Objective: To analyze the long-term results of the congenital penile curvature (CPC) corrected with modified Nesbit plication procedure using monofilament absorbable sutures. Material and Methods: From March 2008 to March 2018, 54 adult patients with CPC underwent the modified Nesbit plication surgery procedure. Absorbable monofilament poliglecaprone-25 suture was used for plication in all patients. Patients older than 16 years of age in March 2008 were included in the study which have minimum 20 degree penile curvature. Long -term follow-up was median 68 (16-120) months and data were available for 48 patients. Results: All of the patients were curvaturefree at the end of the operation. At the time of the follow-up examination, 40 (83.3%) patients were curvature-free. Five (10.4%) had recurrent curvature less than 15 degree and the other 3 (6.2%) had curvature recurrence >15 degree. Disturbing palpable suture knot was detected in only 3 (6.2%) patients. While 38 (79.2%) patients were very satisfied with the operation, 6 (12.5%) stated to be moderately satisfied and 4 (8.3%) were unsatisfied at all. Conclusion: Absorbable poliglecaprone-25 suture provides high success rate in CPC surgery and significantly reduces suture related complications.
Keywords: Reconstructive surgical procedures; penis; abnormalities; penile erection; suture
Amaç: Monofilament emilebilir sütür kullandığımız modifiye Nesbit plikasyon prosedürü ile düzeltilen konjenital penil kurvatürün [congenital penile curvature (CPC)] uzun dönem sonuçlarını incelemek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Mart 2008 ile Mart 2018 tarihleri arasında 54 erişkin CPC hastasına modifiye Nesbit plikasyon prosedürü uygulanmıştır. Tüm hastalarda plikasyon için emilebilir monofilament poliglecaprone-25 sütür kullanılmıştır. En az 20 derece penil kurvatürlü Mart 2008 tarihinde 16 yaşından büyük olan hastalar çalışmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Ortalama 68 (16-120) aylık uzun dönem takip süresi sonunda 48 hastanın verilerine ulaşılabilmiştir. Bulgular: Operasyon sonunda tüm hastaların kurvatürü tam olarak düzelmiştir. Takip sürecindeki muayenede ise 40 (%83,3) hastanın kurvatürünün düzeldiği, 5 (%10,4) hastada 15 dereceden küçük kurvatür rekürrensi olduğu ve diğer 3 (%6,2) hastada da 15 dereceden büyük kurvatür rekürrensi olduğu görülmüştür. Sadece 3 (%6,2) hastada rahatsız edici palpe edilebilir sütür varlığı tesbit edilmiştir. Operasyon sonunda 38 (%79,2) hasta prosedürden çok memnun olduğunu belirtirken, 6 (%12,5) hasta orta düzeyde memnun olduğunu ve 4 (%8,3) hasta ise memnun olmadığını belirtmiştir. Sonuç: Emilebilir monofilament poliglecoprone-25 sütür CPC cerrahisinde yüksek başarı oranı sağlamaktadır ve sütüre bağlı komplikasyonları önemli ölçüde azaltmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Rekonstruktif cerrahi işlemler; penis; anormallikler; penil ereksiyon; sütür
- Sokolakis I, Schönbauer P, Mykoniatis I, Kübler H, Gschwend J, Lahme S, et al. Long-Term Results after Surgical Treatment of Congenital Penile Curvature Using a Modified Nesbit Technique. World J Mens Health. 2020;38(4):564-72. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sokolakis I, Hatzichristodoulou G. Current trends in the surgical treatment of congenital penile curvature. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32(1):64-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ruellas da Silva T, Barrela Neto M, Damião R, da Silva Ruellas EA. A universal mathematical model applied to the congenital ventral penile curvature. Clin Anat. 2020;33(6):906-910. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Makovey I, Higuchi TT, Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Wood HM. Congenital penile curvature: update and management. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13(4):290-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sasso F, Vittori M, D'Addessi A, Bassi PF. Penile curvature: an update for management from 20 years experience in a high volume centre. Urologia. 2016;83(3):130-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gholami SS, Lue TF. Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: a review of 132 patients. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2066-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Çayan S, Aşcı R, Efesoy O, Kocamanoğlu F, Akbay E, Yaman Ö. Comparison of Patient's Satisfaction and Long-term Results of 2 Penile Plication Techniques: Lessons Learned From 387 Patients With Penile Curvature. Urology. 2019;129:106-112. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Turunc T, Deveci S, Guvel S, Peşkircioğlu L. Uluslararası cinsel işlev indeksinin 5 soruluk versiyonunun (IIEF-5) Türkçe geçerlilik çalışmasının değerlendirilmesi [The assessment of Turkish validation with 5 question version of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5)]. Turkish J Urol. 2007;33(1):45-9. [Link]
- Hauck EW, Bschleipfer T, Diemer T, Manning M, Schroeder-Printzen I, Weidner W. Long-term results of Essed-Schroeder plication by the use of non-absorbable Goretex sutures for correcting congenital penile curvature. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(3):146-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sasso F, Vittori M, D'Addessi A, Bassi PF. Penile curvature: an update for management from 20 years experience in a high volume centre. Urologia. 2016;83(3):130-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lee SS, Meng E, Chuang FP, Yen CY, Chang SY, Yu DS, et al. Congenital penile curvature: long-term results of operative treatment using the plication procedure. Asian J Androl. 2004;6(3):273-6. [PubMed]
- Yachia D. Modified corporoplasty for the treatment of penile curvature. J Urol. 1990;143(1):80-2. PMID: 2294269. [Crossref]
- Levine LA, Larsen SM. Surgery for Peyronie's disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):27-34. PMID: 23178395; PMCID: PMC3739133. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kuehhas FE, Egydio PH. Superficial tunica albuginea excision, using geometric principles, for the correction of congenital penile curvature. BJU Int. 2012;110(11 Pt C):E949-53. PMID: 22788740. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hsieh JT, Huang HE, Chen J, Chang HC, Liu SP. Modified plication of the tunica albuginea in treating congenital penile curvature. BJU Int. 2001;88(3):236-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- van der Horst C, Martínez Portillo FJ, Melchior D, Bross S, Alken P, Juenemann KP. Polytetrafluoroethylene versus polypropylene sutures for Essed-Schroeder tunical plication. J Urol. 2003;170(2 Pt 1):472-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Basiri A, Sarhangnejad R, Ghahestani SM, Radfar MH. Comparing absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in corporeal plication for treatment of congenital penile curvature. Urol J. 2011;8(4):302-6. [PubMed]
- Ozkuvanci Ü, Ziylan O, Dönmez MI, Yucel OB, Oktar T, Ander H, et al. An unanswered question in pediatric urology: the post pubertal persistence of prepubertal congenital penile curvature correction by tunical plication. Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43(5):925-31. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Yachia D. Re: An unanswered question in pediatric urology: the post pubertal persistence of prepubertal congenital penile curvature correction by tunical plication. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44(2):411-2. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
.: Process List