. PloS One. 2019;14(7):e0218959.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Mancı E, Gümüş H, Kayatekin BM. Validity and reliability of the wearable bioelectrical impedance measuring device. Journal of Sports and Performance Researches. 2018;9(1):44-55. http://www.dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/omuspd/issue/44687/454291
- Mueller ST, Piper BJ. The psychology experiment building language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;222:250-9.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Piper BJ. Evaluation of the test-retest reliability of the PEBL continuous performance test in a normative sample. PEBL Technical Report Series 2012-05. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxwZWJsdGVjaG5pY2FscmVwb3J0c3xneDoyMmI4MDFjZmIyMmQ0NThk
- Müller BW, Gimbel K, Keller-Pliessnig A, Sartory G, Gastpar M, Davids E. Neuropsychological assessment of adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;257(2):112-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ergönül İ, İnanç G, Taşlıca S, Öniz A. Time estimation and risk taking behavior in type a personality. J Basic Clin Health Sci. 2019;3(2):39-41.[Crossref]
- Ergönül İ, İnanç G, Taşlıca S, Özgören M, Öniz A. The effect of appetitive daytime napping on cognitive functions. J Turk Sleep Med. 2018;5(2):27-30.[Crossref]
- Czajkowski Z. Understanding Fencing: The Unity of Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Staten Island, NY: SKA SwordPlay Books; 2005. p.333.
- Gutierrez-Davila M, Rojas FJ, Antonio R, Navarro E. Response timing in the lunge and target change in elite versus medium-level fencers. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(4):364-71.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Guizani SM, Bouzaouach I, Tenenbaum G, Kheder AB, Feki Y, Bouaziz M. Simple and choice reaction times under varying levels of physical load in high skilled fencers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006;46(2):344-51.[PubMed]
- Borysiuk Z, Waskiewicz Z. Information processes, stimulation and perceptual training in fencing. J Hum Kinet. 2008;19:63-82.[Crossref]
- Azémar G, Stein JF, Ripoll H. Effects of ocular dominance on eye-hand coordination in sporting duels. Sci Sports. 2008;23(6):263-77.[Crossref]
- Harris LJ. In fencing, what gives left-handers the edge? Views from the present and the distant past. Laterality. 2010;15(1-2):15-55.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Williams JE, Wells JCK, Wilson CM, Haroun D, Lucas A, Fewtrell MS. Evaluation of Lunar Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition in healthy persons and patients by comparison with the criterion 4-component model. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(5):1047-54.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Barcelos JL, Morales AP, Maciel RN, dos Anjos Azevedo MM, da Silva VF. Time of practice: a comparative study of the motor reaction time among volleyball players. Fitness & Performance Journal. 2009;8(2):103-9.[Crossref]
- Ardoy DN, Fernández‐Rodríguez J, Jiménez‐Pavón D, Castillo R, Ruiz J, Ortega FB. A physical education trial improves adolescents' cognitive performance and academic achievement: the EDUFIT study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(1):e52-61.[Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi