The aim of this study is to explain the concept of dental malpractice, to reveal the knowledge and opinions of oral and maxillofacial surgery specialists about dental malpractice and to investigate whether these opinions differ according to demographic characteristics. This is a descriptive, cross-sectional survey conducted from January to December 2019 in Turkey. In order to measure and evaluate the views of oral and maxillofacial surgeons on dental malpractice, a questionnaire consisting of 22 questions was prepared after the literature review. One hundred and twenty four oral and maxillofacial surgeons working in public and private sectors were included in the study. 6.5% of the participants stated that judicial and administrative investigations and/or lawsuits have been filed against them due to dental malpractice. While 12.9% of the participants stated that they had sufficient knowledge about the concept of dental malpractice, only 6.5% stated that they had knowledge about the legal regulations related to malpractice. While 93.5% of the participants found their profession risky in terms of dental malpractice, the rate of those who had occupational liability insurance was found to be 80.6%. Of participants 87.1% think that the distinction of malpractice-complication is not made clearly. This study reveals that although oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Turkey have serious concerns about dental malpractice, they do not have sufficient knowledge about dental malpractice and the current legal regulations. So, oral and maxillofacial surgeons should strengthen their professional education and update their knowledge of medical ethics and health law-related issues.
Keywords: Malpractice; ethics; dentistry; oral and maxillofacial surgery
Bu çalışmanın amacı dental malpraktis kavramını açıklamak, ağız ve çene yüz cerrahisi uzmanlarının dental malpraktis hakkındaki bilgi ve görüşlerini ortaya koymak ve bu görüşlerin demografik özelliklere göre değişip değişmediğini araştırmaktır. Türkiye'de Ocak-Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında yapılan tanımlayıcı, kesitsel bir çalışmadır. Ağız ve çene yüz cerrahlarının dental malpraktis konusundaki görüşlerini ölçmek ve değerlendirmek için literatür taramasından sonra 22 sorudan oluşan bir anket hazırlandı. Kamu ve özel sektörde çalışan 124 ağız ve çene yüz cerrahı çalışmaya dahil edildi. Katılımcıların%6,5'i dental malpraktis nedeniyle kendilerine karşı adli ve idari soruşturma ve/veya dava açıldığını belirtmiştir. Katılımcıların% 12.9'u dental malpraktis kavramı hakkında yeterli bilgiye sahip olduklarını belirtirken, sadece%6.5'i malpraktis ile ilgili yasal düzenlemeler hakkında bilgi sahibi olduklarını ifade etmiştir. Katılımcıların % 93,5'i dental malpraktis bakımından mesleğini riskli bulurken, mesleki sorumluluk sigortası olanların oranı %80,6 olarak bulunmuştur. Katılımcıların %87,1'i malpraktis-komplikasyon ayrımının tam yapılmadığını düşünmektedir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki ağız ve çene yüz cerrahlarının dental malpraktisle ilgili ciddi endişeleri olmasına rağmen, dental malpraktis ve mevcut yasal düzenlemeler hakkında yeterli bilgiye sahip olmadıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu yüzden, ağız ve çene yüz cerrahları malpraktis iddialarından kaçınmak için mesleki eğitimlerini güçlendirmeli, tıp hukuku ve etiği ile ilgili konulardaki bilgilerini sürekli olarak güncellemelidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Tıbbi kötü uygulama; etik; diş hekimliği; ağız ve çene yüz cerrahisi
- WMA. World medical association statement on medical malpractice. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/world-medical-association-statement-on-medical-malpractice/
- Sayek F. TTB Raporları/Kitapları: 2009 Sağlıkla İlgili Uluslar arası Belgeler. Turkish Medical Association. Available from: https://ttb.org.tr/yayin_goster.php?Guid=da72a8d0-9470-11e7-914a-a458ccf77150&1534-D83A_1933715A=c40e3d93e27508b93dc019c0d7797d163406a49d
- Karaarslan B, Şirin Karaarslan E, Çelik S, Ertaş E, Çelik N. [Evaluation of malpractice cases in dentistry which was discussed in high health council during 2 1-2 7 years]. Türkiye Klin J Dental Sci. 2010;16(2):142-8.
- Kiani M, Sheikhazadi A. A five-year survey for dental malpractice claims in Tehran, Iran. J Forensic Leg Med. 2009;16(2):76-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Henderson SJ. Risk management in clinical practice Part 11. Oral surgery. Br Dent J. 2011;8;210(1):17-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Montagna F, Cortesini C, Manca R, Montagna L, Piras A, Manfredini D, et al. [Epidemiology of dental professional liability]. Minerva Stomatol. 2011;60(4):179-93. [PubMed]
- Svider PF, Eloy JA, Folbe AJ, Carron MA, Zuliani GF, Shkoukani MA, et al. Craniofacial surgery and adverse outcomes: an inquiry into medical negligence. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(7):515-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Badenoch-Jones EK, White BP, Lynham AJ. The Australian litigation landscape - oral and maxillofacial surgery and general dentistry (oral surgery procedures): an analysis of litigation cases. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(3):310-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Castro ACC, Franco A, Silva RF, Portilho CDM, Oliveira HCM. Prevalence and content of legal suits founded on dental malpractice in the courts of Midwest Brazil. Rev Bras Odontol Leg. 2015;2(1):46-52. [Crossref]
- Hashemipour MA, Movahedi Pour F, Lotfi S, Gandjalikhan Nassab AH, Rahro M, Memaran Dadgar M, et al. Evaluation of dental malpractice cases in Kerman province (2000-2011). J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(7):933-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Manca R, Bruti V, Napoletano S, Marinelli E. A 15 years survey for dental malpractice claims in Rome, Italy. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;58:74-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Liu Z, Zhang Y, Asante JO, Huang Y, Wang X, Chen L, et al. Characteristics of medical disputes arising from dental practice in Guangzhou, China: an observational study. BMJ Open. 2018;8;8(2):e018738. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Badenoch-Jones EK, White BP, Lynham AJ. The Australian litigation landscape - oral and maxillofacial surgery and general dentistry (oral surgery procedures): an analysis of litigation cases. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(3):310-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Koskela S, Suomalainen A, Apajalahti S, Ventä I. Malpractice claims related to tooth extractions. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(2):519-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ozdemir MH, Saracoglu A, Ozdemir AU, Ergonen AT. Dental malpractice cases in Turkey during 1991-2000. J Clin Forensic Med. 2005;12(3):137-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;3;353:i2139. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Traina F. Medical malpractice: the experience in İtaly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(2):434-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Donaldson L. An organisation with a memory. Clin Med (Lond). 2002;2(5):452-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Linda T Kohn, Janet M Corrigan, Molla S Donaldson. To err is human: building a safer health system. Institute of medicine (US) committee on quality of health care in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. [PubMed]
- Nalliah RP. Trends in US malpractice payments in dentistry compared to other health professions - dentistry payments increase, others fall. Br Dent J. 2017;13;222(1):36-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
- Görkey Ş. Patient Rights. Hatemi H, Doğan H, editörler. Medikal Etik. 2003:4:100-26.
- WMA. WMA eclaration of Lisbon on the rights of the patient. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-lisbon-on-the-rights-of-the-patient/
- Resmî Gazete (01.08.1998, Sayı: 23420), 98/11444 sayılı Hasta Hakları Yönetmeliği;1998. p.1-192.
- Resmî Gazete (08.05.2014, Sayı: 28994) sayılı Hasta Hakları Yönetmeliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik; 2014. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/05/20140508-3.htm
- Bostan S, Kılıç T, Çiftçi F. [Comparative analysis of patient complaints via sabim line in the ministry of health]. Glob J Econ Bus Stud. 2014;3(5):43-51.
- Türk Ceza Kanunu. Kanun Numarası: 5237, Kabul Tarihi: 26.09.2004, Yayımlandığı Resmî Gazete Tarihi: 12.10.2004, Yayımlandığı Resmî Gazete Sayısı: 25611.
- Yılmaz A, Demiral G, Şahin G, Yener O, Kocataş A, Bölük S, et al. [The impact of Turkish penal code (TPC) which entered into force in 2005 on surgeons]. J Forensic Med. 2013;27(3):158-72. [Crossref]
- Resmî Gazete (21.07.2010 Sayı:27648) sayılı Tıbbi Kötü Uygulamaya İlişkin Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk Sigortası Genel Şartları; 2010. Available from: https://www.tsb.org.tr/tibbi-kotu-uygulamaya-iliskin-zorunlu-mali-sorumluluk-sigortasi.aspx?pageID=521
- Gulati A, Herd MK, Nimako M, Anand R, Brennan PA. Litigation in national health service oral and maxillofacial surgery: review of the last 15 years. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(5):385-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Marei HF. Medical litigation in oral surgery practice: lessons learned from 20 lawsuits. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(4):223-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Di Lorenzo P, Paternoster M, Nugnes M, Pantaleo G, Graziano V, Niola M. Professional dental and oral surgery liability in Italy: a comparative analysis of the insurance products offered to health workers. Open Med (Wars). 2016;2;11(1):256-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bordonaba-Leiva S, Gómez-Durán EL, Balibrea JM, Benet-Travé J, Martin-Fumadó C, Bescos Atin C, et al. Twenty four years of oral and maxillofacial surgery malpractice claims in Spain: patient safety lessons to learn. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;23(2):187-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Polat G. Tıbbi Uygulama Hataları, Klinik-Sosyal-Hukuksal-Etik Boyutları. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2005. p.598.
- Solaroglu I, Izci Y, Yeter HG, Metin MM, Keles GE. Health transformation project and defensive medicine practice among neurosurgeons in Turkey. PLoS One. 2014;21;9(10):e111446. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Küçük M. Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Turkey. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(2):200-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Resmî Gazete (01.08.1998, Sayı:23429) sayılı Hasta Hakları Yönetmeliği; 1998. p.67-76.
- Aydınlatılmış Onam Kılavuzu. [Cited 2020 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.ttb.org.tr/mevzuat/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=983:onam&catid=26:etik&Itemid=65AYDINLATILMIŞ ONAM KILAVUZUhttps://www.ttb.org.tr
- Turla A, Karaarslan B, Kocakaya M, Pekşen Y. [The determination of the status of sufficient information given]. Türkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med. 2005;2(2):33-8.
- Data Protection Act 2018. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents/enacted
- Karaarslan B, Şirin Karaarslan E, Çelik S, Ertaş E, Çelik N. [Evaluation of malpractice cases in dentistry which was discussed in high health council during 2001-2007 years]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2010;16(2):142-8.
- Yalcin Balcik P, Cakmak C. The evaluation of malpractice cases arising from aesthetic intervention in Turkey based on supreme court case law. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019;34(1):e885-e95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Top M, Gider Ö, Taş Y, Çimen S. [Physicians' assessments about casual factors of medical errors: a field study from Kocaeli province]. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration. 2008;11(2):161-200.
- Yıldırım A, Aksu M, Çetin İ, Şahan A. [Knowledge of and attitudes towards malpractice among physicians in Tokat, Turkey]. Cumhuriyet Med J. 2009;31(4):356-66.
- Tümer AR. [Evaluation of general surgical litigations discussed in health council between 1995-2000]. Turkish Journal of Surgery. 2003;19(1):11-6.
- Özmen P, Şahin S, Çetin M, Türk YZ. [Medical malpractice: sight of the physicians at the Gülhane Military Medical Academy]. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(4):590-2.
.: Process List