Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı; Kütahya ili ve çevresindeki çocuk hastalarda görülen dental anomalilerin prevalansını ve cinsiyetlere göre dağılımını belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Pedodonti ana bilim dalına 2018-2021 yılları arasında başvuran 6-15 yaşları arasındaki 1.441 hastanın muayenesi sırasında alınmış panoramik radyografiler, dental anomaliler açısından retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Dental anomaliler; sayı, durum, biçim, boyut ve doku anomalileri başlıklarına göre değerlendirilmiştir. Tanımlayıcı istatistik, frekans tabloları, çapraz tablolar hazırlanmış ve ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Değerlendirme kriterlerine uygun 1.287 adet panoramik radyografi incelenmiştir. Radyografilerin %52,2'si kız, %47,8'i erkek hastalara aittir. Anomali prevalansı %24,7 olarak bulunmuştur. En sık gözlenen anomali; sayı anomalileri (%11,8) olup, sık rastlanan anomali alt grubunun ise hipodonti (%9,2) olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Meziodens, gömülü diş, mikrodonti, ektopi ve talon tüberkülü anomalilerinin cinsiyet ile arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). Hipodonti anomalisinin mikrodonti (p=0,000), kama lateral (p=0,000), kök anomalisi (p=0,005) ve geminasyon (p=0,002) anomalileri ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p˂0,05). Sonuç: Kütahya ilinde yaşayan çocuklarda en sık gözlenen anomali hipodonti olmuştur. Gömülü diş, mikrodonti, ektopik diş ve talon tüberkülü anomalileri kızlarda daha çok görülürken, meziodens erkeklerde daha çok görülmüştür. Bu bölgedeki diş hekimlerinin, yapacakları muayenelerde erken dönemde anomalileri tespit etmeleri, yapılacak tedavilerin planlanmasına yön verir ve kapsamlı tedavilerin gerekliliğini azaltır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Hipodonti; mikrodonti; prevalans: panoramik radyografi
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of dental anomalies seen in pediatric patients in and around Kütahya and their distribution by gender. Material and Methods: Panoramic radiographs taken during the examination of 1,441 patients aged 6-15 years who applied to the department of pedodontics between 2018-2021 were evaluated retrospectively in terms of dental anomalies. Dental anomalies were evaluated according to the titles; number, condition, shape, size and tissue anomalies. Descriptive statistics, frequency tables, cross tables were prepared and chi-square test was used. Results: A total of 1,287 panoramic radiographs were examined, which complied with the evaluation criteria. 52.2% of the radiographs belong to female patients and 47.8% to male patients. The prevalence of anomaly was found to be 24.7%. The most common anomaly was number anomalies (11.8%), and the most common anomaly subgroup was hypodontia (9.2%). It was determined that there was a statistically significant relationship between gender and mesiodens, impacted tooth, microdontia, ectopia and talon tubercle anomalies (p<0.05). It was determined that hypodontia anomaly was statistically significantly associated with microdontia (p=0.000), peg lateral (p=0.000), root anomaly (p=0.005) and gemination (p=0.002) anomalies (p˂0.05). Conclusion: The most common anomaly observed in children living in Kütahya was hypodontia. Impacted tooth, microdontia, ectopic tooth and talon tubercle anomalies were more common in girls, while mesiodens was more common in boys. The early detection of anomalies in the examinations of the dentists in this region guides the planning of the treatments and reduces the necessity of comprehensive treatments.
Keywords: Hypodontia; microdontia; prevalence; panoramic radiography
- Brook AH. Multilevel complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Arch Oral Biol. 2009;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-17. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bedoya MM, Park JH. A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(12):1485-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Koparal M, Ünsal H, Alan H, Yalçın M, Ege B, Gülsün B. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde yedi farklı dental anomalinin görülme sıklığı [The incidence of seven different dental anomalies in southeastern of Turkey]. Selcuk Dent J. 2018;5(2):135-41. [Crossref]
- Patil S, Doni B, Kaswan S, Rahman F. Prevalence of dental anomalies in Indian population. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5(4):e183-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Arslan ZB, Yildiz D, Yaşar F. Dental anomali görülme sıklığının digital panoramik radyografi ile değerlendirilmesi [The prevalence of dental anomalies by using digital panoramic radiographs]. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;6(3):359-65. [Crossref]
- Folayan MO, Chukwumah NM, Popoola BO, Temilola DO, Onyejaka NK, Oyedele TA, et al. Developmental defects of the enamel and its impact on the oral health quality of life of children resident in Southwest Nigeria. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):160. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Kim MJ, Song JS, Kim YJ, Kim JW, Jang KT, Hyun HK. Clinical considerations for dental management of children with molar-root incisor malformations. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;44(1):55-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Özveren N, Tekbas Atay M. Trakya Bölgesi'ndeki çocuk hastalarda görülen dental anomali tipleri ve prevalansları [Types and Prevalence of dental anomaly in Turkish pediatric patients of Trakya region]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2020;26(3):362-70. [Crossref]
- Buenviaje TM, Rapp R. Dental anomalies in children: a clinical and radiographic survey. ASDC J Dent Child. 1984;51(1):42-6. [PubMed]
- Sumer AP, Akça T, Köprülü H. Çocuklarda görülen dental anomaliler: panoramik radyografik değerlendirme [Dental Anomalies in Children: Panoramic Radiographic Evaluation]. Ondokuz Mayis Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg. 2004;5(2):81-4. [Link]
- Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of saudi arabia. ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:837270. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Aren G, Guven Y, Guney Tolgay C, Ozcan I, Bayar OF, Kose TE, et al. The prevalence of dental anomalies in a turkish population. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2015;49(3):23-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Celebi F, Taşkan MM, Turkal M, Turkal H, Holoğlu F. Orta Karadeniz toplumunda dental anomalilerin görülme sıklığı [Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population]. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2015;18(4):343-50. [Link]
- Ayrancı F. Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi çocuklarında konjenital daimi diş eksikliği prevalansının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the prevalence of congenital teeth deficiencies in the Middle Black Sea Region children]. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;10(2):137-40. [Crossref]
- Bailit HL. Dental variation among populations. An anthropologic view. Dent Clin North Am. 1975;19(1):125-39. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Guttal KS, Naikmasur VG, Bhargava P, Bathi RJ. Frequency of developmental dental anomalies in the Indian population. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(3):263-9. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Shokri A, Poorolajal J, Khajeh S, Faramarzi F, Kahnamoui HM. Prevalence of dental anomalies among 7- to 35-year-old people in Hamadan, Iran in 2012-2013 as observed using panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(1):7-13. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Jang E, Lee K, An S, Song J, Ra J. Retrospective study of association between displacement of maxillary canine and tooth agenesis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(5):488-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bilge NH, Yeşiltepe S, Törenek Ağırman K, Çağlayan F, Bilge OM. Investigation of prevalence of dental anomalies by using digital panoramic radiographs. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018;77(2):323-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rakhshan V. Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): A review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015;12(1):1-13. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Davis PJ. Hypodontia and hyperdontia of permanent teeth in Hong Kong schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987;15(4):218-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nordgarden H, Jensen JL, Storhaug K. Reported prevalence of congenitally missing teeth in two Norwegian counties. Community Dent Health. 2002;19(4):258-61. [PubMed]
- Çakır A, Yıldırım S. Prevalence of congenital missing permanent teeth in children group aged between 5-14 years living in the Konya region: retrospective study. J Inter Dent Sci. 2020;6(2):12-7. [Link]
- Bekiroglu N, Mete S, Ozbay G, Yalcinkaya S, Kargul B. Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken from 1,056 Turkish children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(1):8-12. [PubMed]
- Souza-Silva BN, Vieira WA, Bernardino ÍM, Batista MJ, Bittencourt MAV, Paranhos LR. Non-syndromic tooth agenesis patterns and their association with other dental anomalies: A retrospective study. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;96:26-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gokkaya B, Oflezer OG, Ozdil NY, Kargul B. Is there any relationship between hypodontia and hyperdontia with taurodontism, microdontia and macrodontia? A retrospective study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(6):805-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pallikaraki G, Sifakakis I, Gizani S, Makou M, Mitsea A. Developmental dental anomalies assessed by panoramic radiographs in a Greek orthodontic population sample. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(2):223-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Subasioglu A, Savas S, Kucukyilmaz E, Kesim S, Yagci A, Dundar M. Genetic background of supernumerary teeth. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(1):153-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Bäckman B, Wahlin YB. Variations in number and morphology of permanent teeth in 7-year-old Swedish children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11(1):11-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Uzamış M, Taner TU, Kansu Ö, Alpar R. Evaluation of dental anomalies in 6-13 year old Turkish children: a panoramic survey. J Marmara Un Dent Fac. 2001;4:254-9. [Link]
- Rajab LD, Hamdan MA. Supernumerary teeth: review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12(4):244-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci. 2011;53(2):231-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List