Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ''Sporda Psikolojik Esneklik Ölçeği''nin (SPEÖ) Türkçe formunu geliştirmek ve sporcularda geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin test etmektir. SPEÖ, Johles ve ark. tarafından 2020 yılında geliştirilmiştir. Çalışma, bireysel veya takım sporu dallarından 66 kadın (Xyaş=20,07) ve 82 erkek sporcu (Xyaş=20,14) ile yürütülmüştür. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Sporculara, ''kişisel bilgi formu'', ''Depresyon Anksiyete Stres Ölçeği [The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS21)]'', ''Sporda Bilinçli Farkındalık Ölçeği (SBFÖ)'' ve ''SPEÖ'' uygulanmıştır. SPEÖ, 7 maddeden oluşur ve 7'li Likert tipe sahiptir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliği için Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı, hem güvenirlik hem de geçerlik analizi için ortalama açıklanan varyans (OAV) ve birleşik güvenirlik (BG) değerleri incelenmiştir. Son olarak DASS21 ve SBFÖ ile SPEÖ arasında çakışmalı geçerlilik test edilmiştir. Analizler IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (United States) ve IBM SPSS AMOS 24 (United States) paket programlarında yapılmıştır. Bulgular: DFA'nın sonuçlarına göre ölçekte yer alan maddelerin faktör yükleri 0,58 ile 0,92 arasındadır ve tüm maddelere ait t-değerleri anlamlıdır (p<0,001). OAV katsayısı 0,50'nin BG katsayısı ise 0,70'in üzerinde bulunmuştur. Çakışmalı geçerlilik bağlamında DASS21 ile SPEÖ arasında negatif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki saptanırken, SBFÖ'nün yalnızca ''yeniden odaklanma'' alt boyutu ile anlamlı negatif yönlü bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Analizden elde edilen bulgular, ''SPEÖ''nün sporcuların psikolojik esneklik becerisini değerlendirebilmek için geçerlik ve güvenirlik koşullarını sağladığını kanıtlamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sporda psikolojik esneklik; geçerlik; güvenirlik
Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop the Turkish version of the ''Psychological Flexibility Sport Scale (PFSS)'' and test its validity and reliability in Turkish athletes. The PFSS was developed by Johles et al. in 2020. 66 female (mean age=20.07) and 82 male (mean age=20.14) athletes involved in individual or team sports participated in the study. Material and Methods: A ''personal information form'', ''The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS21)'', ''The Mindfulnes Inventory for Sport (MIS)'' and ''PFSS'' were administered to athletes in this study. PFSS consists of 7 items and is a 7-point Likert-type scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test construct validity, and the Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated to test the reliability of items. In addition, average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) results were examined for reliability and validity. After that, the concurrent validity was examined in relation to the DASS21 and MIS scales. IBM SPSS Statisticss 22 and IBM SPSS AMOS 24 statistical software packages were used for analysis. Results: According to the confirmatory factor analysis results, the factor loading of items ranged between 0.58 and 0.92, and t values of all items were significant (p<0.001). In addition, AVE values determined were above 0.50, and CR values above 0.70. The concurrent validity of PFSS in relation to the DASS21 and MIS scales showed that there is a negative correlation between DASS21 and PFSS. Still, only the ''refocusing'' subscale of MIS and PFSS showed a negative correlation. Conclusion: The results of analysis demonstrated that PFSS is a valid and reliable scale to measure the psychological flexibility skills of athletes.
Keywords: Psychological flexibility in sport; validity; reliability
- Mahoney J, Ntoumanis N, Mallett C, Gucciardi D. The motivational antecedents of the development of mental thoughness: a self-determination theory perspective. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2014;7(1):184-97. [Crossref]
- Johles L, Gustafsson H, Jansson-Fröjmark M, Classon C, Hasselqvist J, Lundgren T. Psychological flexibility among competitive athletes: a psychometric investigation of a new scale. Front Sports Act Living. 2020;2:110. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- De Gaetano JJ, Wolanin AT, Marks DR, Eastin SM. The role of psychological flexibility in injury rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. 2016;10(3):192-205. [Crossref]
- Luoma J, Drake CE, Kohlenberg BS, Hayes SC. Substance abuse and psychological flexibility: The development of a new measure. Addiction Research&Theory. 2011;19(1):3-13. [Crossref]
- Bilgen İ. Terapide Psikolojik Esneklik: Kabul ve Adanmışlık Terapisi. 1. Baskı. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınevi; 2021.
- Bond FW, Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D. Psychological flexibility, ACT, and organizational behaviour. Journal of Organizational Behaviour Management. 2006;26(1-2):25-54. [Crossref]
- Bond FW, Flaxman PE. The ability of psychological flexibility and job control to predict learning, job performance, and mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavioral Management. 2006;26(2):113-30. [Crossref]
- Holmberg J, Kemani MK, Holmström L, Öst LG, Wicksell RK. Psychological flexibility and its relationship to distress and work engagement among intensive care medical staff. Front Psychol. 2020;11:603986. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ramaci T, Bellini D, Presti G, Santisi G. Psychological flexibility and mindfulness as predictors of individual outcomes in hospital health workers. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1302. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Maor M, Zukerman G, Amit N, Richard T, Ben-Itzhak S. Psychological well-being and adjustment among type 2 diabetes patients: the role of psychological flexibility. Psychol Health Med. 2022;27(7):1456-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gentili C, Rickardsson J, Zetterqvist V, Simons LE, Lekander M, Wicksell RK. Psychological flexibility as a resilience factor in ındividuals with chronic pain. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2016. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Trainor H, Baranoff J, Henke M, Winefield H. Functioning with fibromiyalgia: the role of psychological flexibility. Australian Psychologist. 2019;54(3):214-24. [Crossref]
- Fledderus M, Bohlmeijer ET, Fox JP, Schreurs KM, Spinhoven P. The role of psychological flexibility in a self-help acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for psychological distress in a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2013;51(3):142-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Godfrey KM, Butryn ML, Forman EM, Martinez M, Roberts SR, Sherwood NE. Depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility, and binge eating in individuals seeking behavioral weight loss treatment. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2019;14:50-4. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Daks JS, Rogge RD. Examining the correlates of psychological flexibility in romantic relationship and family dynamics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2020;18:214-38. [Crossref]
- Schéle I, Olby M, Wallin H, Holmquist S. Self-efficacy, psychological flexibility, and basic needs satisfaction make a difference: recently graduated psychologists at increased or decreased risk for future health issues. Front Psychol. 2021;11:569605. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Chang WH, Wu CH, Kuo CC, Chen LH. The role of athletic identity in the development of athlete burnout: the moderating role of psychological flexibility. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2018;39:45-51. [Crossref]
- Mottola M. Athletic identity, psychological flexibility, and motivation for return to sport in injured NCAA athletes [PhD thesis]. USA: Southern Illinois University; 2020. [Link]
- Lungren T, Reinebo G, Naslund M, Parling T. Acceptance and commitment training to promote psychological flexibility in ice hokey performance: a controlled group feasibility study. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. 2020;14:170-81. [Crossref]
- Lundgren T, Reinebo G, Löf PO, Näslund M, Svartvadet P, Parling T. The values, acceptance, and mindfulness scale for ice hockey: a psychometric evaluation. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1794. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Badinlou F, Badami R, Reinebo G, Jansson-Fröjmark M, Sepehri F, Molaviniya S, et al. The Persian version of the psychological flexibility in sport scale: a psychometric study. BMC Psychol. 2022;10(1):250. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Büyüköztürk Ş, Çakmak EK, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F. Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 2. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2019.
- Yılmaz Ö, Boz H, Arslan A. Depresyon, anksiyete, stres ölçeğinin (DASS 21) Türkçe kısa formunun geçerlilik-güvenilirlik çalışması [The validity and reliability of depression stress and anxiety scale (DASS21) Turkish short form]. Finans, Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2017;2(2):78-91. [Link]
- Tingaz EO. Sporcu Bilinçli Farkındalık (Mindfulness) Ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of the mindfulness inventory for sport into Turkish: a validity and reliability study]. Spormetre: Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;18(1):71-80. [Crossref]
- Meydan CH, Şeşen H. Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. 2. Baskı. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2015.
.: Process List