Objective: This study was conducted to determine the psychosocial experiences of men with rhinoplasty. Material and Methods: This study was a qualitative study conducted using the phenomenological method. The study was conducted between May and June 2022. A total of 13 men with rhinoplasty were interviewed. Data were collected with an information form and a semi-structured interview form. The data were analysed using content analysis and themes were created. The study protocol was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Permission was obtained from the ethics committee and individual consent was obtained from participants. Results: The ages of the men participating in the study ranged from 19 to 32 years. The majority of the participants had undergraduate education, middle income level, were employed, and single. Two main themes and 5 sub-themes emerged. The themes were mirror (appearance & new nose/new life) and comments about the nose (pressure, perspective and before/after). Participants emphasized the positive and negative effects of rhinoplasty surgeries in terms of psychosocial impact. Conclusion: It was found that with rhinoplasty, men's appearance improved and their self-confidence increased; however, they were exposed to pressure and negative statements about the nose, and need comprehensive counselling about the process. In line with this, counselling-based interventions by mental health professionals can be planned for men before and after rhinoplasty. Educational interventions for youth, adults, families and society can be implemented.
Keywords: Rhinoplasty; men; qualitative study; psychosocial experiences
Amaç: Bu çalışma, burun estetiği yaptıran erkeklerin psikososyal deneyimlerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Fenomenolojik yöntem kullanılarak yapılan nitel bir çalışmadır. Çalışma, Mayıs-Haziran 2022 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenmiş, burun estetiği olan 13 erkek ile görüşülmüştür. Veriler, kişisel bilgi formu ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formuyla derinlemesine görüşme yapılarak toplanmıştır. Veriler içerik analizi yöntemi ile çözümlenerek temalar oluşturulmuştur. Çalışma protokolü, 1975 Helsinki Deklarasyonuna uygun olarak yürütülmüştür. Etik kurul izni ve katılımcılardan bireysel onam alınmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmada erkeklerin yaşları 19 ve 32 yaş arasında değişmektedir. Katılımcıların çoğunluğu lisans eğitimi almış, orta gelir düzeyine sahip, çalışan ve bekârdır. Araştırmada 2 ana tema ve 5 alt tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Temalar ve alt temalar; ayna (görünüm ve yeni burun yeni yaşam) ve burun hakkında söylemler (baskı, bakış açısı, öncesi/sonrası) olarak belirlenmiştir. Katılımcılar, burun estetiği ameliyatlarının psikososyal açıdan olumlu ve olumsuz etkilerini vurgulamışlardır. Sonuç: Burun estetiği ile erkeklerin görünümlerinin iyileştiği ve öz güvenlerinin arttığı bununla birlikte burun konusunda baskıya ve olumsuz söylemlere maruz kaldıkları ve süreçle ilgili kapsamlı bir danışmanlığa ihtiyacın olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu doğrultuda, ruh sağlığı profesyonelleri rinoplasti öncesinde ve sonrasında erkeklere danışmanlık temelli müdahaleler planlanabilir. Gençleri, yetişkinleri, aileleri ve toplumu temel alan eğitimsel müdahaleler yapılabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Burun estetiği; erkek; nitel çalışma; psikososyal deneyim
- Rezaei F, Rezaei F, Abbasi H, Moradi H. A comparison of doctor/patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcomes of rhinoplasty: a prospective study. J Med Life. 2019;12(4):374-80. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Shahbazi Z, Ardalani H, Maleki M. Aesthetics of numerical proportions in human cosmetic surgery. World J Plast Surg. 2019;8(1):78-84. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Thorne CH, ed. Özmen S, çeviri editörü. Grabb ve Smith Plastik Cerrahi. 7. Baskı. İstanbul: Güneş Tıp Kitabevi; 2016.
- Alsubeeh NA, AlSaqr MA, Alkarzae M, Aldosari B. Prevalence of considering revision rhinoplasty in Saudi patients and its associated factors. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;41(1):59. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Koca ÇF. Health-related quality of life after rhinoplasty: a review article. Medical Research Archives. 2017;5(8):1-11. [Link]
- Manhas P, Angral S, Kotwal S. Outcome and pitfalls of open rhinoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;72(1):17-23. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- ISAPS [Internet]. © 2022 International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery [Cited: 15.08.2022]. ISAPS Global Statistics. Available from: [Link]
- Yang F, Liu Y, Xiao H, Li Y, Cun H, Zhao Y. Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative patient satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergoing rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(3):603-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(4):1807-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shauly O, Gould DJ, Patel KM. Assessment of mental illness in patients seeking rhinoplasty: a crowdsourcing-based study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2019;7(8 Suppl):3. [Crossref] [PMC]
- Strazdins E, Nie YF, Ramli R, Palesy T, Christensen JM, Alvarado R, et al. Association between mental health status and patient satisfaction with the functional outcomes of rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018;20(4):284-91. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Rohrich RJ, Mohan R. Male rhinoplasty: update. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(4):744e-53e. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jalali A, Abasi P, Ghaffari Z. Factors involved in the decision of Iranian men to undergo rhinoplasty: a grounded theory Study. Plast Surg Nurs. 2021;41(2):86-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sampieri CRH, Collado FC, Lucio BP. Metodología De La Investigación. 4th ed. México DF.: MC. Graw-Hill; 2013.
- Ghafari Z, Jalali A, Abbasi P, Yousefi-Labani J. Causes and challenges of males' rhinoplasty in Iranian population: qualitative study. Research Square. 2020. [Crossref]
- Najjarzadehghalati F, Gradmann C, Kaboodkhani R. A qualitative study of Iranian candidates' awareness, expectations and motivational factors related to nose job surgery (rhinoplasty). Electronic Journal of General Medicine. 2022;19(2):em353. [Crossref]
- Türk GD, Bayrakcı S. Sosyal medya ve toplumda değişen estetik işlem yaptırma algısı [Social media and perception of changing aesthetic operation in society]. AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi. 2019;10(39):118-35. [Crossref]
- Shahidi N, Mahdavi F, Gol MK. Comparison of emotional intelligence, body image, and quality of life between rhinoplasty candidates and control group. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:153. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Disawal A, Srivastava S. Changes in patient's life after rhinoplasty. International Surgery Journal. 2021;8(4):1260-3. [Crossref]
- Hashemi M, Sakhi N, Ghazavi H, Bolourinejad P, Kheirabadi G. Effects of aesthetic rhinoplasty on quality of life, anxiety/depression, and self-esteem of the patients. European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2020;43(2):153-8. [Crossref]
- Bodnar LA. Psychological predictors of dissatisfaction with the results of rhinoplasty. Вісник Проблем Біології І Медицини. 2020;3(157):304-7. [Crossref]
- Dömbekci HA, Öztürk YE. Burun estetiği operasyonlarını etkileyen sosyal faktörler ve burun estetiğinin tıbbileştirilmesi [Social factors affecting rhinoplasty operations and mecicalization of rhinoplasty]. Ekev Akademi Dergisi. 2021;(87):217-40. [Link]
- Chopan M, Sayadi L, Clark EM, Maguire K. Plastic surgery and social media: examining perceptions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(4):1259-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Timberlake AT, Wu RT, Cabrejo R, Gabrick K, Persing JA. Harnessing social media to advance research in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):1094-100. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kandathil CK, Patel PN, Spataro EA, Most SP. Examining preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction in rhinoplasty patients: a single-center study. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021;23(5):375-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wei L, Ge C, Xiao W, Zhang X, Xu J. Cross-sectional investigation and analysis of anxiety and depression in preoperative patients in the outpatient department of aesthetic plastic surgery in a general hospital in China. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(11):1539-46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List