Objective: To determine the reliability and agreement of different optical devices in terms of keratometry and pachymetry measurements in cross-linked (CXL) keratoconic eyes. Material and Methods: Thirty-eight CXL-treated keratoconic eyes were evaluated. Three repeated measurements were performed with Topcon KR-1 autorefractokeratometry, Sirius topography, Nidek AL-scan optical biometry and RTVue anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The devices were compared in terms of pachymetry and keratometric values. Limits of agreement (LoA) between the devices were detected using Bland-Altman analysis. Intra-examiner reliability was obtained using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: While the mean central corneal thickness (CCT) and minimum corneal thickness (MCT) measured in AS-OCT were 456.37±41.52 μm and 431.89±43.37 μm, respectively, these values were 432.40±48.97 μm and 415.67±47.69 μm in topography (p0.97). When devices were compared in terms of the keratometric values and corneal astigmatism measurements, there was a significant difference among devices except between autorefractokeratometry and optical biometry (p0.99). Conclusion: Pachymetry and keratometry can be performed independently in each device with excellent reliability in CXL-treated keratoconic eyes. However, we consider that measurements made with different devices cannot be used interchangeably in these eyes.
Keywords: Crosslinking; keratoconus; pachymetry; keratometry; reliability
Amaç: Çapraz bağlama yapılmış [cross-linked (CXL)] keratokonik gözlerde, farklı optik cihazların keratometri ve pakimetri ölçümleri açısından güvenirliğini ve uyumluluğunu belirlemek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: CXL ile tedavi edilen keratokonuslu 38 göz değerlendirildi. Topcon KR-1 otorefraktokeratometri, Sirius topografi, Nidek AL-scan optik biyometri ve RTVue ön segment optik koherens tomografi (ÖS-OKT) ile üçer ardışık ölçüm yapıldı. Cihazlar pakimetri ve keratometrik değerler açısından karşılaştırıldı. Cihazlar arasındaki uyum sınırları [limits of agreement (LoA)], Bland-Altman analizi kullanılarak tespit edildi. Sınıf içi güvenirlilik, sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] kullanılarak elde edildi. Bulgular: ÖS-OKT'de ölçülen ortalama santral kornea kalınlığı (SKK) ve minimum kornea kalınlığı (MKK) sırasıyla 456,37±41,52 μm ve 431,89±43,37 μm iken, topografide bu değerler 432,40±48,97 μm ve 415,67±47,69 μm idi (p0,97). Cihazlar, keratometrik değerler ve korneal astigmatizma ölçümleri açısından karşılaştırıldığında, otorefraktokeratometri ve optik biyometri dışında cihazlar arasında anlamlı fark vardı (tümü için; p0,99). Sonuç: Pakimetri ve keratometri, CXL ile tedavi edilen keratokonik gözlerde mükemmel güvenirlilikle her cihazda bağımsız olarak gerçekleştirilebilir. Ancak farklı cihazlarla yapılan ölçümlerin, bu gözlerde birbirinin yerine kullanılamayacağını düşünmekteyiz.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Çapraz bağlama; keratokonus; pakimetri; keratometri; güvenirlik
- Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297-319. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):620-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Akkaya Turhan S, Aydın FO, Toker E. Clinical results of repeated corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus. Cornea. 2020;39(1):84-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Soeters N, Wisse RP, Godefrooij DA, Imhof SM, Tahzib NG. Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal cross-linking for the treatment of progressive keratoconus: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(5): 821-8.e3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shetty R, Pahuja NK, Nuijts RM, Ajani A, Jayadev C, Sharma C, et al. Current protocols of corneal collagen cross-linking: visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(2):243-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mandathara PS, Kalaiselvan P, Rathi VM, Murthy SI, Taneja M, Sangwan VS. Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(3):177-80. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Berjandy F, Nabovati P, Hashemi H, Yekta A, Ostadimoghaddam H, Sardari S, et al. Predicting initial base curve of the rigid contact lenses according to Javal keratometry findings in patients with keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(3):101340. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Çelebi ARC, Mirza GE. Comparison of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasonic pachymetry for assessment of central corneal thickness. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2014;44(4):259-62. [Link]
- Büyük K, Bozkurt B, Kamış Ü, Özkağnıcı A, Okudan S. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes using ultrasonic pachymetry and OCULUS Pentacam [Normal ve keratokonuslu gözlerde ultrasonik paki metri ve OCULUS Pentacam ile ölçülen santral kornea kalınlıklarının karşılaştırılması]. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2011;41(2):104-7. [Crossref]
- Hashemi H, Yekta A, Khabazkhoob M. Effect of keratoconus grades on repeatability of keratometry readings: Comparison of 5 devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(5):1065-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bayhan HA, Aslan Bayhan S, Can I. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(2):302-8. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Nemeth G, Tsorbatzoglou A, Kertesz K, Vajas A, Berta A, Módis L Jr. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a new optical device and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32(3):460-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Viswanathan D, Kumar NL, Males JJ, Graham SL. Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical cohe rence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(6): e488-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tiryaki Demir S, Odabaşı M, Oba ME, Burcu Dirim A, Can E, Kara O. Ultrasonik pakimetre ve Orbscan II korneal topografi santral kornea kalınlık ölçümlerinin karşılaştırılması ve ultrasonik pakimetrenin tekrar lanabilirliğinin değer lendirilmesi [Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasonic pachy metry and Orbscan II corneal topography and evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry repeatability]. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2014;44(4):263-7. [Crossref]
- Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Bhatt J, Hersh PS. Natural history of corneal haze after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: Scheimpflug and biomicroscopic analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(12): 2105-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pahuja N, Shetty R, Subbiah P, Nagaraja H, Nuijts RM, Jayadev C. Corneal densitometry: Repeatability in eyes with keratoconus and postcollagen cross-linking. Cornea. 2016; 35(6):833-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rocha KM, Perez-Straziota CE, Stulting RD, Randleman JB. Epithelial and stromal remodeling after corneal collagen cross-linking evaluated by spectral-domain OCT. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(2):122-7. Erratum in: J Refract Surg. 2014;30(3):171. Rocha, Karoline Maia [corrected to Rocha, Karolinne Maia]. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Antonios R, Fattah MA, Maalouf F, Abiad B, Awwad ST. Central corneal thickness after cross-linking using high-definition optical coherence tomography, ultrasound, and dual scheimpflug tomography: A comparative study over one year. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 167:38-47. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Krumeich JH, Daniel J, Knülle A. Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(4):456-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(3): 170-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(12):2598-604. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ateş C, Öztuna D, Genç Y. Sağlık araştırmalarında sınıf içi korelasyon kat sayısının kullanımı [The use of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in medical research: Review]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Biostat. 2009;1(2):59-64. [Link]
- McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Meth. 1996;1(1):30-46. [Crossref]
- Doğan M, Ertan E. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(2):126-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Milla M, Pi-ero DP, Amparo F, Alió JL. Pachymetric measurements with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system: intraobserver repeatability and agreement with optical coherence tomography pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(2): 310-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shaheen MS, Shalaby Bardan A, Pi-ero DP, Ezzeldin H, El-Kateb M, Helaly H, et al. Wave front-guided photorefractive keratectomy using a high-resolution aberrometer after corneal collagen cross- linking in keratoconus. Cornea. 2016;35(7): 946-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pi-ero DP, Alio JL. Intracorneal ring segments in ectatic corneal disease - a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38(2):154-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Duman R, Çetinkaya E, Duman R, Dogan M, Sabaner MC. Comparison of anterior segment measurements using Sirius Topographer® and Nidek Axial Length-Scan® with assessing repeatability in patients with cataracts. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018; 66(3):402-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Çağlar Ç, Kocamış Sİ, Demir E, Durmuş M. Comparison of the measurements of a novel optical biometry: Nidek AL-Scan with Sirius and a ultrasound biometry. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37(3):491-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Altınel MG, Uslu H. Agreement of keratometric readings measured using rotating Scheimpflug imaging, auto-refractokeratometer, and biograph in eyes with keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(5):1659-69. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hua Y, Xu Z, Qiu W, Wu Q. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained by topcon KR-1W and iTrace. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147086. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yağcı R, Güler E, Kulak AE, Erdoğan BD, Balcı M, Hepşen İF. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new optical biometer in normal and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(1):171-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hashemi H, Mehravaran S, Asgari S. The effect of corneal cross-linking on the anterior and posterior parameters of the cornea: A prospective repeatability study. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2019;63(1):68-74. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tunç U, Akbaş YB, Yıldırım Y, Kepez Yıldız B, Kırgız A, Demirok A. Repeatability and reliability of measurements obtained by the combined Scheimpflug and Placido-disk tomography in different stages of keratoconus. Eye (Lond). 2021; 35(8):2213-20. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List