Amaç: Günlük ağız bakımında, tek başına fırçalama sıkı kontağı bulunan dişlerde arayüzlere ulaşmak için yeterli değildir, bu da bu alanların temizlenmemesine neden olur. Arayüz fırçaları ISO 16409 standardına göre dişlerin arayüzeylerini temizlemek için tasarlanmış, manuel olarak etkinleştirilen araçlardır. Bu çalışmada arayüz fırçalarının belli sürelerde kullanımları sonucu yüzeylerinde meydana gelen değişimlerin Taramalı Elektron Mikroskobu (SEM) kullanılarak incelenmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Farklı model, şekil ve büyüklükteki arayüz fırçaları marka ve boyutlarına göre gruplara ayrılarak kullanım öncesi , 1. hafta , 1. ay kullanım sonrası yüzey değişimleri SEM kullanılarak incelendi. Çalışma yumuşak dokulu bir çene modeli üzerinde uygulandı. Deney sonrası işlev gören uç kısımları keski ile kesilerek SEM de incelemeye hazır hale getirildi. Örnekler çeşitli büyütmelerde incelenerek görüntülü kesitleri alındı. Bulgular: SEM görüntülerinde fırça kıllarının, bir metalin telin kendi etrafında burulması ile oluşan aralarındaki boşluklara yerleştirildiği gözlendi. 1 haftalık 1092 hareket ile kullanım sonucunda hızlı bir yıpranma , 1 aylık 4680 hareket ile kullanım sonunda kırılmalar ile karşılaşıldı ve fırça kılları deforme oldu. İncelemelerde merkezdeki metalin bir plastik ile kaplı olduğu ve bu plastiğin kullanım sonucu aşındığı ve döküldüğü gözlemlendi. Sonuç: Arayüz fırçalarının kullanımları diş aralarının temizliği için çok önemlidir. Bu fırçaların kullanım sonucu yüzeylerinden dökülen plastik parçaların dişeti sulkusunda ya da oral mukozanın çeşitli kısımlarında yabancı cisim reaksiyonuna sebep olabileceğini düşünmekteyiz. Kesin yargılar için bu konu üzerinde invivo çalışmalara gerek vardır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Ağız hijyeni; diş fırçalama; dişeti; diş bakımı; dental araştırma
Objective: In daily oral care, brushing alone is not sufficient to reach the interfaces in tightly contacted teeth, so that these areas can not to be cleaned. Interdental brushes are manually activated tools designed to clean the interfaces of the teeth according to the ISO 16409 standard.In this study, it was aimed to investigate the changes in the surface of the interdental brushes by using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Material and Methods: Interdental brushes of different models, shapes and sizes were divided into groups. Surface changes were examined using SEM before use, 1 week, 1 month after use. After the experiment, the tip of brushes which functioned were cut with chisel and made ready for examination in SEM. Samples were examined at various magnifications and their image sections were taken. Results: In the SEM images, with the use of 1 week and 1092 movements, rapid wear was observed and with 1 month and 4680 movements, breaks were encountered and interdental brushes were deformed. In the investigations, it was observed that the metal in the center was covered with a plastic and this plastic was worn and poured as a result of usage. Conclusion: As a result of the use of these brushes, plastic particles spilled from their surfaces may cause foreign body reaction in gingival sulcus or various parts of oral mucosa. In order to make definite judgments, invivo studies are needed on this subject.
Keywords: Oral hygiene; toothbrushing; gingiva; dental care; dental research
- Marsh PD. Plaque as a biofilm: pharmacological principles of drug delivery and action in the sub- and supragingival environment. Oral Dis. 2003;9 Suppl 1:16-22.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rosen PS; American Academy of Periodontology-Research, Scicence and therapy Committee. Treatment of plaque-induced gingivitis, chronic periodontitis, and clinical conditions. Pediatr Dent. 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):253-62.[PubMed]
- Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Introduction to microbial aspects of periodontal biofilm communities, development and treatment. Periodontol 2000. 2006;42:7-12.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mariotti A. Dental plaque-induced gingival diseases. Ann Periodontol. 1999;4(1):7-19.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol. 1965;36:177-87.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- van der Weijden F, Slot DE. Oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: the evidence. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55(1):104-23.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;21;284(5418):1318-22.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Keller D, Sedghizadeh PP, Costerton JW. Periodontitis: an archetypical biofilm disease. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(8):978-86.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kuramitsu HK, He X, Lux R, Anderson MH, Shi W. Interspecies interactions within oral microbial communities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71(4):653-70.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Nayak RP, Wade AB. The relative effectiveness of plaque removal by the Proxabrush and rubber cone stimulator. J Clin Periodontol. 1977;4(2):128-33.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hansen F, Gjermo P. The plaque-removing effect of four toothbrushing methods. Scand J Dent Res. 1971;79(7):502-6.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Löe H. Oral hygiene in the prevention of caries and periodontal disease. Int Dent J. 2000;50(3):129-39.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Imai PH, Yu X, Macdonald D. Comparison of interdental brush to dental floss for reduction of clinical parameters of periodontal disease: a systematic review. Can J Dent Hyg. 2012;46(1):63-78.[Link]
- Bergenholtz A, Olsson A. Efficacy of plaque-removal using interdental brushes and waxed dental floss. Scand J Dent Res. 1984;92(3):198-203.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Christou V, Timmerman MF, van der Velden U, van der Weijden FA. Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss. J Periodontol. 1998;69(7):759-64.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Imai PH, Hatzimanolakis PC. Encouraging client compliance for interdental care with the interdental brush: the client's perspective. Can J Dent Hygiene. 2010;44(2):56-60.[Link]
- Noorlin I, Watts TL. A comparison of the efficacy and ease of use of dental floss and interproximal brushes in a randomised split mouth trial incorporating an assessment of subgingival plaque. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007;5(1):13-8.[PubMed]
- Waerhaug J. The interdental brush and its place in operative and crown and bridge dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 1976;3(2):107-13.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chapple IL, Van der Weijden F, Doerfer C, Herrera D, Shapira L, Polak D, et al. Primary prevention of periodontitis: managing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42 Suppl 16:S71-6.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Imai PH, Hatzimanolakis PC. Interdental brush in type I embrasures: Examiner blinded randomised clinical trial of bleeding and plaque efficacy. Can J Dent Hygiene. 2011;45(1):13-20.[Link]
- Kiger RD, Nylund K, Feller RP. A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18(9):681-4.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Christou V, Timmerman MF, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden FA. Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss. J Periodontol. 1998;69(7):759-64.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sälzer S, Slot DE, Van der Weijden FA, Dörfer CE. Efficacy of inter-dental mechanical plaque control in managing gingivitis--a meta-review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42 Suppl 16:S92-105.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Larsen HC, Slot DE, Van Zoelen C, Barendregt DS, Van der Weijden GA. The effectiveness of conically shaped compared with cylindrically shaped interdental brushes - a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2017;15(3):211-8.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Katge F, Mithiborwala S, Pammi T. Incidental radiographic discovery of a screw in a primary molar: an unusual case report in a 6 year old child. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:296425.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Daley TD, Wysocki GP. Foreign body gingivitis: an iatrogenic disease? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69(6):708-12.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gordon SC, Daley TD. Foreign body gingivitis: clinical and microscopic features of 61 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83(5):562-70.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gordon SC, Daley TD. Foreign body gingivitis: identification of the foreign material by energy-dispersive x-ray microanalysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83(5):571-6.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kotsakis GA, Lian Q, Ioannou AL, Michalowicz BS, John MT, Chu H, et al. A network meta-analysis of interproximal oral hygiene methods in the reduction of clinical indices of inflammation. J Periodontol. 2018;89(5):558-70.[Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tu YK, Jackson M, Kellett M, Clerehugh V. Direct and indirect effects of interdental hygiene in a clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2008;87(11):1037-42.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Van der Weijden F, Echeverria JJ, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Mechanical supragingival plaque control. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 5th ed. Blackwell Munskgaard, Copenhagen; 2015.
- Topcuoğlu N, Yek E, Yıldız S, Dadaşlı F, Dule J, Çayırcı M, et al. [Contamination of interdental brushes and dental floss with oral bacteria]. İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;46(3):9-14.[Link]
- Massassati A, Frank RM. Scanning electron microscopy of unused and used manual toothbrushes. J Clin Periodontol. 1982;9(2):148-61.[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gordon SC, Daley TD. Foreign body gingivitis: clinical and microscopic features of 61 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83(5):562-70.[Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi