Objective: Atypical small acinar proliferations (ASAP) is defined as lesion without adequate histological atypia to be diagnosed as prostate cancer (PCa) upon prostate biopsy. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the markers that can predict clinically significant (cs)- PCa before a re-biopsy in patients with ASAP. Material and Methods: 2,845 cases were performed prostate biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and/or significant digital rectal examination findings in our clinic between January 2008 and May 2019 were evaluated. In 238 of 2,295 prostate biopsy patients ASAP was revealed and 130 cases whose data were reached taken into the study. Results: 78 (60%) patients were reported as benign and 52 (40%) had PCa after re-biopsy. The f/t PSA ratio was 0.21 and 0.17 in benign and malign groups (p=0.001). There was a significant difference in the systemic immune-inflammation (SII) values between patients with an International Society of Urology Pathology (ISUP) grade 1 and those with an ISUP grade ≥2 (p=0.03) Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference in SII values between Group 1 and patients with an ISUP grade ≥2 (p=0.027). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the total-PSA, PSA density, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio values. Conclusion: ASAP is a well-defined risk factor for PCa. An examination of SII marker before second biopsy may prove to be an active factor in predicting the cs-PCa diagnosis. Early diagnosis and treatment of csPCa will make a positive contribution to management protocols of the disease.
Keywords: Biopsy; prostate; prostatic neoplasms
Amaç: Atipik küçük asiner proliferasyonlar (ASAP); prostat biyopsisi sonrası prostat adenokarsinom tanısını koyabilmek için yeterli miktarda histolojik atipisi olmayan lezyon olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Çalışmanın ana amacı; ilk biyopsisi ASAP gelen hastaların re-biyopsi öncesinde klinik anlamlı prostat kanserini (PKa) öngörebilecek belirteç varlığının araştırılması ve klinik kullanıma koyulmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2008-Mayıs 2019 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde prostat spesifik antijen (PSA) yüksekliği ve/veya anlamlı parmakla rektal muayene bulguları nedeniyle prostat biyopsisi yapılan 2.845 olgu değerlendirildi. 2.295 hastanın patoloji sonucuna ulaşılabildi ve ASAP olan 238 hastanın 130'unun verilerine ulaşılabildi ve çalışmaya alındı. Bulgular: ASAP sonuçlanan ilk biyopsi ardından hastalara yapılan ikinci biyopsinin 78?i (%60) benign ve 52?si (%40) PKa olarak raporlandı. f/t PSA değeri 1. grupta ortalama 0,21 iken 2. grupta 0,17 olarak daha düşük hesaplandı ve gruplar arasındaki bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p=0,001). Uluslararası Ürolojik Patoloji Derneği (ISUP) derecesi 1 olan hastalar ile ISUP derecesi ≥2 olan hastalar arasında sistemik immün inflamasyon (SII) değerlerinde anlamlı fark vardı (p=0,03). Ayrıca benign patolojisi olan hastaların yer aldığı Grup 1 ile ISUP derecesi ≥2 olan hastaların SII değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı (p=0,027). Gruplar arasında total-PSA, PSA dansitesi, nötrofil-lenfosit ve trombosit-lenfosit oranı değerleri arasında anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: ASAP, PKa için iyi tanımlanmış bir risk faktörüdür. İkinci biyopsiden önce SII belirtecinin incelenmesi, klinik anlamlı PKa teşhisini öngörmede aktif bir faktör olabilir. Klinik anlamlı PKa?nın erken teşhis ve tedavisi şüphesiz ki hastalığın yönetimine olumlu katkı sağlayacaktır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Biyopsi; prostat; prostatik neoplazm
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(4):313. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Litwin MS, Tan HJ. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a review. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2532-42.. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Epstein JI, Herawi M. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 1):820-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Amin MM, Jeyaganth S, Fahmy N, Bégin L, Aronson S, Jacobson S, et al. Subsequent prostate cancer detection in patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation. Can Urol Assoc J. 2007;1(3):245-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Iczkowski KA, MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG. Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(12):1489-95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Montironi R, Scattoni V, Mazzucchelli R, Lopez-Beltran A, Bostwick DG, Montorsi F. Atypical foci suspicious but not diagnostic of malignancy in prostate needle biopsies (also referred to as "atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy"). Eur Urol. 2006;50(4):666-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Freschi M, Briganti A, Fantini GV, Bertini R, et al. Predictors of prostate cancer after initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation at 10 to 12 core biopsies. Urology. 2005;66(5):1043-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Wolf S, Trock BJ, et al. Intermediate and longer-term outcomes from a prospective active-surveillance program for favorable-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(30):3379-85. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Carroll PR, Parsons JK, Andriole G, Bahnson RR, Barocas DA, Catalona WJ, et al; National comprehensive cancer network. Prostate cancer early detection, version 1.2014. Featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12(9):1211-9; quiz 1219. [PubMed]
- Khan YA, Maurya SK, Kulkarni C, Tiwari MC, Nagar GK, Chattopadhyay N. Fasciola helminth defense molecule-1 protects against experimental arthritis by inhibiting osteoclast formation and function without modulating the systemic immune response. FASEB J. 2020;34(1):1091-106. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Keenan BP, Fong L, Kelley RK. Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: the complex interface between inflammation, fibrosis, and the immune response. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 18;7(1):267. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):e493-503. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Passardi A, Scarpi E, Cavanna L, Dall'Agata M, Tassinari D, Leo S, et al. Inflammatory indexes as predictors of prognosis and bevacizumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(22):33210-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lolli C, Basso U, Derosa L, Scarpi E, Sava T, Santoni M, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts the clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib. Oncotarget. 2016;7(34):54564-71. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hu B, Yang XR, Xu Y, Sun YF, Sun C, Guo W, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(23):6212-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Man YN, Chen YF. Systemic immune-inflammation index, serum albumin, and fibrinogen impact prognosis in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with first-line docetaxel. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019;51(12):2189-99. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cool DW, Romagnoli C, Izawa JI, Chin J, Gardi L, Tessier D, et al. Comparison of prostate MRI-3D transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for first-time and repeat biopsy patients with previous atypical small acinar proliferation. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016;10(9-10):342-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ericson KJ, Wenger HC, Rosen AM, Kiriluk KJ, Gerber GS, Paner GP, et al. Prostate cancer detection following diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Can J Urol. 2017;24(2):8714-20. [PubMed]
- Leone A, Gershman B, Rotker K, Butler C, Fantasia J, Miller A, et al. Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP): Is a repeat biopsy necessary ASAP? A multi-institutional review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016;19(1):68-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Warlick C, Feia K, Tomasini J, Iwamoto C, Lindgren B, Risk M. Rate of Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015;18(3):255-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Koca O, Calışkan S, Oztürk Mİ, Güneş M, Karaman MI. Significance of atypical small acinar proliferation and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostate biopsy. Korean J Urol. 2011;52(11):736-40. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Totaro A, Di Gianfrancesco L, Pinto F, Racioppi M, Palermo G, Campetella M, et al. Rate of clinically significant prostate cancer on repeat saturation biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Urologia. 2021;88(3):194-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim H, Kim JK, Choe G, Hong SK. Clinical strategy of repeat biopsy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):23143. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ha H, Chung JW, Ha YS, Choi SH, Lee JN, Kim BS, et al. Clinical significance of the De Ritis ratio for detecting prostate cancer in a repeat prostate biopsy. Investig Clin Urol. 2019;60(6):447-53. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Wang S, Ji Y, Chen Y, Du P, Cao Y, Yang X, et al. The values of systemic immune-inflammation index and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in the localized prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia: a retrospective clinical study. Front Oncol. 2022;11:812319. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Wang H, Gu L, Wu Y, Feng D, Duan J, Wang X, et al. The values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and/or prostate-specific antigen in discriminating real Gleason score ≥ 7 prostate cancer from group of biopsy-based Gleason score ≤ 6. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):629. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List