.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Cluster Resistance Training Results Higher Improvements on Sprint, Agility, Strength and Vertical Jump in Professional Volleyball Players
Kümeleme Set Direnç Antrenmanı Profesyonel Voleybol Sporcularında Sprint, Çabukluk, Kuvvet ve Dikey Sıçramada Daha İyi Gelişimler Sağlayabilir
Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Sci. 2021;13(2):234-40
doi: 10.5336/sportsci.2020-79052
Makale Dili: EN
Tam Metin
ABSTRACT
Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of six-week traditional and cluster resistance training (CRT) on sprint, agility, maximal strength and vertical jump parameters in Professional volleyball players. Material and Methods: Twenty-eight Professional male volleyball players participated in the present study. Athletes were randomly assigned into two training groups: traditional resistance training (TRT) (n=14) and CRT (n=14) groups. Both training groups performed the resistance trainings during six-week on three nonconsecutive days (Monday, Wednesday and Friday). Subjects underwent countermovement vertical jump, agility t, 10-m, 20-m sprint, one repetition maximal (1RM) back squat (BS), bench press (BP), pull over (PO), military press (MP) and dead lift (DL) tests prior to and after sixweek resistance training program. Results: Both training groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in 1RM, sprint times, vertical jump displacement and agility t-test (p<0.05). As compared with the TRT group, the CRT group demonstrated large significant gains in 1RM BS (CRT: 4.76%±2.34% vs. TRT: 2.21%±1.57%; p=0.002, effect size (ES)=0.51), 1RM PO (CRT: 7.59%±4.57% vs. TRT: 3.96%±3.65%; p=0.004, ES=0.91), 1RM DL (CRT: 4.19%±2.76% vs. TRT: 1.79%±2.92%; p=0.024, ES=0.875) and 1RM BP (CRT: 5.82%±4.58 vs. TRT: 2.66%±3.51; p=0.033, ES=0.31). As compared with the TRT group, the CRT group demonstrated significantly higher gains in 20-m sprint (CRT: 6.48%±4.70% vs. TRT: 1.81%±1.04%; p=0.001, ES=1.93), agility t-test performances (CRT: 11.35%±3.89% vs. TRT: 2.28%±1.85%; p=0.000, ES=0.81) and vertical jump displacement (CRT: 6.21%±0.90% vs. TRT: 2.13%±0.61%; p=0.000, ES=5.45). Conclusion: This study suggests that CRT provides more advantages than TRT for professional volleyball players.
Keywords: Cluster resistance training; strength training; traditional strength training; volleyball players
Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of six-week traditional and cluster resistance training (CRT) on sprint, agility, maximal strength and vertical jump parameters in Professional volleyball players. Material and Methods: Twenty-eight Professional male volleyball players participated in the present study. Athletes were randomly assigned into two training groups: traditional resistance training (TRT) (n=14) and CRT (n=14) groups. Both training groups performed the resistance trainings during six-week on three nonconsecutive days (Monday, Wednesday and Friday). Subjects underwent countermovement vertical jump, agility t, 10-m, 20-m sprint, one repetition maximal (1RM) back squat (BS), bench press (BP), pull over (PO), military press (MP) and dead lift (DL) tests prior to and after sixweek resistance training program. Results: Both training groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in 1RM, sprint times, vertical jump displacement and agility t-test (p<0.05). As compared with the TRT group, the CRT group demonstrated large significant gains in 1RM BS (CRT: 4.76%±2.34% vs. TRT: 2.21%±1.57%; p=0.002, effect size (ES)=0.51), 1RM PO (CRT: 7.59%±4.57% vs. TRT: 3.96%±3.65%; p=0.004, ES=0.91), 1RM DL (CRT: 4.19%±2.76% vs. TRT: 1.79%±2.92%; p=0.024, ES=0.875) and 1RM BP (CRT: 5.82%±4.58 vs. TRT: 2.66%±3.51; p=0.033, ES=0.31). As compared with the TRT group, the CRT group demonstrated significantly higher gains in 20-m sprint (CRT: 6.48%±4.70% vs. TRT: 1.81%±1.04%; p=0.001, ES=1.93), agility t-test performances (CRT: 11.35%±3.89% vs. TRT: 2.28%±1.85%; p=0.000, ES=0.81) and vertical jump displacement (CRT: 6.21%±0.90% vs. TRT: 2.13%±0.61%; p=0.000, ES=5.45). Conclusion: This study suggests that CRT provides more advantages than TRT for professional volleyball players.
Keywords: Cluster resistance training; strength training; traditional strength training; volleyball players
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 6 hafta boyunca uygulanan geleneksel ve kümelenmiş direnç antrenmanların sprint, çabukluk, maksimal kuvvet ve dikey sıçrama performansı üzerine olan etkilerini kıyaslamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Yirmi sekiz profesyonel erkek voleybol oyuncusu bu çalışmaya katıldı. Sporcular, geleneksel direnç antrenman (GDA; n=14) ve kümelenmiş direnç antrenman grubu (KDA; n=14) olarak randomize bir şekilde 2'ye ayrıldı. Her iki grup direnç antrenmanlarını, 6 hafta boyunca ardışık olmayan 3 ayrı günde (Pazartesi, Çarşamba ve Cuma). Katılımcılara karşı hareket sıçrama, çabukluk t, 10-m, 20-m sprint, 1 tekrar maksimal (1TM) arka squat [back sguat (BS)] , 'bench pres' (BP), 'pull over' (PO), 'military pres' ve 'dead lift' (DL) testleri 6 haftalık antrenman öncesinde ve sonrasında uygulandı. Bulgular: Her iki antrenman grubu 1 TM, sprint zamanı, dikey sıçrama yüksekliği ve çabukluk t-test performanslarında istatistiksel olarak önemli gelişmeler gösterdi (p<0,05). GDA grubuyla kıyaslandığında, KDA grubu 1TM BS'de (KDA: %4,76±%2,34'e karşı GDA: %2,21±%1,57; p=0,002, 'effect size' (ES)=0,51), 1TM PO'da (KDA: %7,59±%4,57'e karşı GDA: %3,96±%3,65; p=0,004, ES=0,91), 1TM DL'de (KDA: %4,19±%2,76'e karşı GDA: %1,79±%2,92; p=0,024, ES=0,875) ve 1TM BP (CRT: %5,82±4,58'e karşı GDA: %2,66±3,51; p=0,033, ES=0,31). GDA grubuyla kıyaslandığında, KDA grubu 20-m sprint (KDA: %6,48±%4,70'e karşı GDA: %1,81±%1,04; p=0,001, ES=1,93) ve çabukluk t-testi (KDA: %11,35±%3,89'a karşı GDA: %2,28±%1,85; p=0,000, ES=0,81) ve dikey sıçramada (KDA: %6,21±%0,90'a karşı GDA: %2,13±%0,61; p=0,000, ES=5,45) istatistiksel anlamda daha yüksek kazanımlar sağladı. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, profesyonel voleybolcularda, GDA yöntemine kıyasla daha iyi avantajlar sağlamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Kümeleme direnç antrenmanı; kuvvet antrenmanı; geleneksel kuvvet antrenmanı; voleybol oyuncuları
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 6 hafta boyunca uygulanan geleneksel ve kümelenmiş direnç antrenmanların sprint, çabukluk, maksimal kuvvet ve dikey sıçrama performansı üzerine olan etkilerini kıyaslamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Yirmi sekiz profesyonel erkek voleybol oyuncusu bu çalışmaya katıldı. Sporcular, geleneksel direnç antrenman (GDA; n=14) ve kümelenmiş direnç antrenman grubu (KDA; n=14) olarak randomize bir şekilde 2'ye ayrıldı. Her iki grup direnç antrenmanlarını, 6 hafta boyunca ardışık olmayan 3 ayrı günde (Pazartesi, Çarşamba ve Cuma). Katılımcılara karşı hareket sıçrama, çabukluk t, 10-m, 20-m sprint, 1 tekrar maksimal (1TM) arka squat [back sguat (BS)] , 'bench pres' (BP), 'pull over' (PO), 'military pres' ve 'dead lift' (DL) testleri 6 haftalık antrenman öncesinde ve sonrasında uygulandı. Bulgular: Her iki antrenman grubu 1 TM, sprint zamanı, dikey sıçrama yüksekliği ve çabukluk t-test performanslarında istatistiksel olarak önemli gelişmeler gösterdi (p<0,05). GDA grubuyla kıyaslandığında, KDA grubu 1TM BS'de (KDA: %4,76±%2,34'e karşı GDA: %2,21±%1,57; p=0,002, 'effect size' (ES)=0,51), 1TM PO'da (KDA: %7,59±%4,57'e karşı GDA: %3,96±%3,65; p=0,004, ES=0,91), 1TM DL'de (KDA: %4,19±%2,76'e karşı GDA: %1,79±%2,92; p=0,024, ES=0,875) ve 1TM BP (CRT: %5,82±4,58'e karşı GDA: %2,66±3,51; p=0,033, ES=0,31). GDA grubuyla kıyaslandığında, KDA grubu 20-m sprint (KDA: %6,48±%4,70'e karşı GDA: %1,81±%1,04; p=0,001, ES=1,93) ve çabukluk t-testi (KDA: %11,35±%3,89'a karşı GDA: %2,28±%1,85; p=0,000, ES=0,81) ve dikey sıçramada (KDA: %6,21±%0,90'a karşı GDA: %2,13±%0,61; p=0,000, ES=5,45) istatistiksel anlamda daha yüksek kazanımlar sağladı. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, profesyonel voleybolcularda, GDA yöntemine kıyasla daha iyi avantajlar sağlamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Kümeleme direnç antrenmanı; kuvvet antrenmanı; geleneksel kuvvet antrenmanı; voleybol oyuncuları
REFERANSLAR:
- Haff GG, Burgess S, Stone M. Cluster training: Theoretical and practical applications for the strength and conditioning professional. Prof Strength Cond. 2008;12:12-17. [Link]
- Tufano JJ, Conlon JA, Nimphius S, Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Haff GG. Different Cluster Sets Result in Similar Metabolic, Endocrine, and Perceptual Responses in Trained Men. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(2):346-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Oliver JM, Kreutzer A, Jenke SC, Phillips MD, Mitchell JB, Jones MT. Velocity Drives Greater Power Observed During Back Squat Using Cluster Sets. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(1):235-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Denton J, Cronin JB. Kinematic, kinetic, and blood lactate profiles of continuous and intraset rest loading schemes. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(3):528-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Girman JC, Jones MT, Matthews TD, Wood RJ. Acute effects of a cluster-set protocol on hormonal, metabolic and performance measures in resistance-trained males. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(2):151-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tufano JJ, Brown LE, Haff GG. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Different Cluster Set Structures: A Systematic Review. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(3):848-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Asadi A, Ramírez-Campillo R. Effects of cluster vs. traditional plyometric training sets on maximal-intensity exercise performance. Medicina (Kaunas). 2016;52(1):41-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hansen KT, Cronin JB, Pickering SL, Newton MJ. Does cluster loading enhance lower body power development in preseason preparation of elite rugby union players? J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(8):2118-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Iglesias-Soler E, Mayo X, Río-Rodríguez D, Carballeira E, Fari-as J, Fernández-Del-Olmo M. Inter-repetition rest training and traditional set configuration produce similar strength gains without cortical adaptations. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(15):1473-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rooney KJ, Herbert RD, Balnave RJ. Fatigue contributes to the strength training stimulus. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(9):1160-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Arazi H, Khanmohammadi A, Asadi A, Haff GG. The effect of resistance training set configuration on strength, power, and hormonal adaptation in female volleyball players. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018;43(2):154-164. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Seo DI, Kim E, Fahs CA, Rossow L, Young K, Ferguson SL, et al. Reliability of the one-repetition maximum test based on muscle group and gender. J Sports Sci Med. 2012;11(2):221-5. [PubMed] [PMC]
- McMahon JJ, Jones PA, Comfort P. A Correction Equation for Jump Height Measured Using the Just Jump System. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(4):555-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rimmer E, Sleivert G. Effects of a Plyometrics Intervention Program on Sprint Performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2000;14(3):295-301. [Crossref]
- Miller MG, Herniman JJ, Ricard MD, Cheatham CC, Michael TJ. The effects of a 6-week plyometric training program on agility. J Sports Sci Med. 2006;5(3):459-65. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Wassertheil S, Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Biometrics. 1970;26(3):588. [Crossref]
- Newton RU, Rogers RA, Volek JS, Häkkinen K, Kraemer WJ. Four weeks of optimal load ballistic resistance training at the end of season attenuates declining jump performance of women volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(4):955-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Häkkinen K. Changes in physical fitness profile in female volleyball players during the competitive season. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1993;33(3):223-32. [PubMed]
- Zarezadeh-Mehrizi A, Aminai M, Amiri-khorasani M. Effects of traditional and cluster resistance training on explosive power in soccer players. Iranian Journal of Health and Physical Activity. 2013;4(1):51-56. [Link]
- Welsh L, Rutherford OM. Effects of isometric strength training on quadriceps muscle properties in over 55 year olds. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;72(3):219-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hardee JP, Lawrence MM, Zwetsloot KA, Triplett NT, Utter AC, McBride JM. Effect of cluster set configurations on power clean technique. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(5):488-96. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Smith RC, Rutherford OM. The role of metabolites in strength training. I. A comparison of eccentric and concentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;71(4):332-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schott J, McCully K, Rutherford OM. The role of metabolites in strength training. II. Short versus long isometric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;71(4):337-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Folland JP, Irish CS, Roberts JC, Tarr JE, Jones DA. Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains during resistance training. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(5):370-3; discussion 374. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: İşlem Listesi