Amaç: Kron-kök kırığı görülen protetik tedavi uygulanmamış kanal tedavili dişlerin; tedavide kullanılan restoratif materyal (amalgam, kompozit), restorasyonun konumu [(mezio-oklüzal (MO), disto-oklüzal (DO), mezio-oklüzo-distal (MOD)] restorasyonun ağızda kalma süresi, kırığın gözlendiği diş grubu, bireyin molar kapanış ilişkisi ve bruksizm alışkanlığı gibi parametrelere göre dağılımının incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalı Kliniğine diş kırığı şikâyeti ile başvuran, yaş aralığı 19-62 yıl olan, 56 kadın ve 44 erkek olmak üzere 100 hastaya ait bilgiler [bireyin yaşı, cinsiyeti, kırılan dişin numarası, uygulanan koronal restorasyonun konumu (MO, DO, MOD), kullanılan restorasyon materyali, restorasyonun ağızda kalma süresi, kanal tedavisinin kalitesine yönelik skorlama, Angle molar kapanış sınıflaması, bruksizm teşhisine yönelik anket soruları ve klinik bulgular)] hazırlanan formlara kaydedilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dâhil edilen 100 bireyin kron-kök kırığı gözlenen dişlerinin tamamı molar ve premolar gruptan idi, kesici ve kaninlerde kronkök kırığı saptanmadı. Kron-kök kırığı gözlenen kanal tedavili dişlere uygulanan restorasyonların ağızda kalma süreleri ortalama 4,18±3,25 yıl idi. Restorasyon konumu ve kullanılan restoratif materyal ile restorasyonun ağızda kalma süresi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki saptanmadı. Bununla birlikte, en az kırık MO kaviteye sahip restorasyonlarda gözlenmiş ve amalgam ile tedavi edilen dişlerde daha fazla kron-kök kırığı izlenmiştir. Bireyin bruksizm alışkanlığı, kapanış ilişkisi, cinsiyeti ile kırılan diş arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki bulunmamıştır. Sonuç: Bireyin estetik beklentileri de göz önüne alınarak kanal tedavili dişlerde uygun koronal restorasyon planlanması önerilmekle birlikte, direkt restoratif tedavilerin klinik performanslarının farklı risk faktörlerinden etkilenme durumlarının değerlendirilebilmesi için prospektif çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Kron-kök kırığı; kanal tedavisi; koronal restorasyon
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of endodontically treated teeth with crown-root fracture without any prosthetic treatment according to such paratmeters: restorative material (composite, amalgam), location of the restoration [(mesio-occlusal (MO), disto-occlusal (DO), mesio-occluso-distal (MOD)], duration of the restoration, tooth group in which the fracture is observed, molar occlusion and bruxism habit of the individual. Material and Methods: Data [age, gender, fractured tooth number, position of applied coronal restoration (MO, DO, MOD), restoration material used, duration time for restoration, scoring for quality of root canal treatment, Angle molar occlusion classification, questionnaire and clinical findings for bruxism)] belongs to a houndred of patients (56 females and 44 males), aged between 19-62 years, who referred to Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department with the dental fracture complaint were recorded in the prepared forms. Results: All of the teeth of the 100 individuals included in the study were in molar and premolar groups and no crown-root fracture was observed in incisors and canines. The mean duration time of coronal restorations was 4.18±3.25 years. There was no statistically significant relationship between the restoration position and the restorative material used and the duration of restoration in the mouth. It was observed that MO cavities had minimum and amalgam restorations showed maximum number of crown-root fractures. There was no statistically significant relationship between the bruxism habit of the individual, occlusion, gender and fractured tooth. Conclusion: Considering the aesthetic expectations of the individual,
appropriate coronal restoration planning for endodontically-treated teeth is recommended, but prospective studies are needed to assess the impact of different risk factors on the clinical performance of direct restorative treatments.
Keywords: Crown-root fracture; root canal treatment; coronal restoration
- Braly BV, Maxwell EH. Potential for tooth fracture in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45(4):411-4. [Crossref]
- Ellis SG, McCord JF, Burke FJ. Predisposing and contributing factors for complete and incomplete tooth fractures. Dent Update. 1999;26(4):150-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hubbezoğlu İ, Kuştarcı A, Bek B. [Management of crown and root fractures in endodontically treated teeth with laser application: case reports]. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2007;10(1):44-9.
- Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L. Crown-root fractures. Textbook and Color Atlas of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth. 4th ed. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. p.314-36.
- Uslu G, Özyürek T, Koçak İ, Yılmaz K. [Multidisciplinary treatment of teeth with crown root fracture: case report]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dent Sci Cases. 2016;2(1):31-4. [Crossref]
- Üstün Y, Dinçer AN, Aslan T, Sağsen B. [Preventive restoration of a complicated crown-root fracture: a case report]. Atatürk Univ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2013;23(2):235-8.
- Keyf F, Sahin E. Retentive properties of three post-core systems. Aust Dent J. 1994;39(1): 20-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yilmaz Y, Zehir C, Eyuboglu O, Belduz N. Evaluation of success in the reattachment of coronal fractures. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24(2): 151-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sapna CM, Priya R, Sreedevi NB, Rajan RR, Kumar R. Reattachment of fractured tooth fragment with fiber post: a case series with 1-year followup. Case Rep Dent. 2014;2014: 376267. [Crossref]
- Olsburgh S, Jacoby T, Krejci I. Crown fractures in the permanent dentition: pulpal and restorative considerations. Dent Traumatol. 2002;18(3):103-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- De Moor RJ, Hommez GM, De Boever JG, Delmé KI, Martens GE. Periapical health related to the quality of root canal treatment in a Belgian population. Int Endod J. 2000;33(2): 113-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sateia MJ. International classification of sleep disorders-third edition: highlights and modifications. Chest. 2014;146(5):1387-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Udoye CI, Sede MA, Jafazadeh H. The pattern of fracture of endodontically treated teeth. Traumo Mon. 2014;19(4):e17054. [Crossref]
- Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(3): 256-63. [Crossref]
- Gale MS, Darvell BW. Dentine permeability and tracer tests. J Dent. 1999;27(1):1-11. [Crossref]
- Jameson MW, Hood JA, Tidmarsh BG. The effects of dehydration and rehydration on some mechanical properties of human dentine. J Biomech. 1993;26(9):1055-65. [Crossref]
- Huang TJ, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J Endod. 1992;18(5):209-15. [Crossref]
- Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994;10(2):91-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kishen A. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeh. Endodontic Topics. 2006;13(1):57-83. [Crossref]
- Nagasiri R, Chitmongkolsuk S. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93(2):164-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res. 1989; 68(11):1540-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6(2):49-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Pradeep P, Kumar VS, Bantwal SR, Gulati GS. Fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars: an in-vitro evaluation. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(6):9-17. [PubMed] [PMC]
- Hansen EK, Asmussen E. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with enamel-bonded resin. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6(5):218-25. [Crossref]
- Kataoka S, Iwai K, Ishihara Y, Amari M, Ohshima K. [Stress analysis of bridge abutment teeth with cemented dowels]. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1990;34(1):175-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Baraban DJ. The restoration of pulpless teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 1967;11:633-53.
- Hudis SI, Golstein GR. Restoration of endodonticaly treated teeth: a review of literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55(1):33-8. [Crossref]
- Rosen H. Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. Prosthet Dent. 1961;11(5):973-86. [Crossref]
- Stern N, Hirshfeld Z. Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;20(2):162-5. [Crossref]
- Çiftçi Y, Tulunoğlu İ. [Frequency distribution of post-core applications after endodontic treatment]. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006;30(2):3-7.
- Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2010; 36(4):609-17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Firestone AR. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. 2nd ed. Chicago, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 1996. p.103-4.
- Giraki M, Schneider C, Schäfer R, Singh P, Franz M, Raab WH, et al. Correlation between stress, stress-coping and current sleep bruxism. Head Face Med. 2010;6:2. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Schmid-Schwap M, Bristela M, Kundi M, Piehslinger E. Sex-specific differences in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2013;27(1):42-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Blanco-Hungría A, Blanco-Aguilera A, BlancoAguilera E, Serrano-del-Rosal R, BiedmaVelázquez L, Rodríguez-Torronteras A, et al. Prevalence of the different Axis I clinical subtypes in a sample of patients with orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders in the Andalusian Healthcare Service. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21(2):e169-77. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Schneider C, Schaefer R, Ommerborn MA, Giraki M, Goertz A, Raab WH, et al. Maladaptive coping strategies in patients with bruxism compared to non-bruxing controls. Int J Behav Med. 2007;14(4):257-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Şener S, Karabekiroğlu S, Ünlü N. [Assessment of bruxism awareness and related various factors in young adults]. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2014;17(4): 361-71. [Crossref]
- Keskin C, Uzun İ, Kalyoncuoğlı E, Güler B, Özyürek T. [Retrospective evaluation of posttreatment apical periodontitis regarding the qual ity of root fillings and coronal restorations]. The Journal of Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Dentistry. 2012;13(3):15-21.
- Silva RG, Kang DS. Prevalence of malocclusion among Latino adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119(3): 313-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sayın MÖ, Türkkahraman H, Atilla AO. [Evaluation of a population referred for orthodontic treatment]. S.D.Ü. Tıp Fak Derg. 2005;12(3): 23-6.
- Oden F, Bekar E, Bıçakcı AA. [Evaluation of malocclusion and crowding in under orthodontic treatment]. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2015;18(3):257-64.
- Ramfjord SP. Bruxism, a clinical and electromyographic study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1961;62:21-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nilner M. Relationship between oral parafunctions and functional disturbances and diseases of the stomatognathic system among children aged 714 years. Acta Odontol Scand. 1983;41(3):167-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List