Objective: To make a detailed content analysis of the management of broken instruments, which is an attractive and challenging topic on Instagram. Material and Methods: Instagram was searched using ''#brokenfile'', ''#brokeninstrument'' and ''brokenfileremoval''. After duplicates and unrelated posts were excluded, 818 posts were evaluated regarding the type of post, country, language, publication year, tooth number, location of the broken instrument, management method, presence of magnification, presence of follow-up, publisher, sharing purpose, number of likes, comments, and views. Videos were rated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and Confidence Score (CS). Results: The majority of the posts were photographs (86.5%), written in English (65.5%), and shared in 2020-2021 (65.6%). The broken instruments were in mandibular molars (49.9%) and located in the apical part (40.5%) mainly. The removal of broken instruments was the preferred management strategy (83.3%). 37.6% of the selected posts reported the use of the dental operating microscope. Clinicians tend to share posts to demonstrate their experience. The GQS and CS values in the posts where the clinicians' experiences were shared were significantly higher compared to other sharing purposes (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between publisher types in terms of GQS, CS, and the number of visualizations of the videos (p>0.05). Conclusion: Instagram is a frequently used social media platform that allows the sharing of variable quality information and experiences about broken instrument management. Thus, the contents of shared posts are needed to be reliable and accurate since they may guide clinicians and patients.
Keywords: Dental instrument; endodontics; internet
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, diş hekimliğinde ilgi çekici ve zorlu bir konu olarak kırık alet yönetimi hakkında İnstagram'da paylaşılan gönderilerin detaylı içerik analizini yapmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: İnstagram'da ''#brokenfile'', ''#brokeninstrument'' ve ''#brokenfileremoval'' etiketleri kullanılarak detaylı bir arama yapılmıştır. Birden fazla yüklenen ve konu ile ilgili olmayan gönderiler çıkarıldıktan sonra 818 gönderi analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz kapsamında; gönderi türü, ülke, dil, yayın yılı, diş numarası, kırık aletin konumu, yönetimi, büyütme varlığı, takip durumu, yayıncı, paylaşım amacı, beğeni, yorum ve görüntülenme sayısı gibi değişkenler incelenmiştir. Videolar, Küresel Kalite Ölçeği [Global Quality Scale (GQS)] ve Güven Skoru [Confidence Score (CS)] kullanılarak derecelendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Gönderilerin büyük bir kısmı fotoğraf (%86,5) ve İngilizce (%65,5) olarak ve çoğunlukla 2020-2021 yıllarında (%65,6) yayımlanmıştır. Kırık alet varlığı çoğunluğu mandibular molarlarda (%49,9) ve genellikle apikal bölgede (%40,5) olacak şekilde saptanmıştır. Kırık alet yönetiminde başlıca yönetim planı, aletin uzaklaştırılması olmuştur (%83,3). Seçilen gönderilerin %37,6'sında dental operasyon mikroskobu kullanımı rapor edilmiştir. Klinik uzmanlar, deneyimlerini sergilemek amacıyla paylaşım yapma eğilimindedir. Deneyimlerin paylaşıldığı gönderilerde GQS ve CS değerleri diğer paylaşım amaçlarına göre anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Yayıncı türleri arasında GQS, CS ve videoların görüntülenme sayıları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Sonuç: İnstagram, kırık alet yönetimi hakkında değişken kalitede bilgi ve deneyimlerin paylaşılmasına olanak tanıyan, sıkça kullanılan bir sosyal medya platformudur. Bu nedenle, paylaşılan gönderilerin içeriklerinin güvenilir ve doğru olması, klinisyenlere ve hastalara yol gösterici olması kapsamında, gerekmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Dental alet; endodonti; internet
- Dogruer N, Eyyam R, Menevis I. The use of the internet for educational purposes. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;28:606-11. [Crossref]
- Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1-2):24-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Abbasi MS, Lal A, Das G, Salman F, Akram A, Ahmed AR, et al. Impact of social media on aesthetic dentistry: general practitioners' perspectives. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(10):2055. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sharma S, Mohanty V, Balappanavar AY, Chahar P, Rijhwani K. Role of digital media in promoting oral health: a systematic review. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e28893. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ghandhi D, Bodani N, Lal A, Maqsood A, Ahmed N, Basha S, et al. Evaluation of social media usage by dental practitioners of Pakistan for professional purposes-a cross-sectional study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022;14:245-52. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sotto-Maior BS, Senna PM, da Silva WJ, Rocha EP, Del Bel Cury AA. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(3):e13-8. [PubMed]
- Dulundu M, Helvacioglu-Yigit D. The Efficiency of the BTR-Pen system in removing different types of broken instruments from root canals and its effect on the fracture resistance of roots. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(17):5816. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Pruthi PJ, Nawal RR, Talwar S, Verma M. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of ultrasonic tips versus the Terauchi file retrieval kit for the removal of separated endodontic instruments. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(2):e14. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Shahabinejad H, Ghassemi A, Pishbin L, Shahravan A. Success of ultrasonic technique in removing fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals and its effect on the required force for root fracture. J Endod. 2013;39(6):824-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yang Q, Shen Y, Huang D, Zhou X, Gao Y, Haapasalo M. Evaluation of two trephine techniques for removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium instruments from root canals. J Endod. 2017;43(1):116-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Meng Y, Xu J, Pradhan B, Tan BK, Huang D, Gao Y, et al. Microcomputed tomographic investigation of the trepan bur/microtube technique for the removal of fractured instruments from root canals without a dental operating microscope. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(5):1717-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yigzaw KY, Wynn R, Marco-Ruiz L, Budrionis A, Oyeyemi SO, Fagerlund AJ, et al. The association between health information seeking on the internet and physician visits (the seventh Tromsø study-part 4): population-based questionnaire study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(3):e13120. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Appel G, Grewal L, Hadi R, Stephen AT. The future of social media in marketing. J Acad Mark Sci. 2020;48(1):79-95. [Crossref]
- Yıldız S, Becet N, Buyuk SK. Quality of information on Instagram about masseter botox injection for bruxism. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;124(1S):101279. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lotto M, Sá Menezes T, Zakir Hussain I, Tsao SF, Ahmad Butt Z, P Morita P, et al. Characterization of false or misleading fluoride content on Instagram: infodemiology study. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(5):e37519. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kaval ME, Kandemir Demirci G, Atesci AA, Sarsar F, Dindaroğlu F, Güneri P, et al. YouTube? as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: quality and content analysis. Int J Med Inform. 2022;161:104732. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jamleh A, Aljohani SM, Alzamil FF, Aljuhayyim SM, Alsubaei MN, Alali SR, et al. Assessment of the educational value of endodontic access cavity preparation YouTube video as a learning resource for students. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0272765. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lin LM, Rosenberg PA, Lin J. Do procedural errors cause endodontic treatment failure? J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(2):187-93; quiz 231. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gündoğar M, Özyürek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue Nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1192-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pereira ES, Peixoto IF, Viana AC, Oliveira II, Gonzalez BM, Buono VT, et al. Physical and mechanical properties of a thermomechanically treated NiTi wire used in the manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):469-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gerek M, Başer ED, Kayahan MB, Sunay H, Kaptan RF, Bayırlı G. Comparison of the force required to fracture roots vertically after ultrasonic and Masserann removal of broken instruments. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):429-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tzanetakis GN, Kontakiotis EG, Maurikou DV, Marzelou MP. Prevalence and management of instrument fracture in the postgraduate endodontic program at the Dental School of Athens: a five-year retrospective clinical study. J Endod. 2008;34(6):675-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hülsmann M, Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(6):252-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):30-76. [Link]
- Schäfer E, Diez C, Hoppe W, Tepel J. Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth. J Endod. 2002;28(3):211-6. 27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alghamdi S, Huang X, Haapasalo M, Mobuchon C, Hieawy A, Hu J, et al. Effect of curvature location on fatigue resistance of five nickel-titanium files determined at body temperature. J Endod. 2020;46(11):1682-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Terauchi Y, Ali WT, Abielhassan MM. Present status and future directions: removal of fractured instruments. Int Endod J. 2022;55 Suppl 3:685-709. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wu J, Lei G, Yan M, Yu Y, Yu J, Zhang G. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy. J Endod. 2011;37(6):758-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ruivo LM, Rios MA, Villela AM, de Martin AS, Kato AS, Pelegrine RA, et al. Fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments during root canal retreatment performed by postgraduate students: a cross-sectional retrospective clinical study. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(4):e49. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ungerechts C, Bårdsen A, Fristad I. Instrument fracture in root canals-where, why, when and what? A study from a student clinic. Int Endod J. 2014;47(2):183-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gencoglu N, Helvacioglu D. Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems. Eur J Dent. 2009;3(2):90-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Madarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough AJ. Opinions and attitudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intracanal fracture of endodontic instruments: part 1. Int Endod J. 2008;41(8):693-701. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- ?o?ić A, ?alinović I, Brzović Rajić V, Ivani?ević Malčić A, Jukić Krmek S, Miletić I. Assessment of damage of endodontic instruments with naked eye and optical instruments. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021;55(2):129-36. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Portela NN, Rech JP, Marchionatti AME, Barasuol JC. Techniques to address fractured instruments in the middle or apical third of the root canal in human permanent teeth: a systematic review of the in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):131-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi