Amaç: Simetrik ve asimetrik cerrahi yapılan primer ekzotropya hastalarında cerrahi sonuçları değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Temmuz 2001-Ocak 2016 tarihleri arasında kliniğimiz Şaşılık ve Nörooftalmoloji Biriminde iki taraflı dış rektus geriletmesi (simetrik cerrahi) ve tek taraflı dış rektus geriletmesi ile iç rektus kısaltması (asimetrik cerrahi) yapılan primer ekzotropya hastalarının kayıtları incelendi. Simetrik (Grup 1) ve asimetrik (Grup 2) cerrahi hastalarındaki cerrahi sonuçlar ve etkileyen faktörler karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Grup 1 hastalarının 15 (%45)'i kadın, 18 (%55)'i erkek; Grup 2 hastalarının 25 (%56)'i kadın, 20 (%44)'si erkek idi. Cerrahi yaşı Grup 1 hastalarında 22,45±15,99 (5-63) yıl, Grup 2 hastalarında 19,58±8,61 (4-45) yıl bulundu. Grup 2 hastalarında anizometropi oranları, refraksiyon değerleri ve cerrahi öncesi kayma açıları daha yüksek, binoküler görme oranları daha düşük saptandı. İki grubun cerrahi miktarları ve cerrahi sonrası kayma açıları arasında istatistiksel anlamda fark bulunmadı. Cerrahi başarı Grup 1 hastalarının 30 (%90,9)'unda elde edilirken, daha büyük kayma açısına sahip Grup 2 hastalarının 36 (%80)'sında elde edildi. İki gruptaki binoküler görme artışı cerrahi öncesine göre anlamlı bulundu. Sonuç: Ekzotopya hastalarında klinik özelliklerine göre seçilecek simetrik veya asimetrik cerrahi ile başarılı sonuçlar alınmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Asimetrik cerrahi; ekzotropya; simetrik cerrahi
Objective: To evaluate surgical outcomes in patients with primary exotropia who had symmetric and asymmetric surgery. Material and Methods: The records of the patients with primary exotropia who underwent bilateral lateral rectus recession (symmetric surgery) and unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection (asymmetric surgery) were evaluated at Strabismus and Neuro-ophthalmology Department of our clinic between July 2001-January 2016. Surgical outcomes and influencing factors were compared in patients of symmetric (Group 1) and asymmetric (Group 2) surgical groups. Results: Fifteen (45%) patients of Group 1 were women and 18 (55%) were men, whereas 25 (56%) patients in Group 2 were women and 20 (44%) were men. Age at surgery was 22.45±15.99 (5-63) years in Group 1 patients, and 19.58±8.61 (4-45) years in Group 2 patients. The rate of anisometropia, refraction values and preoperative deviation angles were higher, the rate of binocular vision were lower in Group 2 cases. No significant difference was detected between the amount of surgery and postoperative deviation angles in both groups. Surgical success was achieved in 30 (90.9%) patients of Group 1, while in 36 (80%) patients of Group 2 cases which had greater deviation angle. The increase in binocular vision was significant compared to preoperative in both groups. Conclusion: Successful outcomes can be achieved when symmetric or asymmetric surgical technique is selected according to the clinical features of the patients.
Keywords: Asymmetric surgery; exotropia; symmetric surgery
- Belfort R, Marbeck P, Hsu CC, Freitas D. Epidemiological study of 134 subjects with allergic conjunctivitis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 2000;(230):38-40. [Crossref]
- Nebbioso M, Zicari AM, Celani C, Lollobrigida V, Grenga R, Duse M. Pathogenesis of vernal keratoconjunctivitis and associated factors. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(5-6):340-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Saboo US, Jain M, Reddy JC, Sangwan VS. Demographic and clinical profile of vernal keratoconjunctivitis at a tertiary eye care center in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(9):486-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bielory L. Allergic and immunologic disorder of the eye. Part II: ocular allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106(6):1019-32. [Crossref][PubMed]
- Bonini S, Bonini S, Lambiase A, Marchi S, Pasqualetti P, Zuccaro O, et al. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis revisited: a case series of 195 patients with long term follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(6):1157-63. [Crossref]
- Zicari AM, Nebbioso M, Lollobrigida V, Bardanzellu F, Celani C, Occasi F, et al. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis: atopy and autoimmunity. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17(10): 1419-23.
- Solomon A. Corneal complications of vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;15(5):489-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim WJ, Rabinowitz YS, Meisler DM, Wilson SE. Keratocyte apoptosis associated with keratoconus. Exp Eye Res. 1999;69(5):475-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nawaz S, Shaveta IAS, Querishi T. Corneal topographic changes in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis: Tertiary Hospital Report from Jammu and Kashmir, India. J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci-Jemds. 2015;4(82): 14277-84. [Crossref]
- Barretto J Jr, Netto MV, Santo RM, José NK, Bechara SJ. Slit-scanning topography in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(2):250-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cameron JA, Al-Rajhi AA, Badr IA. Corneal ectasia in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(11):1615-23. [Crossref]
- Dantas PE, Alves MR, Nishiwaki-Dantas MC. Topographic corneal changes in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2005;68(5):593-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gautam V, Chaudhary M, Sharma AK, Shrestha GS, Rai PG. Topographic corneal changes in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a report from Kathmandu, Nepal. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(6):461-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Totan Y, Hepşen IF, Cekiç O, Gündüz A, Aydin E. Incidence of keratoconus in subjects with vernal keratoconjunctivits: a videokeratographic study. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(4): 824-7. [Crossref]
- Shoja MR, Besharati MR. Evaluation of keratoconus by videokeratography in subjects with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). J Res Med Sci. 2006;11(3):164-9.
- Caputo R, Versaci F, Pucci N, de Libero C, Danti G, De Masi S, et al. Very low prevalence of keratoconus in a large series of vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;172:64-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- De Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L, Turco D, Mutani B, Gringolo FM. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1534-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cairns G, McGhee CN. Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):205-20[Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rao SN, Raviv T, Majmudar PA, Epstein RJ. Role of orbscan II in screening keratoconus suspects before refractive corneal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(9):1642-6. [Crossref]
- Fam HB, Lim KL. Corneal elevation indices in normal and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(8):1281-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Taneja M, Ashar JN, Mathur A, Vaddavalli PK, Rathi V, Sangwan V, et al. Measure of keratoconus progression in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis using scanning slit topography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36(1):41-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List