.: ORİJİNAL ARAŞTIRMA
Ağartma Materyallerinin Çeşitli Restoratif Materyallerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne ve Yüzey Sertliğine Etkilerinin İn Vitro Olarak İncelenmesi
In Vitro Evaluation of the Effects of Bleaching Materials on Surface Roughness and Surface Hardness of Various Restorative Materials
Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2021;27(3):439-50
doi: 10.5336/dentalsci.2020-75722
Makale Dili: TR
Tam Metin
Ücretsiz Erişim
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; ofis ve ev tipi ağartma materyallerinin, klinikte sıklıkla kullanılan yedi farklı restoratif materyalin yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve yüzey sertliği üzerine etkilerini in vitro olarak incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ofis tipi (Opalescence Boost PF %40) ve Ev tipi (Opalescence PF % 16) ağartma materyalleri; disk şeklinde (2x10 mm) hazırlanmış, A2 renginde mikrohibrit (Gradia Direct Anterior), nanohibrit (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic), mikrofil (Renamel) ve nanoseramik içeren (Ceram-X-One Universal) kompozit rezin, kompomer (Dyract XP), rezin modifiye cam iyonomer siman (Fuji II LC) ve geleneksel cam iyonomer siman (Fuji IX) yüzeyine üretici firma talimatları doğrultusunda uygulanmıştır. Ağartma uygulanmayan kontrol grubu dahil 3 uygulama grubu ve 7 restoratif materyal grubu ile toplam 21 adet grup (n=10) oluşturulmuştur. Kontrol grubu yapay tükürük içerisinde bekletilmiştir. Örneklerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü Profilometre cihazı (Perthometer M2, Mahr, Almanya) ve yüzey sertliği de Knoop mikrosertlik cihazı ile ölçülmüştür. Yüzey özellikleri SEM analizi ile kalitatif olarak incelenmiştir. Verilerin istatistiksel analizi iki yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Ev tipi ağartma, yüzey pürüzlülüğünü Fuji II LC grubunda anlamlı derecede artırırken, Fuji IX grubunda anlamlı derecede azaltmıştır (p0,05). Test grupları arasında yüzey sertliği bakımından anlamlı derecede fark bulunmuştur (p0,05). Sonuç: Yüzey pürüzlülüğünde sonuçlar restoratif materyalin yapısına, ağartma materyaline, uygulama süresine bağlı olarak değişmektedir. Yüzey sertliği ise ağartma materyallerinden etkilenmemiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Ağartma; yüzey pürüzlülüğü; yüzey sertliği
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; ofis ve ev tipi ağartma materyallerinin, klinikte sıklıkla kullanılan yedi farklı restoratif materyalin yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve yüzey sertliği üzerine etkilerini in vitro olarak incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ofis tipi (Opalescence Boost PF %40) ve Ev tipi (Opalescence PF % 16) ağartma materyalleri; disk şeklinde (2x10 mm) hazırlanmış, A2 renginde mikrohibrit (Gradia Direct Anterior), nanohibrit (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic), mikrofil (Renamel) ve nanoseramik içeren (Ceram-X-One Universal) kompozit rezin, kompomer (Dyract XP), rezin modifiye cam iyonomer siman (Fuji II LC) ve geleneksel cam iyonomer siman (Fuji IX) yüzeyine üretici firma talimatları doğrultusunda uygulanmıştır. Ağartma uygulanmayan kontrol grubu dahil 3 uygulama grubu ve 7 restoratif materyal grubu ile toplam 21 adet grup (n=10) oluşturulmuştur. Kontrol grubu yapay tükürük içerisinde bekletilmiştir. Örneklerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü Profilometre cihazı (Perthometer M2, Mahr, Almanya) ve yüzey sertliği de Knoop mikrosertlik cihazı ile ölçülmüştür. Yüzey özellikleri SEM analizi ile kalitatif olarak incelenmiştir. Verilerin istatistiksel analizi iki yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Ev tipi ağartma, yüzey pürüzlülüğünü Fuji II LC grubunda anlamlı derecede artırırken, Fuji IX grubunda anlamlı derecede azaltmıştır (p0,05). Test grupları arasında yüzey sertliği bakımından anlamlı derecede fark bulunmuştur (p0,05). Sonuç: Yüzey pürüzlülüğünde sonuçlar restoratif materyalin yapısına, ağartma materyaline, uygulama süresine bağlı olarak değişmektedir. Yüzey sertliği ise ağartma materyallerinden etkilenmemiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Ağartma; yüzey pürüzlülüğü; yüzey sertliği
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of office and home bleaching materials on the surface roughness and surface hardness of seven different restorative materials which are commonly used in the dental clinics. Material and Methods: Office type (Opalescence Boost PF 40%) and Home type (Opalescence PF 16%) bleaching materials applied on disc (2×10 mm) in A2 color microhybrid (Gradia Direct Anterior), nanohybrid (Clearfil Majesty Estetic), microfil (Renamel) and nanoceramic based (Ceram-X-One Universal) composite resin, compomer (Dyract XP), resin modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) and conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). A total of 21 groups (n=10) were formed with 3 treatment groups including non-bleaching control groups and 7 restorative material groups. The surface roughness were calculated by aprofilometer and surface hardness calculated by a Knoop microhardness device and analyzed by. SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison test. Results: Home bleaching caused a significant increase in surface roughness in the Fuji II LC group and a significant decrease in the Fuji IX group (p0.05). A significant difference in surface hardness was found between the test groups (p0.05). Conclusion: Surface rougheness is depending on the restorative and bleaching material. Hardness is not affected by bleaching materials.
Keywords: Bleaching; surface roughness; surface hardness
Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of office and home bleaching materials on the surface roughness and surface hardness of seven different restorative materials which are commonly used in the dental clinics. Material and Methods: Office type (Opalescence Boost PF 40%) and Home type (Opalescence PF 16%) bleaching materials applied on disc (2×10 mm) in A2 color microhybrid (Gradia Direct Anterior), nanohybrid (Clearfil Majesty Estetic), microfil (Renamel) and nanoceramic based (Ceram-X-One Universal) composite resin, compomer (Dyract XP), resin modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) and conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). A total of 21 groups (n=10) were formed with 3 treatment groups including non-bleaching control groups and 7 restorative material groups. The surface roughness were calculated by aprofilometer and surface hardness calculated by a Knoop microhardness device and analyzed by. SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison test. Results: Home bleaching caused a significant increase in surface roughness in the Fuji II LC group and a significant decrease in the Fuji IX group (p0.05). A significant difference in surface hardness was found between the test groups (p0.05). Conclusion: Surface rougheness is depending on the restorative and bleaching material. Hardness is not affected by bleaching materials.
Keywords: Bleaching; surface roughness; surface hardness
REFERANSLAR:
- Kihn PW. Vital tooth whitening. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):319-31, viii. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Haywood VB. History, safety, and effectiveness of current bleaching techniques and applications of the nightguard vital bleaching technique. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(7):471-88. [PubMed]
- Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(2):137-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang L, Francisconi LF, Atta MT, Dos Santos JR, Del Padre NC, Gonini A Jr, et al. Effect of bleaching gels on surface roughness of nanofilled composite resins. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(2):173-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Polydorou O, Hellwig E, Auschill TM. The effect of different bleaching agents on the surface texture of restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2006;31(4):473-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yap AU, Ng SC, Siow KS. Soft-start polymerization: influence on effectiveness of cure and post-gel shrinkage. Oper Dent. 2001;26(3):260-6. [PubMed]
- Wattanapayungkul P, Yap AU, Chooi KW, Lee MF, Selamat RS, Zhou RD. The effect of home bleaching agents on the surface roughness of tooth-colored restoratives with time. Oper Dent. 2004;29(4):398-403. [PubMed]
- Polydorou O, Mönting JS, Hellwig E, Auschill TM. Effect of in-office tooth bleaching on the microhardness of six dental esthetic restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2007;23(2):153-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Attin T, Hannig C, Wiegand A, Attin R. Effect of bleaching on restorative materials and restorations--a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2004;20(9):852-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Taher NM. The effect of bleaching agents on the surface hardness of tooth colored restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6(2):18-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yu H, Li Q, Cheng H, Wang Y. The effects of temperature and bleaching gels on the properties of tooth-colored restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(2):100-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bahari M, Savadi Oskoee S, Mohammadi N, Ebrahimi Chaharom ME, Godrati M, Savadi Oskoee A. Effect of different bleaching strategies on microhardness of a silorane-based composite resin. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(4):213-9. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sulieman M. An overview of bleaching techniques: 2. Night Guard Vital Bleaching and non-vital bleaching. Dent Update. 2005;32(1):39-40, 42-4, 46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Neme AL, Frazier KB, Roeder LB, Debner TL. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002;27(1):50-8. [PubMed]
- Joniot S, Salomon JP, Dejou J, Grégoire G. Use of two surface analyzers to evaluate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing. Oper Dent. 2006;31(1):39-46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rattacaso RM, da Fonseca Roberti Garcia L, Aguilar FG, Consani S, de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza F. Bleaching agent action on color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of composites submitted to accelerated artificial aging. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(2):143-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Mendes AP, Barceleiro Mde O, dos Reis RS, Bonato LL, Dias KR. Changes in surface roughness and color stability of two composites caused by different bleaching agents. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(6):659-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yap AU, Mok BY. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material. Oper Dent. 2002;27(2):161-6. [PubMed]
- Bailey SJ, Swift EJ Jr. Effects of home bleaching products on composite resins. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(7):489-94. [PubMed]
- Sharafeddin F, Jamalipour G. Effects of 35% carbamide peroxide gel on surface roughness and hardness of composite resins. J Dent (Tehran). 2010;7(1):6-12. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yap AU, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(1):1-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dogan A, Ozcelik S, Dogan OM, Hubbezoglu I, Cakmak M, Bolayir G. Effect of bleaching on roughness of dental composite resins. The Journal of Adhesion. 2008;84(11):897-914. [Crossref]
- Cehreli ZC, Yazici R, García-Godoy F. Effect of home-use bleaching gels on fluoride releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2003;28(5):605-9. [PubMed]
- Cengiz E, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ulusoy N, Deniz ST, Yuksel-Devrim E. The effect of home bleaching agents on the surface roughness of five different composite resins: A SEM evaluation. Scanning. 2016;38(3):277-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alqahtani MQ. Tooth-bleaching procedures and their controversial effects: A literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(2):33-46. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(6):642-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Thomé T, Steagall W Jr, Tachibana A, Braga SR, Turbino ML. Influence of the distance of the curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15(6):486-91. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Rouhollahi M, Mohammadibasir M, Talim Sh. Comparative depth of cure among two light-cured core build-up composites by surface vickers hardness. J Dent (Tehran). 2012;9(3):255-61. [PubMed] [PMC]
- García-Godoy F, García-Godoy A, García-Godoy F. Effect of bleaching gels on the surface roughness, hardness, and micromorphology of composites. Gen Dent. 2002;50(3):247-50. [PubMed]
- Mujdeci A, Gokay O. Effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(4):286-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yu H, Li Q, Hussain M, Wang Y. Effects of bleaching gels on the surface microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials in situ. J Dent. 2008;36(4):261-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bahannan SA. Effects of different bleaching agent concentrations on surface roughness and microhardness of esthetic restorative materials. The Saudi Journal for Dental Research 2015;6(2):124-8. [Crossref]
- Lee JH, Kim HI, Kim KH, Kwon YH. Effect of bleaching agents on the fluoride release and microhardness of dental materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(5):535-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aliping-McKenzie M, Linden RW, Nicholson JW. The effect of saliva on surface hardness and water sorption of glass-ionomers and "compomers". J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14(10):869-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, Hume WR. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dent Mater. 2001;17(1):34-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: İşlem Listesi