Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 1 cm veya daha küçük böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde JJ stentsiz retrograd intrarenal cerrahinin (RİRC) güvenilirliğini, etkinliğini değerlendirmek, avantaj ve dezavantajlarını belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bir cm veya daha küçük böbrek taşları nedeniyle komplike olmayan RİRC uygulanan 103 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Üç grup oluşturuldu. RİRC işleminde 33 hastadan oluşan Grup 1'e JJ stent yerleştirilmedi, 36 hastadan oluşan Grup 2'ye açık uçlu üreteral stent yerleştirildi ve 34 hastadan oluşan Grup 3'e JJ stent yerleştirildi. Hastaların demografik verileri, taş karakterleri ile operatif ve postoperatif verileri analiz edildi. Tüm hastalarda postoperatif ağrı görsel analog skala [visual analog scale (VAS)] ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Demografik veriler ve taş özellikleri açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı fark yoktu. Postoperatif erken dönemde (ilk 24 saat) Grup 1'de VAS skorları anlamlı olarak yüksek iken, postoperatif 1. hafta kontrolünde Grup 3'te anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bulundu. Postoperatif erken dönemde rutin olmayan analjezik ilaç kullanımı diğer gruplara kıyasla Grup 1'de daha fazla hastada gerekti. Ameliyat sonrası ateşli idrar yolu enfeksiyonu açısından 3 grup arasında anlamlı fark yoktu. Sonuç: Postoperatif erken dönemde analjezi ihtiyacında artış olsa da seçilmiş olgularda JJ stent takılmadan da etkili ve güvenli RİRC'nin yapılabileceğini destekliyoruz. JJ stent semptomlarının olmadığı ve çıkarılması için ek bir müdahaleye gerek duyulmadığı unutulmamalıdır.
Keywords: Retrograde intrarenal surgery; ureteral catheterization; visual analogue scale; stent-related complaints
Objective: To evaluate the safety, efficacy of without JJ stent of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of renal stones of 1 cm or less, and to determine the advantages and disadvantages. Material and Methods: The data of 103 patients who underwent uncomplicated RIRS for kidney stones of 1 cm or less were retrospectively analyzed. We formed 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of 33 patients were not placed JJ stent, Group 2 consisted of 36 patients were placed open-tip ureteral stent and Group 3 consisted of 34 patients were placed JJ stent in the RIRS procedure. Demographic data of patients and stone characters, as well as operative and postoperative data were analysed. Postoperative pain in all patients was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences between the groups for demographic data and stone characteristics. While the VAS scores were significantly higher in Group 1 in the early postoperative period (first 24 hours), a significant higher was found in Group 3 in the postoperative 1st week control. There were no significant difference between the 3 groups in terms postoperative febrile urinary tract infection. Conclusion: Although there may be an increase in the need for analgesia in the early postoperative period, we support that effective and safe RIRS can be performed without JJ stent placement in selected cases. It should be kept in mind that there are no JJ stent symptoms and no additional intervention is required for its removal.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Retrograd intrarenal cerrahi; üreter kateterizasyonu; görsel analog skala; stent ile ilgili şikâyetler
- Wendt-Nordahl G, Mut T, Krombach P, Michel MS, Knoll T. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res. 2011;39(3):185-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yitgin Y, Yitgin E, Verep S, Gasimov K, Tefik T, Karakose A. Is access sheath essential for safety and effective retrograde intrarenal stone surgery? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31(10):1202-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Agrawal S, Patil A, Sabnis RB, Singh AG, Ganpule AP, Desai MR. Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN?) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study. World J Urol. 2021;39(10):3957-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Oh JJ, Lee S, Cho SY, Lee SW, Cho MC, Na W, et al. Effects of naftopidil on double-J stent-related discomfort: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4154. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Karakose A, Yüksel MB. An extremely rare complication of double-j stenting: renal parenchymal perforation with no hematoma. Curr Urol. 2011;5(3):165-8. [Crossref]
- Joshi HB, Okeke A, Newns N, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents. Urology. 2002;59(4):511-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yitgin Y, Karakose A, Akdeniz E. Üst üriner sistem taşları tedavisinde retrograd intrarenal cerrahi deneyimlerimiz [Our experience of retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones]. Endourol Bull. 2021;13(1):23-8. [Link]
- Schwartzmann I, Gaya JM, Breda A. Cateterización tras Ureteroscopia, ¿siempre, nunca, cuándo? [Catheterization after ureteroscopy. Always? never? when?]. Arch Esp Urol. 2016;69(8):565-70. Spanish. [PubMed]
- Bulbul E, Ilki FY, Gultekin MH, Erozenci A, Tutar O, Citgez S, et al. Ureteral wall thickness is an independent parameter affecting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in ureteral stones above the iliac crest. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(7):e14264. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH. Effects of specific alpha-1A/1D blocker on lower urinary tract symptoms due to double-J stent: a prospectively randomized study. Urol Res. 2009;37(3):147-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Santiago JE, Hollander AB, Soni SD, Link RE, Mayer WA. To dust or not to dust: a systematic review of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy techniques. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(4):32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Karakose A, Aydogdu O, Atesci YZ. Unilateral complete ureteral duplication with distal ureteral stone: A rare entity. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7(7-8):E511-2. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Nabi G, Cook J, N'Dow J, McClinton S. Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;334(7593):572. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Chen YT, Chen J, Wong WY, Yang SS, Hsieh CH, Wang CC. Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2002;167(5):1977-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, de la Rosette J, Preminger G. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008;179(2):424-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Karakose A, Yüksel MB. Üreteroskopik üriner taş hastalığı cerrahisinde malzemelerin tekrar kullanımının işlem maliyetine etkisinin analizi [An analysis of the impact on cost-effectiveness of re-use of the instruments in ureteroscopic urinary stone surgery]. New J Urol. 2012;7(1):21-5. [Link]
- Denstedt JD, Wollin TA, Sofer M, Nott L, Weir M, D'A Honey RJ. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented versus stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1419-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Karim SS, Hanna L, Geraghty R, Somani BK. Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature. Urolithiasis. 2020;48(3):263-70. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yitgin Y, Altınkaya N, Turaliev N, Guven S, Ergul RB, Boyuk A, et al. Evaluation of the optimal duration for retrograde intrarenal stone surgery to prevent postoperative complications. Scott Med J. 2022;67(3):121-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L, Marson F, Butticè S, Doizi S, et al. Can we provide low intrarenal pressures with good irrigation flow by decreasing the size of ureteral access sheaths? J Endourol. 2016;30(1):49-55. Erratum in: J Endourol. 2017;31(1):110. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J, Lee DI, Felfela T, Conradie MC, et al. Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology. 2003;61(4):713-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Karaköse A, Aydogdu O, Atesci YZ. The use of the amplatz sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does amplatz sheath size matter? Curr Urol. 2013;7(3):127-31. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List