.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Effect of Chelating Irrigation on the Bond Strength of a Fiber Post System
Şelasyon Ajanlarının Fiber Postların Bağlantı Dayanımına Etkisi
Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2021;27(1):34-41
doi: 10.5336/dentalsci.2020-73627
Makale Dili: EN
Tam Metin
Ücretsiz Erişim
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different irrigation solutions on the bond strength of the fiber posts to the root canal dentin through resin cement. Material and Methods: The sample size of each group was determined by using a power analysis (G Power 3.1.9.2 software). Post cavity of 84 maxillary single rooted teeth were prepared and were divided into 7 groups according to the last irrigation solutions (n=36). G1: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), G2: 17% EDTA+ 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), G3: Distilled water, G4: SmearOFF, G5: Dual Rinse HEDP (MedCem, Switzerland), G6: Dual Rinse HEDP+5% Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), G7: 2% CHX. Fiber posts were cemented using G-CEM LinkAce' (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Push-out bond strengths were evaluated at three different radicular levels: coronal, middle, and apical. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze the data. Results: The highest push-out bond strength was found in the Dual Rinse HEDP group (p<0.001). SmearOFF and 17% EDTA+2% CHX groups were statistically similar (p>0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the 2% CHX, distilled water and 5% NaOCl +Dual Rinse HEDP groups (p>0.05), these 3 groups showed statistically significant lower pushout bond strength than the other groups (p<0.001). Conclusion: Clinically, irrigating of the post cavity with Dual Rinse HEDP is recommended, because it increases the bond strength of the fiber posts. However, when the antibacterial effect is desired, SmearOFF may be preferred instead of NaOCl due to its CHX content.
Keywords: Etidronic acid; smear layer; root canal irrigants; adhesion; post-core
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different irrigation solutions on the bond strength of the fiber posts to the root canal dentin through resin cement. Material and Methods: The sample size of each group was determined by using a power analysis (G Power 3.1.9.2 software). Post cavity of 84 maxillary single rooted teeth were prepared and were divided into 7 groups according to the last irrigation solutions (n=36). G1: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), G2: 17% EDTA+ 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), G3: Distilled water, G4: SmearOFF, G5: Dual Rinse HEDP (MedCem, Switzerland), G6: Dual Rinse HEDP+5% Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), G7: 2% CHX. Fiber posts were cemented using G-CEM LinkAce' (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Push-out bond strengths were evaluated at three different radicular levels: coronal, middle, and apical. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze the data. Results: The highest push-out bond strength was found in the Dual Rinse HEDP group (p<0.001). SmearOFF and 17% EDTA+2% CHX groups were statistically similar (p>0.05). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the 2% CHX, distilled water and 5% NaOCl +Dual Rinse HEDP groups (p>0.05), these 3 groups showed statistically significant lower pushout bond strength than the other groups (p<0.001). Conclusion: Clinically, irrigating of the post cavity with Dual Rinse HEDP is recommended, because it increases the bond strength of the fiber posts. However, when the antibacterial effect is desired, SmearOFF may be preferred instead of NaOCl due to its CHX content.
Keywords: Etidronic acid; smear layer; root canal irrigants; adhesion; post-core
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı şelasyon kabiliyeti olan irrigasyon solüsyonlarının fiber post ve kök dentin yüzeyine karşı bağlanma dayanımlarına olan etkisini, push-out test yöntemi ile değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Her grubun örneklem büyüklüğü, bir güç analizi (G Power 3.1.9.2 yazılımı) kullanılarak belirlendi. Seksen dört adet çekilmiş tek köklü dişin post kaviteleri hazırlandı ve dişler son irrigasyon solüsyonuna göre rastgele 7 gruba ayrıldı (n=36): G1: %17 etilen diamin tetraasetik asit (EDTA), G2:%17 EDTA+%2 klorheksidin (CHX), G3:Distilled water, G4: SmearOFF, G5: Dual Rinse HEDP, G6: Dual Rinse HEDP+%5 Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), G7: %2 CHX. Fiber postlar, G-CEM LinkAce' (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) ile yapıştırıldı. Push-out bağlantı dayanımları koronal, orta ve apikal olmak üzere ölçüldü. Veriler, Kolmogorov-Smirnov testi ve Kruskal-Wallis testi kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Dual Rinse HEDP grubu (p<0,001) en yüksek bağlantı dayanımını gösterdi. SmearOFF ve %17 EDTA+% 2 CHX grupları istatistiksel olarak benzer bulundu (p>0,05). %2 CHX, distile su, %5 NaOCl+Dual Rinse HEDP grupları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı herhangi bir fark saptanmadı (p>0,05) ve bu 3 grup diğerlerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ölçüde düşük bağlantı dayanımı gösterdi (p<0,001). Sonuç: Fiber post kavitelerinin yıkanmasında Dual Rinse HEDP ile irrigasyon klinik başarıyı artırırken, NaOCl kullanımı düşürmektedir. Bu yüzden antibakteriyel etki istendiğinde, NaOCl'in Dual Rinse HEDP ile birlikte kullanımı yerine, CHX içeren SmearOFF tercih edilebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Etidronik asit; smear tabakası; kök kanal yıkama solüsyonları; adezyon; post-kor
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı şelasyon kabiliyeti olan irrigasyon solüsyonlarının fiber post ve kök dentin yüzeyine karşı bağlanma dayanımlarına olan etkisini, push-out test yöntemi ile değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Her grubun örneklem büyüklüğü, bir güç analizi (G Power 3.1.9.2 yazılımı) kullanılarak belirlendi. Seksen dört adet çekilmiş tek köklü dişin post kaviteleri hazırlandı ve dişler son irrigasyon solüsyonuna göre rastgele 7 gruba ayrıldı (n=36): G1: %17 etilen diamin tetraasetik asit (EDTA), G2:%17 EDTA+%2 klorheksidin (CHX), G3:Distilled water, G4: SmearOFF, G5: Dual Rinse HEDP, G6: Dual Rinse HEDP+%5 Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), G7: %2 CHX. Fiber postlar, G-CEM LinkAce' (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) ile yapıştırıldı. Push-out bağlantı dayanımları koronal, orta ve apikal olmak üzere ölçüldü. Veriler, Kolmogorov-Smirnov testi ve Kruskal-Wallis testi kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Dual Rinse HEDP grubu (p<0,001) en yüksek bağlantı dayanımını gösterdi. SmearOFF ve %17 EDTA+% 2 CHX grupları istatistiksel olarak benzer bulundu (p>0,05). %2 CHX, distile su, %5 NaOCl+Dual Rinse HEDP grupları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı herhangi bir fark saptanmadı (p>0,05) ve bu 3 grup diğerlerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ölçüde düşük bağlantı dayanımı gösterdi (p<0,001). Sonuç: Fiber post kavitelerinin yıkanmasında Dual Rinse HEDP ile irrigasyon klinik başarıyı artırırken, NaOCl kullanımı düşürmektedir. Bu yüzden antibakteriyel etki istendiğinde, NaOCl'in Dual Rinse HEDP ile birlikte kullanımı yerine, CHX içeren SmearOFF tercih edilebilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Etidronik asit; smear tabakası; kök kanal yıkama solüsyonları; adezyon; post-kor
REFERANSLAR:
- Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004;30(5):289-301.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gu XH, Mao CY, Kern M. Effect of different irrigation on smear layer removal after post space preparation. J Endod. 2009;35(4):583-6.[PubMed]
- Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006;32(5):389-98.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod. 2002;28(1):17-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ricci HA, Sanabe ME, de Souza Costa CA, Pashley DH, Hebling J. Chlorhexidine increases the longevity of in vivo resin-dentin bonds. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(4):411-6. Erratum in: Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(5):535.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Krishnan U, Saji S, Clarkson R, Lalloo R, Moule AJ. Free active chlorine in sodium hypochlorite solutions admixed with Octenidine, SmearOFF, Chlorhexidine, and EDTA. J Endod. 2017;43(8):1354-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Piperidou M, Sodhi RNS, Kolosowski KP, Basrani BR. Effects of final irrigation with SmearOFF on the surface of dentin using surface analytical methods. J Endod. 2018;44(11):1714-9.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Girard S, Paqué F, Badertscher M, Sener B, Zehnder M. Assessment of a gel-type chelating preparation containing 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-bisphosphonate. Int Endod J. 2005;38(11):810-6.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dual Rinse HEDP user manuel. Available from: [Accessed 30 January 2021].[Link]
- Lottanti S, Gautschi H, Sener B, Zehnder M. Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod J. 2009 Apr;42(4):335-43. Epub 2009 Feb 7.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wu H, Hayashi M, Okamura K, Koytchev EV, Imazato S, Tanaka S, et al. Effects of light penetration and smear layer removal on adhesion of post-cores to root canal dentin by self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater. 2009;25(12):1484-92.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength of dual-polymerizing cementing systems to dentin using different polymerizing modes. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(2):99-106.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Arrais CA, Rueggeberg FA, Waller JL, de Goes MF, Giannini M. Effect of curing mode on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems. J Dent. 2008;36(6):418-26.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aguiar TR, Di Francescantonio M, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. Effect of curing mode on bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;93(1):122-7.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pisani-Proença J, Erhardt MC, Amaral R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Del Castillo-Salmerón R, et al. Influence of different surface conditioning protocols on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(4):227-35.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Miguel-Almeida ME, Azevedo ML, Rached-Júnior FA, Oliveira CF, Silva RG, Messias DC, et al. Effect of light-activation with different light-curing units and time intervals on resin cement bond strength to intraradicular dentin. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(4):362-6.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moura AS, Pereira RD, Rached FJ Junior, Crozeta BM, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Souza-Flamini LE, et al. Influence of root dentin treatment on the push-out bond strength of fibre-reinforced posts. Braz Oral Res. 2017;10;31:e29.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent. 2000;13(5):255-60.[PubMed]
- de Moraes AP, Cenci MS, de Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. Current concepts on the use and adhesive bonding of glass-fiber posts in dentistry: a review. Appl Adhes Sci. 2013;1;4:2-12.[Crossref]
- Broyles AC, Pavan S, Bedran-Russo AK. Effect of dentin surface modification on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(1):59-62.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pane ES, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Critical evaluation of the push-out test for root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2013;39(5):669-73.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Paulson L, Ballal NV, Bhagat A. Effect of root dentin conditioning on the pushout bond strength of biodentine. J Endod. 2018;44(7):1186-90.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schwartz RS. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system-the promise and the problems: a review. J Endod. 2006;32(12):1125-34.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- De-Deus G, Zehnder M, Reis C, Fidel S, Fidel RA, Galan J Jr, et al. Longitudinal co-site optical microscopy study on the chelating ability of etidronate and EDTA using a comparative single-tooth model. J Endod. 2008;34(1):71-5.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- De-Deus G, Namen F, Galan J Jr, Zehnder M. Soft chelating irrigation protocol optimizes bonding quality of Resilon/Epiphany root fillings. J Endod. 2008;34(6):703-5.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ballal NV, Jain H, Rao S, Johnson AD, Baeten J, Wolcott JF, et al. Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(1):28-32.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod. 2001;27(12):753-7.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ari H, Yaşar E, Belli S. Effects of NaOCl on bond strengths of resin cements to root canal dentin. J Endod. 2003;29(4):248-51.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ari H, Erdemir A, Belli S. Evaluation of the effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of root canal dentin. J Endod. 2004;30(11):792-5.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Santos JN, Carrilho MR, De Goes MF, Zaia AA, Gomes BP, Souza-Filho FJ, et al. Effect of chemical irrigants on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to pulp chamber dentin. J Endod. 2006;32(11):1088-90.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moreira DM, de Andrade Feitosa JP, Line SR, Zaia AA. Effects of reducing agents on birefringence dentin collagen after use of different endodontic auxiliary chemical substances. J Endod. 2011;37(10):1406-11.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Martinho FC, Carvalho CA, Oliveira LD, de Lacerda AJ, Xavier AC, Augusto MG, et al. Comparison of different dentin pretreatment protocols on the bond strength of glass fiber post using self-etching adhesive. J Endod. 2015;41(1):83-7.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res. 1990;69(10):1652-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moreira DM, Almeida JF, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Line SR, Zaia AA, et al. Structural analysis of bovine root dentin after use of different endodontics auxiliary chemical substances. J Endod. 2009;35(7):1023-7.[Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi