Amaç: Primer makula deliği (MD) cerrahisinde uygulanan iki farklı iç limitan membran (İLM) soyma tekniğinin görme prognozuna etkisi ve delik kapanma oranlarının değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2015-Şubat 2017 tarihleri arasında, idiyopatik MD tanısı ile opere edilmiş hastalar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastaların operasyon öncesi; görme keskinliği (GK), görsel semptom süresi ve MD evresi kaydedildi. OKT ile MD'nin minimal ve taban çap ölçümleri yapıldı. İLM soymak için; bir cerrah İLM forsepsi (Grup 1), diğer cerrah membran kazıyıcıyı (Grup 2) kullandı. Hastaların operasyon sonrası; bir, üç ve altıncı ay GK ve delik kapanma oranları kaydedildi. Bulgular: Grup 1'de 26, Grup 2'de 11 olmak üzere toplam 37 göz değerlendirildi. Görsel semptom süresi Grup 1'de 8,7±13,1 (1-60) ay, Grup 2'de 10,5±7,8 (2-24) ay idi. Cerrahi öncesi ve sonrası altıncı ay GK sırayla Grup 1'de 0,11±0,09, 0,33±0,26 iken; Grup 2'de 0,09±0,09, 0,22±0,25 bulundu. Grup 1'de 14 (%53,8) göz, grup 2'de 8 (%72,7) gözde evre 4 MD mevcuttu. Operasyon öncesi, MD'nin minimal ve taban çapı sırayla Grup 1'de 523±224 μ, 1025,1±320 μ iken; Grup 2'de 487,9±151 μ, 976,2±294 μ idi. Grup 1'in %73,1'i, Grup 2'nin %63,6'sında altıncı ayda MD tam kapanma görüldü. Her iki grupta delikte kapanma olan ve olmayanlar arasında deliğin minimal ve taban çap ölçümleri arasında fark saptanmadı. Sonuç: İki farklı İLM soyma tekniği ile MD kapanma oranları benzerdir ve GK'de artış sağlamaktadır. İleri evre kronik hastalarda cerrahi öncesi minimal ve taban çapı ölçümleri ile delik kapanması arasında ilişki bulunmamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Elmas tozlu membran kazıyıcı; iç limitan membran soyma forsepsi; makula deliği cerrahisi
Objective: To evaluation of the effect of two different internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling techniques on visual prognosis and hole closure rates in primary macular hole (MH) surgery. Material and Methods: Patients who were operated on due to MH were evaluated retrospectively between January 2015- February 2017. Preoperative visual acuity (VA), visual symptom duration and stage of MH were recorded. Minimal and base diameter measurements of MH were performed with OCT. For peeling the ILM; a surgeon used the ILM forceps (Group 1), and the other surgeon used a membrane scraper (Group 2). The VA and hole closure rates of patients were recorded at 1, 3, 6 months after the operation. Results: Thirty-seven eyes (26 in Group 1 and 11 in Group 2) were included. The symptom duration was 8.7±13.1 (1-60) months in Group 1; 10.5±7.8 (2-24) months in Group 2. Preoperative VA and postoperative 6th month VA were respectively 0.11±0.09 and 0.33±0.26 in Group 1; 0.09±0.09, 0.22±0.25 in Group 2. There were 14 (53,8%) eyes in group 1, 8 (72,7%) eyes in group 2 had stage 4 MH. Before operation; minimum and base diameter were respectively 523±224 μ and 1025.1±320 μ in Group 1; in Group 2, it was 487.9±151 μ, 976.2±294 μ. The MH was closed 73.1% in Group 1 and 63.6% in Group 2. Conclusion: The MH closure rates are similar for two different ILM peeling techniques and it increases VA. In advanced stage chronic cases; there is no relationship between hole closure with minimal and base diameter measurements of the MH before operation.
Keywords: Diamond dusted membrane scraper; internal limiting membranes peeling forceps; macular hole surgery
- Gass JD. Idiopathic senile macular hole: its early stages and pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(5):629-39. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Goldberg RA, Waheed NK, Duker JS. Optical coherence tomography in the preoperative and postoperative management of macular hole and epiretinal membrane. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98 Suppl 2:ii20-3. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Huang LL, Levinson DH, Levine JP, Mian U, Tsui I. Optical coherence tomography findings in idiopathic macular holes. J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:928205. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Jenisch TM, Zeman F, Koller M, Märker DA, Helbig H, Herrmann WA. Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1127-34. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Lois N, Burr J, Norrie J, Vale L, Cook J, McDonald A, et al; Full-thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study (FILMS) Group. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1586-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gass JD. Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119(6): 752-9. [Crossref]
- Roth DB, Smiddy WE, Feuer W. Vitreous surgery for chronic macular holes. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(12):2047-52. [Crossref]
- Guyer DR, Gren WR, de Bustros S, Fine SL. Histopathologic features of idiopathic macular holes and cysts. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(8): 1045-51. [Crossref]
- Nakamura T, Murata T, Hisatomi T, Enaida H, Sassa Y, Ueno A, et al. Ultrastructure of the vitreoretinal interface following the removal of the internal limiting membrane using indocyanine green. Curr Eye Res. 2003;27(6):395-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Park DW, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR, Dugel PU, Jacobsen J. Macular hole surgery with internal-limiting membrane peeling and intravitreous air. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(7):1392-7. [Crossref]
- Çakır M, Kapran Z, Başoğlu A, Acar N, Ünver YB, Altan T, et al. [Anatomical and functional results of vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling in grade 3 and 4 macular holes]. Ret-Vit. 2006;14(2):109-14.
- Brooks HL Jr. Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(10):1939-48. [Crossref]
- Tognetto D, Grandin R, Sanguinetti G, Minutola D, Di Nicola M, Di Mascio R, et al; Macular Hole Surgery Study Group. Internal limiting membrane removal during macular hole surgery: results of a multicenter retrospective study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1401-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mester V, Kuhn F. Internal limiting membrane removal in the management of full-thickness macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129 (6):769-77. [Crossref]
- Mahajan VB, Chin EK, Tarantola RM, Almeida DR, Somani R, Boldt HC, et al. Macular hole closure with internal limiting membrane abrasion technique. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133 (6):635-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Steel DH, Dinah C, Habib M, White K. ILM peeling technique influences the degree of a dissociated optic nevre fibre layer appearance after macular hole surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(5):691-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Demirel S, Abdullayev A, Yanık Ö, Batıoğlu F, Özmert E. Evaluation of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness after vitreoretinal surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling in cases with idiopathic macular hole. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2017;47(3):138-43. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Almeida DR, Chin EK, Tarantola RM, Folk JC, Boldt HC, Skeie JM, et al. Effect of internal limiting membrane abrasion on retinal tissues in macular holes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(5):2783-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Shukla SY, Afshar AR, Kiernan DF, Hariprasad SM. Outcomes of chronic macular hole surgical repair. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(7):795-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig MW, Kampik A. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(4):390-3. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Wakely L, Rahman R, Stephenson J. A comparison of several methods of macular hole measurement using opticalcoherence tomography, and their value in predicting anatomical and visual outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(7):1003-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ruiz-Moreno JM, Staicu C, Pi-ero DP, Montero J, Lugo F, Amat P. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgeryoutcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(5):640-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ip MS, Baker BJ, Duker JS, Reichel E, Baumal CR, Gangnon R, et al. Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120;(1):29-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List