Objective: As surgeons in the early years of post-residency training, we aimed to share the clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy of the entry method we implemented using ultrasound and fluoroscopy together in supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) surgeries. Material and Methods: Between November 2022 and April 2024, 20 patients who underwent supine mini PNL with a combined entry method using ultrasonography and fluoroscopy were retrospectively evaluated. The imaging, laboratory, and surgical data of patients operated on by urologists in their early years following specialty training were collected. The demographic characteristics, age, gender, side of surgery, operative time, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, complications, preoperative stone volumes, decrease in hemoglobin levels on postoperative day 1, stone removal rates, fluoroscopy times, total fluoroscopy doses, and complications were analyzed. Results: A total of 20 patients, including 12 men and 8 women, underwent supine mini PNL. The mean operative time was 64±14.33 minutes. Entry was successfully achieved in all patients using ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance. No significant bleeding or organ injury related to the entry was observed. The stone-free rate determined by comparing preoperative and postoperative imaging was 87.6%±13.68%. The mean fluoroscopy duration was 65.8±22.4 seconds. According to the Clavien complication classification, Grade 1 complications were observed in 4 patients, Grade 2 in 4 patients, and Grade 3A in 1 patient. Conclusion: In conclusion, based on our experience, we believe that the combined use of ultrasound and fluoroscopy in supine mini PNL surgeries provides a safe, straightforward approach with low radiation exposure.
Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy; supine position; ultrasonography
Amaç: Uzmanlık eğitimi sonrası ilk yıllarındaki cerrahlar olarak supin mini perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) cerrahisinde ultrason ve floroskopiyi birlikte kullanarak uyguladığımız giriş yönteminin klinik sonuçlarını, güvenirliğini ve etkinliğini paylaşmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kasım 2022-Nisan 2024 tarihleri arasında ultrasonografi ve floroskopi birlikteliğinde kombine giriş yöntemi uygulanarak supin mini PNL uygulanan 20 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Uzmanlık eğitimi sonrası yeni uzman ürologlar tarafından yapılan cerrahilerdeki hastaların görüntüleme, laboratuvar ve cerrahi özellik kayıtları toplandı. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, yaş, cinsiyet, taraf, operasyon süresi, kan transfüzyonu, hastanede yatış süresi, komplikasyonları, preop taş büyüklükleri, postop 1. günde hemoglobindeki düşüş, taşların alınma oranları, floroskopi süreleri, toplam floroskopi dozları ve komplikasyonlar incelendi. Bulgular: 12 erkek 8 kadın olmak üzere toplam 20 hastaya supin mini PNL yapıldı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 64±14,33 dk idi. Tüm hastalara ultrasonografi ve floroskopi eşliğinde giriş yapıldı. Girişe bağlı ciddi bir kanama veya organ hasarı saptanmadı. Taşların preop ve postop görüntülemelerle karşılaştırılmasıyla saptanan taşların dışarı alınma oranları ise %87,6±13,68 olarak saptandı. Ortalama floroskopi kullanım süresi 65,8±22,4 sn saptandı. Clavien komplikasyon sınıflamasına göre 4 hastada Derece 1, 4 hastada Derece 2 ve 1 hastada Derece 3A komplikasyon saptandı. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak başlangıç deneyimlerimize göre supin mini PNL cerrahilerinde ultrasonografi ile floroskopinin kombine kullanımı ile yapılan girişin; güvenli, kolay ve düşük radyasyon maruziyetli olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Perkütan nefrolitotomi; supin mini perkütan nefrolitotomi; supin pozisyon; ultrasonografi
- de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, et al; CROES PCNL Study Group. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25(1):11-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Valdivia Uría JG, Lachares Santamaría E, Villarroya Rodríguez S, Taberner Llop J, Abril Baquero G, Aranda Lassa JM. Nefrolitectomía percutánea: técnica simplificada (nota previa) [Percutaneous nephrolithectomy: simplified technic (preliminary report)]. Arch Esp Urol. 1987;40(3):177-80. Spanish. [PubMed]
- Valdivia JG, Valer J, Villarroya S, López JA, Bayo A, Lanchares E, et al. Why is percutaneous nephroscopy still performed with the patient prone? Journal of Endourology. 1990;4(3):269-77. [Crossref]
- Pulido-Contreras E, Garcia-Padilla MA, Medrano-Sanchez J, Leon-Verdin G, Primo-Rivera MA, Sur RL. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasound-assisted puncture: does the technique reduce dependence on fluoroscopic ionizing radiation? World J Urol. 2021;39(9):3579-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Matlaga BR, Shah OD, Zagoria RJ, Dyer RB, Streem SB, Assimos DG. Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 2003;170(1):45-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol. 2007;178(1):15-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chu C, Masic S, Usawachintachit M, Hu W, Yang W, Stoller M, et al. Ultrasound-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a description of three novel ultrasound-guided needle techniques. J Endourol. 2016;30(2):153-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Li X, Long Q, Chen X, He D, He H. Real-time ultrasound-guided PCNL using a novel SonixGPS needle tracking system. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(4):341-6. Erratum in: Urolithiasis. 2014;42(5):473. Dalin, He [corrected to He, Dalin]. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, et al; CROES PCNL Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):246-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ullah A, Khan MK, Rahman AU, Naeem M, Khan S, Rehman RU. Total ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a novel technique. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013;11(2):149-54. [Link]
- Yan S, Xiang F, Yongsheng S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy guided solely by ultrasonography: a 5-year study of >700 cases. BJU Int. 2013;112(7):965-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Karami H, Rezaei A, Mohammadhosseini M, Javanmard B, Mazloomfard M, Lotfi B. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position: a comparative study. J Endourol. 2010;24(8):1357-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhu W, Li J, Yuan J, Liu Y, Wan SP, Liu G, et al. A prospective and randomised trial comparing fluoroscopic, total ultrasonographic, and combined guidance for renal access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int. 2017;119(4):612-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Basiri A, Shakiba B, Hoshyar H, Ansari A, Golshan A. Biplanar oblique access technique: a new approach to improve the success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urologia. 2018;85(3):118-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gamal WM, Hussein M, Aldahshoury M, Hammady A, Osman M, Moursy E, et al. Solo ultrasonography-guided percutanous nephrolithotomy for single stone pelvis. J Endourol. 2011;25(4):593-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hall E. Hereditary effects of radiation. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 4th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1994, Section 2. p.187-200.
- Theocharopoulos N, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Occupational exposure from common fluoroscopic projections used in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(9):1698-703. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Miller ME, Davis ML, MacClean CR, Davis JG, Smith BL, Humphries JR. Radiation exposure and associated risks to operating-room personnel during use of fluoroscopic guidance for selected orthopaedic surgical procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(1):1-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List