Amac: Ulkemizde eğlenceye dayalı rekreasyon hizmeti veren işletmelerin sayısı gun gectikce artmaktadır. Bu sayısal artış beraberinde rekabeti getirmektedir. Rekabette bir adım one gecmek isteyen işletmeler icin tuketicilerin satın alma tarzları onem arz etmektedir. Bu bağlamda araştırmanın amacı, rekreasyon urunlerini satın alan bireylerin satın alma tarzlarını belirleyebilecek bir olcme aracının gecerlik ve guvenirliğini kanıtlamaktır. Gerec ve Yontemler: Araştırmanın evrenini, rekreatif urunleri tuketen tum bireyler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmaya kolayda orneklemi yontemi ile secilen 304 rekreasyon tuketicisi dahil edilmiştir. Literatur incelemesi sonucunda herhangi bir urunun satın alınma tarzını belirleyen boyutlar olcek kapsamına dahil edilerek gecerlik ve guvenirlik calışması yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Veri analizinde olceğin icerik gecerliği (uzman goruşu) ve yapı gecerliği (6 faktorlu 22 maddeli), yakınsak gecerliği (faktor yuk değeri en duşuk 0,702 en yuksek 0,860) ve ıraksak gecerliği (tum faktorlerde pozitif yonde duşuk, 214 ve orta duzeyde, 614 ilişki) belirlenmiştir. Olcek guvenirliğinin değerlendirilmesinde ise Cronbach alfa katsayısı (,910), madde toplam korelasyonu (en duşuk, 289 en yuksek, 711) ve test-tekrar-test tekniğinden (yuksek duzeyde ilişki) yararlanılmıştır. Ayrıca, olcek doğruluğunun sınanması amacıyla doğrulayıcı faktor analizi kullanılmış ve olceğin uygun uyum indekslerine sahip olduğu saptanmıştır. Sonuc: Yapılan analizler sonucunda, rekreasyon urunlerini satın alan bireylerin satın alma tarzını gecerli ve guvenilir şekilde belirleyebilen bir olcme aracı geliştirilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Rekreasyon; pazarlama; satın alma tarzı; ölçek geliştirme; geçerlik ve güvenirlik
Objective: The number of businesses that provide entertainment based recreation service in our country is increasing day by day. This numerical increase brings competition. Consumers' buying ways are important for businesses that want to move one step ahead of the competition. The aim of the research is to prove the validity and reliability of an instrument that can determine the buying ways of individuals who buy leisure products. Material and Methods: Universe of research is all the individuals who consume leisure time products. 304 leisure time consumer selected by convenience sampling method were included. As a result of the literature review, the dimensions determining the buying way of any product or service were included in the scale and validity and reliability studies were made. Results: Data analysis identified content validity (expert opinion) and construct validity (22 factors with 6 factors), convergent validity (the lowest factor of loading value is 0,702 and highest factor is 0,860) and divergence validity ((all factors in the positive direction low, 214 and mid level 614 relationship). Cronbach's Alpha coefficient (910), item total correlation (lowest, 289 highest, 711) and test re-test technique (high level of correlation) was used for assessing scale reliability. In addition, scale accuracy was tested by using confirmatory factor analysis and it was determined that the scale had appropriate adaptation indices. Conclusion: As a result of the analyzes made, an instrument has been developed which can validity and reliability determine the buying style of the individuals who buy leisure products.
Keywords: Recreation; marketing; the buying style; scale development; validity and reliability
- Simsek KY. Ticari Rekreasyon. 1. Baski. Ankara: Detay Yayincilik; 2018. p.230.
- Kraus R. Recreation and Leisure in Modern Society. 3rd ed. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman; 1984. p.427.
- Dereli T, Baykasoglu A. Gaziantep tuketicisinin supermarket alisveris aliskanliklari. Standard Dergisi. 2002;41(485):79-85.
- Cakmak AC, Yurtsever S. [The effect of credit card on impulse purchase: an application for the academic staff of Karabuk University]. Tarih Kultur ve Sanat Arastirmalari Dergisi. 2012;1(4):45-72. [Crossref]
- Ozdemir S, Yaman F. Hedonik alisverisin cinsiyete gore farklilasmasi uzerine bir arastirma. Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi IIBF Dergisi. 2007;2(2):81-91.
- Sproles GB. Conceptualization and measurement of optimal consumer decision-making. The Journal of Consumer Affairs (Winter). 1983;17(2):421-38. [Crossref]
- Kendall SE, Sproles GB. Consumer decision making styles as a function of individual learning styles. The Journal of Consumer Affairs (Summer). 1990;24(1):134-47. [Crossref]
- Dogrul U. [The effects of utilitarian and hedonic motivations on electronic shopping behaviour]. Sosyal ve Beseri Bilimler Dergisi. 2012;4(1):321-31.
- Aytekin P, Ay C. [The relationship between hedonic consumption and impulse buying]. Nigde Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;8(1):141-56.
- Babin JB, Darden WR, Griffin M. Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J Consum Res. 1994;20(4):644-56. [Crossref]
- Kim HS. Using hedonic and utilitarian shopping motivations to profile inner city consumers. Journal of Shopping Center Research. 2006;13(1):57-79.
- Hopkinson GC, Pujari D. A factor analytic study of the sources of meaning in hedonic consumption. Eur J Marketing. 1999;33(3/4): 273-94. [Crossref]
- O'Shaughnessy J, O'Shaughnessy NJ. Marketing the consumer society and hedonism. European Journal of Marketing (EJM). 2002;36(5/6):524-47. [Crossref]
- Hirschman CE, Holbrook MB. Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing (JM). 1982;46(3):92-101. [Crossref]
- Ozcan B. [Shopping centres: the space of rational purchasing and leisure exhibitions]. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2007;9(2):39-68.
- Arslan B. [The effect of ethnical origin on hedonic consumption: a research concerning consummers living in Turkey and having different ethnical identity]. Akademik Bakis Dergisi. 2016;53:272-85.
- Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE. Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing. 2003;79(2): 77-95. [Crossref]
- Ozkan B. [Hedonic consumption, women and horoscopes]. Int Journal of Management Economics and Business. 2017;13(1):117-35.
- Odabasi Y, Baris G. Tuketici Davranisi. 15. Baski. Istanbul: MediaCat; 2002. p.376.
- Rook DW. The buying impulse. J Consum Res. 1987;14(2):189-99. [Crossref]
- Piron F. A comparison of emotional reactions experienced by planned, unplanned and impulse purchasers. In: McAlister L, Rothschild ML, eds. NA-Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 20. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research; 1993. p.341-4.
- Youn S, Faber RJ. Impulse buying its relation to personality traits and cues. In: Hoch SJ, Meyer RJ, eds. NA-Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 27. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research; 2000. p.179-85.
- Babacan M. Hedonik tuketim ve ozel gunler alisverislerine yansimasi. 6. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi Bildiri Kitabi. Erzurum: Ataturk Universitesi, IIBF; 2001. p.97-106.
- Oz M, Mucuk S. [Examination about the effects of hedonic consumption on impulse shopping within the scope of consumers' buying behavior]. Pazarlama Teorisi ve Uygulamalari Dergisi. 2015;1(2):37-60.
- Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-5. [Crossref]
- Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement Innursing and Health Research. 3rd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Co.; 2005. p.448.
- Cattell RB. The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: London Plenum Pr; 1978. p.618. [Crossref]
- Churchill GA. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR). 1979;16(1):64-73. [Crossref]
- Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS). 1988;16(1):74-94. [Crossref]
- Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2010. p.800.
- Comrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course in Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsie, NJ: Erlbaum; 1992. p.430.
- Ko DW, Stewart WP. A structural equation model of residents' attitudes for tourism development. Tourism Management. 2002; 23(5):521-30. [Crossref]
- Bentler PM, Bonnet DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analyses of covariance structures. Psychol Bull.1980;88(3):588-606. [Crossref]
- Joreskog K, Sorbom D. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide, 2nd ed. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International; 1996. p.11.
- Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21(2):230-58. [Crossref]
- Kline RB. Convergence of Structural Equation Modeling and Multilevel Modeling. na. In: Williams M, Vigt WP, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. 1st ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2011. p.562-89. [Crossref]
- Anderson JC, Gerbingi DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):411-23. [Crossref]
- Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodnes-of-fit index in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):391-410. [Crossref]
- Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001.
- Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Muller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online (MPR-online). 2003;8(2):23-74.
- Tabachnick BG, Fidel LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.; 2001. p.966.
- Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR). 1981;18(1):39-50. [Crossref]
- Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ. Con?rmatory factor analysis. In: Drasgow F, Schmitt N, eds. Organizational Frontiers Series, 14. Measuring and Analyzing Behavior in Organizations: Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p.221-54.
- Schreiber JB. Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008;4(2):83-97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tahtam RL, Black CW. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1998. p.768.
.: Process List