Objective: This study is designed to put forth how stuttering -as a disorder- and people who stutter (PWS) are perceived by employers in Türkiye and reveal attitudes of employers toward PWS in consideration of gender and educational status. The current study also investigates different responses of employers in 5 business areas (health service, education service, factory/company, cafe/restaurant, and store) and the general impression of employers toward PWS and people with a physical disability. Material and Methods: One hundred and eighteen employers from 5 business areas in İzmir were contacted and the data were analyzed by using the convenience sampling method. The Public Opinion Survey of Human AttributesStuttering (POSHA-S) is used as a measuring instrument. POSHA-S samples various beliefs, reactions, behaviors, and emotions that can identify social ignorance, stigmatization, and/or discrimination towards stuttering. Results: Employers consider PWS to be shy, timid, angry, and easily excitable. It has been found that employers have negative attitudes toward PWS, and stuttering is an undesirable quality for employers. No significant difference was found between the 5 business areas, different educational statuses and genders, and similar negative attitudes were observed (p>0.05). Furthermore, employers have more negative attitudes toward PWS than they have toward people with a physical disability. Conclusion: There are similar negative attitudes and stigmatization towards stuttering and PWS by employers regardless of business area, age, gender, and educational status. For this reason, PWS will likely have difficulties in employment and maintaining the job, and this will negatively affect the lives of individuals.
Keywords: Stigmatization; employer; stuttering; POSHA-S; attitude
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kekemeliğin ve kekeleyen bireylerin ülkemizdeki işverenler tarafından nasıl algılandığını ve işverenlerin kekeleyen bireylere yönelik tutumlarını cinsiyet ve eğitim durumu değişkenlerini göz önünde bulundurarak araştırmak olup; ayrıca 5 iş alanı (sağlık hizmeti, eğitim hizmeti, fabrika/şirket, kafe/restoran ve mağaza) işverenleri arasındaki yanıt farklılıklarını ve bu alanlardaki işverenlerin, kekemeliği olan bireyler ile bedensel engeli olan bireylere yönelik genel izlenimlerini belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Uygunluk örnekleme yöntemiyle İzmir'de 5 iş alanından 118 işverene ulaşılmış, veriler kolayda analiz yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Ölçme aracı olarak İnsan Özellikleri Kamuoyu Anketi-Kekemelik [The Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes- Stuttering (POSHA-S)] kullanılmıştır. POSHA-S, toplumsal bilgisizlik, damgalama ve/ veya ayrımcılığı belirleyebilecek çeşitli inanç, tepki, davranış ve duyguları örneklemektedir. Bulgular: İşverenler, kekemeliği olan bireylerin genel olarak utangaç, çekingen, sinirli ve kolay heyecanlanabilir olduklarını düşünmektedir. İşverenlerin, kekemeliği olan bireylere yönelik olumsuz tutumlara sahip olduğu ve kekemeliğin, işverenler tarafından istenmeyen bir özellik olduğu bulunmuştur. Beş iş alanı, farklı eğitim durumları ve cinsiyetler arasında benzer olumsuz tutumlar olduğu görülmüş ve aralarında anlamlı fark bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Ayrıca işverenlerin, kekemeliği olan bireylere yönelik bedensel engeli olan bireylere olandan daha olumsuz izlenime sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Sonuç: İşverenler tarafından iş alanı, yaş, cinsiyet ve eğitim durumu fark etmeksizin kekemeliğe ve kekemeliği olan bireylere yönelik benzer olumsuz tutumlar ve damgalamalar söz konusudur. Bu nedenle kekemeliği olan bireylerin, istihdam ve işi sürdürme konularında zorluklar yaşayacağı ve bu durumun, bireylerin yaşamını olumsuz yönde etkileyeceği olası
Anahtar Kelimeler: Damgalama; işveren; kekemelik; POSHA-S; tutum
- O'Brian S, Jones M, Packman A, Menzies R, Onslow M. Stuttering severity and educational attainment. J Fluency Disord. 2011;36(2):86-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bricker-Katz G, Lincoln M, Cumming S. Stuttering and work life: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Fluency Disord. 2013;38(4):342-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Abdalla F, St Louis KO. Modifying attitudes of Arab school teachers toward stuttering. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2014;45(1):14-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ozdemir RS, St Louis KO, Topbaş S. Public attitudes toward stuttering in Turkey: probability versus convenience sampling. J Fluency Disord. 2011;36(4):262-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gabel RM. Effects of stuttering severity and therapy involvement on attitudes towards people who stutter. J Fluency Disord. 2006;31(3): 216-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Towler AJ, Schneider DJ. Distinctions among stigmatized groups. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;35(1):1-14. [Crossref]
- Maes JD, Icenogle ML, Weldy TG. A managerial perspective: oral communication competency is most important for business students in the workplace. J Bus Comm. 1997;34(1):67-80. [Crossref]
- Davis S, Howell P, Cooke F. Sociodynamic relationships between children who stutter and their non-stuttering classmates. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002;43(7):939-47. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Klompas M, Ross E. Life experiences of people who stutter, and the perceived impact of stuttering on quality of life: personal accounts of South African individuals. J Fluency Disord. 2004;29(4):275-305. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ozdemir RS, St Louis KO, Topbaş S. Stuttering attitudes among Turkish family generations and neighbors from representative samples. J Fluency Disord. 2011;36(4):318-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Louis KOS, Yaruss JS, Lubker BB, Pill J, Diggs CC. An international public opinion survey of stuttering: Pilot results. J Fluency Disord. 2000;3(25):232. [Crossref]
- St Louis KO. The Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes--Stuttering (POSHA-S): summary framework and empirical comparisons. J Fluency Disord. 2011;36(4):256-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Louis KOS, Lubker BB, Yaruss JS, Aliveto EF. Development of a prototype questionnaire to survey public attitudes toward stuttering: reliability of the second prototype. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science & Disorders. 2009;36:101-7. [Crossref]
- St Louis KO, Reichel IK, Yaruss JS, Lubker BB. Construct and concurrent validity of a prototype questionnaire to survey public attitudes toward stuttering. J Fluency Disord. 2009; 34(1):11-28. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ip ML, St Louis KO, Myers FL, Xue SA. Stuttering attitudes in Hong Kong and adjacent Mainland China. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(6):543-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hurst MI, Cooper EB. Employer attitudes toward stuttering. J Fluency Disord. 1983;8(1):1-12. [Crossref]
- Hurst MA, Cooper EB. Vocational rehabilitation counselors' attitudes toward stuttering. J Fluency Disord. 1983;8(1):13-27. [Crossref]
- Erdogan K, Özen KE, Yildiz H, Malas MA. Assessment of awareness, knowledge and attitudes about the importance of cadaver and cadaver donation: report of Izmir, Turkey. Int J Morphol. 2020;38(4):831-7. [Crossref]
- Günaydın D, Cavlak H. Avrupa Birliği ve İzmir işgücü piyasaları: toplumsal cinsiyet açısından bir değerlendirilme [Evoluation from the point of view of Aegean Region and gender of Izmir labour market]. Balkan Journal of Social Sciences. 2015;4(7):1-11. [Link]
- Hopkins KD, Weeks DL. Tests for normality and measures of skewness and kurtosis: Their place in research reporting. Educ Psychol Meas. 1990;50(4):717-29. [Crossref]
- DeCarlo LT. On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychol Methods. 1997;2(3):292-307. [Crossref]
- Weidner ME, St Louis KO, Nakisci E, Ozdemir RS. A comparison of attitudes towards stuttering of non-stuttering preschoolers in the United States and Turkey. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2017;64(1):e1-e11. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Cangi ME, Alpay C. Turkish individuals' listener reactions to the person who stutters: a cross-cultural comparative study. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches. 2021;17(34):832-54. [Crossref]
- Przepiorka AM, Blachnio A, St Louis KO, Wozniak T. Public attitudes toward stuttering in Poland. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013; 48(6):703-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Valente ARS, St Louis KO, Leahy M, Hall A, Jesus LMT. A country-wide probability sample of public attitudes toward stuttering in Portugal. J Fluency Disord. 2017;52:37-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- St Louis KO. Male versus female attitudes toward stuttering. J Commun Disord. 2012; 45(3):246-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Walker R, Mayo R, St Louis KO. Attitudes of college career counselors towards stuttering and people who stutter. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2016;1(4):44-53. [Crossref]
- Andersson J, Luthra R, Hurtig P, Tideman M. Employer attitudes toward hiring persons with disabilities: A vignette study in Sweden. J Vocat Rehabil. 2015;43(1):41-50. [Crossref]
- Nota L, Santilli S, Ginevra MC, Soresi S. Employer attitudes towards the work inclusion of people with disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014;27(6):511-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Topgül S, Yıldırım M. Engelli istihdamına ilişkin işverenlerin tutum ve algıları: Tokat örneği [Attitude and perceptions of employers to disabilities' employment: Tokat sample]. Journal of Human Sciences. 2018;15(2):855-69. [Crossref]
.: Process List