Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, sosyal destek, yardımlaşma ve normları kapsayan sosyal sermaye algısıyla fiziksel aktivite düzeyi arasındaki yordayıcı ilişkinin üniversite öğrencileri arasında araştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu araştırmaya, 227 kadın ve 104 erkek üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak, Sosyal Sermaye Algısı Ölçeği ve Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Kısa Formu kullanılmıştır. Düşük, orta ve yüksek düzeyli fiziksel aktiviteyle harcanan eden görevin metabolik eş değeri [metabolic equivalent of task (MET)] miktarı bağımlı değişken olarak ele alınmıştır. Verilerin analizinde ise çoklu lineer regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Analiz sonucunda ise üniversite arkadaşları arasındaki sosyal destek, yardımlaşma ve normları kapsayan yatay okul sosyal sermaye algısı alt boyutu ve yüksek düzeyde yapılan fiziksel aktivite ile harcanan MET miktarı arasında doğrusal, aile sosyal sermaye algısı arasında ise ters yönlü yordayıcı ilişki tespit edilmiştir; F (6,321)=2,427, p=0,026. Düşük düzeyde fiziksel aktiviteyle harcanan MET [F (6,321)=0,838, p=0,541] ile orta düzeyli fiziksel aktiviteyle harcanan MET [F (6,321)=0,695, p=0,653] miktarlarının sosyal sermaye algısı arasında herhangi bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir. Sonuç: Bu bulgular, üniversite öğrencilerinin birbirlerine sağladıkları sosyal desteğin ve üniversite arkadaşları ile içerisinde bulundukları sosyal ağların, yüksek düzeyli fiziksel aktivite katılımı için uygun ortamı sağladığını göstermektedir. Buna karşın aileye yönelik sosyal sermaye algısının, fiziksel aktivite yoğunluğunu ters yönde yordaması ise daha önce ulusal ve uluslararası çalışmalarca farklı yıllarda raporlanan, Türk kültüründe her yaştan bireyin fiziksel aktivite katılımının düşük olmasıyla açıklanabilir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, üniversite öğrencilerini hedef alan fiziksel aktivite müdahale planlarında arkadaşlar arası sosyal etkileşimin planların içerisine dâhil edilmesi gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sosyal sermaye; fiziksel aktivite; üniversite öğrencileri
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between social capital which includes social support, reciprocity and norms, and physical activity level among university students. Material and Methods: Participants of the study were 227 women and 104 men university students. Social Capital Perception scale and short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were used as data collection tool. metabolic equivalent of task (MET) estimates of low, moderate and high physical activity were analyzed as dependent variables. Data were analyzed with multiple logistic regression. Results: As a result of the analysis, there is a linear relationship between the horizontal school social capital perception subdimension including social support, cooperation and norms among university friends and the amount of MET spent with high level physical activity. On the other hand, a reverse predictive relationship was found between family and social capital perception, F (6.321)=2.427, p=0.026. There was no any significant association between social capital perception and MET spent with low [F (6.321)=0.838, p=0.541], and moderate MET [F (6.321)=0.695, p=0.653] level physical activity participation. Conclusion: These findings show that the social support that university students provide to each other and the social networks they are in with their university friends provide a suitable environment for high level physical activity participation. On the other hand, the negative prediction of social capital perception towards the family's intensity of physical activity can be explained by the low level of physical activity participation of individuals of all ages in Turkish culture, which was previously reported by national and international studies in different years. The results obtained reveal the necessity of including social interaction among friends in physical activity intervention plans targeting university students.
Keywords: Social capital; physical activity; university students
- Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic reiew of current systematic reviews. Current Opinion in Cardiology. 2017;32(5):541-556 [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Humphreys BR, Mcleod L, Ruseski JE. Physical activity and health outcomes: evidence from Canada. Health Econ. 2014;23(1):33-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Currie C, Roberts C, Settertobulte W, Morgan A, Smith R, Samdal O, Rasnyssen VB. Young people's health in context: Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2001/2002 survey (No. EUR/04/5048327); 2004.Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
- Commission on Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: Commission on Social Determinants of Health final report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
- Dawkins CJ. Outlook: Two views on Robert D. Putnam's " E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty‐first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture": Reflections on diversity and social capital: A critique of Robert D. Putnam's "E Pluribus Unum: Diversity. Hous. Policy Debate. 2008;19:207-217. [Crossref]
- Healy T, Côté S. The well-being of nations: the role of human and social capital. education and skills. Paris: OECD; 2001.
- Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, De Looze M, Roberts C, Samdal O, Smith ORF, Barkenow V. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012. p.139-200.
- DiPietro L, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle SHJ, Borodulin K, Bull FC, Buman MP, Cordon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu L, Jago R, Katmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Willumsen JF. Advancing the Global Physical Activity Agenda: Recommendations for Future Research by the 2020 WHO Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Guidelines Development Group. Int. J Behav Nutr Phys Act;2020:14;1-11. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lindström M, Hanson BS, Östergren PO. Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: the role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. Soc. Sci. Med. 2001;52(3):441-451. [Crossref]
- Ueshima K, Fujiwara T, Takao S, Suziki E, Iwase T, Doi H, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. Does social capital promote physical activity? A population-based study in Japan. PLoS One 2010;5(8):e12135. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lindstrom M, Moghaddassi M, Merlo J. Social capital and leisure time physical activity: a population based multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden. J. Epidemiol. Community Health.2003;57: 23-28. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Aliyas Z. Social Capital and Physical Activity Level in an Urban Adult Population. Am. J. Heal. Educ.2020;51: 40-49. [Crossref]
- Yıldızer G, Bilgin E, Korur EN, Novak D, Demirhan G. The association of various social capital indicators and physical activity participation among Turkish adolescents. J. Sport Heal. Sci. 2018;7(1):27-33. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yıldızer G, Yılmaz İ, Novak D. Social capital and physical activity participation among Turkish adolescents in urban centre: a preliminary study. South African J. Res. Sport. Phys. Educ. Recreat.2009;41:117-129.
- World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. (2014). Geneva: Sweeden.
- LaCaille L, Dauner KN, Krambeer R, Pedersen J. Psychosocial and environmental determinants of eating behaviors, physical activity, and weight change among college students: a qualitative analysis. J. Am. Coll. Heal. 2011;59(6):531-538. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Deliens T, Deforche B, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Clarys P. Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Novak D, Doubova SV, Kawachi I. Social capital and physical activity among Croatian high school students. Public Health. 2016;135:48-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Meydan CH, Şeşen H. (Structural Equation Modelling: AMOS Applications) Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık; 2011.
- Tabachnik BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th Ed. Allyn and Bacon. Needham Heights Ma; 2006.
- Steiger JH, Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2007;42(5):893-898. [Crossref]
- Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd Ed. Guilford Press; 2011.p.64-70.
- Craig CL, Marshall AL, Söström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis J, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-Country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381-1395. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Saglam M, Arıkan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, Tokgozoglu L. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept. Mot. Skills. 2010;111(1):278-284. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Welk GJ, Beyler NK, Kim Y, Matthews CE. Calibration of self-report measures of physical activity and sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sport. Exer. 2017;49(7):1473. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Murphy JJ, Murphy MH, MaxDonncha C, Murphy N, Nevill AM, Woods CB. Validity and reliability of three self-report ınstruments for assessing attainment of physical activity guidelines in university students. Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci. 2017;21(3):134-141. [Crossref]
- Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital-1986. Szemen I., Kaposy T. editors. Cultural theory: An anthology. 1 st ed. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011; p., 81-93.
- Lindstrom M. Social capital and health-related behaviors. In: Kawachi, I, Subramanian, SV, Kim D, ed. 1 st ed. Social Capital and Health. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 215-238. [Crossref]
- Bartshe M, Coughenour C, Pharr J. Perceived walkability, social capital, and self-reported physical activity in Las Vegas college students. Sustain. 2018;10(9):1-11. [Crossref]
- Clopton AW, Finch BL. Are college students 'bowling alone?' Examining the contribution of team ıdentification to the social capital of college students. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2010:33(4);377-402.
- Legh-Jones H, Moore S. Network social capital, social participation, and physical inactivity in an urban adult population. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012;74;1362-1367. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wu SY, Pender N, Noureddine S. Gender differences in the psychosocial and cognitive correlates of physical activity among Taiwanese adolescents: a structural equation modeling approach. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2003;10:93-105. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Kim D. Social capital and health a decade of progress and beyond. In: Kawachi, I, Subramanian, SV, Kim D, ed. 1 st ed. Social Capital and Health. New York: Springer; 2008. p.1-28. [Crossref]
- Villalonga-Olives E, Kawachi I. The dark side of social capital: A systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital. Soc. Sci. Med. 2017;194:105-127. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pugliese JA, Okun MA. Social control and strenuous exercise among late adolescent college students.Parents versus peers as influence agents. J. Adolesc. 2014;37(5):543-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List