.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Failure Mode of Three Different CEREC Omnicam Endocrowns: An In Vitro Study
Üç Farklı CEREC Omnicam Endokronun Kırılma Dayanıklılığı ve Kırılma Modlarının Karşılaştırılması: İn Vitro Bir Çalışma
Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2022;28(2):442-9
doi: 10.5336/dentalsci.2021-84878
Makale Dili: EN
Tam Metin
Ücretsiz Erişim
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate fracture strength of porcelain endocrown produced by a computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system using different types of ceramic blocks. Material and Methods: Forty-five extracted human mandibular molars were divided randomly into 3 groups (n=15). Standardized endodontic treatment was applied the forty-five molars in 3 groups, received endocrown preparations. Experimental groups were; Group 1 (VS); Lithium silicate reinforced with zirconia (Vita Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrick, Bad Säckingen, Germany), Group 2 (EM); Lithium silicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein) and Group 3 (CS); Resin nanoceramic (Cerasmart, GC, Tokyo, Japan). Restorations were cemented with dual-cure resin cement Variolink N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and samples were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. All samples were subjected to thermocycling for 5,000 cycles in water baths between 5°C and 55°C. The fracture strength of samples was determined under compressive loads at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until fracture. The maximum fracture strength (Newton) values of the restorations were recorded. Fracture strength data were evaluated with one-way ANOVA (p=0.05). Results: The highest fracture strength values were observed in CS (2,379.6±483.07 N), which was significantly higher than the other groups (p0.05). Conclusion: Resin nanoceramic endocrowns produced using CEREC Omnicam system demonstrated significantly higher fracture strength values than the other groups.
Keywords: CAD/CAM; endocrown; fracture strength
Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate fracture strength of porcelain endocrown produced by a computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system using different types of ceramic blocks. Material and Methods: Forty-five extracted human mandibular molars were divided randomly into 3 groups (n=15). Standardized endodontic treatment was applied the forty-five molars in 3 groups, received endocrown preparations. Experimental groups were; Group 1 (VS); Lithium silicate reinforced with zirconia (Vita Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrick, Bad Säckingen, Germany), Group 2 (EM); Lithium silicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein) and Group 3 (CS); Resin nanoceramic (Cerasmart, GC, Tokyo, Japan). Restorations were cemented with dual-cure resin cement Variolink N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and samples were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. All samples were subjected to thermocycling for 5,000 cycles in water baths between 5°C and 55°C. The fracture strength of samples was determined under compressive loads at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until fracture. The maximum fracture strength (Newton) values of the restorations were recorded. Fracture strength data were evaluated with one-way ANOVA (p=0.05). Results: The highest fracture strength values were observed in CS (2,379.6±483.07 N), which was significantly higher than the other groups (p0.05). Conclusion: Resin nanoceramic endocrowns produced using CEREC Omnicam system demonstrated significantly higher fracture strength values than the other groups.
Keywords: CAD/CAM; endocrown; fracture strength
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmada, bilgisayar destekli tasarım/bilgisayar destekli üretim [computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)] sisteminde kullanılan içeriği farklı seramik bloklardan hazırlanan porselen endokronların kırılma dayanıklılığı açısından değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kırk beş adet çekilmiş insan alt molar dişi rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı (n=15). Üç gruptaki 45 dişe standart kanal tedavisi işlemi uygulanıp, endokron preparasyonu yapıldı. Deney grupları şu şekilde belirlendi: Grup 1; Zirkonyum ile güçlendirilmiş lityum silikat seramik (Vita Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrick, Bad Säckingen, Almanya), Grup 2; Lityum disilikat seramik (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichten stein) ve Grup 3; Rezin hibrit nanoseramik (Cerasmart, GC, Tokyo, Japonya). Restorasyonlar, 'dual-cure' rezin siman Variolink N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lihtenştayn) kullanılarak dişlere simante edildi ve örnekler distile suda 37°C'de 24 saat süre ile bekletildi. Daha sonra tüm örnekler 5°C ve 55°C arasında 5.000 döngülük termal siklus işlemine tabi tutuldu. Örneklere üniversal bir test cihazında kırılma dayanıklılığı testi 0,5 mm/dk hızla yükleme yapılarak uygulandı. Restorasyonların maksimum kırılma dayanıklılığı (Newton) değerleri kaydedildi. Örneklerin kırılma tipleri incelendi. Kırılma dayanıklılığı testi bulguları, tek yönlü ANOVA varyans analizi ile değerlendirildi (p=0,05). Bulgular: En yüksek ortalama kırılma dayanıklılığı Grup 3'te görüldü (2.379,6±483,07 N). Bu değer diğer grupların ortalama değerlerinden anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu (p0,05). Sonuç: CEREC Omnicam sistemi ile üretilen rezin nanoseramik endokronların kırılma dayanıklılığının diğer gruplardan anlamlı olarak yüksek olduğu sonucuna varıldı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: CAD/CAM; endokron; kırılma dayanıklılığı
Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmada, bilgisayar destekli tasarım/bilgisayar destekli üretim [computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)] sisteminde kullanılan içeriği farklı seramik bloklardan hazırlanan porselen endokronların kırılma dayanıklılığı açısından değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kırk beş adet çekilmiş insan alt molar dişi rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı (n=15). Üç gruptaki 45 dişe standart kanal tedavisi işlemi uygulanıp, endokron preparasyonu yapıldı. Deney grupları şu şekilde belirlendi: Grup 1; Zirkonyum ile güçlendirilmiş lityum silikat seramik (Vita Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrick, Bad Säckingen, Almanya), Grup 2; Lityum disilikat seramik (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichten stein) ve Grup 3; Rezin hibrit nanoseramik (Cerasmart, GC, Tokyo, Japonya). Restorasyonlar, 'dual-cure' rezin siman Variolink N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lihtenştayn) kullanılarak dişlere simante edildi ve örnekler distile suda 37°C'de 24 saat süre ile bekletildi. Daha sonra tüm örnekler 5°C ve 55°C arasında 5.000 döngülük termal siklus işlemine tabi tutuldu. Örneklere üniversal bir test cihazında kırılma dayanıklılığı testi 0,5 mm/dk hızla yükleme yapılarak uygulandı. Restorasyonların maksimum kırılma dayanıklılığı (Newton) değerleri kaydedildi. Örneklerin kırılma tipleri incelendi. Kırılma dayanıklılığı testi bulguları, tek yönlü ANOVA varyans analizi ile değerlendirildi (p=0,05). Bulgular: En yüksek ortalama kırılma dayanıklılığı Grup 3'te görüldü (2.379,6±483,07 N). Bu değer diğer grupların ortalama değerlerinden anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu (p0,05). Sonuç: CEREC Omnicam sistemi ile üretilen rezin nanoseramik endokronların kırılma dayanıklılığının diğer gruplardan anlamlı olarak yüksek olduğu sonucuna varıldı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: CAD/CAM; endokron; kırılma dayanıklılığı
REFERANSLAR:
- Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989; 15(11):512-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Linn J, Messer HH. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars. J Endod. 1994;20(10):479-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):9B-13B. [PubMed]
- Ozkurt Z, Işeri U, Kazazoğlu E. Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J. 2010;29(3):233-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stricker EJ, Göhring TN. Influence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human mandibular premolars. An in vitro study. J Dent. 2006; 34(5):326-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Totiam P, González-Cabezas C, Fontana MR, Zero DT. A new in vitro model to study the relationship of gap size and secondary caries. Caries Res. 2007;41(6):467-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011;56 Suppl 1:77-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Skupien JA, Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. A systematic review of factors associated with the retention of glass fiber posts. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29: S1806-83242015000100401. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(3):255-65. [PubMed]
- Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):117-29. [PubMed]
- Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(6):383-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bankoğlu Güngör M, Turhan Bal B, Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Karakoca Nemli S. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate and resin nano ceramic restorations used for endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater J. 2017;36(2):135-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Roig M, Krejci I. Composite vs ceramic computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing crowns in endodontically treated teeth: analysis of marginal adaptation. Oper Dent. 2013; 38(6):663-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137 Suppl: 7S-13S. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):201-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zimmermann M, Koller C, Reymus M, Mehl A, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of indirect particle-filled composite resin CAD/CAM partial crowns after 24 months. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(8):694-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Amesti-Garaizabal A, Agustín-Panadero R, Verdejo-Solá B, Fons-Font A, Fernández-Estevan L, Montiel-Company J, et al. Fracture resistance of partial indirect restorations made with CAD/CAM technology. a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(11):1932. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(4):587-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Attia A, Kern M. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns luted using two bonding methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(3):247-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Stappert CF, Guess PC, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance. Am J Dent. 2007;20(1):21-6. [PubMed]
- Yildiz C, Vanlıoğlu BA, Evren B, Uludamar A, Kulak-Ozkan Y. Fracture resistance of manually and CAD/CAM manufactured ceramic onlays. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(7):537-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aktas G, Yerlikaya H, Akca K. Mechanical failure of endocrowns manufactured with different ceramic materials: an in vitro biomec hanical study. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(4):340-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, Grenade CF, Vanheusden AJ, Mainjot AK. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent. 2017;63:1-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mörmann WH, Bindl A. All-ceramic, chair-side computer-aided design/computer-aided machining restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2002;46(2):405-26, viii. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bindl A, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns. Dent Mater. 2006;22(1):29-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fasbinder DJ. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(9):702-4, 706, 708-9. [PubMed]
- Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(2):72-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Leung BT, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Pow EH. Comparison of mechanical properties of three machinable ceramics with an experimental fluorophlogopite glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(3):440-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, Grau-Benitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(4):e495-500. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Forberger N, Göhring TN. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(4):264-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chang CY, Kuo JS, Lin YS, Chang YH. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. J Dent Sci. 2009;4(3):110-7. [Crossref]
- Lin CL, Chang YH, Pai CA. Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation. Dent Mater. 2011;27(5):431-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Decerle N, Bessadet M, Munoz-Sanchez ML, Eschevins C, Veyrune J, Nicolas E. Evaluation of Cerec endocrowns: a preliminary cohort study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2014;22(2):89-95. [PubMed]
- Otto T. Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24(5):446-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prostho dont. 2005;18(3):219-24. [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi