Amaç: Mandibular kondil morfolojisi farklı yaş grupları arasında büyük farklılıklar gösterir. Mandibular kondilin kraniyofasiyal kompleksin gelişimindeki rolü nedeniyle, kondiler hacmin değerlendirilmesi, oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) görüntüleri kullanılarak mandibular kondil hacminin ve yüzey alanının hesaplanması, kondil şekillerinin belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Farklı sebeplerle alınmış, 50 hastanın (toplam 100 Kondil) KIBT görüntüleri retrospektif olarak taranarak, çalışmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Kondil morfolojisi; Kondil anterior yüzeyi düz/posterior yüzey konveks, Bikonveks, Anterior yüzey konkav/posterior yüzey konveks, düz, Bikonkav olarak aksiyel KIBT kesitlerinde sınıflandırıldı. Kondil hacmi, yüzey alanı, kondilin mediolateral ve anteroposterior çapı, yüksekliği her bir Kondil için özel bir yazılım kullanılarak hesaplandı. Kondiller arası uzunluk ve koronoidler arası uzunluk ölçüldü. Bu parametrelerin yaş ve cinsiyete göre karşılaştırılması yapıldı. P değerinin 0.05'ten küçük olması istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda en yaygın görülen Kondil tipi anterior yüzey konkav/posterior yüzey konveks olandı. Kondil çapı, hacmi, yüzey alanı gibi morfolojik özelliklerde cinsiyete göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunamadı. Sağ ve sol kondil hacimleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklı yoktu. Sağ ve sol kondil yüzey alanları arasındaki fark anlamlı bulundu. Sonuç: KIBT tekniği klinik için kemik hacmi ölçümlerinin yapılmasında ve Mandibular Kondil morfolojilerinin değerlendirilmesinde kullanışlı bir yöntemdir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi; mandibula kondil; hacim
Objective: Mandibular condyle morphology varies widely among different age groups. Due to the role of the Mandibular condyle in the development of the craniofacial complex, evaluation of the condylar volume is very important. The aim of this study is to calculate mandibular condyle volume and surface area and determine condyle shapes using using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: CBCT images of 50 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Condyle morphology was classified as anterior side flat/posterior side convex, biconvex, anterior side concave/posterior side convex, flat or biconcave in the axial view. Condyle volume, surface area, mediolateral and anteroposterior diameter, height of the condyle were calculated using a special software for each condyle. The length between the condyles and the length between the coronoids were measured. Comparison of these parameters by age and gender was made. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Anterior side concave/posterior side convex morphology in the axial view was found to be the most prevalent type. There was no statistically significant difference in morphological features such as condyle diameter, volume and surface area by gender. There was no statistically significant difference between right and left condyle volumes. The difference between the right and left condyle surface areas was found significant. Conclusion: CBCT technique is useful method for clinical measurement of bone volume and evaluation of mandibular condyle morphology.
Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; mandible condyle; volume
- Katsavrias EG. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(4):470-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Bieza A, Zepa K, Rogovska I. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion. Stomatologija. 2007;9(3):67-71. [PubMed]
- Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Zepa K. Three-dimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in Class II and Class III patients. Stomatologija. 2009;11(1):32-6. [PubMed]
- Alexiou K, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K. Evaluation of the severity of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes related to age using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38(3):141-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ali AM, Sharawy M. Enlargement of the rabbit mandibular condyle after experimental induction of anterior disc displacement: a histomorphometric study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(5):544-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chen J, Sorensen KP, Gupta T, Kilts T, Young M, Wadhwa S. Altered functional loading causes differential effects in the subchondral bone and condylar cartilage in the temporomandibular joint from young mice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(3):354-61. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Brooks SL, Brand JW, Gibbs SJ, Hollender L, Lurie AG, Omnell KA, et al. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83(5):609-18. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J. Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-images for assessing periodontal breakdown. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(3):395-401. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(4):219-26. Erratum in: Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(5):392. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Standring S, Ellis H, Healy J, Johnson D, Williams A, Collins P, Wigley C. In: Standring S, ed. Grays Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
- Alomar X, Medrano J, Cabratosa J, Clavero JA, Lorente M, Serra I, et al. Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007;28(3):170-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hegde S, Praveen BN, Shetty S. Morphological and radiological variations of mandibular condyles in health and diseases: a systematic review. Dentistry. 2013;3(1):1-5. [Crossref]
- Yale SH, Allison BD, Hauptfuehrer JD. An epidemiological assessment of mandibular condyle morphology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966;21(2):169-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- de Farias JF, Melo SL, Bento PM, Oliveira LS, Campos PS, de Melo DP. Correlation between temporomandibular joint morphology and disc displacement by MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(7):20150023. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tassoker M, Kabakci ADA, Akin D, Sener S. Evaluation of mandibular notch, coronoid process, and mandibular condyle configurations with cone beam computed tomography. Biomedical Research. 2017;28(19):8327-35. [Link]
- Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Maes F, Michiels K, van Steenberghe D. Volumetric analysis of extraction sockets using cone beam computed tomography: a pilot study on ex vivo jaw bone. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(11):985-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Oberoi S, Chigurupati R, Gill P, Hoffman WY, Vargervik K. Volumetric assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(5):503-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Deguchi T Sr, Katashiba S, Inami T, Foong KW, Huak CY. Morphologic quantification of the maxilla and the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(2):218-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Huntjens E, Kiss G, Wouters C, Carels C. Condylar asymmetry in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(6):545-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tecco S, Saccucci M, Nucera R, Polimeni A, Pagnoni M, Cordasco G, et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging. 2010 Dec;10:28. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- El H, Palomo JM. Measuring the airway in 3 dimensions: a reliability and accuracy study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(4 Suppl):S50.e1-9; discussion S50-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ahmad M, Hollender L, Anderson Q, Kartha K, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL, et al. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(6):844-60. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ. Evaluating the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(4 Suppl):S58-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Saccucci M, D'Attilio M, Rodolfino D, Festa F, Polimeni A, Tecco S. Condylar volume and condylar area in class I, class II and class III young adult subjects. Head Face Med. 2012;8:34. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Al-koshab M, Nambiar P, John J. Assessment of condyle and glenoid fossa morphology using CBCT in South-East Asians. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121682. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Sülün T, Akkayan B, Duc JM, Rammelsberg P, Tuncer N, Gernet W. Axial condyle morphology and horizontal condylar angle in patients with internal derangement compared to asymptomatic volunteers. Cranio. 2001;19(4):237-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]
.: Process List