Amaç: Son yıllarda kozmetik cerrahi prosedürleri giderek daha popüler hâle gelmiştir. Cerrahiye karar vermede internetin önemli bir rol oynadığı vurgulanmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışmada plastik, estetik ve kozmetik cerrahi uygulanan hastaların karar verme sürecinde internet kullanma durumlarına yönelik mevcut araştırmaların eğilimlerini ve öne çıkanlarını belirlemek amacıyla bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Veriler için ''Web of Science Core Collection'' veri tabanı kullanılmış ve ileri düzey tarama yapılmıştır. Yayın sayıları, en çok yayın yapan dergiler, ülkeler, kurumlar, yazarlar ve anahtar kelimeler ''VOSviewer'' programı aracılığıyla görselleştirilmiştir. Analiz için ''R Studio'' programı kullanılmıştır. Erken erişim, bildiri ve kitap analize dâhil edilmemiştir. Bulgular: 1999-2023 yılları arasında 153 çalışma analize dâhil edilmiştir. Çalışmaların %93,46'sının araştırma makalesi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Otuz dokuz farklı ülkedeki araştırmacılar tarafından üretilen çalışmalar 77 çeşitli dergide yayımlanmıştır. En çok yayın üreten ülkenin Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve kurumun Stanford Üniversitesi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. ''Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery'' en fazla yayın yapan dergi olarak bulunmuştur. ''Breast reconstruction'', ''breast cancer'', ''social media'', ''plastic surgery'', ''surgery'' en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimelerdir. Sonuç: Çalışmada; plastik, estetik ve kozmetik cerrahi uygulanacak hastaların karar verme sürecinde internet kullanma durumlarına yönelik yaklaşık 25 yıllık mevcut araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular alana yönelik kapsamlı bakış açısı sunmaktadır. Klinisyenlere ve araştırmacılara yol gösterici olması beklenmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Plastik, estetik ve kozmetik cerrahi; internet; karar verme; bibliyometrik analiz
Objective: Cosmetic surgery procedures have become increasingly popular in recent years. It is emphasized that the internet plays an important role in deciding on surgery. For this reason, in the study, a bibliometric analysis was conducted to determine the trends and highlights of existing research on the internet usage in the decision-making process of patients undergoing plastic, aesthetic and cosmetic surgery. Material and Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection database was used for the data and advanced scanning was performed. Numbers of publications, most published journals, countries, institutions, authors and keywords were visualized through the VOSviewer program. R Studio program was used for analysis. Book chapters, early Access and proceedings paper are not included in the analysis. Results: Between 1999 and 2023, 153 studies were included in the analysis. It was determined that 93.46% of the studies were research articles. Studies produced by researchers in 39 different countries have been published in 77 various journals. It has been determined that the country that produces the most publications is the United States and the institution is Stanford University. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery was found to be the journal with the most publications. ''Breast reconstruction'', ''breast cancer'', ''social media'', ''plastic surgery'', ''surgery'' are the most frequently used keywords. Conclusion: In the study, a bibliometric analysis of approximately 25 years of existing research on the internet usage status of patients who will undergo plastic, aesthetic and cosmetic surgery in the decision-making process was conducted. The findings provide a comprehensive perspective on the field. It is expected to guide clinicians and researchers.
Keywords: Plastic, aesthetic and cosmetic surgery; internet; decision making; bibliometric analysis
- Pearlman RL, Wilkerson AH, Cobb EK, Morrissette S, Lawson FG, Mockbee CS, et al. Factors associated with likelihood to undergo cosmetic surgical procedures among young adults in the United States: a narrative review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:859-77. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Fanning JE, Okamoto LA, Levine EC, McGee SA, Janis JE. Content and readability of online recommendations for breast implant size selection. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(1):e4787. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Montemurro P, Porcnik A, Hedén P, Otte M. The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(2):270-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sonmez M, Esiyok E. The effect of social media usage, appearance-related social media pressure and body mass index on body appreciation of cosmetic procedure patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(6):2711-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Murdock N, Missner A, Mehta V. Health literacy in oculofacial plastic surgery: a literature review. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41518. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- McMahon ME, Gressmann K, Martin-Smith JD. An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information for patients seeking cosmetic surgery abroad. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;81:88-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Performans Yönetimi ve Kalite Geliştirme Daire Başkanlığı. Güvenli Cerrahi Kontrol Listesi Uygulama Rehberi. 2011. [Link]
- World Health Organization [Internet]. © 2025 WHO [Cited: March 20, 2024]. Safe surgery. Available from: [Link]
- Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim Weng M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285-96. [Crossref]
- Jiang S, Liu Y, Zheng H, Zhang L, Zhao H, Sang X, et al. Evolutionary patterns and research frontiers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg. 2023;109(9):2774-83. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, Donthu N. Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research. 2022;148:101-15. [Crossref]
- Yeung AWK. A revisit to the specification of sub-datasets and corresponding coverage timespans when using Web of Science Core Collection. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e21527. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-38. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 2017;11(4):959-75. [Crossref]
- Gardiner S, Hartzell TL. Telemedicine and plastic surgery: a review of its applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(3):e47-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Walden JL, Panagopoulous G, Shrader SW. Contemporary decision making and perception in patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(3):395-403. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Funderburk CD, Batulis NS, Zelones JT, Fisher AH, Prock KL, Markov NP, et al. Innovations in the plastic surgery care pathway: using telemedicine for clinical efficiency and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(2):507-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ward B, Ward M, Paskhover B. Google Trends as a Resource for informing plastic surgery marketing decisions. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42(2):598-602. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jejurikar SS, Rovak JM, Kuzon WM Jr, Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Cederna PS. Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the Internet. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(5):460-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dorfman RG, Mahmood E, Ren A, Turin SY, Vaca EE, Fine NA, Schierle CF. Google ranking of plastic surgeons values social media presence over academic pedigree and experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(4):447-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tijerina JD, Morrison SD, Nolan IT, Vail DG, Nazerali R, Lee GK. Google Trends as a tool for evaluating public interest in facial cosmetic procedures. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(8):908-18. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Montemurro P, Cheema M, Hedén P. Patients' and surgeons' perceptions of social media's role in the decision making for primary aesthetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(10):1078-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ricci JA, Vargas CR, Chuang DJ, Lin SJ, Lee BT. Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1573-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rufai SR, Davis CR. Aesthetic surgery and Google: ubiquitous, unregulated and enticing websites for patients considering cosmetic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(5):640-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lazar CC, Deneuve S. Patients' perceptions of cosmetic surgery at a time of globalization, medical consumerism, and mass media culture: a French experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(6):878-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ding H, Li S, Fu Q, Zhou G, Wang Y, Zheng C, et al. Facial cosmetic injection: a bibliometric analysis of research status and hotspots. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024;23(3):746-57. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Xi T, Guo R, Wu X, Jiang H, Xiong J. A bibliometric and visualized research on global trends of abdominoplasty, 2011-2021. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(12):6893-901. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- WOS (Web os Science) [Internet]. © 2025 Clarivate [Cited: March 20, 2024]. Available from: [Link]
- Zhang H, Gao Y, Ying J, Yu H, Guo R, Xiong J, Jiang H. Bibliometric analysis of global research on breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer from 2011 to 2021. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(7):2071-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rymer BC, Choa RM. A worldwide bibliometric analysis of published literature in plastic and reconstructive surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(9):1304-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi